Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  3. Article

An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information

  • Open access
  • Published: 10 January 2007
  • Volume 15, pages 221–252, (2007)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information
Download PDF
  • Catholijn M. Jonker1,
  • Valentin Robu2 &
  • Jan Treur3 
  • 2145 Accesses

  • 128 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

A component-based generic agent architecture for multi-attribute (integrative) negotiation is introduced and its application is described in a prototype system for negotiation about cars, developed in cooperation with, among others, Dutch Telecom KPN. The approach can be characterized as cooperative one-to-one multi-criteria negotiation in which the privacy of both parties is protected as much as desired. We model a mechanism in which agents are able to use any amount of incomplete preference information revealed by the negotiation partner in order to improve the efficiency of the reached agreements. Moreover, we show that the outcome of such a negotiation can be further improved by incorporating a “guessing” heuristic, by which an agent uses the history of the opponent’s bids to predict his preferences. Experimental evaluation shows that the combination of these two strategies leads to agreement points close to or on the Pareto-efficient frontier. The main original contribution of this paper is that it shows that it is possible for parties in a cooperative negotiation to reveal only a limited amount of preference information to each other, but still obtain significant joint gains in the outcome.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Negotiation Support Through Interactive Dominance Relationship Specification

Article 13 October 2021

Automated Negotiating Agent with Strategy Adaptation for Multi-times Negotiations

Chapter © 2016

Automated Negotiations Under User Preference Uncertainty: A Linear Programming Approach

Chapter © 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration
  • Lobbying
  • Information Model
  • Mediation and Conflict Management
  • Multiagent Systems
  • Procurement
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Benn, W., Goerlitz, O., & Neubert, R. (1999). Enabling integrative negotiations by adaptive software agents. In Cooperative Information Agents III, LNAI Vol. 1652 (pp. 335–346). Springer-Verlag.

  2. Bosse, T., & Jonker, C. M. (2005). Human vs. computer behaviour in multi-issue negotiation. In T. Ito, H. Hattori, T. Matsuo, & M. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international workshop on rational, robust, and secure negotiations in multi-agent systems, RRS’05, pp. 10–25.

  3. Bosse, T., Jonker, C. M., & Treur, J. (2004). Experiments in human multi-issue negotiation: Analysis and support. In N. R. Jennings, C. Sierra, L. Sonenberg, & M. Tambe, (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, AAMAS’04. ACM Press, pp. 672–679. Extended version: Bosse, T., Jonker, C. M., van der Meij, L. & Treur, J. (2007). Automated formal analysis of human multi-issue negotiation processes. Multi-agent and Grid Systems Journal (to appear).

  4. Brazier F.M.T., Jonker C.M., Treur J. (2000). Compositional design and reuse of a generic agent model. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal 14: 491–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brzostowski, J., & Kowalczyk, R. (2006). Experimental evaluation of posibilistic mechanism for negotiation partners selection. In Proceedings of second international workshop on rational, robust, and secure negotiations in multi-agent systems, Hakodate, Japan. Springer Lecture Notes in Computational Intelligence (to appear).

  6. Byde, A., & Chen, K.-Y. AutONA: A System for Automated Multiple 1–1 Negotiation. Fourth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, (2003) pp. 198–199.

  7. Coehoorn, R. M., & Jennings, R. M. (2004). Learning an opponent’s preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation tradeoffs. In Proceedings of sixth international conference on e-commerce, delft, ACM Press, pp. 59–68.

  8. Dash R.K., Parkes D.C., Jennings N.R. (2003). Computational mechanism design: A call to arms. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(6): 40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dang J., Huhns M.H. (2006). Concurrent multiple-issue negotiation for internet-based services. IEEE Internet Computing 10(6): 42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faratin P., Sierra C., Jennings N. (2003). Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142(2): 205–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2002). Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In Intelligent Agents VIII, LNAI, Vol. 2333, (pp. 377–392). March 2002, Springer-Verlag.

  12. Fatima, S. S., Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2003). Optimal agendas for multi-issue negotiation. Second international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS-03), Melbourne, July 2003, pp. 129–136.

  13. Gutman, R., & Maes, P. (1998). Cooperative vs. competitive multi-agent negotiation in retail electronic commerce. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on cooperative information agents (CIA’98), NAI Vol. 1435, (pp. 135–148) Springer Verlag, Paris.

  14. Hemaissia, M., Seghrouchni, A. E. F., Labreuche, C., & Mattioli, J. (2006). Cooperation-based multilateral multi-issue negotiation for crisis management. In Proceedings of second international workshop on rational, robust, and secure negotiations in multi-agent systems, Hakodate, Japan. Springer LNCI (to appear).

  15. Jonker, C., & Robu, V. (2004). Automated multi-attribute negotiation with efficient use of incomplete preference information. In Proceedings of third international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS-04), New York, pp. 1056–1064, ACM Press.

  16. Jonker, C. M., & Treur, J. (1999). A re-usable broker agent architecture with dynamic maintenance capabilities. In O. Etzioni, J. P. Mueller, & J. Bradshaw (Eds.), Proceedings of the third annual conference on autonomous agents, Agents’99. ACM Press, 1999, pp. 376–377. Extended version: Jonker, C. M., & Treur, J. (2002). Compositional design and maintenance of broker agents. In L. C. Jain, Z. Chen, & N. Ichalkaranje (Eds.), Intelligent Agent and their Applications, (pp. 149–171). Springer-Verlag.

  17. Jonker, C. M., & Treur, J. (2001). An agent architecture for multi–attribute negotiation. In B. Nebel (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventeenth international joint conference on AI, IJCAI’01, 2001, pp. 1195–1201.

  18. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). Negotiating complex contracts. In Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Bologna:AAAI Press.

  19. Klein M., Faratin P., Sayama H., Bar-Yam Y. (2003). Protocols for negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal, Special Issue Agents & Markets 18(6): 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, G., Li, C., Sycara, K., & Giampapa, J. (2004). Literature review on multi-attribute negotiations, Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-04–66, Carnegie Mellon University, Robotics Institute.

  21. Lai, G., Sycara, K., & Li, C. (2006). A decentralized model for multi-attribute negotiations with incomplete information and general utility functions. In Proceedings of second international workshop on rational, robust, and secure negotiations in multi-agent systems, Hakodate, Japan. Springer LNCI (to appear).

  22. Lewicki R., Saunders D., Minton J. (1997). Essentials of negotiation. Irwin Press.

  23. Luo X., Shadbolt N., Leung H., Lee J. H., Jennings N.R. (2003). A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence Journal 142(1–2): 53–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S. D., Jennings, N. R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., & Sonenberg L. (2004). Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review (to appear).

  25. Raiffa H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raiffa, H. (1996). Lectures on negotiation analysis. PON Books, Harvard Law School.

  27. Robu, V. (2003). Improving the efficiency of cooperative negotiations in electronic environments with incomplete information. Master Thesis, Vrije Univ, Amst.

  28. Rosenschein J.S., Zlotkin G. (1994). Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussets

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shakshuki, E., & Abu-Draz, S. (2005). Agent-mediated e-commerce system. In Proceedings of the nineteenth international conference on advanced networking and applications (AINA’05), Vol. 2, pp. 739–744, IEEE Computer Society Press.

  30. Somefun K., Gerding E., Bohte S., & La Poutré, H. (2003). Automated negotiation and bundling of information goods. In Agent-mediated electronic commerce V, Melbourne, Australia, July.

  31. Strobel, M. (2000). Effects of electronic markets on negotiation processes. IBM Research Technical Report, Zurich.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands

    Catholijn M. Jonker

  2. CWI, Dutch Research Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Valentin Robu

  3. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jan Treur

Authors
  1. Catholijn M. Jonker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentin Robu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Treur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentin Robu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jonker, C.M., Robu, V. & Treur, J. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 15, 221–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-006-9009-y

Download citation

  • Published: 10 January 2007

  • Issue date: October 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-006-9009-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Agent architecture
  • Bilateral negotiation
  • Multi-attribute negotiation
  • Cooperative negotiation
  • Component-based modeling
  • Cognitive modeling

Profiles

  1. Valentin Robu View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature