Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Graham's avatar

I’m completely unpersuaded on the no-bubble argument and find the rationale deeply specious.  The economic Law of One Price would posit that holding all else constant - a dollar of future distributable cashflow should be worth the same regardless of the margin structure of the company generating it.  Now different companies trade at wildly different multiples of earnings or cashflow but that is due to varying perceptions surrounding the resiliency and duration of earnings/cashflow and also the future rates of growth or decline in the same, not to mention speculative factors like investor psychology.

The idea that high margin businesses are inherently more valuable than low margin businesses is absurd to me.  Look at a Walmart or Costco just for example.  My teenage job was working in a chain of regional grocery stores that operated on, say 1-2% margins and the owner of the chain traveled between stores on his private jet.

Additionally, it seems to me that A16Z has the logic precisely backward.  Companies earning excess economic profits quickly draw the attention of competitors and would be competitors.  Without durable competitive advantages those excess profits quickly get competed away.  I think you’re already starting to see evidence of that today.  GQG did the best job in their recent whitepaper I’ve seen discussing these trends and I think it’s well worth reading again.  What were once stable, monopolistic or oligopolistic franchises run by the mega cap tech giants have turned into open warfare - new entrants in cloud computing and data centers, everyone now competing with Meta and Google for digital advertising, increasingly intense competition in chip design and manufacturing, a battle for the new form factor for mobile devices to supplant the iPhone, all the potential future disruption that AI and LLMs might bring to the incumbents and that’s just scratching the surface.

In my humble opinion, A16Z is trying to drive its car forward by looking in the rear view mirror.

Expand full comment
Mike Densem's avatar

Just because something feels less crazy doesn’t mean it’s safe. Faster growth often carries faster failure. Earlier‐stage valuations especially are more speculative: “forward-deployed capital” means more capital committed before proof (or less proof).

Expand full comment

No posts