Charts of the Week: Valuations not so crazy?
Valuations not so crazy? US startups doing it faster; survey says: gimme more; forward-deployed goes parabolic; SF is so back
Valuations not so crazy after all?
Public markets keep breaking all-time-highs and the doomers are hollering “bubble.” If you look at p/e ratios, you might also notice that investors are paying historically high prices for earnings. So, checkmate for the no-bubble bros, right?
Not so fast. It’s true that multiples on earnings are historically high, but it’s also true that companies are historically profitable–and valuations have scaled accordingly. The higher the margins, the higher the p/e ratio.
At ~14.5% margins, the S&P is more profitable than ever. And unlike the clear “bubbles” of Dotcom (orange) and Pandemania (dark green), current valuations are well within trend. Adjusting for margins, the current p/e is ~17.75%, which is about the same as it was from 2015-2018!
The point here is that for all the histrionics, investors aren’t dumb. There’s a clear method to the madness, and it’s all about profitability. Fat margins and growing profits lead to high stock prices, and fat margins and growing profits is exactly what PublicCos keep doing.
Now, reasonable minds can disagree about whether forward earnings estimates are correct (and there are of course many other things that affect stock prices), but taking them at face value, there is nothing bubbly at all about current valuations.
US Startups doing it faster
Stripe’s data shows that US startups are growing revenues much more quickly than the rest of the world. US startups have grown ~1400%, while EU and UK startups lag far behind at ~600% and 500% respectively.
It’s not AI-either. When you strip out AI, US startups still have a pretty wide lead. Although, interestingly enough, AI startups did start to pull away from non-AI, sometime around 2024.
Why is growth so much faster in the US? It’s hard to say for sure, and it’s probably not one reason.
Patrick Collison thinks it might have something to do with technological adoption: US startups adopt new tech more quickly than most. Other reasons might include regulation (Europe has a lot), market-size (US is bigger), and/or the spending appetite (and tech adoption) of US customers. In all events, US startups are absolutely cooking, so ‘Fade America’ at your peril.
Survey says: gimme more AI
Speaking of revenue growth, ~88% of enterprise decision-makers anticipate spending more on AI over the next 12 months, according to a recent Wharton Survey. That’s a 16pp increase from last year, or +22%.
The biggest shifts in “substantial” spending increases are in IT, Operations, and Finance/Accounting, where ~25% of respondents expect a lot more to come. Legal remains the relative laggard, but even there, a majority of respondents expect AI spend to increase.
Also of note: the number of respondents expecting to decrease spend is barely visible. That’s consistent with the wildly impressive retention curves, recently highlighted by Ramp’s spending data: AI retention curves for business customers have improved every year, with current 9-month retention just under 90%.
This one pretty much speaks for itself. Sure, it’s only a survey, but expectations are that enterprises are going to keep investing in AI, and even more so than before (and basically no one said “less”). ROI may be hard to measure, but we’re two years in and businesses like what they see, more and more. We’re still in the very early innings of this thing.
Forward-deployed payback goes parabolic
Palantir PLTR 0.00%↑ reported earnings this week, which included a “staggering” $476M in profit for the quarter.
That’s ~3.5x the profit from just a year ago, and as Mr. Karp is wont to remind us, that means the business is now generating “more profit in a single quarter than it did in revenue not long ago.”
There’s nothing quite like a Palantir letter to shareholders. The more interesting thing about all this profitability (besides the passing reference to Yeats) is that Palantir pioneered the so-called “forward-deployed engineer,” a hybrid software and services approach to selling its wares.
The question, of course, was whether Palantir could achieve software-like profitability, with its more labor-intensive approach. The answer, for now, is “yes,” especially when it comes to the commercial application of LLMs. Karp credits the give and take between software and engineer as charting “the route for . . . something universal—a generalizable artificial intelligence platform—[] made possible by an obsessive focus on the specific: the particularized and quite idiosyncratic challenges and technical problems of our disparate set of customers.”
You do you, Mr. Karp. We’re only here to observe that whatever it is you’re doing, the forward-deployed model appears to be working.
SF (office) is so back
For the past 4 years, demand for SF office space had fallen off a cliff, running ~50% below pre-pandemic levels, according to data from VTS.
In September, everything changed: SF office demand skyrocketed to ~25% higher than before-times.
The burst of office demand isn’t a nationwide thing, either: all the other metros are running about where they were before, including the new poster-children for office malaise, D.C. and Chicago (where demand is still less than half of the status quo ante).
SF is back. They said it couldn’t be done.
Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.
The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.
Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.
There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.
With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.
For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov









I’m completely unpersuaded on the no-bubble argument and find the rationale deeply specious. The economic Law of One Price would posit that holding all else constant - a dollar of future distributable cashflow should be worth the same regardless of the margin structure of the company generating it. Now different companies trade at wildly different multiples of earnings or cashflow but that is due to varying perceptions surrounding the resiliency and duration of earnings/cashflow and also the future rates of growth or decline in the same, not to mention speculative factors like investor psychology.
The idea that high margin businesses are inherently more valuable than low margin businesses is absurd to me. Look at a Walmart or Costco just for example. My teenage job was working in a chain of regional grocery stores that operated on, say 1-2% margins and the owner of the chain traveled between stores on his private jet.
Additionally, it seems to me that A16Z has the logic precisely backward. Companies earning excess economic profits quickly draw the attention of competitors and would be competitors. Without durable competitive advantages those excess profits quickly get competed away. I think you’re already starting to see evidence of that today. GQG did the best job in their recent whitepaper I’ve seen discussing these trends and I think it’s well worth reading again. What were once stable, monopolistic or oligopolistic franchises run by the mega cap tech giants have turned into open warfare - new entrants in cloud computing and data centers, everyone now competing with Meta and Google for digital advertising, increasingly intense competition in chip design and manufacturing, a battle for the new form factor for mobile devices to supplant the iPhone, all the potential future disruption that AI and LLMs might bring to the incumbents and that’s just scratching the surface.
In my humble opinion, A16Z is trying to drive its car forward by looking in the rear view mirror.
Just because something feels less crazy doesn’t mean it’s safe. Faster growth often carries faster failure. Earlier‐stage valuations especially are more speculative: “forward-deployed capital” means more capital committed before proof (or less proof).