To answer your last question, it will be (however well it is optimized), it has been well reported that this will be a feature of Windows 11 not just the Xbox Ally devices.

$899

https://www.theshortcut.com/p/...

Cannot be worn or sold in California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington as they violate 2 party consent laws.

Heâ(TM)s not discovering anything, heâ(TM)s actively engineering it.

There is no dark side of the Moon, There's a far side, but it gets sun, especially during eclipses.

Looking at you post history, it's not surprising you don't care about rights.

Oh really and you thing e-verify is useful?

Old Orchard Beach Police Chief Elise Chard said the department used E-Verify to hire Officer Jon Luke Evans.

“As part of the hiring process, the Town reviewed multiple forms of identification, including photo identification, and submitted Evans’ I-9 form to the Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify Program. The Department of Homeland Security then verified that Evans was authorized to work in the U.S. The form was submitted and approved by DHS on May 12, 2025. Evans would not have been permitted to begin work as a reserve officer until and unless Homeland Security verified his status,” Chard said in a statement on Monday.

"... The Old Orchard Beach Police Department’s reckless reliance on E-Verify to justify arming an illegal alien, Jon Luke Evans violates federal law, and does not absolve them of their failure to conduct basic background checks to verify legal status,” -Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security

Hmm, Facebook and Google get to violate copyright on a massive scale. but you little folk have to pay through the nose.

As it should be /s

Once streaming became as expensive as cable I was not surprised that piracy became thing again.

wait, are you saying it is illegal for me to setup a filter to automatically delete messages I don't want to see? How does that not violate MY 1st Amendment right. Pretty sure my civilian 1A right overrules a random politician', especially on my device.

I hope they do. Price fixing laws will come into play and that's a felony offense.

He's not gatekeeping, The US Copyright office is. "Typing prompts has nothing to do with creativity." is literally their reason for denying AI created works copyright. So get off your fake high horse and grow the fuck up.

And AI created music does not get copyright protection

The idea that they are doing it because their rights are expiring is completely wrong though.

"Recordings prior to 1923 entered the public domain three years from passage, which equated to January 1, 2022 (see note).[4] Recordings from 1923 to 1956 enter the public domain on January 1 the year after they turn 100 years old. For example, a work published on June 1, 1925, enters the public domain on January 1, 2026. Every January 1 following 2022,[5] works enter the public domain, until the final date occurring on January 1, 2047, which concludes the entire corpus of works published between 1923 and 1946. Following a 10 year break, recordings from 1947 to 1956 will enter every year until the final date occurring on January 1, 2067. All recordings from 1957 to February 14, 1972, will be protected until February 15, 2067."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

How many artists from 1925 are doing that? Read the Music Modernization Act of 2018, no modern artist has to worry about their works entering the public domain in their lifetimes.