I hope Amazon loses this case. This opens the door to all sorts of abuse.
Buying is buying.

I certainly hope my email filters ALL political garbage.. I don't want any political parties sending me emails.

The most popular battery chemistry today is LFP, and it doesn't use cobalt.

Slapstick does. I remember Airplane and Top Secret did quite well because the comedy was easy to translate.

People wanted Tesla's it was the iPhone of EVs. People would buy other brands because they couldn't afford a Tesla.

But Tesla was the disruptive product. Now, with the brand damage, people have no exciting brand to turn to. So yes, I think it does hurt all EVs in general.

"However, quantum computing can, in theory, solve certain NP complete problem in polynomial time."

If you can solve one NP complete problem in polynomial time, you can solve them all.

Quantum computers can't solve NP complete problems in polynomial time. That is incorrect.
But it can solve some other troublesome problems that can't be solved in polynomial time with a conventional computer.

Based on the prompts you give them they act the way you prompt them.

They are very good at playing the part. And it's often convincing.

The Sun sends out charged particles that hit the surface of the moon constantly. However, in many of the craters, the particles don't reach the crater flood because they are masked by the crater walls.

This causes a strong electrical potential difference. Ie. moon craters are essentially batteries. You should be able to connect a wire between the crater floor and the crater top that would cause electricity to flow and you'd get an endless source of energy.

Why bother with reactors when you can simply take a few wires?

The QDenga vaccine is another solution.

Aedes Aegypti is an invasive species

Sounds like an good MBA program to me.

The danger is when they come out thinking that they DID learn something and proceed to destroy companies like Boeing, HP, GE, IBM, etc..

Well, it's hard to make it sound "natural" when it's not your native language.

So people may use someone to check their English, or Grammarly, or an LLM.

I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with that.

English speakers can feel all high and mighty about it. But remember, these other researchers are writing in their non-native language. And that can really sound "unnatural". That doesn't mean their work is less valuable.

"It's death by a thousand small cuts for authors and content creators."

This is a replay of the debate held about player pianos over a hundred years ago.

Yes. This scenario is possible.

The biggest win for AI companies is the ruling that AI is "highly transformative". If that holds then there's no ambiguity regarding "derivative works" vs "transformative works" and that means that we can use source code or movies generated by AI without being worried that the original authors of the works the AI was trained on will come and get us for copyright infringement.

I generally agree with this stance, but am a bit worried about when AI "memorizes". For example it could dump out a verbatim implementation of TimSort that was "derivative" or the original code. But this ruling strengthens the "transformative" interpretation.

As for "fair use".. yeah.. it's obvious that if you read something you don't have to pay every time you read it or any time you recall it. As long as you obtained the material legally, you should be allowed to learn from it. If this didn't hold we'd all be in trouble.

Marketing folks are the bane of technical products.

I remember when they started calling everything Java at Sun..

If you name everything the same thing then it stops meaning anything.