Ibas of Edessa’s Letter to Maris: Two Condemnations and Two Acquittals for the Same Epistle. This study provides the first Hungarian translation of Ibas’ famous letter to the Persian Maris concerning the christological and...
moreIbas of Edessa’s Letter to Maris: Two Condemnations and Two Acquittals for the Same Epistle.
This study provides the first Hungarian translation of Ibas’ famous letter to the Persian Maris concerning the christological and church-political debates of the Nestorian controversy, the Council of Ephesus of 431 as well as the signing of the Formula of Reunion in 433 with a biographical and theological introduction. As the evidence shows, Ibas, the leader of the famous school of Edessa accepted the christological statements of the Antiochene tradition and interpreted the Formula accordingly. His dissensions with Rabbula, whom he succeeded as bishop in Edessa, are present in this letter, which is very significant also as a historical and doctrinal document. The author was condemned twice for ‘Nestorianism’ (in 449 by the Latrocinium and in 553 by the so-called fifth ecumenical council held in Constantinople) and at least twice exonerated (in 449 by the local council of Berytus and in 451 by the fourth ecumenical council held in Chalcedon) based on this very same epistle. The translation of the text is accompanied by notes explaining the key points of divergence between Alexandrian and Antiochene theological positions as well as throwing light upon various events of ecclesiastical history which lay behind or influenced the composition.
Keywords: Ibas of Edessa, Christology, Theodore of Mopsuestia, Cyril of Alexandria, Rabbula of Edessa, Council of Ephesus (431), school of Edessa, Monophysitism, Latrocinium, Council of Chalcedon, Three Chapters.