Key research themes
1. How is popular sovereignty over natural resources normatively justified and operationalized amid competing global justice and self-determination claims?
This research theme interrogates the normative foundations for states' and peoples' sovereignty claims over natural resources in a global context characterized by debates over cosmopolitan justice, self-determination, and consequential well-being. It also examines the conceptual differentiation of resource rights incidents and critiques prevailing justifications based on self-determination. The focus is on developing frameworks that justify popular sovereignty by maximizing overall well-being, considering transition costs and feasible alternatives, thus offering actionable ethical and policy guidance that can inform international law and local resource management.
2. What are the political dynamics, institutional factors, and lobbying influences shaping natural resource governance and extraction policies?
This theme addresses the political economy of natural resource governance, focusing on resource nationalism, decentralized participatory governance, and the strategic interactions among governments, interest groups, and environmental organizations. It explores how political institutions condition governments’ resource policies, how lobbying distorts extraction paths, and how multi-actor bargaining shapes policy outcomes. These insights inform understanding of institutional frameworks, policymaking under competing interests, and democratization efforts in resource management.
3. How do evolving conceptualizations of extractivism, global resource governance, and ecological complexities inform current debates about the sustainability and geopolitics of natural resource exploitation?
This theme explores critical perspectives on extractivism as a global socioeconomic phenomenon, the interaction of natural resource governance with earth system sciences, and the challenges posed by environmental degradation and sustainability. It encompasses analysis of changing legal frameworks, geopolitical responses to resource dependency, and interdisciplinary approaches to corruption and environmental management, providing actionable insights for reconciling environmental protection with resource needs and addressing governance challenges in the Anthropocene.