Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Richard Rillo

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Respondents’ gender distribution cross-tabulated with ethnicity This can be gleaned in Table 2 where females outnumbered the males across ethnic categories. Table 2

Table 2 Respondents’ gender distribution cross-tabulated with ethnicity This can be gleaned in Table 2 where females outnumbered the males across ethnic categories. Table 2

Related Figures (7)

Respondents Ethnic Grouping distribution Table 1 “havacano which was expected as the research sites from which the data were collected were
Respondents Ethnic Grouping distribution Table 1 “havacano which was expected as the research sites from which the data were collected were
hypothesized model.
hypothesized model.
Standardized regression weights of the initial path specification. Table 3. Table 3 showed that the three paths were not statistically significant. These are ethnicity to LAEng
Standardized regression weights of the initial path specification. Table 3. Table 3 showed that the three paths were not statistically significant. These are ethnicity to LAEng
Parameter estimates for the final re-specified model (Model E) Hair, Black, Babin, and Anderson (2014) specify the conditions in establishing
Parameter estimates for the final re-specified model (Model E) Hair, Black, Babin, and Anderson (2014) specify the conditions in establishing
Related topics:
Languages and LinguisticsCulture and CognitionBilingual education (mother tongue-based)
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved