The marketing team wants design changes that harm user experience. How will you navigate this challenge?
When marketing demands clash with user experience, it's crucial to find common ground. To navigate this challenge:
How do you balance team demands with user needs? Join the conversation.
The marketing team wants design changes that harm user experience. How will you navigate this challenge?
When marketing demands clash with user experience, it's crucial to find common ground. To navigate this challenge:
How do you balance team demands with user needs? Join the conversation.
-
When the marketing team suggests changes that could harm user experience, I focus on finding a balance between business goals and usability. I start by understanding their objectives and presenting data or user feedback to explain the potential impact of their suggestions. Collaborating to explore alternatives ensures we meet marketing goals without compromising the user experience.
-
As a UX Designer, I would first understand the marketing team's goals and the reasons behind their requested design changes. Then, I would assess the impact on user experience by evaluating usability, accessibility, and user needs. I’d present data (from user research or analytics) to highlight potential negative effects. To find a solution, I would propose alternative designs that meet both marketing goals and UX best practices. If needed, I’d suggest A/B testing to validate changes. Throughout, I’d emphasize the importance of balancing branding with a positive user experience for long-term success. If no compromise is reached, I’d escalate the issue to senior leadership to ensure alignment on business and user goals.
-
Balancing marketing goals with user experience is a delicate task. Here’s how to manage it: 1. Start with data: Use user insights and analytics to back your approach. 2. Find common ground: Identify shared goals between UX and marketing teams. 3. Propose alternatives: Offer creative solutions that meet marketing objectives without sacrificing UX. 4. Educate stakeholders: Highlight the long-term value of prioritizing user experience. 5. A/B testing: Run tests to objectively compare different approaches. 6. Compromise wisely: Be flexible, but maintain core UX principles. Great design serves both users and business goals. How can you bridge this gap in your organization?
-
I’ve been caught between marketing’s bold asks and the integrity of user experience. When this happens, I step back and ask, How can we make the user the hero of this story? I bring data to the table of user feedback, heatmaps, and drop-off rates to show the real impact of UX changes. And then, I invite the marketing team into the process, brainstorming ideas that align with their goals while protecting usability. The best outcomes happen when it’s not ‘us vs. them’ but a shared mission to delight users
-
When the marketing team requests design changes that could harm the user experience, I prioritize open communication and empathy. I begin by explaining the rationale behind the current design choices, using data and user feedback to support my decisions. I also invite them to share their goals and concerns, ensuring we align on the overall objectives. If possible, I propose alternatives that balance both marketing needs and user experience, such as A/B testing or compromise designs that maintain usability while meeting marketing requirements. The key is to collaborate to find solutions that benefit both user satisfaction and business goals.
-
First, I think it's important for all involved parties to gain a clear understanding of where everyone is coming from. Why does the marketing team want the change? In what way will it harm the user experience? This will reduce confusion and help all sides build empathy. From there, it seems helpful to understand the severity of the impact and what is to be gained from the change. There might be a good reason for the change, but that has to be weighed against negative impacts. It might be possible to compromise. Using data to back up design decisions is helpful in these cases, as it can serve as solid proof of their value. Additionally, I think it's also important to take personal ego out of the conversation and be objective.
-
There is always a middle ground. 'The marketing team wants a change that can harm the user experience', This statement offers two insights. 1) The marketing team has found something that they feel will add value to increase sales; 2) the way they are trying to materialize this value in design might not align with the user experience. Understanding what this value is and what are some alternate ways to meet this value can bring synergy in marketing and design goals.
-
I would gather all the relevant UX data and research to support my design decisions. Then, I'd communicate my concerns to the marketing team, explaining how their requested changes might negatively impact the user experience. After that, I'd work closely with them to find alternative design solutions that balance their goals with UX principles, and hopefully, we'd come up with something that works for everyone.
-
When faced with design changes that could harm user experience, OPEN COMMUNICATION is key. I would collaborate with the marketing team to present data and examples that align with their goals while showcasing potential impacts on UX. Together, we can brainstorm solutions that balance both perspectives, ensuring user experience remains intact. It’s important to stay open to ideas, appreciate their input, and ultimately prioritize decisions that benefit the user.
-
Run feedback-driven research to understand user needs Collaborate with marketing to find alternative solutions Use data to inform decisions and prioritize user experience By working together, we can find solutions that meet business objectives without compromising user experience.