- Regularly check vendor progress to spot delays early. - Look for backup vendors or temporary fixes. - Focus on tasks that don’t rely on the vendor. - Follow up often to push for faster delivery. - Get senior management involved if delays get serious.

Quick advice for Monday: Implement proactive controls by Scheduling regular check-ins with vendors, setting clear, measurable deadlines, and establishing escalation procedures. Also, monitor progress closely, adjust timelines as needed, and develop contingency plans to mitigate delays while maintaining transparent stakeholder communication.

Gerenciar fornecedores, na ITIL 4, vai além de só “cobrar prazos”, envolve criar relacionamentos estratégicos baseados em confiança, valor e desempenho contínuo. Então aqui vai algumas dicas pra esse tipo de cenário: 🔹 Estabeleça acordos claros de nível de serviço (SLAs) alinhados aos seus objetivos de negócio. 🔹 Monitore KPIs e use reuniões regulares não só para cobrar, mas para colaborar. 🔹 E claro, não dependa de sorte: tenha um modelo de gestão de riscos e planos de continuidade bem definidos. Mais que cobrar entregas, é sobre cocriação de valor. Beleza?

To reduce vendor delays, ensure expectations are articulated and timelines and accountability metrics are defined. Check in from time to time to gauge progress made on those timelines and solve any problems that arise. Have contingency plans with backup vendors and solutions, if those delays threaten to disrupt work. Clear communication and early escalation of concerns will keep the project on track. An approach that is proactive and flexible is the best way to ensure that milestones are met despite the potential of outside disruptions.

"Proactive management prevents last-minute crises." When vendor delays put your IT project at risk, act swiftly to keep milestones on track. Start by identifying the root cause of delays and working with the vendor to establish a recovery plan with clear deadlines. In my experience, increasing check-ins, setting phased deliverables, and introducing performance incentives can help accelerate progress. Explore backup options, such as alternate vendors or in-house solutions, to mitigate risks. A common mistake is waiting for vendors to self-correct; instead, maintain hands-on oversight, enforce accountability, and adjust resources strategically to meet project goals.

Vendor delays happen, but I’ve found staying proactive makes all the difference. I keep constant communication with vendors, pushing for realistic timelines and escalation when needed. Internally, I build in buffer time and identify critical path tasks early, so we can pivot if needed. I also flag risks to the client right away—no surprises. Sometimes, reassigning tasks or parallel tracking helps us stay on schedule despite external hiccups.

To mitigate vendor delays and keep IT projects on track, consider fostering collaborative relationships with vendors by involving them in planning and problem-solving discussions. Incentivize timely delivery through performance-based contracts or penalties for delays. Streamline communication channels to reduce response times and decision bottlenecks. Additionally, explore project adjustments such as re-sequencing tasks or reallocating internal resources to maintain momentum. Always have a Plan B. Temporary equipment etc. PMOLogic.com

Vendor delays can derail project timelines, but proactive risk management keeps milestones on track. I establish clear SLAs, buffer timelines, and track vendor performance against KPIs. Regular check-ins, escalation paths, and contractual penalties ensure accountability. Parallel tasking, alternative sourcing or scope adjustments mitigate risks. Effective communication, stakeholder engagement, and risk response planning are key to maintaining project momentum. #ProjectManagement #RiskManagement

In vendor-dependent projects, delays are often outside your control, but “active waiting” can turn downtime into progress. Instead of pausing the entire flow, our team sometimes creates mocks or temporary stubs to simulate missing vendor inputs. Yes, it takes effort, but it’s not overhead; it’s risk mitigation. This way, developers stay productive, features evolve, and we reduce rework when the real integration happens. It's a small upfront cost that protects delivery continuity and avoids bottlenecks later. We see it as building architectural flexibility, not wasting time.

Maintain proactive communication with the vendor to get clear timelines and escalate if needed. Identify critical tasks and adjust workflows to minimize delays. If possible, seek alternative vendors or temporary solutions to keep progress moving. Internally, reallocate resources to prioritize dependent tasks. Keep stakeholders informed and manage expectations while pushing for accountability. After resolution, analyze the delay's root cause and implement strategies to prevent future risks.