I'm uncertain why this is an issue. The commonalities between iOS and Android - both Unix-based - facilitate app developers scaling on both platforms; From an enterprise perspective, productivity apps operate alike and are cross-platform compatible. All is well. Now, some enterprises - a minority - might choose to mandate an OS (not wise, in my opinion; little reason beyond personal preferences in the IT department or, God forbid, the C-suite), but most allow employee OS choice based on personal preference. Yes, Apple fan-boys tend to be passionate about the closed ecosystem they subscribe to, just as Android afficionados love to tout openness; But those are personal preferences that ought not matter in the workplace. Just my thoughts.

What is the problem here???? People can choose whatever phone. If they seriously have issues amongst them about this, I’ll suspect there is something else in the air as well? That is then to be found out and settled accordingly.

There can be a small number of instances where application support forces the selection of one OS over another but on the most part this shouldn't be a discussion. Perhaps of increasing importance are things like recyclable materials, sustainability, repairability, warranty and OS support/updates for 5 years or more?

To address conflicts over mobile OS preferences, focus on user needs through market research and analytics. Assess technical requirements and explore cross-platform solutions like Flutter or React Native. Establish clear prioritization criteria based on factors like market share and project timelines. Facilitate discussions to weigh pros and cons, fostering collaboration and mutual understanding. If feasible, test features on both platforms to gather user feedback. Communicate the decision transparently, explaining how it aligns with user and business goals. This approach ensures balanced, data-driven decisions.

When a team is divided on mobile OS preferences, unity is key. Encouraging open dialogue ensures all opinions are respected. Focusing on functionality and aligning decisions with work-related needs can help bridge gaps. Striking a balance between majority preferences and minority considerations fosters collaboration, ensuring the team stays productive and cohesive.