SciPost

𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗱𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗣𝗖𝘀 Today's Open Access publishing landscape is very polluted and unhealthy: ❌ APCs (Article Processing Charges) dominate, ❌ predatory profit-making thrives, ❌ in financial dealings, academic institutions are manifestly being outplayed by private corporations. The consequences include large-scale damage to library budgets, depleted research budgets, and curtailed careers of researchers. SciPost would like to re-empower the academic side in this battle for Open Access, by offering an alternative designed by and optimized purely for academic interests. Our business model can be summarized by the following: 𝘞𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘴, 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘵; 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘖𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘣𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴. Said otherwise, our system is academia's antidote to APCs. https://lnkd.in/e9r8Hkqv

𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗦 𝗙𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 🎉 We are pleased to announce that SCOSS - The Global Sustainability Coalition for Open Science Services has selected SciPost for its 6th pledging round for funding, welcoming us into the SCOSS Family of Essential Open Science Infrastructures. We feel extremely honored by this recognition, which deems SciPost "a reliable Diamond OA infrastructure that offers a robust OA publishing model that enables the equitable and accessible dissemination of research findings". With SCOSS backing, we aim to solidify our finances and fuel our expansion over the next coming years, providing our Diamond Open Access services to an ever growing open research community. Thanks to SCOSS for this recognition, and congratulations to our fellow awarded infrastructures AFRICAN JOURNALS ONLINE (RF), CCSD - Centre for direct scientific communication and Make Data Count! Ready to pledge your support to SciPost? Contact us at [email protected]

𝗖𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟯𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘀 💎 🎉 Today, we are very proud to present our 3000th Diamond Open Access publication, Tensor network Python (TeNPy) version 1, by Johannes Hauschild et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 41 (2024) https://lnkd.in/eE43rutk This paper is the peer-reviewed documentation for the Python package TeNPy, version 1.0 of which has also been peer-reviewed and published as part of the innovative construction of SciPost Physics Codebases which enables authors to release their research software as fully-fledged scientific publications. Codebase release 1.0 for TeNPy, by Johannes Hauschild et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 41-r1.0 (2024) https://lnkd.in/eH8x4Piv On this occasion, we would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the authors of SciPost's 3000 publications for the trust they have placed in us and for helping us in our mission to transform Open Access publishing. A big thanks also to all the referees and SciPost's editorial Fellows who, lending us their time and knowledge, have been fundamental to building the high-quality publishing platform that we are today. And of course, a well-deserved congratulations to the authors of the TeNPy package for their shiny new publications!

📖 SciPost, founded in 2016 by Jean-Sébastien Caux, has been a beacon for open-access, fee-free publishing in science. In our latest Hub post, we discuss how SciPost aims to change academic publishing by placing transparency at its core, and delve into the hurdles it currently faces. Let's hear your opinion: Is it time to change the way we approach scientific publishing? 🌍 https://lnkd.in/ekWmt4hw #OpenScience #SciPost #SciencePublishing #InnovationInResearch

Today is an exciting day for SciPost, as we published the first paper in our new journal SciPost Physics Community Reports! 🎉 Snowmass white paper: The cosmological bootstrap, by Daniel Baumann, Daniel Green, Austin Joyce, Enrico Pajer, Guilherme L. Pimentel, Charlotte Sleight and Massimo Taronna, SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 1 (2024) https://lnkd.in/eCGviWPz SciPost Physics Community Reports is a premium-quality, two-way open access, peer-witnessed refereed journal offering a venue for publishing results of collaborative efforts involving groups of researchers in any individual or combined specialties in Physics, or broader collaborations linking Physics with other fields. We opened this journal at the request of communities of physicists whose publication needs were not being met by the current publishing landscape. We were extremely happy to honour this request and to see an immediate interest in the journal. As we celebrate the milestone of a first publication, we also wholeheartedly thank the scientists who put their trust in us by submitting their manuscripts to this new venue. Cheers, to plenty more Community Reports! 🥂 🍾

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵? Last week, I participated in the International Conference on Reproducibility in Condensed Matter Physics, organised by the Pittsburgh Quantum Institute. It was fascinating to hear different perspectives on the topic from such a diverse group of people: researchers, funding agencies, publishers and science journalists all gathered to discuss the biggest challenges in making research more easily reproducible and replicable. While the discussion was focused on condensed matter physics, many of these challenges are general to all research fields or at least very similar across disciplines. I feel honoured to have been invited to give a talk. I discussed the role that academic publishers play in enabling reproducibility, and how SciPost's policies are a great step forward. After all, open science practices make it much easier to reproduce and replicate scientific results. I was particularly happy to point out how SciPost's peer-witnessed refereeing process allows to tackle the reproducibility issue much earlier and more openly than traditional peer-review, as all referee reports are publicly visible from the beginning, 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 any publication decision is made. It also allows the entire scientific community to give their opinions on a manuscript in the form of volunteered referee reports. Why wait until after a paper is published to find all the issues with it? The talks were recorded and are available on YouTube. You can find mine at https://lnkd.in/e7RuZpQS. Take a look at the other talks and panel discussions as well! They are quite illuminating and show a side of research that is seldom discussed. A big thanks to the PQI for the opportunity to share my perspectives on the matter!