Baymard Institute’s Post

What happens when AI gets UX wrong? Revenue takes a hit ❌ Generative AI tools can sound confident - but most only reach 50–75% accuracy when analyzing UX or CRO opportunities. That means 1 in 3 recommendations can actually hurt your site’s conversion performance 🚨 In his latest article, Baymard co-founder Christian Holst explains why accuracy is the missing ingredient in AI-driven UX, and how UX-Ray 2.0 became the first system to reach a documented 95% Accuracy Rate, matching human specialists. Inside, you’ll learn: ✔️ Why most AI UX tools fail below the 95% accuracy threshold ✔️ How small UX errors create outsized business costs ✔️ The research process behind UX-Ray’s validation Before trusting AI to influence your product decisions, it’s worth seeing how we proved that accuracy really matters. 📖 Read the article: https://lnkd.in/eEB5uD2H #UXResearch #AIUX #EcommerceUX #ConversionOptimization #Baymard

  • table, Excel
Cory Baird

Prompt Engineer | AI Agent Developer | Automation Systems Architect | Consultant

3w

Shawn I tend to agree. We have a bit more time until the datasets catch up. Unfortunately variations come largely from batched requests which if not self hosted can give vastly different output for the same input depending on how it was batch. Tools like this genuinely require someone with your background to properly configure all the guard rails , SOP , and best practices given the industry norms for the time. Which will evolve as time moves forward. I love gen ai but we just aren't there yet. We have to tip toe our way closer towards AGI. After we achieve that ASI will shortly follow...

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories