Roberto López del Campo’s Post

View profile for Roberto López del Campo

Football Intelligence & Performance Project Coordinator and Sports Research Area at LALIGA. PhD in Physical Activity and Sports Science with ANECA accreditation. UEFA PRO License No. 386..

“Does more ball possession lower physical demand?” ⚽️💡 🔍 Challenge the default: In many dressing rooms, “run more to win” is still the mantra. Our multi‑season work in LaLiga tested that belief with tracking data and a simple question: What really happens to physical demand when your team keeps the ball? Short answer: possession doesn’t simply reduce work; it reallocates it—and the with‑ball high‑speed actions are the currency that matters most. Key takeaways coaches and performance staff can use: 1️⃣ More possession → fewer metres overall Across matches and seasons, higher possession is associated with lower total distance and less medium/high‑intensity running. The effect is strongest in teams that already keep the ball and push it even further on the day. 🧭 2️⃣ Success tracks with with‑ball high speed, not total volume Teams that rank higher don’t necessarily run more; they produce more ≥21 km·h⁻¹ actions with the ball. Champions can post lower total distance yet win through decisive, on‑ball bursts that break lines. 📈 3️⃣ Match status changes the workload recipe When protecting a lead, teams tend to sustain longer, cleaner possessions (less chasing, fewer repeated high‑speed efforts). Chasing the game accelerates progression—more metres per possession and higher high‑speed cost. ⏱️ 4️⃣ Role‑specific shifts In very high‑possession contexts, attackers (CM/WM/CF) often show lower per‑minute metres across bands; don’t misread this as “low intensity.” You still need timed with‑ball spikes. Full‑backs can carry more transition load when possession plans require width and repeat supports. 🧩 5️⃣ Effective time matters Possession profiles influence how much the ball is actually in play. Reading loads per effective minute avoids false comfort from clock time alone. 🧪 🗺️ The graphic attached condenses this into a + / − cheat‑sheet: each row states a possession factor (e.g., raise possession in this match) and the expected change in physical demand. 🧠 Why this matters This programme is about disciplined curiosity: take a tradition (“run more to win”), treat the pitch as a living lab, and let data confirm, challenge, or refine it. That mindset turns conditioning minutes into competitive advantage. Research led by the Football Intelligence & Performance Department at LALIGA. Complementary literature echoes the same signal: possession style shapes demands, and with‑ball speed—not kilometres—separates efficiency from excess. 🎧 Podcast: https://lnkd.in/d66kyrCw 📄 Peer‑reviewed article (DOI): If you want to explore each peer‑reviewed paper behind this cheat‑sheet in depth, please visit: https://lnkd.in/dMz9riZX

  • table

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories