My PhD Journey: When Supervisors Become Family This week's Nature editorial asks "What makes PhD students happy?" and my answer is clear: supervisors like Scott Young and Simon Chenery. I was blessed to pursue my PhD at the University of Nottingham and BGS after completing doctoral studies in Egypt (but not awarded). What I found wasn't just academic supervision—I found mentors who transformed my entire approach to research. Scott Young taught me the systematic art of scientific thinking: how to dissect research problems, design rigorous experiments, and craft compelling narratives in English. His confidence in me—ranking me among his top PhD candidates out of 40—became the fuel that drove me forward. More remarkably, he trusted me to co-supervise undergraduate projects and even a PhD student before I completed my own doctorate. That trust was transformative. Simon Chenery showed me that fieldwork could be both scientifically rigorous and deeply human. I'll never forget collecting samples amidst waterfalls and green meadows, his careful attention to my safety crossing roads, and his meticulous teaching of sampling protocols. The week I spent with Simon and his wife Caroline, sharing meals and bridging Egyptian and English cultures, remains one of the most beautiful chapters of my life. The Nature editorial emphasizes that "supervisors who invest in positive mentoring relationships with their PhD candidates also reap the benefits for their own research." Scott and Simon exemplified this philosophy. They didn't just supervise—they invested in me as a whole person. To Scott and Simon: You weren't just my supervisors. You were my academic family. The lessons you taught me about rigorous thinking, ethical research, and genuine mentorship continue to shape how I now supervise my own students in Environmental Soil Sciences. Simon's gift still sits on my desk—a daily reminder that great supervision creates ripples that extend far beyond a single PhD thesis. To every PhD supervisor reading this: your mentorship matters profoundly. Invest in your students, trust their potential, and remember that good supervision doesn't just produce better research—it shapes better researchers, better teachers, and better human beings. #PhDLife #AcademicMentorship #GratefulForMyJourney #SoilScience #UniversityOfNottingham #BGS #PhDSupervision
How PhD supervisors became my family
More Relevant Posts
-
In today’s academic world, it’s unfortunate to see a growing number of mentors treating PhD scholars merely as a path to their own promotion or API score. Many dedicated research scholars contribute significantly to publications and experimental work, yet their efforts often go under-recognized — their names appear after their supervisors or are excluded from authorship discussions altogether. A PhD journey is meant to nurture independent researchers, not to produce papers for others’ advancement. True mentorship should involve: • Guiding the scholar to become a confident, ethical researcher. • Ensuring fair credit and authorship where it is deserved. • Supporting the scholar’s career goals beyond their thesis. The relationship between a mentor and a PhD scholar must be built on trust, integrity, and collaboration, not hierarchy and exploitation. When a supervisor uplifts their scholar, both the research quality and academic culture rise together. Let’s bring back the essence of mentorship — where success is shared, ethics are valued, and growth is mutual. 🌿 #PhDLife #ResearchEthics #AcademicIntegrity #MentorshipMatters #LeadershipInAcademia #HigherEducation #PhDSupervision
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
[Research Reflection] As a mentor of young researchers, one of the key topics that consistently arises in our discussions is: “What can we actually control in our work?” My answer is always the same: “We don’t control whether a paper is accepted or not, or whether we win an academic position. The only thing we truly control is the quality of the work we produce — and that is non-negotiable.” Of course, this answer can be difficult for younger researchers to accept at first. But over time, it becomes our guiding principle as a research group. How do we measure quality? My favorite metric is recognition by the community. Last week, we had a few inspiring examples of that: · My Master’s student Miguel Mota Cruz was awarded a Fulbright Portugal Scholarship with the support of FLAD - Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento · My PhD student Arthur Dantas Mangussi won third place in the Best Master Thesis Award by Sobrapo - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional · My former PhD student Miriam Seoane Santos received the Recognising Excellence in Emerging Talent — the Cor Baayen Award from the European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM). It seems that our focus on quality is paying off. 😊
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What makes PhD students happy? Good supervision Supervisors who invest in positive mentoring relationships with their PhD candidates also reap the benefits for their own research. https://lnkd.in/gVVa-kbz
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
What truly makes PhD students happy? According to Nature’s 2025 global PhD survey, the answer is clear — good supervision. Students who meet their supervisors more often and feel genuinely supported are not only more satisfied but also perform better. Quality mentorship isn’t just about academic guidance; it’s about curiosity, empathy, and reliability. Supervisors who invest time in their students help build confidence, resilience, and stronger research outcomes — while also enriching their own scientific growth. A few minutes of meaningful conversation each week can make all the difference. Because good supervision doesn’t just shape better PhDs — it shapes better science. 🔗 Read the editorial in Nature: https://lnkd.in/d6pSb3V4
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Good supervision makes all the difference. Nature’s 2025 global PhD survey found that the happiest PhD students are those who have supportive supervisors who meet them regularly, listen, and guide with empathy. It sounds simple, but in many places, it seems not to be the norm. What also is interesting that the survey found that most students enjoy their PhD, which is in stark contrast to the image of the horrible academic environment that is sometimes painted on social media (as in LinkedIn). I know many early-career researchers who feel insecure about asking for more time, clarity, or feedback from their supervisors. I get that. When you are a PhD student, every meeting feels like an evaluation. But here is what I consider the truth: supervision is both a privilege but mostly a responsibility. I have been lucky with my own supervisors, and I try to carry that forward in how I supervise today (at least they smiled when they told me this new idea I had was stupid :) ). But I also know we all get busy, and academia sometimes rewards output more than mentorship. T If you are supervising PhD students: 1. Make time for them, even when things are hectic. 2. Be honest about challenges, including your own limits. It is OK if your feedback sometimes takes a week. 3. Encourage them to build a network beyond you. An independent PhD might be a successful academic. If you are a PhD student: ▪️ Do not hesitate to ask for what you need. ▪️ Seek multiple mentors; one person cannot do it all. ▪️ Remember that needing support is not weakness; it is part of learning, and it might be the most efficient way to move a research project forward. Good supervision is not about control. It is about curiosity, empathy, and reliability. Investing time in mentoring others is one of the best investments we can make as academics. #PhDLife #AcademicMentorship #HigherEducation #ResearchCulture #Academia
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
At Rice University, we believe discovery begins with conversation. The Gulf Coast Undergraduate Research Symposium (GCURS) reflects that belief, bringing together hundreds of undergraduates from across the country to present their research not as posters, but as vibrant presentations. Guided by Rice faculty and graduate mentors, students learn to communicate complex ideas with clarity and confidence, an essential skill for every future scholar. For higher education, GCURS represents more than an event. It’s a model for how universities can invest in the next generation of innovators: By emphasizing mentorship over competition. By teaching that communication is as vital as experimentation. And by opening the doors of research to students from every background and discipline. Each presentation strengthens not just a resume, but a researcher’s voice, and that’s where real discovery begins. 🎓 Learn more about how GCURS is advancing undergraduate research: 🔗 gcurs.rice.edu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Good PhD supervision goes beyond papers It’s never just about producing research papers. it’s about shaping people. Behind every PhD journey are moments of doubt, exhaustion, and quiet breakthroughs that never make it to publications. And during those moments, the kind of supervision we receive makes all the difference. Supervision isn’t only about guiding experiments or correcting manuscripts. It’s about helping students find their voice as independent thinkers, nurturing empathy in collaboration, and building the confidence to lead with integrity. A great supervisor doesn’t measure success in numbers or prestige. They remind their students that curiosity, patience, and kindness are just as important as data and deadlines. Because in the end, the reputation of a university isn’t defined by metrics it’s defined by the people it shapes, and the stories its graduates carry forward. #PhDLife #AcademicMentorship #ResearchCulture #GradSchool #HigherEducation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How to ensure the mental and emotional health of PhD students? The answer is simple, yet the solution is not that simple
Nature’s recent survey on PhD satisfaction echoes Paulo Freire’s timeless insight: education thrives on dialogue, empathy, and mutual respect. As a recent PhD graduate and academic teacher, I have supported students at various levels, not just with knowledge but with presence and care. The survey shows that the happiest PhD students had supervisors who were engaged and collaborative. I would dare say this is true for all students. That kind of support is not extra; it is essential. The survey also highlights a serious concern: bullying and mistreatment, often from supervisors. We need safer, more accountable systems for reporting such behavior. Silence should never be the default, and in an environment where power dynamics are as strong as in academia, this becomes an even more delicate topic. I believe that a student’s success is deeply tied to a professor’s success. That connection is sometimes forgotten, but it is foundational. It does not stop at graduation. Support, mentorship, and guidance matter at every stage of the research journey. We are all students, and we are always learning. P.S.: Seeing Brazil ranked first for positive PhD–supervisor relationships makes me really proud. Connection truly is our strength, o jeitinho brasileiro 😉 The link to the editorial: https://lnkd.in/eMKMXgZJ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Meanwhile, on Reddit... why are so many PhD supervisors… bad? A good number of reasons are given in the comments. Let me paraphrase: 1. Most academic institutions provide no training to PhD advisors, and for those that do the training is often ridiculously bad. 2. Empathy is not a skill highly valued in academia. 3. "I had a hard life when I was a PhD student. Therefore, my PhD students should have a hard life." 4. Some departments foster a culture in which PhD students are first and foremost seen as cheap labour. 5. If you are a professor, you probably didn't need much advising when you were a student. So you don't see the need to advise. 6. Every hour spent supervising a student is an hour lost for writing the next grant proposal. (Always look to where the incentives are.) 7. Toxicity gets passed down academic generations, just like family dysfunctions. 8. Professors have to fulfil so many roles (teacher, advisor, manager, researcher) that its unrealistic to expect them to be good at everything. 9. Mentoring is actually hard. Some PhD students have unrealistic expectations. https://lnkd.in/dW-uJtak
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
"Supervisors who invest in positive mentoring relationships with their PhD candidates also reap the benefits for their own research." #PhD #academia https://lnkd.in/g9E32K3d
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
--
6dThank you for your kind words Ezzat, it was a pleasure having you as a student and you are so right we are investing in the future with our students