QS University World Ranking vs Unicorn Founder Ranking The QS World University Rankings focus on academic excellence, research output, and reputation. But how do these rankings compare when measuring entrepreneurial success? We selected only US universities in the ranking and compared to our US unicorn rankings. Top performers in both rankings: Massachusetts Institute of Technology ranks #1 in QS, #3 by unicorn founders (184) Stanford University ranks #3 in QS, #1 by unicorn founders (296) Harvard University ranks #5 in QS, #2 by unicorn founders (205) Universities that outperform their QS ranking in unicorn ranking: University of California, Berkeley: #17 in QS but #4 by unicorn founders (125) University of Pennsylvania: #15 in QS but #5 by unicorn founders (76) Columbia University: #16 in QS but #7 by unicorn founders (72) Yale University: #21 in QS but #6 by unicorn founders (74) Princeton University: #25 in QS but #11 by unicorn founders (45) Universities stronger in academics: Caltech: #10 in QS but #15 by unicorn founders (13) Academic quality and entrepreneurial success could be different. MIT and Stanford excel at both, while Berkeley punches far above its QS weight in producing unicorn founders. This tells us that building unicorns may require something beyond traditional academic excellence— proximity to venture capital, entrepreneurial culture, and strong alumni networks matter. Thank you to Stanford University Venture Capital Initiative for supporting this research.
Ilya there’s a mistake on the chart: you swapped Northwestern and UChicago, and Cornell and Columbia’s QS rankings respectively.
John BENATOUIL - Co-Founder at www.breedj.com 🌍| Scaling Africa’s Skilled Workforce to Global Markets | Ecosystem Builder
Stanford has an unfair advantage - they have Ilya Strebulaev 😄
Fascinating comparison. While early-stage innovation often grabs headlines, the path from unicorn to mature issuer frequently brings these companies into the credit markets. Understanding the ecosystems behind that evolution is increasingly relevant.
An insightful and practical comparison. It would be interesting to see similar application for the UK.