IJDR Is Read and Viewed in 86 Countries So Far 86 countries. 34,000 contacts. 6 months. One mission – global digital science. It’s been exactly six months since the launch of the International Journal of Digital Research (IJDR), and the results so far are beyond expectations. Through our extensive global outreach campaign, we have reached over 34,000 researchers, professors, and professionals from all over the world. According to Google Analytics, our website has now welcomed visitors from 86 countries across every continent – with strong engagement from the United States, Bulgaria, the Netherlands, Ireland, Bangladesh, India, and Canada. Our international visibility continues to grow rapidly, reflecting the journal’s open-access policy, inclusive scope, and dynamic editorial work. We are proud to have built a diverse editorial team of nearly 30 academicians and reviewers from different regions, ensuring broad interdisciplinary representation. During these six months, IJDR has successfully published its first three issues, featuring authors from multiple countries and disciplines – from artificial intelligence and digital education to economics, tourism, and engineering. On November 1st, we are opening Issue 4, inviting new submissions and collaborations from around the world. As we move forward, our goals remain clear: to provide accessible, affordable, and globally visible publishing opportunities for emerging and established researchers, and to continue fostering innovation in the digital research ecosystem. 86 countries. 34,000 contacts. 6 months. One mission – global digital science.
International Journal of Digital Research’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
The Current moves forward — from reflection to impact. We are proud to announce the next chapter of The Obsidian Current. What began as a newspaper of ideas has now evolved into a youth-led think tank: The Obsidian Current Institute. The Institute brings together young researchers from leading universities around the world, supported by a board of senior mentors: professors, policymakers, and advisors, to produce in-depth policy reports on major global and regional challenges. Our goal is simple yet ambitious: to bridge the gap between academic analysis and actionable policy. Through regional desks (The Americas and Oceania, Africa, Europe, and Asia) and sub-regional desks, we will explore the dynamics shaping today’s world and propose innovative solutions. Following our first event at UNESCO, the Institute will soon publish its first reports and collaborations.
-
-
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: https://lnkd.in/ekcmPnYv #OpenAccess Some key findings: 1️⃣ #Social #media are the most important source of information about science in most countries – but traditional #news media remain relevant, particularly in Northwestern Europe. 2️⃣ Little access to #digital media is associated with more offline #engagement with science (museums, zoos, public talks). 3️⃣ Low press freedom and limited #academic #freedom do not necessarily prevent public engagement with science. 4️⃣ Less educated populations tend to discuss science more frequently with others. 5️⃣ Limits to #democratic deliberation and freedom of speech may not decrease willingness to participate in public #protests on science matters. 👀 See the full paper for many more results and a detailed discussion of regional patterns. I’ll also post some visuals in the comments below. Our results are relevant not only for future #scicomm research, but also for science #policy, #funding, #education, and science communication #practice. 🔁 All analyses are fully #reproducible with the code and data available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gvcfe/. We published the complete dataset here: https://lnkd.in/ewx7SyWj 🙏 Massive thanks to the #TISP consortium, especially my project co-leader Viktoria Cologna. They collected the data, helped writing and revising the manuscript, and provided countless insights into local contexts that had been unknown to me. You folks are amazing. Feel free to share, PCST Network, EUSEA - European Science Engagement Association, Association of Science Communicators, #EUPRIO – European Association of Communication Professionals in Higher Education, International Communication Association Environmental Communication Division, Nationaal Expertisecentrum Wetenschap & Samenleving, European Competence Centre for Science Communication, powered by COALESCE 📣
-
-
Strategic Communications Leader | Crisis & Risk Messaging | Driving Visibility, Trust & Engagement | Advisor to Executives | Team Builder
This is a great study, and if you are a practitioner working on strategies for communication science, you should read this one, as well as the other publications from the TISP team. There are a lot of great insights in this dataset.
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: https://lnkd.in/ekcmPnYv #OpenAccess Some key findings: 1️⃣ #Social #media are the most important source of information about science in most countries – but traditional #news media remain relevant, particularly in Northwestern Europe. 2️⃣ Little access to #digital media is associated with more offline #engagement with science (museums, zoos, public talks). 3️⃣ Low press freedom and limited #academic #freedom do not necessarily prevent public engagement with science. 4️⃣ Less educated populations tend to discuss science more frequently with others. 5️⃣ Limits to #democratic deliberation and freedom of speech may not decrease willingness to participate in public #protests on science matters. 👀 See the full paper for many more results and a detailed discussion of regional patterns. I’ll also post some visuals in the comments below. Our results are relevant not only for future #scicomm research, but also for science #policy, #funding, #education, and science communication #practice. 🔁 All analyses are fully #reproducible with the code and data available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gvcfe/. We published the complete dataset here: https://lnkd.in/ewx7SyWj 🙏 Massive thanks to the #TISP consortium, especially my project co-leader Viktoria Cologna. They collected the data, helped writing and revising the manuscript, and provided countless insights into local contexts that had been unknown to me. You folks are amazing. Feel free to share, PCST Network, EUSEA - European Science Engagement Association, Association of Science Communicators, #EUPRIO – European Association of Communication Professionals in Higher Education, International Communication Association Environmental Communication Division, Nationaal Expertisecentrum Wetenschap & Samenleving, European Competence Centre for Science Communication, powered by COALESCE 📣
-
-
🧬 Latest discoveries in science communication! You can explore their findings at this amazing dashboard https://lnkd.in/gCuc4WVW This is part of the Trust in Science and Science-related Populism (TISP) project. With a remarkable sample size and global reach, the outcomes show that, globally, there is strong interest and trust in science, desire for more science communication, and strong support for scientists' involvement in policy-making. In short, completely countering the doom-n-gloom of the overwhelming media and political narratives. #FARvisions #OpenAccess #science #SciComm #education #UNESCO #EUPHA #WHO #UN #Scenarios4Tomorrow The Scottish Government
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: https://lnkd.in/ekcmPnYv #OpenAccess Some key findings: 1️⃣ #Social #media are the most important source of information about science in most countries – but traditional #news media remain relevant, particularly in Northwestern Europe. 2️⃣ Little access to #digital media is associated with more offline #engagement with science (museums, zoos, public talks). 3️⃣ Low press freedom and limited #academic #freedom do not necessarily prevent public engagement with science. 4️⃣ Less educated populations tend to discuss science more frequently with others. 5️⃣ Limits to #democratic deliberation and freedom of speech may not decrease willingness to participate in public #protests on science matters. 👀 See the full paper for many more results and a detailed discussion of regional patterns. I’ll also post some visuals in the comments below. Our results are relevant not only for future #scicomm research, but also for science #policy, #funding, #education, and science communication #practice. 🔁 All analyses are fully #reproducible with the code and data available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gvcfe/. We published the complete dataset here: https://lnkd.in/ewx7SyWj 🙏 Massive thanks to the #TISP consortium, especially my project co-leader Viktoria Cologna. They collected the data, helped writing and revising the manuscript, and provided countless insights into local contexts that had been unknown to me. You folks are amazing. Feel free to share, PCST Network, EUSEA - European Science Engagement Association, Association of Science Communicators, #EUPRIO – European Association of Communication Professionals in Higher Education, International Communication Association Environmental Communication Division, Nationaal Expertisecentrum Wetenschap & Samenleving, European Competence Centre for Science Communication, powered by COALESCE 📣
-
-
Outreach Specialist | Helping Researchers, Universities & Industry Maximise the Impact of Their Work | SciPod | SciTube | Science Diffusion
Big new study on how people meet science: most of us find it on social media; news still counts in parts of Europe; and when digital access is limited, offline stuff (talks, museums) matters more. The usual “more education = more engagement” story isn’t so simple. This is why we do what we do at Science Diffusion. SciPod turns your paper into a clear audiobook, published open access and shared across major audio platforms. SciTube turns research into short, friendly animations built for social and the web. Both are written by PhD science communicators so non-specialists can follow YOUR story without the jargon. If you’re an academic who needs to show public engagement or just wants your work to reach people beyond the journal, happy to help - drop me a note.
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: https://lnkd.in/ekcmPnYv #OpenAccess Some key findings: 1️⃣ #Social #media are the most important source of information about science in most countries – but traditional #news media remain relevant, particularly in Northwestern Europe. 2️⃣ Little access to #digital media is associated with more offline #engagement with science (museums, zoos, public talks). 3️⃣ Low press freedom and limited #academic #freedom do not necessarily prevent public engagement with science. 4️⃣ Less educated populations tend to discuss science more frequently with others. 5️⃣ Limits to #democratic deliberation and freedom of speech may not decrease willingness to participate in public #protests on science matters. 👀 See the full paper for many more results and a detailed discussion of regional patterns. I’ll also post some visuals in the comments below. Our results are relevant not only for future #scicomm research, but also for science #policy, #funding, #education, and science communication #practice. 🔁 All analyses are fully #reproducible with the code and data available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gvcfe/. We published the complete dataset here: https://lnkd.in/ewx7SyWj 🙏 Massive thanks to the #TISP consortium, especially my project co-leader Viktoria Cologna. They collected the data, helped writing and revising the manuscript, and provided countless insights into local contexts that had been unknown to me. You folks are amazing. Feel free to share, PCST Network, EUSEA - European Science Engagement Association, Association of Science Communicators, #EUPRIO – European Association of Communication Professionals in Higher Education, International Communication Association Environmental Communication Division, Nationaal Expertisecentrum Wetenschap & Samenleving, European Competence Centre for Science Communication, powered by COALESCE 📣
-
-
📣 How do people around the world inform themselves about science? 🤔 We surveyed over 70,000 participants in 68 countries to find out 👇 Huge thanks to Niels G. Mede for leading this study and excellently summarizing its findings 👏 https://lnkd.in/dAM_q8fC
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: https://lnkd.in/ekcmPnYv #OpenAccess Some key findings: 1️⃣ #Social #media are the most important source of information about science in most countries – but traditional #news media remain relevant, particularly in Northwestern Europe. 2️⃣ Little access to #digital media is associated with more offline #engagement with science (museums, zoos, public talks). 3️⃣ Low press freedom and limited #academic #freedom do not necessarily prevent public engagement with science. 4️⃣ Less educated populations tend to discuss science more frequently with others. 5️⃣ Limits to #democratic deliberation and freedom of speech may not decrease willingness to participate in public #protests on science matters. 👀 See the full paper for many more results and a detailed discussion of regional patterns. I’ll also post some visuals in the comments below. Our results are relevant not only for future #scicomm research, but also for science #policy, #funding, #education, and science communication #practice. 🔁 All analyses are fully #reproducible with the code and data available at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gvcfe/. We published the complete dataset here: https://lnkd.in/ewx7SyWj 🙏 Massive thanks to the #TISP consortium, especially my project co-leader Viktoria Cologna. They collected the data, helped writing and revising the manuscript, and provided countless insights into local contexts that had been unknown to me. You folks are amazing. Feel free to share, PCST Network, EUSEA - European Science Engagement Association, Association of Science Communicators, #EUPRIO – European Association of Communication Professionals in Higher Education, International Communication Association Environmental Communication Division, Nationaal Expertisecentrum Wetenschap & Samenleving, European Competence Centre for Science Communication, powered by COALESCE 📣
-
-
Looking to streamline your research process and boost productivity? Discover five powerful tools that can support your academic journey, from literature review to citation management: 1- Connected Papers – Explore related research visually https://lnkd.in/dBdiYZQ 2- ResearchRabbit – Track and expand your research network. https://lnkd.in/gsjDFg8X 3- Scite – Evaluate citations with smart metrics. https://scite.ai/ 4- Zotero – Organize and manage your references with ease. https://www.zotero.org/ 5- Semantic Scholar – Find relevant papers faster with AI-powered search. https://lnkd.in/eta63tg 📚 Whether you're starting a new project or refining your thesis, these tools can make a real difference. Found this useful? Follow IRIS NOVA FCT for more tools, tips, and updates to support your research journey!
-
🌍 Where Do You Stand in Europe’s Peer Comparison? According to AD Scientific Index data, when compared with peer universities across the continent, some institutions are rapidly moving ahead. The i10-index (Total and Last 5 Years) clearly highlights: Rising institutions (upward arrows) gaining momentum. Declining institutions (downward arrows) losing ground. This perspective allows you to track not only your own performance but also the movements of your competitors. 🔎 Why Are Some Institutions Surpassing You? The reasons can be explored in detail within AD Scientific Index: Disciplinary strengths: Certain universities dominate in specific fields, driving higher publications and citations. Recent productivity: The last 5 years carry significant weight, reflecting fresh academic impact. Faculty dynamics: The addition of highly productive researchers can shift rankings rapidly. International collaborations: Joint publications and projects accelerate growth in i10-index and citations. 🎯 SMART Benefits for Your Institution Using AD Scientific Index peer comparisons provides: Early warning system: Detect fast-rising institutions before they overtake you. Strategic planning: Reinforce strong areas and develop strategies for weaker ones. Competitive analysis: Monitor not only your own trajectory but also your rivals at the continental level. Decision support: Solid data for leadership, faculty planning, and research policy. Conclusion: AD Scientific Index does not just show your current rank — it reveals the competitive dynamics across your continent, making it the only tool that truly guides strategic decision-making.
-
-
Professor of Management, Auditing; Academy of Management (USA); AAAS (USA), University of Zielona Góra; previously Jagiellonian University
The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study The skills gap poses a critical challenge across the European Union, impacting every nation and organisation. It is essential to understand the root causes and far-reaching consequences of this gap. Why does it persist? Researchers are actively seeking answers by studying numerous companies in a country recognised as one of the top 20 most developed economies globally. Addressing this issue is vital for future growth and competitiveness. https://lnkd.in/eP2FSpe5
-
Professor of Management, Auditing; Academy of Management (USA); AAAS (USA), University of Zielona Góra; previously Jagiellonian University
The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study The skills gap poses a critical challenge across the European Union, impacting every nation and organisation. It is essential to understand the root causes and far-reaching consequences of this gap. Why does it persist? Researchers are actively seeking answers by studying numerous companies in a country recognised as one of the top 20 most developed economies globally. Addressing this issue is vital for future growth and competitiveness. https://lnkd.in/eP2FSpe5
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
VR Experience | Tourism Researcher
1wWow impressive 😄