🎓 𝐃𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝐓𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬: 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐑𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬
For decades, global ranking providers have rated the world’s universities – shaping reputations, policy and funding – but now, their own credibility is under scrutiny.
The ‘𝐁𝐢𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞’ – Shanghai (ARWU), QS, Times Higher Education (THE) – have long defined global university prestige. Originally intended to benchmark Chinese universities, the ARWU became an international yardstick. QS and THE followed, turning data, insights and reputation into an industry that now influences billions in funding, student choices and research collaborations.
𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐨 𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫?
They have long served as a compass for students, academics, policymakers and employers. High rankings attract top talent, funding and partnerships and even influence immigration and scholarship policies.
𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤.
Institutions including Utrecht, Zurich, Sorbonne, Birkbeck and the American University of Beirut have withdrawn from THE. In the US, leading law and medical schools at Harvard, Yale and Stanford have boycotted the U.S. News & World Report rankings. Similar withdrawals are emerging in South Korea, China and India.
In my 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 article, I reflect on:
☑ Brief history of the ‘Big Three’
☑ Why Do University Rankings Matter?
☑ Uprisings Against University Rankings
☑ What’s The Issue and What’s Next?
☑ Recent Global University Rankings
🔗 Read the 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 below. 👇
#HigherEducation #UniversityRankings #QS #THE #ARWU #EducationPolicy #AcademicIntegrity #Research #GlobalEducation #UK #US #China #India #ShanghaiARWU #QSRanking #TimesHigherEducation #USNewsWorldReportrankings #HETrends #AcademicIntegrity #LeagueTables #HigherEdInsights #HigherEdStrategy #ShanghaiRanking #UniversityWorldNews #BestColleges
Consultor Académico en ARCO Estrategias
3moMe encanta esto, Isidro