Defining Spirit & Intent in a Security Standard

View profile for Michael Burns

Information Security Policy & Standards Practitioner | Writer exploring the human side of Security and AI

🌍 Spirit & Intent of a Security Standard In my experience this is the most powerful and often overlooked aspect when creating a security standard. I do this first, to focus my research, my writing and prevent me from deviating from the subject. Think of it as the constitution for a standard, providing the context for why it exists. What is Spirit & Intent? A concise statement that defines the underlying core security issue the standard is trying to solve, and the overall desired security outcome. It frames the standard, making it the source of truth for interpreting any requirement. ➡️ Spirit is the philosophy: Why are we doing this? ➡️ Intent is the objective: What is the fundamental result we must achieve? I place it in the 'Introduction' section and then follow on with any relevant org specific information. 🌍 Why it’s Critical for Compliance When SMEs, stakeholders or audit, encounters a requirement that seems unclear, or overly prescriptive, you can refer to the Spirit & Intent. Plus, it really helps when responding to resistance, pushback and general enquiry. In short, if the literal interpretation of a requirement violates the Spirit & Intent, then Spirit & Intent should win. Example: Spirit & Intent for a Data Classification standard: This standard establishes requirements for classifying, labelling, and secure handling (access, process, share, store, transport and secure dispose) of company X information.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories