There are two types of #developers when it comes to #speed and #quality: 1.The #Developer Who Promises Speed: They tell the Product Manager, "If I skip the unit and integration tests, we'll deliver faster." This creates an illusion of speed now, but guarantees #techdebt, #bugs, and panic later. They trade hours today for weeks of pain next month. 2.The #Developer Who Delivers Speed: They don't talk about skipping #tests because writing them is a non-negotiable part of the work. They deliver stable, tested #code the first time, which makes #refactoring, pivoting, and fixing #bugs trivial. They are the ones who achieve sustainable speed and predictable delivery. The difference isn't who works harder; it's who understands what truly drives long-term velocity. #seniordeveloper #softwaredevelopment #seniormindset #productowner #unittest #integrationtest #qa
Oleg Dykyi’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
I came across a post recently that perfectly describes the reality of being in QA 👇 When a QA finds a bug late in the sprint… It’s 6:00 PM. The team is wrapping up. The build looks stable. The release feels smooth. And then you spot it — That one bug that seems small… but could disrupt the experience for hundreds of users. 😬 For a moment, you think: “Should I log this now or just do it tomorrow?” But deep down, you already know the answer. QA doesn’t sleep on bugs. So you log it. You add detailed steps, screenshots, impact analysis. Yes, the release might get delayed by a few hours… But you just prevented a bigger issue from reaching production. And that is what QA truly does. We’re not here to slow the process down. We’re here to make sure things don’t break when everything speeds up. 🚀 Quality is not an obstacle — it’s the guardrail. #QualityAssurance #SoftwareTesting #QA #TestAutomation #AutomationTesting #Agile #DevOps #SoftwareDevelopment #ProductQuality #BugHunting #QALife #TechCommunity #CareerInTech #BuildInQuality
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Tip Tuesday: QA Doesn’t End at the Release — It Evolves Beyond It For years, QA has been told to “shift left” — test early, find bugs before they go live. That mindset still matters. But in 2025, that’s only half the story. The best teams are now shifting both left and right — building continuous quality into the delivery pipeline and the live environment. Here’s what that looks like in practice 👇 1️⃣ Shift-Left → Integrate QA early in the SDLC. Automate at commit level, run static analysis, and validate acceptance criteria before development even starts. This reduces rework and keeps delivery predictable. 2️⃣ Shift-Right → Extend QA into production. Use real-time observability, chaos testing, and synthetic monitoring to validate performance, reliability, and user experience post-release. This helps teams catch issues that test environments never reveal — like latency under real traffic or unexpected integrations. 3️⃣ The Magic Is in the Feedback Loop. Shift-Left finds defects early. Shift-Right ensures resilience under real-world conditions. Together, they create a closed feedback loop that keeps quality measurable, continuous, and transparent. At RAPD, we help clients design QA frameworks that connect both ends of the delivery spectrum — from code commit to customer experience. Because quality isn’t a phase anymore — it’s an ecosystem. #TipTuesday #QATesting #ShiftLeft #ShiftRight #DevOps #ContinuousTesting #QALeadership #RAPD #QualityEngineering #SoftwareQuality
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Shift-Left Testing – Catch Bugs Before They Happen Most teams still find bugs too late — during QA or even in production. That’s why the “Shift-Left” mindset matters more than ever. It’s about moving testing earlier in the development cycle — from requirement reviews to design discussions. ✅ QA gives feedback before code is written. ✅ Developers test as they build. ✅ Teams collaborate, not hand off. 🧠 My tip: Shift-left isn’t just about tools — it’s about shared ownership of quality. 💬 When do you think testing should start in a project? #ShiftLeftTesting #QA #SoftwareTesting #DevOps #QualityEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
✨ Thought on Dev–QA Collaboration Sometimes I feel that developers work with greater confidence knowing the QA team is right there beside them. Not because they are careless — but because they know there is a safety net. Developers focus on building and innovating. QA focuses on validating, refining, and ensuring stability. When both work in sync, it creates something powerful: Developers bring ideas to life QA helps shape those ideas into reliable, user-ready experiences It’s not a “handoff” — it's a collaboration. A partnership built on trust, feedback, and shared ownership of quality. At the end of the day, great software isn’t just written. It’s crafted — through discussion, iteration, and teamwork. 💡🤝 I’d love to hear your thoughts — How do you see the relationship between Dev & QA evolving in your teams? #softwareengineering #qualityassurance #productdevelopment #collaboration #productmanager #teamwork #agiledevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"QA is not the gatekeeper. QA is the quality partner." I’ve seen it many times, that old “QA vs Dev” mindset. But honestly, it doesn’t work anymore. Quality isn’t about one team blocking another. It’s about collaboration, sitting together, understanding the goal, and making sure the final product truly works for the user. When QA and Dev work side by side, bugs turn into conversations, not conflicts, and that’s when real quality starts to shine. ✨ #SoftwareTesting #QA #QualityAssurance #Agile #DevOps #Collaboration #TestingMindset
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Not only does it erode the trust within the team, it can erode trust in leadership. I heard a Developer say, "I'm not going to say anything because I've seen what happens when <QA person> speaks up about problems," and that was not a one-off.
Site Reliability & Platform Engineering Leader | Quality Automation & Observability | AWS • Terraform • CI/CD • AI Reliability • DevOps at Scale
When QA loses trust with Devs, it’s not just the tests that break; it’s the team. I’ve seen it too many times: Devs stop tagging QA early because “it slows us down.” QA stops raising bugs because “nobody listens anyway.” Leadership keeps saying “just automate more.” By the time anyone notices, the relationship’s gone from collaboration to quiet resentment. And once that trust is gone, no new framework or CI dashboard can bring it back. Here’s the truth most orgs miss: 🔥 You can’t fix a burned-out QA team with tools. You fix it by rebuilding belief. 👉 Belief that their work matters. 👉 Belief that quality is shared, not assigned. 👉 Belief that Dev and QA are on the same side of the sprint, not opposite ends of the blame cycle. I wrote a new piece about this exact moment; the point where QA isn’t just tired, but disconnected. It’s about how to reboot your team’s trust, energy, and identity before another “green build” hides a broken culture. 👉 Read it here: https://lnkd.in/g4hrkvHt If your QA team feels invisible right now, this one’s for you. #QualityEngineering #QA #DevOps #Leadership #EngineeringCulture #Automation #TeamDynamics #SoftwareTesting #Agile #ContinuousDelivery #TestAutomation #DeveloperExperience #EngineeringLeadership #CICD #BreakTheBuild
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Developer: “It works on my system.” QA: “That’s great — but production just found a whole ecosystem.” 🐛 This may look like a meme, but it reflects a deeper truth in every tech organization. Quality isn’t just about code — it’s about ownership, accountability, and user experience. A missed validation or untested scenario can escalate from a minor glitch to a production crisis that affects clients, revenue, and brand trust. That’s why great companies don’t treat testing as a phase — they treat it as a culture. Behind every stable product release, there’s a QA team that questions assumptions, challenges comfort zones, and prevents failures before users ever see them. As teams grow, the real strength lies not in avoiding bugs, but in building systems where quality is everyone’s responsibility. #Leadership #QALife #SoftwareTesting #QualityAssurance #ProductQuality #BugHunting #TechLeadership #TeamCulture #DevVsQA #TestingMindset #BusinessGrowth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💥 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐬 & 𝐐𝐀𝐬: 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐬? It depends on whether your team sees bugs as criticism or collaboration. 🐛🤝 We’ve all been there. The QA logs a “critical defect.” The dev takes it personally. Suddenly, the sprint stand-up feels… tense. 😅 But here’s the truth 👇 It’s all about perspective. Seeing bug reports as system enhancements, not personal attacks. That one mindset shift changes everything. Strong teams thrive on trust. Developers who know QAs are allies. QAs who understand dev challenges. Working towards one shared goal: ✨ Building better software. Blame divides. Insight unites. The best teams? They talk. They listen. They collaborate. Because every “bug” is just a chance to make the product stronger. 💬 What do you think? Are close Dev & QA relationships crucial to team success? Share your experience. I’d love to hear how your team builds trust. #QA #Developers #Teamwork #SoftwareDevelopment #Product #Communication #Leadership #Bugs #Testing #Collaboration #TestExcel
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most QA problems aren’t about tools, but about timing, ownership, and mindset. You can have the best framework, full coverage, and every dashboard in place and still struggle with quality. Because the real blockers usually are: Testing too late: QA joins only before release. Shift testing left. Involve QA from the planning phase, review requirements early, and automate feedback in CI/CD. No shared ownership: Developers code, QA tests, Product manages. Make quality a shared KPI. Flaky automation: Unstable tests kill trust. Prioritize reliability over volume. Stabilize environments, mock external dependencies, and continuously refactor. Wrong metrics: Counting bugs says little about impact. Focus on value metrics. Most critical bugs ae. Communication gaps: QA finds issues late because they weren’t part of the design. Bring QA into discussions early. Align on acceptance criteria and use shared tools for visibility. Speed over stability: Deadlines win over discipline. Build a culture that values quality as velocity. Fast releases are great, but stable releases are sustainable. Quality come from how teams think, collaborate, and measure success. #QualityAssurance #SoftwareTesting #Startup #SoftwareQuality #Leadership #EngineeringCulture
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚨Shipping shouldn’t feel like a fire drill.🚨 This blog post shares 6 lightweight QA habits (shift-left, testing pyramid, CI gates, flags, quick exploratory tests, observability) that turn chaotic launches into calm ones. Read 👉 https://lnkd.in/dRVF5cGY What’s one QA habit you’d never ship without? #QualityAssurance #SoftwareTesting #QA #TestAutomation #DevOps #CICD #EngineeringLeadership #ProductManagement #BugFree #QualityProduct
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development