Doctor Explains Why Scientists Don’t Hide Things. Source- imastroanna on TT University departments are often assessed based on the quality, quantity, and impact of their research outputs, which include published papers, conference presentations, patents, and collaborations. These assessments are typically conducted by national or institutional review bodies and help determine how effectively a department contributes to academic knowledge and innovation. High-quality publications in reputable journals demonstrate research excellence, which strengthens a department’s reputation and supports future funding applications. When departments fail to publish regularly or produce meaningful research, it can raise concerns about productivity and academic relevance. Over time, this may lead to reduced funding or resource allocation, as grants and institutional support are often tied to measurable research performance. In this way, maintaining consistent research output is not only vital for advancing knowledge but also for ensuring the financial sustainability and academic standing of a university department. #science #research #universities
More Relevant Posts
-
🌟 Understanding the Difference Between a Research Gap and a Research Problem 🌟 In academic research, it’s essential to clearly distinguish between a research gap and a research problem — two foundational elements that shape the direction and purpose of any study. 🔹 Research Gap: Represents a missing piece in existing knowledge — what is not yet known. Identifying this gap helps you understand where your research can contribute to the scientific community. 🔹 Research Problem: Represents a specific issue that needs to be addressed — what has not yet been solved. This defines why your study is important and what you aim to achieve. In simple terms: > A research gap guides you toward discovery, while a research problem drives you toward solutions. 🎓 Whether you're a PhD scholar, a postgraduate student, or a researcher, mastering this distinction strengthens the clarity and impact of your research design.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Today number of papers and not research skills matter to many. This is not good for research in the long run. There are instances in west where a single paper, even if thesis not submitted, can earn PhD degree. Quality should guide the research. Quantity can only create hype of research. Further, experience in research should be the guiding factor. #Research #ResearchPaper #ReviewPaper #QuantitativeResearch #QualitativeResearch #PhD
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Is the "publish or perish" mandate for PhD students actually harming research quality? A recent study at a top university found a shocking result: forcing pre-submission publications pushed 75% of students into journals that don't even disseminate new knowledge. The pressure to publish often leads to rushed work in predatory journals, missing the entire point of a PhD. But what if the secret to producing high-quality papers was to stop focusing on them? In a thought-provoking article, Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar argues that the primary goal of a PhD is to make unique contributions to knowledge; publications are a natural by-product of this effort, not a prerequisite. Here’s a breakdown of the argument: The Unproductive Rule: Forcing publication before thesis submission often leads to students publishing in predatory or non-indexed journals simply to meet a requirement. This doesn't contribute to high-quality research. The Process is Too Slow: A single paper can take 4-6 months for a first review, followed by several more months of revisions. Linking this lengthy, unpredictable process to a PhD submission creates undue pressure and encourages corner-cutting. A Better System for Quality: Instead of a publication mandate, the focus should be on strengthening the PhD process itself. This includes: Close mentorship from supervisors. Regular presentations and feedback from a Research Advisory Committee (RAC). Rigorous evaluation by two external examiners. A comprehensive viva-voce defense. The author's conclusion is powerful: "We need to encourage students to become inquisitive explorers... and the publication of research papers... will naturally result from this". Focus on quality, and the publications will follow. #PhDLife #AcademicTwitter #Research #PublishOrPerish #Academia #GradSchool #HigherEducation #PhDStudent #ScienceCommunication
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🎓 Another exciting initiative from CEEAplA! The SHARP-T Workshop Series (Scientific Hands-on Approaches for Research and Publication Training) is coming soon — an initiative designed to provide practical training in qualitative and quantitative methodologies applied to scientific research. 🔬 The series will include several sessions aimed at those who wish to enhance their research and academic publishing skills through a dynamic and collaborative approach. To launch this series, we will welcome a very special guest — editor of indexed scientific journals and an outstanding researcher with international recognition. 🌍✨ Stay tuned for more updates coming soon! #CEEAplA #UniversityoftheAzores #Research #Workshop #SHARPT #ScientificTraining #AcademicPublishing #Methodology
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
"Citations: Between Quality and Manipulation" Citations are widely regarded as a key indicator of the quality and scholarly impact of scientific research. However, this quantitative metric does not necessarily capture the true scientific value of a study. While a high citation count is often assumed to reflect a researcher's influence and contribution to advancing knowledge in their field, certain practices have emerged that compromise the objectivity of this measure. Among these are reciprocal citation arrangements between scholars, frequently aimed at inflating performance metrics to secure promotions or enhance institutional rankings. To mitigate such distortions, practical measures can be adopted. These include reducing the emphasis on citation counts as a primary criterion for academic evaluation—thus preventing the scholarly community from being misled by research of limited value—and implementing robust deterrents to curb the manipulation of citations among researchers.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
PhD Students / Researchers – How to get your journal article published? 𝟓 𝐤𝐞𝐲 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞. 1. Publications are important for PhDs and academics 2. Assess rejection risk before submission. 3. Carefully select a suitable journal for submission. 4. Before submission, read journal's submission guideline. 5. Determine whether the journal is single/double blind. Any other point you'd like to add? #phd #research #publication
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Within the scholarly community, published research resides at the end of a major research cycle. Research journal articles are part of the established scientific knowledge that provides the foundation for future research and scholarship. As a result, a robust peer review process is of the utmost importance to ensure a research manuscript can adequately contribute to that knowledge. The peer review process ensures that published research is robust and of significant interest to researchers. #dissertationschedule #dissertation #proposal #researchtopic #dissertationplanning #graduatestudent #doctoralstudent #students #coursework #sources #researchstudy #highereducation #literature #researchproblem #researchdesigns #Methodology
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Journals from all over the world give researchers a global perspective on essential topics. This is one example of how Academic Search Ultimate supports faculty, students, and researchers with the largest collection of global, multidisciplinary content. Download our infographic to learn more about its role in supporting multidisciplinary research: https://m.ebsco.is/uje0U
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 New publication alert! I’m pleased to share my new paper, “Is academic freedom associated with strong science? Evidence from a cross-national time-series analysis,” published in the International Journal of Educational Research. Using data from 119 countries between 1996 and 2021, the study shows that higher levels of academic freedom are linked to stronger scientific performance in subsequent years, measured by the citation impact of publications. The effect is robust across 2–5-year time lags and is particularly evident in countries where academic freedom is already moderate or high. These findings suggest that academic freedom is not only a core academic value but also a structural condition that enables high-quality science. The article is available with free access for 50 days here: https://lnkd.in/eM3em9Sk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Some nuggets of wisdom in this article which will be needed if we want to make organization research more relevant to practice than to just academicians. The authors compare the field with research practices in other fields like medicine which allows for theoretical contribution to happen separately and not from each and every paper (which has been the primary expectation of organization journals)... from the paper..."Rather than expecting every study to contribute by way of theoretical novelty, researchers could focus on discovering and validating evidence for our scientific enterprise systematically, acknowledging that substantive theoretical insights typically emerge from synthesized evidence rather than being a prerequisite for each individual paper." https://lnkd.in/g7x9MNVe
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development