Citations: A flawed measure of scientific quality

It appears the Minister of Science has been listening to what actual scientists have been saying and science funding will be removed from organisations with ideological goals and handed to one with that is designed to value actual scientific research. This is not only going to be great for the actual scientists doing the work, but all of the students coming through high school and university now looking for a career in the sciences. https://lnkd.in/gHJrvtBQ

Doctor Explains Why Scientists Don’t Hide Things. Source- imastroanna on TT University departments are often assessed based on the quality, quantity, and impact of their research outputs, which include published papers, conference presentations, patents, and collaborations. These assessments are typically conducted by national or institutional review bodies and help determine how effectively a department contributes to academic knowledge and innovation. High-quality publications in reputable journals demonstrate research excellence, which strengthens a department’s reputation and supports future funding applications. When departments fail to publish regularly or produce meaningful research, it can raise concerns about productivity and academic relevance. Over time, this may lead to reduced funding or resource allocation, as grants and institutional support are often tied to measurable research performance. In this way, maintaining consistent research output is not only vital for advancing knowledge but also for ensuring the financial sustainability and academic standing of a university department. #science #research #universities

The lack of direct money for scientific research means that all research gets pre-screened by reviewers through proposals. This is born out of a negative sentiment: the fear that scientists would otherwise waste time on nonsense. But the process means that the level of ambition of research has to be lowered to a level that an average scientist considers feasible. This stands in the way of truly ambitious research and levels science down to the middle-of-the-road.

Some nuggets of wisdom in this article which will be needed if we want to make organization research more relevant to practice than to just academicians. The authors compare the field with research practices in other fields like medicine which allows for theoretical contribution to happen separately and not from each and every paper (which has been the primary expectation of organization journals)... from the paper..."Rather than expecting every study to contribute by way of theoretical novelty, researchers could focus on discovering and validating evidence for our scientific enterprise systematically, acknowledging that substantive theoretical insights typically emerge from synthesized evidence rather than being a prerequisite for each individual paper." https://lnkd.in/g7x9MNVe

Local and international scholars have remarkably contrasting interests in terms of research topics, as local scholars are deeply invested in revealing the intricate threads of their own histories and cultures, while international scholars traverse regional boundaries and engage in macro-level discussion to explore scientific questions. This diversity is also found in their journal selection preferences, with local scholars focusing on local journals and international scholars preferring high-impact international journals. This findings seem to apply to many other acadeic fields. https://lnkd.in/gmf4AVuZ

A total of 62 researchers from Chonnam National University (CNU) have been listed among the “2025 World’s Top 2% Scientists,” reaffirming the university’s global research excellence. The list, jointly announced by global information analytics and academic publishing company Elsevier and Stanford University in the United States, identifies researchers from 22 scientific fields and 174 subfields who have published at least five papers. Based on citation data from the prestigious Scopus database, the selection comprehensively evaluates citation impact and influence, recognizing those who are considered leading scientists in their respective disciplines worldwide. Researchers are ranked in two categories: the career dataset, reflecting lifetime achievements, and the single-year (2024) dataset, reflecting research performance during the year 2024. As a result, 31 researchers from CNU were listed in the career category, and 53 in the 2024 single-year category. Among them, 22 researchers were recognized in both categories, demonstrating their continued excellence in research. CNU Research Director Yoon-Seong Lee stated, “This achievement is a testament to the world-class quality of our university’s researchers. We will continue to actively support creative and challenging research endeavors and strive to foster a global-level research environment.”

Learn from the Master Researchers "The Research Methodology" which shall be the Concrete Base for your Academic and industry research work

Universities are justifiably concerned about the impact of federal cuts to science funding. But what is really at stake for society if these cuts diminish our research output? Jay Akridge and I have a two part series highlighting the evidence on the value of university research. Part 1 focuses on commercialization. https://lnkd.in/gxh-49pA

Great piece by Jay Akridge and David Hummels! It’s got me thinking that the technology created by Research Software Engineers (RSEs), often in open-source form, may be the modern “calculus” underpinning science. Today’s open software frameworks, data platforms, and computational tools quietly power the breakthroughs that follow. The return isn’t always captured in patents or startups…it’s in the spillovers: the shared, open foundations that make progress possible!

Journals from all over the world give researchers a global perspective on essential topics. This is one example of how Academic Search Ultimate supports faculty, students, and researchers with the largest collection of global, multidisciplinary content. Download our infographic to learn more about its role in supporting multidisciplinary research: https://m.ebsco.is/uje0U