Aligning Tech Innovation with Sustainability Goals

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Sheri R. Hinish

    Trusted C-Suite Advisor in Transformation | Global Leader in Sustainability, AI, Sustainable Supply Chain, and Innovation | Board Director | Creator | Keynote Speaker + Podcast Host | Building Tech for Impact

    60,643 followers

    What if the key to achieving our global sustainability goals isn’t just more renewable energy or circular economy practices but the criticality of deploying AI, too? A new 2025 study published in Nature reveals that AI investment is a powerful accelerator for UN Sustainable Development Goals in the US. Here’s what every supply chain and sustainability leader needs to know: 1) AI drives measurable sustainability progress: Every 1% increase in AI investment correlates with a 0.26% improvement in SDG performance, proving technology can be a force multiplier for environmental and social impact. 2) Green electricity amplifies results: The study confirms that renewable energy and AI create a powerful synergy effect, with both factors independently boosting sustainability outcomes. 3) Economic growth paradox: Traditional GDP growth actually negatively impacts SDG scores, highlighting why we need smarter, not just bigger, economic models. 4) Innovation over expansion: The research validates that strategic technology investments outperform pure economic expansion for sustainable development. Supply Chain Implications: From my perspective leading supply chain transformation, this research validates what we’re seeing in practice: - Precision agriculture powered by AI is revolutionizing food system sustainability - Smart energy grids are optimizing renewable resource allocation - Predictive analytics in healthcare is improving access and outcomes - Supply chain optimization is reducing waste and emissions at scale The Critical Caveat: The study emphasizes that AI’s sustainability impact depends ENTIRELY on responsible deployment. What does that mean? -Robust data infrastructure -Ethical oversight frameworks -Equitable access to benefits -Strong governance structures Bottom Line for Leaders: This isn’t about choosing between profit and planet. It’s about leveraging intelligent technology to achieve both. Companies investing in AI for sustainability aren’t just future proofing their operations. They’re actively contributing to global development goals. How is your organization balancing AI innovation with sustainability objectives? What barriers are you encountering? I hope you find this research and perspective useful.

  • View profile for Rochelle March

    Impact-Driven GTM & Product Strategy | AI x DeepTech x Sustainability

    11,446 followers

    AI is here to stay. The question is: How do we make it work for sustainability, not against it? Engaging with clients and colleagues, I’ve heard a wide range of concerns—energy consumption, ethical usage, and even fears of AI displacing human labor. But beyond the headlines, we’re at a crossroads where sustainability & AI intersect—bringing both challenges and transformative opportunities. Like past general-purpose technologies—from the steam engine to the internet—the potential is enormous, but its impact is still unfolding. So what should our goal be? → Minimize the harm. Maximize the benefit. I’ve been working on a graduate-level curriculum & workshop exploring the concepts below, some obvious and some with immense nuance. I’d love to hear where the sustainability community stands on these key issues: Key Challenges: •  High Energy & Resource Use – AI infrastructure (data centers) requires massive electricity & water, raising sustainability concerns. •  Data Gaps – Many sustainability applications rely on high-quality data, but AI models often face bias, inaccessibility, or limitations in key areas like biodiversity & climate science. •  Policy & Governance – The lack of clear regulations can lead to environmental inefficiencies, ethical risks, and unintended consequences. •  Unequal Access – AI-driven solutions are concentrated in high-income countries, leaving underserved regions without critical technology. •  Community Impacts – AI data centers can strain local resources and face challenges related to land use, energy consumption, and social acceptance. Key Opportunities: • Optimizing Complex Systems – AI helps us measure, predict & optimize sustainability efforts by leveraging massive datasets. • Accelerating Innovation – AI fast-tracks discoveries in materials science, e-waste recycling, precision agriculture & more. • Workforce Empowerment – AI closes knowledge gaps, automates routine tasks & improves decision-making across industries. • Enhancing Risk & Resilience – AI-powered models predict extreme weather, optimize disaster preparedness & manage resources. • Driving the Energy Transition – AI improves grid management, boosts energy efficiency & accelerates renewables adoption. A Few Thought-Starters: 💧 Google used 5.2B gallons of water globally for data centers in 2022—a staggering number, but also less than 0.5% of the water used for California’s almond farming. 🔋 AI's energy demands have caused Google & Microsoft emissions to rise—but tech is one of the largest drivers of renewable energy demand. Can we ultimately decarbonize the electrons that are in demand? 🛠️ McKinsey predicted that 30% of work hours across the economy could be automated by 2030. The number is debatable but the question is whether this will create job losses or more productivity—or something else entirely. I think AI & sustainability don’t have to be at odds—together they can be transformational. Intentional strategy & action are key.

  • View profile for Lisa Sachs

    Director, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment & Columbia Climate School MS in Climate Finance

    24,889 followers

    As #datacenters scale rapidly to support #AI, cloud computing, and other digital services, much has been written about whether existing grids can meet the surge in electricity demand—and whether emissions will spike, since most grids remain carbon intensive. This outlook - focusing on the risks and challenges of data center growth - misses the transformative role that data centers and technology companies could play in accelerating national and regional energy, climate, and sustainable development goals. In our new blog, Perrine Toledano, Bradford M. Willis and I explain how #hyperscalers can help resolve the very constraints that are slowing the energy transition and undermining broader climate and development goals. Specifically, hyperscalers can uniquely: 🔹 reduce investment risks and marginal costs for new clean grid infrastructure, as large, predictable off-takers 🔹 create financeable demand for large-scale energy storage. Storage integration - which strengthens grid reliability and resilience - has been hard to finance because of uncertain revenue streams. 🔹 expand access to water and thermal systems through shared-use infrastructure platforms, learning from successful models in other sectors like mining 🔹 deploy rapidly-evolving AI and digital tools to increase energy efficiency, manage energy demand, streamline interconnection, lower system costs, and optimize maintenance, among other evolving functions, and 🔹 expand access to broadband and digital services, closing the persistent digital divide, and bringing transformative benefits in health, education, agriculture, and financial inclusion to underserved communities. These benefits are happening already in ad hoc ways - but could be massively scaled when embedded in strategic policy frameworks and coordinated with public and private partners. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/ea6vMMaG Side note: our current focus on carbon footprinting has distracted from—rather than supported—tech firms’ transformative potential. While footprinting can provide a useful snapshot of emissions/exposure/influence, our over-emphasis on emissions reporting has crowded out any discussion of strategic systemic integration and even creates perverse incentives. The over-reliance on footprinting as the key metric has also very predictably led to myriad illegitimate practices, including 'offsetting' emissions with unbundled RECs or dubious carbon credits, and other accounting loopholes (see yet another timely, insightful article from Simon Mundy on big tech's climate claims: https://lnkd.in/eNvtGxGu). Let's shift the focus to encouraging tech firms to engage in strategic public/private cooperation in grid design and expansion, financing solutions, and expanded digital inclusion -- optimizing transformative digital innovations for societal and planetary benefit.

Explore categories