Account-Based Sales Playbook Tactics

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Andrew Mewborn
    Andrew Mewborn Andrew Mewborn is an Influencer

    founder @ distribute.so | The simplest way to follow up with prospects...fast

    217,441 followers

    "Deal's looking good. I'm in with the CMO." A colleague shared his excitement. I rolled my little eyeballs. "What?" he asked, confused. "Single-threaded deals die," I replied. Three weeks later: "CMO went on leave. Deal's stalled." I wasn't surprised. The average B2B purchase now involves 11+ stakeholders. Yet most reps are still playing the "one relationship" game. Old playbook: Find one champion. Let them "sell internally" for you. Hope for the best. Failure rate? About 80%. A recent client win taught me the better approach: Initial call with the VP of Sales. Great fit, but I asked: "Who else needs to be comfortable with this decision?" The list: - CRO (economic buyer) - IT Director (technical approval) - Sales Enablement (implementation) - 2 Regional VPs (end users) That's 6 people. Each with different: - Priorities - Objections - Questions Rather than pestering my champion to coordinate everything... I created a single digital room with: - Role-specific sections for each stakeholder - Tailored ROI calculations for the CRO - Security documentation for IT - Implementation timeline for Enablement - Quick-start guides for the Regional VPs My champion shared the link. The magic happened silently: Analytics showed the CRO viewed the ROI calculator 5 times. The IT Director spent 15 minutes on security docs. Both Regional VPs watched the training videos. I hadn't spoken to any of them directly. But they were all selling themselves. When we finally had the "decision call," everyone was already aligned. No last-minute objections. No mysterious "other stakeholders." No surprises. Here's what changed: Old approach: Pray your champion effectively represents you to people you never meet. New approach: Give every stakeholder what they need, even without direct access. Multi-threading isn't about scheduling more calls. It's about making yourself irrelevant to the process. The best deals close when stakeholders convince themselves...without you in the room. Are you still gambling on single-threaded relationships? Or building networks that sell for you? Agree?

  • View profile for Shiyam Sunder
    Shiyam Sunder Shiyam Sunder is an Influencer

    Founder - TripleDart | Ex- Remote.com, Freshworks, Zoho| SaaS Demand Generation

    20,180 followers

    𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗧𝗠 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 $𝟭𝟬𝟬𝗸+ 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘀. The rules have changed—are you ready? It used to be exclusive—reserved for those massive, high-value accounts. Why? Because it was too manual, too expensive, and too hard to scale. But today, the game is different. With account data becoming more accessible (almost a commodity now) and AI tools automating deep account research, we can shift our focus. 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗥𝗠. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗼 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 *𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆* 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁-𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁—𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝘀𝗵. Sounds exciting, right? But let’s not sugarcoat it: pivoting to ABM is brutal. There are no real playbooks, and tactical resources are painfully scarce. But when we did, the results were jaw-dropping: → $350k in pipeline in just 90 days. → $7 in pipeline generated for every $1 spent. We are doubling down now—and shared the guide Here’s our ABM checklist: 1. Define your ABM goals & leading metrics. 2. Choose a level of personalization: 1:1, 1:few, 1:many. 3. Set up campaigns: account stages, scoring, and duration. 4. Select channels (LinkedIn was our starting point). 5. Build your target list: accounts, personas, etc. 6. Prep content, messaging, and ad formats. 7. Approve budget & resources. 8. Onboard tools/vendors to handle each ABM element. 9. Set up dashboards to track performance. Our unbundled tech stack? ~$1k/month across 8 tools: → HubSpot, Clay, BuiltWith, Apollo.io for list building. → Factors for ad pilot → ZenABM/Fibbler for intent recognition → Smartlead for prospecting. ABM isn’t easy, but the rules have changed. With the right tools, strategies, and mindset, it’s no longer just for the $100k+ deals. What’s stopping you from making the shift? #abm #marketing #gtm #saas

  • View profile for Nate Nasralla
    Nate Nasralla Nate Nasralla is an Influencer

    Co-Founder @ Fluint | Simplifying complex sales I Author of Selling With I "Dad" to Olli, the AI agent for B2B teams

    80,912 followers

    Here's a breakdown of what an Account-Based Sales model looks like. Designed to drive up win % while landing logos at a higher ACV $ upfront. The big idea: every deal gets a tailored set of account-specific docs, guiding a customer's buying process from problem → outcome. _____ → STAGES & FRAMEWORKS: - BDR/AE's collab on a research-backed POV + draft account plan ↓ - Which drives tailored outreach to engage buying teams execs early ↓ - Buying group collabs on a problem statement, mapped to the priority ↓ - SE's get a pre-demo brief, with a storyline scripted around this ↓ - AE's customer inputs above into a full biz case with target outcomes ↓ - Sales leaders get a written deal brief to spot gaps in < 60 seconds ↓ - Go-live plan shows a path from commercials to customer outcome ↓ - CS gets a handoff doc to guide transition post-sales ↓ - AM's get a written case for expansion to drive upsells Here, you're capturing each customer’s journey in a set of “living” docs that evolve and flow into each other: POV ↓ Account Plan ↓ Demo Brief ↓ Business Case ↓ Leader's Deal Brief ↓ Mutual Success Plan ↓ CS Handoff Doc 100% tailored for each account. Grab a set of editable frameworks for these here: https://lnkd.in/gG3XRbT2 ______ → PRINCIPLES: Written docs are the “container” your process lives in, because: (1) Content = context. Think of it like those Russian nesting dolls — each doc has context from the last doc nested inside the next one. e.g. POV drives a problem statement, that sits in the full biz case, which is context for a go-live plan, etc. (2) Content is evidence. It’s concrete, not abstract: - Less, "It was a good meeting, they're interested." - More, "Here are redlines adding data to our problem statement." It’s how we see where, exactly, a customer is in the buying journey. While making it visible to everyone. (3) Content is influence. It's in the room when you can't be. Scripting internal convo's happening about you, without you. ______ → EXECUTION: This isn't just for key accounts. It scales downmarket, too. It's why Fluint's AI is built around the first "living doc" that writes, learns, and redlines itself inside every deal  (see it here: fluint.io ) Letting you treat every account, like a key account.

Explore categories