A new battery is rising — and it works by dropping 50-ton blocks into old mine shafts to light up the grid. Around the world, renewable energy is gaining momentum, but there’s still a problem no one has solved completely — storage. Solar and wind energy aren’t always available when demand is high, and lithium-ion batteries, while helpful, come with environmental downsides and a limited lifespan. Enter a radically different concept that uses no chemicals, no flames, and no lithium: gravity. The idea is surprisingly elegant. You lift a huge weight when there’s extra energy on the grid — storing potential energy. When energy is needed later, the weight is dropped, spinning a generator as it falls. That motion produces electricity on demand. It’s a battery that charges by lifting and discharges by dropping. This principle is already used in pumped hydroelectric stations, but gravity batteries don’t need lakes or rivers. They just need height and mass — things like steel blocks and vertical shafts. This makes them far more flexible. They can be placed in old buildings, custom towers, or even underground. Scotland’s Gravitricity is leading this field. In a recent test, they used a 250 kW system to lift and drop 50-ton weights, successfully powering machinery with precision. Their next step? Transforming abandoned mine shafts into vertical energy storage systems. These shafts — once used for coal — could now help store wind and solar energy. Because these systems rely on simple mechanical parts, they don’t degrade like batteries. They last decades. There’s no risk of fire, no chemical leakage, and no rare-earth metals required. In a world trying to reduce waste, that’s a massive advantage. This is renewable energy storage that doesn’t fight nature — it works with it.
Sustainable Energy Storage Solutions
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Over the weekend I had a chance to dive into an Ember report from last month that didn’t receive enough attention. The premise of the study is this: How much solar plus storage is needed to support a 1 kW continuous 24/7 load? And is it cost-competitive with alternatives? For US cities with good solar irradiance, the answer is 5 kW plus 17 kWh of energy storage sustains 1 kW loads for a very high percentage of the time and at competitive costs. For Las Vegas, the economics work currently, while in cities like Washington DC, costs need to continue to improve for this to make sense (See figure below). But in a world where firm capacity is increasingly valuable and natural gas & nuclear plants have very long lead times, 24/7 solar plus storage deserves a hard look, especially for #datacenters. Yes, this approach gets more expensive in lower irradiance locations and there will be shortfalls (see second graphic) but couple this approach with the concept of variable large loads per Duke University “Rethinking Load Growth” by Tyler Norris et al, and we have solutions. In addition, legacy #naturalgas plants can more efficiently plug shortfalls with this approach, by running longer to charge longer duration #energystorage vs. turning on/off to address short-term peaks. The Ember analysis focuses on existing technology and market conditions (LFP BESS, 2025 costs), so the results are particularly compelling. And the 1.7 GWh #battery for a 100 MW #datacenter campus equals one day of current global gigafactory output. When I independently looked at the cost (back of the envelope – see Table in graphic), the math checks out. The Ember report calculates $104/MWh LCOE, while my results showed $112/MWh with 30% ITC. [Note: estimate limitations include uncertain FEOC restrictions and tariffs). Compare these numbers to what Microsoft is paying for a 20-year PPA with Constellation to restart the Three Mile Island #nuclear plant (for 835 MW 24/7 power). Microsoft will pay $110–115/MWh for 20 years. Thus, the #solar plus storage solution is cost competitive. But does this solution just pencil in Las Vegas? No, the 5-to-1 PV-to-load plus 17 kWh-per-kW battery rule works today in one-fifth of the 50 largest U.S. cities, including: Phoenix (1.7 million people); San Diego (1.4 million); El Paso (680k), Tucson, Fresno, Sacramento, Mesa, and Albuquerque (all ≈ 500k). Data Center developers take note. References in comments. #sustainability #renewableenergy
-
Revolutionizing Energy Storage: Exowatt’s Heat Battery Tech Alex Wilhelm and Exowatt's Hannan P. discuss Exowatt’s innovative energy solution for data centers and industrial use. • Modular Power System: Each unit, the size of a 40-ft shipping container, collects solar energy through custom lenses and stores it as high-temperature heat. • Breakthrough Heat Battery: Unlike traditional lithium-ion batteries, Exowatt’s solid-state heat battery stores energy cheaply, without chemical reactions or degradation, maintaining efficiency over time. • Game-Changing Cost: This system enables 24-hour renewable power dispatch at a fraction of the cost—targeting the elusive 1 cent per kilowatt-hour goal. A transformative approach to powering the energy-intensive future of AI and data centers.
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development