Manual versus automated tuning
Manual tuning involves adjusting hyperparameters based on intuition, experience, and gradual experimentation. Manual tuning allows you to leverage domain knowledge to explore tailored configurations systematically, but it is time-intensive, prone to suboptimal results, and inefficient in exploring large hyperparameter spaces.
Automated tuning, on the other hand, uses algorithms to systematically explore the hyperparameter space. Automated tuning efficiently explores large hyperparameter spaces using algorithms to optimize performance, saving time and effort compared to manual tuning, but it can be computationally expensive and may require expertise to configure properly.
Manual tuning is useful when domain knowledge or intuition can guide a small, targeted search space, especially in resource-constrained settings or for simpler models. Automated tuning is better for large, complex hyperparameter spaces where systematic exploration and optimization...