Evaluating quality and ethical considerations
Evaluating the quality of ReWOO’s reasoning can be challenging as it often deals with hypothetical scenarios. Possible approaches include the following:
- Human evaluation: Using human experts to assess the coherence, relevance, and completeness of the generated plans and reasoning
- Comparison with ground truth: For scenarios with known outcomes, ReWOO’s predictions can be compared with actual results
- Benchmarking: Using standardized test sets designed to evaluate abstract reasoning and planning capabilities
It is also crucial to keep ethical considerations in mind while doing any evaluation:
- Bias amplification: ReWOO might inherit and amplify biases present in the training data of the underlying LLM
- Misuse potential: The ability to generate plans and reason about hypothetical scenarios could be misused for malicious purposes
- Overreliance: Users might place too much trust in ReWOO’...