Fatigue Analysis
in ASME B31.3 Piping
Nigel Marsh
Chief Pipe Stress Analysis Engineer
Worley Parsons Australia
Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
Content
ASME B31.3
Typical Fatigue Offshore Oil and Gas
Fatigue approach using pressure vessel code
Fatigue evaluation example
Intergraph 2014
ASME B31.3
Stresses Types
Sustained
Occasional
Displacement stress range
At fittings and discontinuities SIFs increase stresses for weld system
Intergraph 2014
ASME B31.3
Stress range factor corrects for cycles
ASME B31.3 now limits Sc, Sh to 138MPa
Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue Offshore Oil & Gas
Conductors and Risers
Wave and current move conductor relative to the platform
Conductor guide gaps limit relative movement
Wave motion causes high cycle fatigue loading in piping
Wellhead vertical growth low cycle fatigue loading in piping
Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue Offshore Oil & Gas
Bridge piping
Platforms can move relative to each other
Bridge pinned one end, sliding other
Piping must absorb relative movement
Variable amplitude high cycle fatigue
Thermal expansion low cycle fatigue
Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue Offshore Oil & Gas
FPSOs
Ship hull motion and acceleration causes high cycle fatigue loading in
piping
Many permutations of the different motions and accelerations
Variable amplitude high cycle fatigue
Thermal expansion low cycle fatigue
Intergraph 2014
Fatigue approach using pressure
vessel code
This discussion is limited to static analysis only, not dynamic
analysis
Identify fatigue loadings on piping.
Thermal
Pressure
Wave loading
Movements
Accelerations
FPSO cargo loading/unloading
Operational / Transport
Identify cycles for each load.
Wave induced loading may be defined for a design condition with
the majority of cycles at a significantly less load
Intergraph 2014
Fatigue approach using pressure
vessel code
Build CAESAR II model including fatigue loadings
Build load cases in CAESAR II to reflect loads
Decide which pressure vessel code to use to evaluate fatigue
Select fatigue curve for welded system
Design Fatigue Factor
Factor of safety for uncertainties in fatigue analysis
Some operating companies specify
EN13445 requires inspection at 20% of fatigue life, DFF 5.0
DNV offshore structural code has requirements that are sometimes
used
Intergraph 2014
Pressure vessel codes
EN13445 Unfired pressure vessels - Part 3: Design
EN13445 uses equivalent stress range ( 2 x shear stress )
Load cases in CAESAR II must be the stress range
Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II fatigue load case
Fatigue load (FAT) cases in CAESAR II calculate the Stress
Intensity
CAESAR II Config file, SIFs and Stresses
Max 3D Shear Tresca
VonMises Maximum distortion energy theory
Removes corrosion allowance to calculate stresses
Refer to CAESAR II users guide stress formulation.
Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II fatigue load case
Refer to CAESAR II users guide stress formulation.
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
18.10.1.2 Classification of weld details to be assessed using
equivalent stress range - Table 18-4.
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Classification of weld
details for supports
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Correction factors
Deviations from design shape (Ovality, weld misalignment)
Material thickness (typically > 25 mm)
Temperature
Corrosion
NDT
Elastic / plastic behaviour
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Simplified counting method
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Simplified counting method
Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Simplified counting method
Intergraph 2014
Cumulative Fatigue Damage
ASME B31.3 and vessel codes evaluate cumulative damage in the
same way
Each Di = ni/Ni is the damage from a fatigue load
Where; n = number of applied cycles
N = allowed cycles at a given stress
Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Evaluation Example
Example typical bridge piping connecting two offshore platforms
Identify loads
Build CAESAR II model
Build load cases to calculate fatigue stress ranges
Constant amplitude Thermal, Pressure
Variable amplitude platform movements due to waves.
Use relationship between stress and loading
Assume to be linear in this example.
Consider nonlinear affects in CAESAR II model
Elastic - plastic check
Cumulative fatigue damage
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
Loadings
Thermal expansion; -10 to 100C, 1560 cycles
Relative platform movement; 100 year return period storm, movements
in various directions
Wave induced loading simplified in this example
Pressure vessel code ; EN13445
Design Fatigue Factor 3.0 as the piping is difficult to inspect
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II model
Temperature T3 -10, T2 100C
Displacements D1 North/South 350mm, D2 East/West 700mm
Apply displacements to support CNodes
Consider nonlinear aspects of model, include friction, exclude
guide gaps
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II model
s
ide
s
p
)
To
e en d
g
d
i
Br iding
l
(S
North
Fixed point
in model
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II fatigue allowable stress
Fatigue data to include correct factors
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II load cases
Load case for full fatigue stress range
D1 & D2 are half the displacement stress range from movements
1 (OPE) W+T1+P1
2 (OPE) W+T2+P1
3 (OPE) W+T3
- Operating temp
- Max design temp
- Min design temp
4 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1
5 (OPE) W-D1+T1+P1
6 (OPE) W+D2+T1+P1
7 (OPE) W-D2+T1+P1
8 (SUS) W+P1
9 (EXP) L9=L2-L3
10 (FAT) L10=L2-L3 (1560 cycles)
11 (FAT) L11=L4-L5 (3.28E7 cycles)
12 (FAT) L12=L6-L7 (1.12E8 cycles)
Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II output reports
Single fatigue load case
Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II output reports
Cumulative damage report
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
Fatigue assessment including wave height distribution
Start with assumption that max stress in all fatigue load cases are at
same location for all fatigue loads.
The following example is simplified
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II results
Intergraph 2014
Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
Elastic - Plastic check
ASME B31.3 displacement stress range check
EN13445
Intergraph 2014
Summary
ASME B31.3 has limitations for high cycle fatigue analysis
Define fatigue loadings and associated cycles
Select fatigue approach / code
Select fatigue curve for piping butt weld
Apply fatigue curve correction factors
Use CAESAR II to calculate stresses required
Evaluate cumulative damage
Document, method, assumptions and results
Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
Thank You
Nigel Marsh
Chief Pipe Stress Analysis Engineer
Worley Parsons Australia
Intergraph 2014
