Scribd
Upload
45 views3 pages

Crosstabs: (Dataset1) C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/Ipeh - Sav

The document contains summaries of crosstab analyses examining the relationships between various factors (IMT, smoking status, occupational factors) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in a sample of 80 cases. The crosstabs show that the majority with overweight IMT experienced MSDs (9 out of 9). The majority of smokers also experienced MSDs (71 out of 75). While occupational factors of very high or high risk were mostly associated with MSDs, medium and low risk factors showed a more even split between those with and without MSDs. Chi-square tests found no statistically significant relationships between the factors and MSDs.

Uploaded by

sszh_
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
45 views3 pages

Crosstabs: (Dataset1) C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/Ipeh - Sav

The document contains summaries of crosstab analyses examining the relationships between various factors (IMT, smoking status, occupational factors) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in a sample of 80 cases. The crosstabs show that the majority with overweight IMT experienced MSDs (9 out of 9). The majority of smokers also experienced MSDs (71 out of 75). While occupational factors of very high or high risk were mostly associated with MSDs, medium and low risk factors showed a more even split between those with and without MSDs. Chi-square tests found no statistically significant relationships between the factors and MSDs.

Uploaded by

sszh_
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Crosstabs

[DataSet1] C:\Users\Dell\Downloads\ipeh.sav

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

IMT * MSDs

80

100,0%

0,0%

80

100,0%

Merokok * MSDs

80

100,0%

0,0%

80

100,0%

Faktor_Pekerjaan * MSDs

80

100,0%

0,0%

80

100,0%

IMT * MSDs
Crosstab
MSDs
Ya
IMT

Overweight

Count
% within IMT

Normal

Underweight

Total

100,0%

0,0%

100,0%

62

66

93,9%

6,1%

100,0%

80,0%

20,0%

100,0%

75

80

93,8%

6,3%

100,0%

Count
% within IMT
Count
% within IMT

Total

Count
% within IMT

Tidak

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

2,217a

,330

Likelihood Ratio

2,223

,329

Linear-by-Linear Association

1,908

,167

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

80

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is ,31.

Merokok * MSDs

Crosstab
MSDs
Ya
Merokok

Ya

Count
% within Merokok

Tidak

Total

75

94,7%

5,3%

100,0%

80,0%

20,0%

100,0%

75

80

93,8%

6,3%

100,0%

Count
% within Merokok

Total

71

Count
% within Merokok

Tidak

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

1,721a

,190

,128

,721

1,170

,279

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

,282
1,699

,192

80

a. 3 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

,282

Faktor_Pekerjaan * MSDs
Crosstab
MSDs
Ya
Faktor_Pekerjaan

Sangat Tinggi

Count
% within Faktor_Pekerjaan

Tinggi

Count
% within Faktor_Pekerjaan

Sedang

Count
% within Faktor_Pekerjaan

Rendah

Count
% within Faktor_Pekerjaan

Total

Count
% within Faktor_Pekerjaan

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

3,588a

,310

Likelihood Ratio

3,748

,290

Linear-by-Linear Association

2,151

,143

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

80

a. 6 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is ,13.

Tidak

Total

100,0%

0,0%

100,0%

43

44

97,7%

2,3%

100,0%

28

32

87,5%

12,5%

100,0%

100,0%

0,0%

100,0%

75

80

93,8%

6,3%

100,0%

You might also like