The First Battle of
GROZNY
Decembre 1994 - January 1995
Lieutenant-General Yakovleff (FRA-AR),
VCOS SHAPE
SHAPE Military History Society lecture
28 January 2016
Framing the topic
First Battle of GROZNY
and not War of Chechnia
Lessons learned of the battle and
not of the campaign
Grozny
A Russian Victory
OUTLINE
The spiral leading to war
Act One : failure
31 Decembre 1994 - 3 January 1995
Act Two : revenge
5 January - 13 March 1995
Lessons learned
GROZNY
500 000 inhabitants
250 km2
7 x 9 km
123 accesses
a pipeline
refineries
Fifth attempt 26 November 1994
Chechen elements supported by
Russian special forces
spontaneous, overwhelming reaction of
pro-independence Chechens
20 Russian nationals captured
Yeltsin ultimatum
29 November 1994
1 December : first air and
artillery bombardments
11 December : Yeltsin deploys thousands
of troops
13 December : extension of operations to
all Chechnia (heavy losses)
30,000 men
Three chains of command
Extension of conflict
Phase 1 : isolate
MOZDOK
(3 days)
Phase 2: penetrate
(2 days)
KIZLYAR
VLADIKAVKAZ
Phase 3: sweep to the
South (5-10 days)
Phase 4: clear
The Russian Plan
Avoid pitched
battle
Harass MVD
troops and
rear
First
resistance on
the outskirts
of Grozny
Bait the force
into town
The Chechen Plan
Decentralised
combat in
town
Preliminary Operations
Air operations involving the whole
Air Force
Up to 4,000 arty rounds per day
30,000 Russians against 15,000
Chechens
And yet, only 6,000 Russians
entered Grozny
Disaster on
1 January
31 December:
attempted raid
3 January: attack
repulsed
1st Battalion
131st Bde
Makop
800 casualties out of 1,000
men
20 tanks out of 26
102 IFVs out of 120
RUSSIAN SIDE
No unity of command
Over-optimistic
planning
Heterogeneous units,
poor training
Inappropriate tactics
Weak morale
Faulty details
(maps)
Logistic shortfalls in
contact
Massive failure
THE CHECHENS
Fight for survival
Intimate knowledge of
their enemy
anticipation
intoxication
Brilliant deception
Dcentralisation in
hunting squads
AP (sniper, MG)
AT (RPG7)
The Battle of Attrition
From 5 January, a battle of attrition
Methodical advance
Presidential palace conquered 19 Jan
Combat until May1995
August 1996 : first agreement
(Lebed)
The Lessons: Command
Faulty assumptions:
A foreign and empty town
A conventional enemy
Time to grow a combat force (during the approach)
Even then, the raid could have been a
success! !
Second plan is more realistic
Unity of command
Better use of communication
Protection of networks
Materiel
TOS-1
Enormous consumption of ammunition
1 phosphorous round in 5
Air-to-air arty
Searchlights to cut LI
and avoid fratricide
Lessons: fire support
Welcome
to hell II
Improved tactics
Lessons: close fight
Extra protection of armour
Protection of armour by infantry
Using the tops (hooks, ladders)
Massive use of flame-throwers,
teargas, phosphorous
Anti-sniper ambushes
Lessons:
logistics
Enormous deployment
Three bases ~ 110 km
2,850 then 6,700 trucks
1 MP brigade
Railways: 260 km repaired, 70 km demined
Supporting the soldier
3,000 heated tents, 114 mess facilities
Improved rations (150 %)
3, then 4 bakeries: 18 T/D
HYGIENE in
combat
WATER a
persistent
problem
quantity
quality : hepatitis,
cholera
One battalion had
240 unfit for duty !
1 paramedic per Coy, 1 medical
doctor per Bn
2 KIA/DOW out of 3 WIA
mortar and burns
serious sanitary crisis
PSYCHOLOGICAL
LOSSES
72 %
2/3 psychosomatic
1/3 psychotic
Maintenance
MAINTENANCE
225 armoured vehicles destroyed
Of 2,221 armour, 846 (38%) temporarily out of
action
1,286 VH repaired (of which 26% depot level)
259 evacuated
646 arrived as sitting stock!
SPARE PARTS
573 T armour, 605 T other, 60 T artillery
Logistics : the problem was
forward
Transshipping in a combat zone
fuel, ammunition, water
Provide hot food
Health and medication
Rest and recuperation
Relieve after a few hours
1,500 KIA
Civilians in war
25,000 to100,000 killed
Constant
presence
(Russians)
Need to take into
account
Discrimination
impossible
Searching:
shoulders
sleeves
fingers
smell
Combatants or
non-combatants ?
Russian power...
... As seen by the media.
A good little
war. (Pavel
Grachev)
Most tactical and logistical
problems solved
War of information lost (tactical
and strategic
Legitimacy issue,
internationally and on the
home front
Win the battle and loose the war
The fundamental
dilemma:
siege
or demolition
When it will be my turn...
Develop specific skills and
tactical concepts
Adapt or develop
materiel
Increase protection
Fight at distance
See at distance
New solutions or novel use
of common technology
Urban combat tomorrow ?
Endure in combat
Relieve/rotate personnel
Hot meal every day
Basic hygiene and sanitation
Attitude regarding population
Plan for fires etc.
Mental
hygiene:
the key
challenge
Nothing except a battle lost can
be half so melancholy as a
battle won.
Wellington