0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views2 pages

Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Danara McLaurin's appeal of the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint against Verizon Maryland, Inc. for lack of jurisdiction. The court summarized that McLaurin's notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the district court entered its order, making it untimely under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal without oral argument.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views2 pages

Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Danara McLaurin's appeal of the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint against Verizon Maryland, Inc. for lack of jurisdiction. The court summarized that McLaurin's notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the district court entered its order, making it untimely under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal without oral argument.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2172

DANARA MCLAURIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERIZON MARYLAND, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:14cv-04053-JKB)

Submitted:

January 14, 2016

Decided:

January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danara McLaurin, Appellant Pro Se. Elena D. Marcuss, Adam Thomas


Simons, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Danara McLaurin seeks to appeal the district courts order
dismissing her employment discrimination complaint.

We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal


was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district
courts final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period
under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

[T]he timely filing of a notice of

appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.

Bowles

v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).


The district courts order was entered on the docket on August
27, 2015.

The notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 2015.

Because McLaurin failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to


obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

You might also like