0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 650 views315 pagesStructural Geomorphology by Tricart
This is a pre-plate tectonics book on structural geomorphology
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Geographies for Advanced Study
Edited by Professor Stanley H. Beaver, M.A., F.R.G.S.
The British Isles: A Geographic and Economic Survey
Central Europe
Concepts in Climatology
East Africa
Eastern Europe
Geography of Population
Geomorphology
The Glaciations of Wales and Adjoining Regions
An Historical Geography of South Africa
An Historical Geography of Western Europe before 1800
Human Geography
Introduction to Climatic Geomorphology
Land, People and Economy in Malaya
The Landforms of the Humid Tropics, Forests and Savannas
Malaya, Indonesia, Borneo and the Philippines
North America
The Polar World
A Regional Geography of Western Europe 7
The Scandinavian World
The Soviet Union
Statistical Methads and the Geographer
Structural Geomorphology
The Tropical World
Urban Essays: Studies in the Geography of Wales
Urban Geography
West Africa
The Western Mediterranean WorldStructural Geomorphology
J. Tricart
Director, Centre de Géographie Appliquée.
University of Strasbourg
Translated by
S. H. Beaver
Professor of Geography. University of Keele
and
E. Derbyshire
Senior Lecturer, Department of Geography,
University of Keele
iy
aE
mY
LongmanLongman
1724-1974
LONGMAN GROUP LIKETED
London
and LONGMAN INC ,
New York
Associated companses, Branches and representatives
throughout the world
English translation © Longman Group Limited 1974
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior
permission of the Copyright owner.
Géomorphologye Siructurate frst published by the
Société d’Edition d’Enseignement Supéricur, Paris 1968
English edition first published 1974
ISBN 0 582 48462 6
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number. 73-86130
Printed in Great Britain by William Clowes & Sons, Limited
London, Beccles and ColchesterContents
List of illustrations
Translators’ preface
Introduction: the place of geomorphology among the earth
sciences
The nature of geomorphology
General notions of causality in geomorphology
Internal forces
Lithology
Tectonics
External forces
General morphogenetic evolution
Morphoclimatic systems
Summary of the history of geomorphology
1 The globe—continents and oceans
Distribution of land and sea
The pattern of land and sea
The continents
Islands and seas
Distribution of heights and depths
The hypsographic curve
The arrangement of the major orographical units
Continents
Ocean basins
Structure of the crust and origin of continents
Structure of the crust
Data derived from earthquakes
The crust and its character
Dynamism of the crust: isostasy
Variations in sea level and coastal changes
The mechanism of eustatism
xiii
ROoOWAneContents
Enstatic equilibrium
Glacio-eustatism
Oscillations of sea level during the Quaternary
Correlation of former sea levels
Quaternary variations in the general sca level
2 Geosynclines and fold belts
Evolution of geosynclines
The period of downwarping and heavy sedimentation
Origin and distribution of geosynclinal troughs: the unilateral
troughs; the intracontinental troughs
Sedimentation and the appearance of geosynclines
The cordillera phase
The opposing roles of regional tension and isostasy
The evolution of cordilleras and furrows
Tendency towards gradual stabilisation
The orogenic phase
Deformation of the gcosynclinal suite
‘The end phase of geosynclincal development and regencrated
geosynclines
Relief forms of geosynclines
Massifs dominated by vertical movements: cordilleras, deepseated
folds
General characteristics: vigour of dissection; the weakness of
differential erosion
Distinctive qualities of structural units
Chains dominated by the ejective style: thrusts, thrust blocks,
klippen
Common characteristics: tectonic vigour; discontinuity of strata
‘The relief of overthrust blocks
The relief of klippen and fault blocks: the klippen; the fault
blocks
The intermontane basins
Accumulation in intermontane basins
Tectonic deformation and dissection : deformation and infilling;
deformation and evolution of basin margins; deformation
and basin drainage
General structure of the geosynclinal folded chains
Arrangement of the structural units: continental geosynclines;
littoral (unilateral) geosynclines
Organisation of the drainage networks
Folded cover rocks and their relief
Flowing parallel folds (classic Jura style)
Tectonic style of flowing folds
Relief on flowing folds: Jura-type relief forms; genesis of Jura-
type relief
50
52
55
58
95
95
98
102
106
106
108
I
ur
Ig.
118
120
123Contents
Interaction of folds and faults
The comtois style: the fold fault; pinch; anchorage
The Provengal style
Folds in rigid cover rocks
Diapirs and mushroom folds
Conclusion
3 The platform regions
The tectodynamics and structural evolution of platforms
Characteristics of platform tectodynamics
The style of the deformations: openfold deformation of broad
radius ; minor features
The rhythm of the deformations
General geomorphological evolution of the platforms
Erosion and sedimentation on the platforms: lithology of the
antéclises; tectonic style and modes of dissection ; the nature
of the deposits
Structural differentiation of the platforms: the duration of
development; the types of tectonic disturbance
Types of relief on the platforms
Relief forms of antéclises
The role of lithology: Appalachian relief; pseudo-Appalachian
relief and other lithological types
Relative importance of planation and tectonics: conditions of
planation development; residual relief
Types of antéclise: sedimentary antéclises; metamorphic anté-
clises
Relief forms of synéclises
Specific morphogenetic styles: the influence of sedimentation;
the influence of tectonic history; the conditions which unleash
dissection
The relief of cuestas: characteristics; structural factors in the
development of cuestas; the importance of the different
methods of dissection
Landforms developed at the contact between cover rocks and
shields: contacts beneath discordant deposits; shield margins
with asymmetrical peripheral depressions; shield margins with
discontinuous depressions
Conclusions
4 Faults and volcanoes
Faults and fractures
Part played by faults and fractures in tectogenesis
The tectodynamics of faults: mechanical aspect ; the time aspect
The disposition of faults: quantitative analysis; faults and
regional structure
132
134,
139
141
143
146
147
148
148
149
154
157
157
165
169
169
183
189
200
206
209
210
210
210
216
viiContents
Geomorphological role of faults and fractures
Tectonic relief forms: the shaping of active fault scarps; active
faults and the hydrographic system; residual and composite
fault scarps
Shatter belts and dykes: shatter belts; induration by faults
Derived slopes resulting from differential erosion: reversed or
opposed faultline scarps; subdued faultline scarps; exaggerated
faultline scarps
The geomorphological role of vulcanism
Volcanic deposits and their formation
Magmatic differentiation: structure of the carth’s crust; the role
of gas; the role of temperature
Principal types of volcanic deposits: petrographical classification;
classification by physical form
Modes of deposition of volcanic materials : the Lacroix classifica-
tion of volcanic eruptions; the rhythm of vulcanicity
Volcanic landforms and their evolution
Simple forms: larva flows; aiguilles and domes; pyroclastic
deposits; mud volcanoes; destructive forms—craters
Composite volcanoes: stratovolcanoes; complexes of cones and
calderas ; subsidence volcanoes (Scottish type)
Volcanic structures
Evolution of lava flows
Denudation of vents, plugs and dykes
Bibliography
Index
viii
238
243
244
244
248
252
255
255
266
273
273
277
282
303List of illustrations
0.1 Diagram of causal relationships in geomorphology
11 Coherence of the areas of continental character (after L. Egved, 1957, p. 107)
1.2 Sigmoid axes of continents and oceans (afler P. Fourmaner, 1962, p. 1416)
1.3 Global distribution of volcanoes and earthquakes
1.4 Structural map of the world, after Glangeaud, Beloussov, Gutenberg, Richter
and others
The Flandrian transgression, based on C,, dating (from H. Graul, 1959)
Glacio-eustatic oscillations of sea level during the Quaternary (after Farbridge,
1961, p. 131)
2.1 Schematic outline of geosynclinal development according to Beloussov (1951)
2.2 Schematic diagram ofa bilateral tectogene: the Spanish-Moroccan assemblage
(after Glangeaud, 1957)
2.3 Geophysical structure of the East Indian arc (after Umbgrove, 1949, and Auboum,
1961)
24 Schematic map of the tectonic evolution of the central Mediterranean (after
Muratov, 1962, p. 188)
2.5 Collapse structure: the ‘Barre de Sisteron”
2.6 Accordant summit levels (gipfeffluir) of the Sierra de la Culata, in the
Venezuelan Andes
2.7. The rift valley of Lagunillas, in the Venezuelan Andes
2.8 Nappes in the southern Tell: schematic sections by A. Caire, 1962
2.9 Folded strata in a nappe, in the Diablerets massif, Switzerland
2.10 Schematic section across the Tellian nappes (on the Bordj-bou-Arreridj map-
sheet) (after Caire, 1962)
2.11 A geosynclinal chain formed by the piling up of nappes (the ‘hyperplastic’ form)
in western Timor (after Lemoine, 1958, p. 209)
2.12 A series of sections across the Nepalese Himalaya (after Hagen, 1954, Pp. 327)
2.13 The front of a nappe, near Sallanches in Savoy
2.14 Sections across the Djurdjura, showing fractured recumbent folds (after
Flandrin, 1952)
2.15 Recumbent folds (*ejected’ style) in the southern Pindus, Greece (afler
Antonin, 1959)
16 The flank of an anti
ti
an
line, at southern foot of Lubéron, western pre-Alps
ine in quartzitic sandstones, in the Venezuelan Andes
ticlinal ridge crossed by a gorge, Kuh-i-Kialan, Iran (drawn by Rambert from
an aerial photograph)
Mountainside, and part of annular valley, near Bienne in the Swiss Jura
The valley of Pont de Gueydan, Alpes Maritimes
2.21 An asymmetric anticline with eroded core, Bou Amrane, in the middle
Moulouya valley of Morocco
27
30
38
53,
59
67
69
n
74
77
82
86
98
100
Tor
102
103
104
105
11g
120
122
123
124
126,List of ulustrations
2
2
2
2
2
a
3
3
2.29 Lroded anticline with core-ndge, Suchet, mn the Jura
23 Outer crest ofa “perched” synchne, on the western cdge of the Forest of Saou
(French 1 80 o00 series sheet 199, Privas)
24, Discordance on the flank ofan anticline (southern flank of Lance anuchnem the
pre-Alps of Dioss)
25 Production of ridges by renewed uphft of an anticline m the region of Chota,
Peru
26 Formation of an eroded antichne
27 Rekef developed on folds, in the Chota region of Peru
28 Ongin of a ‘perched’ syncline (based on the Forest of Saou—see French
1 80 000 sheet 199, Privas)
29 Perched synclines m the Basque Pyrenecs of Binbaleta and Kartchila (after
Viers, 1960 p 101)
30 Jurassic folds A series of cross-scctions in the Syam area east of the plateau of
Champagnole, in the ‘plateau Jura (fiom Guillaume, 1961, p 108)
gx Eroded monochne at Plasians (Dréme}, in the Baronntes area of the pre-Alps
32 Formation of an overthrust Based on examples fiom Provence (on the 1 80.000
sheet 225, Nice)
33 Barner ridge (barre) at the foot of the Vercors, in the pre-Alps (La Baume
Cornillane)
34 Ahomoclinal scarp formed bs the front edge of a thrust mass, at Lac de la Motte
in the Jura
35 Sections across folds in Thessaly (after Inbomn 1959)
36 The flank ofa drapsr, at Sodom, in Jsrael, on the western edge of the Dead Sea
37 Folds and overfolds at La Roche des Arnaulds (Hautes-Alpes)
1 Folds and faults on the western border of the Dead Sea rift valley
2 The flexure that bounds the western side of the Dead Sea trench, in the hulls of
Tamar
33 Gramitic mtrusions of Taounrts im the western Ahaggar (afler Bois-Sonnas, 1963)
3.4 Differential dissection of a deep-seated fold (pli de fond) in the Gordsllera de Ta
3
3
3
8
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
x
Costa, near Caracas in Venezucla
5 Gradual evolution of Appalachian rehef
6 Appalachtan-type relief in central Austraha, near Alice Springs
7 Domed up-warping of an ancient massif Penarroya, im Spain (a/ter Beral, 1959,
p 125)
8 Southern flank of the Argoual, m the Cevennes
9 Homochnal ndges in the alluvial deposits of ulted predmonts, at the contact of
the Andes and the Venezuelan Llanos
10 The‘ button-hole’ or eroded anticline of Makhtesh Gadol in the Negev of Israet
11 Escarpments in the region of Alice Springs, im central Australia (after Par,
Mabbutt et al 1962, 69)
12 Sandstone scarp near Douentza in Malt
13 Muschelhalk scarp near Hardheam, Alsace (drawn fiom a photograph)
14 Rehef of escarpments
15 A composite scarp-face in the Vich basin, Catalufia, Spain
16 A scarp produced by hmestone resting on marl, in the Agenais region of
France
37 Evoluon of a coastal platform under the mfluence of continental warping
(after Mescheniahov, 1960, p 32)
18 The cuesta of Botucatu, in Sao Paulo state, Brazil (after 1b'saber, 1956, p 12)
1A fault passes upwards into a flexure
2 Tectomic breccia at Delphi in Greece
3. Shichenside near Corverssiat in the Jura
4 Shchenside m basaltic breccias, north of Chirilagua in Salvador
127
128
128
129
130
131
133,
133,
136
137
139
14
142
144
145
150
152
160
170
172
74
181
182
186,
188
189
191
192
193
198
199
201
207
aur
212
213
arg45
46
48
49
=
3
qu
412
413
au
415
416
417
418
419
420
4q2t
422
=
&
Last of wlustrations
Gaping faults in micaschist, in the Cordillera de la Costa near Valencia
(Venezuela)
Relationship between the width of a fault and its throw (after Carlleus, 1960,
109)
Seder stan the northern part of the Red Sea, from geophysical data (afler
Drake and Girdler, 1964, p 489)
Section across the faulted zone of the northern Red Sea (from Vaumas, 1961)
Onginal fault-scarp on the side of the Waitaki valley in New Zealand (drawn
by Schnerder from a photograph 6) Cotton}
Fault-scarp at the junction of the Gordillera de la Costa and the Caracas basin,
in Venezuela
An onginal fault-scarp near Lagunillas, in the Venezuelan Andes
A faulted coasthne, with ulted raised beaches, Barmg Head, New Zealand
(after Cotton, 1951, p 108)
Influence of a fault on the river pattern, at Wellington, New Zealand (after
Cotton, 1951, p 64)
The Welhngton fault (drawn from a photograph in Cotton, 1957, 6) 1 Maurer)
Median facets on ndges marking the position ofa fault (after Cotton, 1950,p 227)
Fault-scarp cut up mto facets, Deep Springs Valley, California (drawn by
Schneider from a photograph by E Blackwelder}
Fault-scarps in Alsace at Gueberschwihr
A transverse fault with formation of truncated spurs (after Cotton 1950, 750)
Exolution of faulted blocks (after Cotton, 1950, » 739)
An orginal fault-scarp, on the edge of the Jow-lving Wartakt valley in New
Zealand (drawn by Schneider from a photograph b Cotton)
Tiltg against a fault, Hanmer Plain, New Zealand (after Cotton, 1953, p 216)
Geomorphological result of renewed movement of a fault, on the edge of the
Vosges south of Saverne
3 Hydrographic pattern oriented by fractures, m the granitic massif of the
Guarda region in Central Portugal (from Fe1o and Brilo, 1950, p 261)
Fault-guided meanders of the middle Zezera in central Portugal (from Fe10 and
Bnito, 1950, 259)
5 Complea evolution of a fault-scarp
Faults on the eastern margin of the Causses, near Treves
The pelean ‘aguille’ of Pent Piton, in St Lucia, West Indies
Distribution of ash from a rhy olituc erupuon of Hecla (Bed H3) (after Thorarins-
son, Finarsson and Kyartansson, 1959, p 154)
Hydrocinentes, spread and deposited by water, in the island of Sel, in the Cape
Verde group
Valley fossihsed by hydrocinenttes, south of Valle Pescadores in Peru
cate scouring by stream action of a rain of ashes, south of Arequipa in
cru
Deposits of a Jahar near Vieu.-Fort in St Lucia, West Indies
‘The crater of Mist. m the Peruyian Andes
Section across a crate: (Svemar Iceland) (afler Thorarmsson, Finarsson and
Ayartansson 1959, p 161)
The Souftiere volcano, Guadeloupe, in eruption im October 1956 (draun by
Rimbert from a photograph by Lasserre)
Cauldron subsidence (the ‘Scottish’ type of A Guilcher) the evolution of the
caldera on the island of Mull, in the Inner Hebrides (from Guilcher, 1950,p 3)
Cauldron subsidence in the island of Niuafo, in the South Pacific (after Cotton,
1952 p 38)
8 \low cone made by fluid basalt, with a crater much enlarged by an caplosion
heat San Francisco Arzona (after Cotton 1952, p 75)
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
230
231
232
232
234
236
237
240
242
256List of illustrations
4.39 Secondary cone within a caldera, Fogo island (Cape Verde group) (after
Ribeiro, 1954, p- 38)
4-40 Section across Fogo island (Cape Verde group) (after Ribetro, 1954s P. 40)
4.41 A pyroclastic cone, at the Col de la Coulée de la Souliére, in the Coirons district,
France
4.42 Acomplex volcano. Monte Amiata, in Tuscany (from Htaltan geological maps)
4443 The volcano Challapalca, in the Tacna region of Peru
4-44 Inversion of relief in a volcanic area
4-45 Basalt mesa at St Jean le Centenier in the Coirons district of France
4.46 Scarpland relief due to basalt flows in southern Brazil (after Almeida, 1960, p..96)
4.47 Basalt necks north of Rochemaure, Ardéche, France
4.48 Basic dyke thrown into relief by differential erosion, south of Marble Bar in
Western Australia (drazon by Rombert from an acral photograph)
4.49 Interstratified cuffs and lavas cut by dykes, on the inner side of Monte Somma,
Vesuvius (from Cotton. 1952, 228)
4.50 Volcanic alignments at Ludent, in Iceland (after Thorarmsson, Exarsson and
Kiartansson, 1959. 6 159)
4.51 Alignment of basalt cones along a fissure, Craters of the Moon, Idaho, USA
(after Cotton, 1952, p. 99)
267
268
269
27
274
275
276
277
278
278
280
281
The geological maps of France referred to so frequently in the text arc in the £80 000 series
known as the Carte géologique détaillée de la France. These maps have been issued at various
dates since 1870 and the series now totals some 258 sheets. The topographical base, printed
in sepia, is the Carte de f’Etat-Major on the same scale.
xii wsTranslators’ preface
Structural Geomorphology is the first volume of a major work, Précis de Geo-
morphologie, the second volume of which, Elements of Pedology and Hydrology,
appeared in French in 1972. The Précis is designed to provide both an
introduction and a detailed systematic text of particular value to students
reading for their first degree in geography. It is also intended to provide a
comprehensive over-view of the science of geomorphology for specialists in
cognate disciplines, notably geology, pedology, ecology and planning. Such
is the organisation of the material that Structural Geomorphology may be used
at a variety of levels depending on the degree of generalisation appropriate
to the needs of the user. English-speaking readers coming to this work for the
first time will find several distinctive and valuable features, amongst which
might be mentioned the comprehensive reading guides which gather to-
gether a great deal of material rarely encountered in English-language texts
of geomorphology ; the impressive diversity of examples of structural land-
forms, many of them illustrated from Professor Tricart’s own field-work;
and a lucid introductory statement on the place of geomorphology within
the Earth Sciences which contains a typically forthright assessment of the
cycle of erosion according to W. M. Davis.
Professor Tricart’s numerous other geomorphological texts, two of which
have appeared in translation in the ‘Geographies for advanced study’
series, are listed in an appendix.
University of Keele S. H. Beaver
July 1973 Edward Derbyshire
xiiiIntroduction
The place of geomorphology among the
earth sciences
Geomorphology, as the Greek roots of the word indicate, is the science of
landforms. Its object is the study of the appearance and behaviour of the
lithosphere, the earth’s solid crust.
The nature of geomorphology
The surface of the earth’s crust brings the solid mass of the globe into
contact with the liquid hydrosphere and the gascous atmosphere that
surround it. Since man is by his very nature a terrestrial creature, it is the
subaerial surface that is best known and most easily studied, but submarine
relief is no less a part of geomorphology, and rapid advances are being
made in this field.
The earth’s crust, like any other surface affected by contact between
different bodies, is moulded by the interaction of forces which originate on
either side of it; this general physical law is basic to geomorphology. On
the one side the crust is modified by internal forces, manifesting themselves
in tectonic movements and vulcanicity; these forces control the differentia-
tion between the continents and the ocean basins. On the other side are the
external forces originating in the atmosphere and hydrosphere; these also
play their part and interact with the internal forces. Atmospheric weather-
ing affects rocks at their outcrop, and water, ice and wind transport the
debris, here sculpturing patterns of erosion and there forming accumu-
lations, not in the open air but also, especially, beneath the seas and oceans.
Itis the interaction between the internal and external forces that controls
the moulding of the earth’s surface; and it is this which gives it its unique
character. The surface of the moon, for example, now reasonably well
known, has been fashioned solely by internal forces, in the absence of any
atmosphere; this is the explanation of its resemblance to our earthly
volcanic landforms, which themselves are largely manifestations of the
internal forces.
The internal and external forces vary both in time and in space. Vulcan-
icity, for example, affects only certain parts of the globe at the present time,
especially the borders of the Pacific Ocean, whilst other areas, such as
1Introduction
Scandinavia and the lands surrounding the North and Baltic Seas, are
completely exempt. But this is only a synoptic glimpse in the long history
of the earth; volcanic landscapes resulting from eruptions that have now
ceased are to be found, for example, in the Eifel region of Germany.
Similarly with tectonic movements. Intermittent earthquakes show that
certain parts of the earth’s crust are in a state of disequilibrium and subject
to particularly intensive movement. Their distribution at the present time,
however, is not the same as might have been observed 20 million years ago.
The Alps, the Rhine graben, and the Limagne, which today are only
affected by rare and very slight earthquakes, were at that time the scene
of the violent and repeated shocks of a tectonic paroxysm.
The external forces fluctuate also. Coastlines have changed unceasingly
during geological time. Encroachments of the sea—usually called trans-
gressions—have subjected to submarine erosion surfaces that were formerly
sculptured by subaerial agencies. Some 20 000 years ago the North Sea
was almost all dry land, and peat bogs formed on the Dogger Bank before
the area was submerged by the ‘Flandrian transgression’ which was
caused by the rise of sea level resulting from the melting of the Wiirm or
Weichselian ice sheets. Much of the relief of the continental shelves is of
subaerial origin, resculptured to a greater or Jess extent by the recent
advance of the sea. Only 15 000 years ago ice caps similar to that which now
covers Greenland, enveloped Scandinavia and the Baltic, and the whole
of northern and northeastern Canada as far south as the Great Lakes. The
conditions under which the land surface of those regions evolved at that
time were thus very different from those of the present day.
Both in time and in space, therefore, as well as in their nature and
intensity, the manifestations of the internal and external forces are variable,
as also is the degree of their interaction. Sometimes the internal forces are
strongest, as when mountains are raised and depressions are invaded by the
sea. At other times the external forces predominate, gradually reducing the
mountains and filling the lower parts of the crust with sediment. There is
thus a perpetual struggle, an uninterrupted morphological evolution,
always in progress but never finished. If this were not so, the earth’s surface
would be dead, like that of the moon or an extinct star.
The object of geomorphology is thus the study of this surface of contact
that is the earth’s crust: the description and classification of the many forms
and shapes that result from the ever-changing interaction of the opposed
forces; the understanding of the mechanism of this interaction in order to
comprehend the landforms that are generated by it, if necessary by pene-
trating backwards into time so as to trace the evolution of these forms and
to place the present landscapes in their true historical context. Like the
biological sciences, geomorphology is based on notions of evolution, of the
interference of the various factors and their mutual adaptation. As with
specics, landforms are born, develop and then decline and disappear;
some of them are relics or survivals, and the biogeographical term endemism
2The nature of geomorphology
springs to mind with regard to some of them. There exists a veritable
ecology of landforms, that is an assemblage of circumstances that are
necessary for the growth and development of this or that type of relief.
But whereas in biology these circumstances are necessary but not sufficient,
in geomorphology they are both necessary and sufficient, for although
the landforms evolve they are not living things.
These analogies between biology and geomorphology are not just
artificial. They are one aspect of the fundamental processes of nature, and
we must have regard for them if we wish to comprehend these profound
truths.
Our methods of reasoning share the same complexities as those of
biology ; and dealing as they do with antagonistic and ever-changing forces,
they can only be dialectical. The Davisian theories, springing from geo-
metrical reasoning nourished by imagination, have in fact checked and
retarded the development of modern geomorphology. Instead of opening
our eyes to the complex realities, they have lulled us into the security of a
deceptive simplicity.
Before embarking on the study of the different types of landforms, it is
necessary to take a broad general view of the interaction of opposing forces
and to formulate a general model of causality in geomorphology that will
guide our reasoning and place our observations in perspective.
General notions of causality in geomorphology
Figure 0.1 shows in graphical form the causal relationships that govern
geomorphology. This diagram has two conceptual bases, first that of
evolution (time) shown vertically and ending in the present day, and
secondly that of dynamism, of which the various aspects appear in the
vertical columns, since their role is temporal. We have thus a system of
interactions; these vary with time and their elements change in intensity
from region to region, in conformity with the ideas expressed above. The
vertical columns show the factors which are modified with the passage of
time. Vertical arrows show how these factors bear on presentday geo-
morphology; horizontal arrows take account of the temporary or per-
manent interactions between these same factors. Lastly, the oblique
arrows show the interactions that are produced over a period of time. In all
cases the strength of the arrows is a rough indication of the intensity of the
actions and interactions that they represent.
Although this model has been reduced to its utmost simplicity, and has
been drawn with as much clarity as possible, it is by no means simple. Its
complexity can but reflect the complexity of the causal mechanisms in
geomorphology, and for this reason some further comments are necessary.
We shall deal with each of the vertical columns in turn.Inhoduction
DYNAMISM
internal Forces External Forces
Types of Types of
aevcrune ie Structural Retief ZI Morphoclimatic Retief
é
Actual
influence
==
. 28 | on reafressive
: 3
mal ow
any Se
e z tu |cpmatic influence on] &
= s aes een! RE
s 3 gtacioeustatism)| > S
= on E
o = Oe [Influence of bose | | =
7 = = & PTevel on retvet 33
Intive| S| tithotogy on ee ge
w pon of feliet & | morphoclimatic =3
w : e~ sé
© = System 8
= = [Diataten tractures =
co z
b 2
Tectame style
LITHOLOGY
Seok
Hentage from
past
g &
2: gE
2 eg
etl {2 |
Fic, 0.1. Diagram of causal relationships in geomorphologyGeneral notions of causality in geomorphology
Internal forces
Three columns end at the level of the present day in the rectangle inscribed
‘structure’. This shows that the geological structures that we see now, like
those which might have been seen at any moment in the past, are the result
of the combined action of several factors that depend more or less on the
internal forces.
LITHOLOGY
Lithology, the nature of the rocks, is a direct product of the internal forces
in the case of magmatic rocks like granite and basalt, that have been
formed by plutonic and volcanic action. But a closer look at volcanic rocks
shows that the situation is far from simple, for the form of the lava flows may
be much modified by the nature of the land over which they pass; there is
interaction between the internal forces that are responsible for the emission
of the lavas, and other factors that control the nature of the underlying
surface, which may be of sedimentary rocks almost unaffected by the
internal forces. In the case of metamorphic rocks the interaction of internal
and external geodynamic forces is even more obvious, for such rocks result
from the modification of sedimentary rocks that are in contact with elements
derived from the magma.
Lithology thus reflects the interactions of the internal and external forces.
The latter are represented by the mineral components of rocks of magmatic
origin and by the modifications suffered at depth by sedimentary rocks—
which in turn are related to the tectonic movements that caused them to
reach such depths. This is why, on the diagram, an oblique arrow leads from
the ‘tectonic evolution’ column into ‘lithology’. Along the course of this
arrow we are reminded of the three ways in which tectonics influence
lithology:
AMetamorphism. This takes place when sedimentary rocks are depressed to a
great depth; tectonic movements facilitate their penetration by material
of magmatic origin, generally through the action of tensions which open
up fissures into which the magma can more easily enter. Thus meta-
morphism often penetrates upwards to a greater extent in tensional
structures such as domes and geanticlinecs.
Pulcanism. This results from the localised rise of magma through fissures;
the rise is so rapid that the magma has no time to get polluted by contact
with the rocks traversed. All volcanic phenomena are associated with
fracture zones, either the great faults that break up folded mountains into
separate blocks or the faults that rupture the continental shields and
Platforms, Japan provides an example of the first case, East Africa of the
second.Introduction
Sclustosity. This results from the squeezing and stretching of sedimentary
rocks under very great pressure. It is particularly clearly displayed in clays
that have been subjected to foliation, but it is seen also in other rocks,
especially marls and limestones. It only develops beneath at least 4 000
or 5 000 m of superincumbent strata, and occurs in geosynclinal structures,
Other less extreme features are also discernible in some rocks. Diagenesis,
which transforms mobile sediments into coherent rocks, results in part from
the pressure exerted on the sediments by the deposits of younger age that
accumulate on top of them, and this accumulation in turn results from slow
subsidence. Friction along the tectonic discontinuities known as faults and
thrust planes shatters the rocks and gives rise to fault breccias, sometimes
called crush or tectonic breccias.
External influences on lithology are expressed through the medium of
sedimentation. The sediments that are laid down at any given moment
of time in any region are controlled by the following factors:
The nature of the rocks that are being eroded. Granite, for example, yields an
abundance of quartz grains, whercas limestone yields almost none; lime-
stone however yields much more calcium than does granite.
The processes by whech the soled rocks are converted into rock debris that can be
transported far from its point of origin. These processes vary greatly from one
part of the world to another, especially in response to climate but also toa
lesser extent in response to the nature of the relief. Where there is a dense
vegetation cover the processes are mainly biochemical, and the products
are chemical compounds in solution, and clays resulting from complex
alteration mechanisms. On the other hand, where there is little or no
vegetation, asin hot or cold deserts, and beneath ice, the rocks are rendered
mobile through mechanical fragmentation and plucking. The products in
this case are detrital, clastic materials, composed of unaltered rock frag-
ments ranging in size from sit to boulders,
The mechanisms of transport. The materials weathered from the rocks at the
surface are carried into sedimentation basins by running water, by ice or
by the wind. They undergo, both in water and in the air, a sorting process
that is a function of the strength of the current, and it is the finer material
that stands the greatest chance of eventually reaching the sediment basin.
While in the course of transportation by water, the materials are also
subject to chemical action that alters them and extracts some substances in
solution. Within glaciers and ice sheets there is no such sorting, but only
abrasion that reduces part of the debris to rock flour.
Of these factors controlling the nature of the raw materials subsequently
deposited to form sedimentary rocks, only one results directly from
structure, and that is lithology. But the other two, the mechanisms of
6General notions of causality in geomorphology
mobilisation and transport, are also integral parts of the morphogenetic
system, controlled by climate and the nature of the relief. For this reason,
in the lower righthand corner of the diagram, two columns represent
morphogenetic evolution and the morphoclimatic system of a given period
in the past; from the top of these columns runs an arrow leading to the base
of the ‘lithology’ column. This is to indicate that the character of one sort
of rock—the sedimentary—depends directly on the external forces that
were operative at the time of the sedimentation. Subsequently, the internal
forces play their part, in diagenesis, in crushing, in foliation—in a word, in
the metamorphosis by which the rocks are variously modified. To this must
be added vulcanism, bringing in other elements of internal origin.
TECTONICS
Tectonics are divided in the diagram into tectostatic and tectodynamic.
In the usually accepted sense of the term tectonics, two ideas are confused :
the disposition of the strata and the deformations that caused such dis-
positions. Thus, in referring to a folded mountain belt such as the Alps, we
speak of the tectonics of thrusts to indicate the disposition of overthrust
beds already in position, but we also use tectonics in referring to the
complex movements that created such dispositions. In the first case we are
concerned with a static disposition that has happened in the past and
suffers no further modification : feciostasy. In the second case, on the contrary,
we are concerned with the actual folding process: tectodynamism.
The two terms tectostatic and tectodynamic must be used, of course, in
relation to time. They are only valid for a given moment of time in the
history of a given region of the earth. Tectostasy refers to the actual
disposition of existing strata (tabular, faulted or folded) and tectodynam-
ism to the deformations that the rocks underwent at the given time period.
Tectodynamism may be negligible—there may be an interval of tectonic
calm. On the other hand, it may be very great, in which case we speak ofa
tectonic upheaval or paroxysm.
Tectodynamism often changes its character, so that, in the Jura for
example, a phase of folding may follow a phase of faulting, or, as in the
southern fore-Alps, several successive phases of folding may be charac-
terised by folds of different orientation and aspect. Geologists call this
superimposed tectonics. Each new paroxysm impresses its own brand of
tectodynamism upon the pre-existing tectostatic circumstances. Another
example of widespread occurrence may be drawn from those old massifs
that were folded in the Palaeozoic; the folds are still visible because the
metamorphism was not intense, and the tectostatic character is of a folded
chain ; subsequently the massifs were, affected mainly by folds of less
Intensity and larger amplitude, accompanied now and again by fractures.
After relatively recent uplift by tectodynamic forces, differential erosion
acts on the tectostatic folds and in favourable lithological circumstances
sculptures them into an appalachian type of relief. The distinction between
7Introduction
the static and dynamic aspects of tectonics at any given moment of time in
the earth’s history, but principally at the present time, thus plays an in-
dispensable part in the development of ideas in structural geomorphology.
The successive tectodynamic episodes of the past are spoken of as the
tectonic evolution which culminates in the tectodynamics of the present.
This is why these two expressions form part of the same column in the
diagram. Naturally, the state of affairs at any moment in the past consti-
tutes a certain set of tectostatic circumstances, represented by certain dis-
positions of the rocks; and the durability of such dispositions varies with
the rhythm and amplitude of the tectodynamic forces. In a period of tectonic
calm the dispositions will be more long-lasting than during a paroxysm,
when they will be in a state of continual disturbance. At any moment in the
earth’s history, the existing structure integrates the tectodynamic effects
which have taken place since the emplacement of the affected strata. For
this reason, in the diagram, a series of arrows leads from ‘tectonic evolution’
to ‘tectostasy’, and one of the arrows Jeads into the base of the latter
column. In reality, we are dealing with effects that are more or less con-
tinuous, but a series of arrows is the most convenient form of diagrammatic
representation.
Tectostasy and tectodynamism lead directly into present structure; but
the arrows that indicate this are of different dimensions, for in fact in most
cases the influences of tectostasy are much more important in morphogenesis
than the influence of actual tectodynamism—though of course, the part
played by each will vary from region to region. In a region that is going
through a period of tectonic calm, tectostatics are much more important.
Such is the case, for example, in the Paris Basin and southern England.
On the contrary, in a region that is suffering a tectonic upheaval, like
Japan, New Zealand or California, tectodynamism plays an important
part that varies with the intensity of the paroxysm and is combined with
the effects of differential erosion on the uplifted sections. Active faults, for
example, give fault scarps that change with each earthquake. For this
reason an arrow is shown leading from the ‘tectonic evolution’ column
towards ‘morphogenetic evolution’; it indicates the control of morpho-
genesis by tectodynamism. There are several interactions (indicated by
arrows) between tectonic evolution and lithology. Lithology not only
influences tectogenesis directly through the medium of diapirism but also
acts in a less direct fashion.
Diapirism is a particular form of tectodynamism brought about by
masses of salt (rock salt, potash etc.). Such salt masses, which are more
plastic and have a density appreciably less than that of other rocks, have
a tendency, when compressed, to seek an outlet to the surface by breaking
through the rocks which cover them, They thus form domes, or diapirs,
which often take on a mushroom form. The movements of the salt domes
are relatively independent of other deformations and may occur even in
times of tectonic calm. They are simply a product of lithology.
8General notions of causality in geomorphology
The mechanical properties of rocks also influence tectonics, for they
control the degree of resistance that the rocks offer to tectodynamism. A
sheet of paper does not fold in the same way as a piece of cardboard. Rock
strata either fracture or bend, depending on their plasticity and on the
intensity of the deforming stresses. For example, granite does not fold; it
fractures. Clay strata containing salt, however, are not only very plastic
but may also be slippery. Quite often they become stretched out, enabling
the more rigid superincumbent strata to slide over them. In this way the
rock layers become loosened, and differential movement culminates in
the formation of overthrusts. On the other hand, as we have seen, tectonic
history modifies the characteristics of rocks and so influences lithology.
Thus certain tectonic features, such as open faults, permit volcanic emis-
sions; and metamorphism results not only from the deep burial of sedi-
mentary rocks but also from a whole series of conditions favouring the
diffusion of magmatic elements through these rocks. The compression that
produces schistosity is the direct result of the mechanical stresses to which
the rocks are subjected in the course of tectonic deformation.
Important interactions thus occur between the various internal forces,
while others are produced between the internal and the external forces.
Both types have their part to play in the development of geological struc-
tures, but the internal forces are dominant. Indeed, the external forces
operate only through the medium of the morphogenetic systems as they
influence the formation of sediments. Though not negligible, this influence
dates from the remote past, when palaeogeographical circumstances were
very different from those of the present day. Nevertheless, structure is not
entirely the product of internal forces, especially in regions of sedimentary
rocks, where interactions between internal and external forces are apparent.
But the predominance of the internal forces justifies the position of the
terms ‘internal forces’ and ‘structure’ on the diagram.
External forces
Two major aspects of the working of the external forces may be distin-
guished, general morphogenetic evolution and morphoclimatic systems.
GENERAL MORPHOGENETIC EVOLUTION
General morphogenetic evolution responds to cosmic forces which are of
two distinct kinds. In the first place there is gravity, which acts perpen-
dicularly to the carth’s surface and controls the downward movement of
objects. In geomorphology, gravity sometimes acts directly, as in the forma-
tion of boulder screes, but more often indirectly through the agency of
Tunning water, glaciers and solifluction. It tends to lessen relief by removing
debris from high places (slope summits, interfluves, mountain ranges) and
depositing it in lower places (slope-foot colluvium, terminal moraines,
Ones de déjections, deltas and submarine depressions where turbidity currents
9Introduction
lose their loads). This reduction of relief by running water was the basis of
W. M. Davis's theory of the cycle of erosion and peneplanation.
Secondly, there are the tangential movements that take place in the
atmosphere and the hydrosphere. The winds and the currents in the sea
and in lakes have an important horizontal component which is of some
significance in morphogenesis. The winds, blowing over the surface of the
earth, whip up dust and sand grains—a functional effect that is not funda-
mentally different from that exercised by a river on its bed, for both obey
the same laws of fluid mechanics and only differ in respect of the value of
the parameters representing the density of air and of water. But there is an
important geomorphological difference, for running water obeys the law
of gravity and always rans downhill, whereas moving air only responds to
gravity in respect of its convectional movements and not in its turbulence
when in contact with the carth’s surface. Thus wind can overcome gravity
and lift the debris it transports, as in the formation ofsand dunes. The same
effect happens on the sea shore; waves and tides may throw up beach
material into strand lines which represent the level reached by the highest
tides. Tidal currents and longshore drift cause the displacement of beach
material laterally along coasts, an action more important than that of
gravity.
Gravitational and tangential movements obey Newton’s laws, which are
among the basic principles of physics. They have been going on over the
whole of the earth's surface ever since that surface came into being, and
are thus the motive force behind the evolution of relief. They come into
play wherever movable particles on the earth’s surface are free to be trans-
ported. The wind, for example, with a power of movement much less than
that of ice or water, can only act if the movable particles are not protected
by vegetation and if they are small enough to be transported; the same
applies to the movement of particles by a stream. This notion ofcompetence
can also be applied (excluding the protective vegetational cover) to the
action of waves and longshore drift.
Gravitational ahd tangential movements may thus take place anywhere;
they are of potential importance over the whole globe but are not necessarily
effective everywhere. Gravitational movements are geomorphologically
much more important than tangential ones, for they may affect all sorts of
particles, from the chemical element dissolved in water running in a
stream or percolating downwards through the rocks, to the boulder that
rolls down the mountainside when its support is removed. The effects of
gravitational movements are much greater than those of tangential move-
ments, for the functional force of the wind is relatively slight, thus the
former play the major role in the evolution of relief, except in limited
spheres such as sand dunes and beaches. This is why there is a general
tendency for relief to diminish with the passage of time. During the course
of this evolution the surface rocks that yield the most mobile particles will
be most rapidly eroded. This differential denudation is a function of Jith-
10General notions of causality in geomorphology
ology; through its medium the dissection of the surface becomes adapted
to lithology and tectonic structure. Thus we get the sculpture of structural
relief forms like cuestas, faultline scarps and the diverse forms derived from
folded strata. But gravitational forces depend directly on the existence of
inequalities in the earth’s surface, and these result from tectonic action. A
change of level of tectonic origin creates a certain morphogenetic potential,
just as a waterfall offers hydroelectric potential. Under the influence of
gravitational forces the change of level tends to be reduced, but before it
can be reduced it must first appear. It is thus clear that interaction between
tectonic movements and gravitational forces controls the evolution of
tectonic relief.
For this reason the rectangle labelled ‘morphogenetic evolution’ in
the diagram leads directly, by a broad arrow, into ‘types of structural
relief’, into which there also comes an arrow from the compartment
labelled ‘structure’. Types of structural relief are the result of the inter-
action of gravitational and tectonic forces, working now in their tecto-
dynamic aspect, now through tectostasy, within a certain lithological
framework. This general morphogenetic evolution controlled by gravity
interferes with tectogenesis and even with lithology. But these reper-
cussions are apparently slight, and in the diagram they are shown by
thinner arrows.
As for influences on tectodynamism, they are of two kinds:
1. Isostatic reactions are provoked on the one hand by the unloading that
results from the erosion in an area subjected to vigorous dissection, and on
the other hand by the arrival of large masses of debris in an area of accumu-
lation such as a piedmont. Bearing in mind the high viscosity of the earth’s
crust, itis clear that such reactions will only take place when the forces pass
a certain threshold. It has been calculated that reaction is only possible in
the case of sharply delimited areas that are several dozen kilometres in size.
For areas with more blurred margins the threshold is higher. The reaction
in the case ofan area subject to intense and rapid erosion, and so lightened,
will be a tendency to uplift. But such erosion necessarily implies a previous
tectonic uplift, so that isostatic reaction simply sustains an uplift of tectonic
origin. The same thing happens, though in the opposite sense, in the case
of depressed areas, which are subject to considerable accumulation.
2. The existence of pre-cxisting relief influences tectogenesis. For example,
studies begun in the Jura and later extended to many other folded areas
have brought to light modifications of tectonic deformations due to the
resistance of the pre-existing folds. It is easy to see how an escarpment,
subjected to tangential pressure, could advance laterally without en-
countering much resistance, whereas the rocks beneath the surface would
be blocked against cach other. When a shearplane occurs at the base of an
¢scarpment—a condition easily produced in soft rocks like clays and
marls—the whole feature may move forward to cover the rocks beneath
IrIntroduction
which are more resistant to the tangential pressures. In Provence, for
example, many rock splinters are made up of the former crests of overfolds
which have been thrust over the hollow which formerly lay at their foot.
(For further details see Chapter 2.)
As for the repercussion of morphog:netic evolution on lithology, this is
also a consequence of the removal of debris from regions undergoing
erosion. It has been noted in many types of region, in high mountains and
in narrow gorges, as in the Colorado, that cracks parallel to the walls
develop as a result of the existence of the deep chasms. Some authors have
ascribed the joints in granite to the progressive erosion of the overlying
sediments. In very rigid rocks, the decompression resulting from erosion
certainly tends to create fissures (called ‘dilatation fractures’) that are
generally parallel to the surface; these in their turn facilitate further erosion.
As we have seen, gravity seldom works directly. Tangential forces, such
as the wind, are hindered by a screen of vegetation. The intensity and the
processes of morphogenetic evolution are influenced by a whole series of
factors which are a function of the state of the earth’s surface (vegetation,
soil, superficial deposits etc.). Since climate controls these, we group them
under the heading of ‘morphoclimatic systems’.
MORPHOCLIMATIC SYSTEMS
The direct and indirect influences of climate play a fundamental role in
morphogenesis. The vegetation cover protects the soil from certain
mechanical actions such as the impact of raindrops, which are of great
importance in the formation of runnels. In its turn, the decaying vegetation
modifies the nature of the infiltrating solutions, and so not only influences
soil formation but also chemical weathering such as karstification. The
vegetation cover thus plays a large part in the process of transforming
coherent rocks into debris that may subsequently be transported. Climate
exerts its influence indirectly through the vegetation : cach major vegetation
type, forest, savanna, steppe and desert, is found in climatically determined
areas. But there are also direct influences, through rainfall intensity, the
strength and regularity of wind and frost. Polar coasts, for example, are
protected from wave action during the whole or the greater part of the year
because of the ice pack. For this reason we have begun to talk about
climatic geomorphology: the study of the direct and indirect influences of
climate in morphogenesis.
Corresponding to each climate there tends to develop a vegetation
cover in equilibrium with it; this is termed the climatic climax. Under
similar conditions morphogenesis is effected through the medium of a
certain combination of processes, of which some are conditioned by climate
and vegetation. In arid regions, for example, the sporadic rains attack the
surface soil directly, for there is but a sparse protective vegetation cover.
The development of runnels is easy, and this is everywhere the mode of
12General notions of causality in geomorphology
surface sculpture. But chemical weathering, in the virtual absence of water,
is ata minimum. Running water, moreover, can only erode friable rocks;
when it comes up against the slightest solid obstacle it goes round it,
leaving an upstanding edge or cliff. The erosion pattern is thus finely
incised by innumerable small gulleys on the slopes, as is clearly seen in
parts of the Sahara. Concentrated runnel development is not peculiar to
deserts, far from it; but in the absence of a vegetation cover it develops
without hindrance and gives the relief an unmistakable imprint. Indeed, it
is the cornerstone of what we may call a ‘morphoclimatic system’.
Morphoclimatic systems are specially important in conditioning the
fragmentation of rocks, the transformation of coherent rocks or large
boulders into fragments sufficiently small to be moved by the normal
agencies of transport. In this way they control the whole process of morpho-
genetic evolution. Moreover, they exercise a strong influence on the way
in which the gravitational forces operate. In the desert, for example, they
work through the medium of sudden and concentrated torrents. In the
savannas, the obstacles provided by plants hinder concentrated torrent
formation, and the stream pattern remains diffuse for a long time. In peri-
glacial regions, during the ice melt, with the soil still frozen to some depth,
surface water that cannot infiltrate becomes liquid mud and gravitates
slowly under its own weight; this is solifluction. Beneath the wet tropical
forest, intense weathering and the loss of chemical elements in solution
lead to subsidence and thus to another kind of soil flow. In each morpho-
climatic system, the modes of operation of the gravitational and tangential
forces are modified in a particular way. In the forest the wind merely
waves the trees about, thus producing wind-fallen dead branches and
trunks; but in the desert, provided there is sand, it heaps up dunes. The
nature of the forces, by reason of their cosmic origin, is always the same;
but the way in which they operate varies from one climate to another.
Morphoclimatic systems thus control the processes of landscape evo-
lution. The vegetation cover and the climatic factors influence the stream
regime and the ability of the rivers to transport debris, upon which depends
their incision into uplifted regions. Vegetation and climate also control the
fragmentation and alteration of rocks and the mobilisation of the debris on
slopes, and so the way in which debris reaches the streams. If the debris is
not too abundant or too large, it can be carried away, the rivers can incise
their channels, and dissection makes progress. In the contrary case dissec-
tion is hindered. Thus there is continual interaction between morpho-
climatic systems and morphogenesis.
An increase in slope, of tectonic origin, may set in motion a phase of
erosion that involves the incision of the streams and then headward
recession. This is a common phenomenon of morphogenesis. The incision
of the stream beds increases the angle of the valley slopes, and so may
modify the speed and even the nature of the sculptural processes. For
example, earth slides may replace soil creep. Within the framework of the
13