0% found this document useful (1 vote)
769 views1 page

Case 3

Ms. Juliana Sarangaya worked to find borrowers for a new branch of Mutual Lending that was struggling. A friend mentioned a prospect that could arrange loans for a university's employees. At a meeting, the prospect demanded a facilitator's fee, which would require raising interest rates for the low-income borrowers. Ms. Sarangaya refused, believing this fee constituted a bribe. She debated whether to agree for the sake of the branch or maintain her morals.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
769 views1 page

Case 3

Ms. Juliana Sarangaya worked to find borrowers for a new branch of Mutual Lending that was struggling. A friend mentioned a prospect that could arrange loans for a university's employees. At a meeting, the prospect demanded a facilitator's fee, which would require raising interest rates for the low-income borrowers. Ms. Sarangaya refused, believing this fee constituted a bribe. She debated whether to agree for the sake of the branch or maintain her morals.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Case 3.

Mutual Ending: Help Yourself

The job of Ms. Juliana Sarangaya was to solicit borrowers for the branch office of Mutual
Lending , a financing firm. The branch had just open seven months earlier and was still struggling to
justify its existence. So far, Ms. Sarangaya was able to develop a profitable group of clients, she was still
not satisfied, however. She knew that for the branch to survive, it must have a bigger portfolio clients.

Ms. Sarangaya’s opportunity came when a longer-time friend mentioned a possible prospect.
She was assured that with the help of the prospect, she could get a sufficient number of qualified
borrowers. The prospect held a high position in a large university and he could arrange an exclusive loan
agreement between the university’s emp0loyees and Mutual Lending. A meeting between Ms.
Sarangaya and the prospect was scheduled.

During the meeting, the prospect told Ms. Sarangaya that a facilitator’s fee was required for the
deal to push through. From Ms. Saranagaya’s point of view, the was only possible if the interest charge
was jacked-up. Ms. Saranagaya thinks that this would cause inconvenience to the borrowers who were
mostly low-income earners. She relayed the information at once to her superior who prodded her to go
ahead. Ms. Sarangaya was adamant. “I consider the facilitator’s fee as a bribe and I don’t think it is
morally right for me to agree to such a condition.” Ms. Sarangaya thought.

Tom between clinching the agreement and her moral duty, Ms. Sarangaya’s mind wandered
from one option to the other.

Rephrased

You might also like