GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS REPORT

REPORT No.: GGC/ 208 / 2017-18

PROJECT: GEO TECHNICAL TESTING FOR PROPOSED STRUCTURES AT

MANTALAI

CLIENT: Patel Engineering Ltd.

SUBMITTED TO: Mr R.S Reddy, Patel Engineering Ltd.

DURATION : Nov-Dec 2017

Consultants:
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS
(Geotech & Structural consultants)
Plot No. 528, Industrial Area Phase 9 Mohali
Punjab-160062, Mob: 9888608424

1
 SOIL INVESTIGATION for
designing of foundation of
proposed structure at
MANTALAI JAMMU .
 Contents

Sr. No. Description Page No.

____________________________________________________________________________

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. SCOPE OF WORK 1

3. GROUND WATER TABLE 2

4. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 2

5. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 3-5

6. INTERPRETATION OF SOIL STRATA 5

7. NOTATIONS USED 6-7

8. FILED SPT DATA AND CALCULATION OF 8-11

CORRECTED N-VALUES

9. COMPUTATION OF LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY 12-15

OF PILE & RECOMMENDATIONS

11. SUMMARY 15

12. BORE LOG CHART & DATA SHEET 16-25

________________________________________________________________________
1.00 Introduction

1.01 The report presented herein deals with result of field and laboratory investigation carried
out to assess the nature of sub-soil strata and to evaluate the bearing capacity and other
parameters for subsequently designing the foundation of proposed structure at Mantalai,
jammu

1.02.1 The work of soil investigations was assigned to M/s Geo Globe Consultants,
Mohali. (Pb)

2.00 Scope of work

The soil investigation covers the following: -

2.01 Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in 8 No. bore holes up to a depth of 10m or
refusal whichever is earlier.

2.02 Collecting soil samples at various depths as per requirement of the Client from the
boreholes as feasible, for laboratory tests.

2.03 Analyzing the field and laboratory observations.

2.04 Submitting two copies of the soil investigations report and recommending safe
bearing capacity of soil.

3.00 Site

3.01 The Site of Investigation is at Mantalai, jammu

There is no special features which affected the explorations.

1
3.02 The location of bore holes was given by the client’s representative who was with the
investigating team till the investigations were over.

4.0 Ground Water table

Water table is not found during SPT.

5.0 Field Investigations

The field investigations were conducted to cover the entire scope of the job.

Boring – operations

The exploratory bore holes were made by shell and auger by pushing the casing pipe and
removing material within the casing. To avoid excessive disturbance to the in-situ
deposits, the casing was not driven but was rotated frequently with slow motion. The
samples were taken from below the bottom of the casing after completely cleaning the
bore holes of any loose material at all depths wherever the samples had to be taken. The
undisturbed soil samples were taken by pushing thin walled tubes into the bore holes.
Immediately after taking these, they were logged, labeled, sealed in polythene bag and sent
to the laboratory for testing.

5.02 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

The Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at various depths in the bore holes. These
tests were conducted by driving into the soil a standard split spoon sampler. This sampler
was driven with the help of a hammer weighing 63.5 kg. which was vertically guided to
fall through a free height of 75cm on the driving head. This driving head was attached to a
drill rod, to the other end of which the sampler was fitted. The number of blows required
to penetrate the first, second and third 15 cm lengths of the sampler were noted. The
number of blow(i.e.N value), as given in the data sheets of bore holes, is the numerical
value for the number of blows counted during the second and third stages i.e. for a depth
of 30 cms. The procedure adopted for conducting this test was as per IS: 2131. The
observed N values for all the boreholes have been noted down in tables. These values were
corrected for over burden pressure.

2
6.00 Laboratory Investigations
6.01 The laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples recovered from the test bore
holes. The results obtained have been given in the various tables at the end of the report.
6.02: Water Content
The water content of samples has been evaluated after drying each sample in an oven at
110°C for 24 hours as per procedure laid down in the IS: 2720 (Part II)

6.03: Grain Size Analysis:

Grain Size analysis was carried out on Disturbed and undisturbed Samples obtained
during boring operation. Percentage of sand and combined Silt and Clay were
determined from this analysis. The test was carried out as per IS: 2720 (Part IV)

6.04: Liquid Limits and Plastic Limits

To obtain an idea about the consistency characteristics of materials met with at various
elevations, the liquid limits and plastic limits of fine fractions were evaluated as per
procedure laid down in IS : 2720 (Part-V). These values have been recorded only in the
case of plastic samples (cohesive soils), on the bore hole data.

6.05 The wet density and grain size analysis was done for the samples taken as per
IS : 2720 (Part IV)

6.06 Direct Shear Test

This test was performed in a shear-box apparatus. The apparatus consisted of

two-piece shear box of square cross-section. The lower half of the box was rigidly held in
positions in a container which rested over rollers and which was pushed forward at a
constant rate by a geared jack, driven by an electric motor. The upper half of the box
butted against a proving ring. The soil sample was compacted in the shear box and was
held between metal grids and porous stones. Normal load was applied on the pressure pad.
The shearing strain was made to increase at constant rate. The shear force at failure
corresponding to the applied normal load was measured with the help of the proving ring.
A number of identical specimens were tested under increasing normal loads and the
required maximum shear force was recorded and a graph was plotted between shear force

3
 as the ordinate and normal load as the abscissa to get the failure envelops and the value of
C&

6.07 Unconfined Compression Test is carried out on cylindrical sample of cohesive soil
of dia 3.8 cm as per guidelines given in IS : 2720 Part 10.

6.08 Triaxial Compression Test

A triaxial compression test is the most versatile test available for the shear testing of soil.
In this test a soil specimen , cylindrical in shape was subjected to direct stresses acting in
three mutually perpendicular directions by means of triaxial apparatus comprises of
triaxial cell and loading frame. The major principal stress was applied in the vertical
direction and the other two principal stresses were applied in the horizontal directions by
the fluid pressure all around the specimen .the test was performed on cylindrical specimen
of dia 38 mm. The height of the specimen was twice the dia. Shearing processes were
started immediately without any consolidation and without allowing any drainage of
water. In this way no drainage or dissipation of pore water pressure from soil specimen
took place during the entire testing time

6.09 CONSOLIDATION TESTS

The consolidation tests were carried out on undisturbed soil specimen in order to
determine the settlement characteristics of soil at different depths. The tests is
conducted in accordance to IS : 2720 (Pt-XV).
An undisturbed soil specimen was extruded to the consolidation ring of 60mm dia.
The edge was trimmed carefully such that the sample was flushed with the top and
bottom edges of the ring. The thickness of the specimen was measured and the
weight was recorded. The bottom porous stone was then centered on the base of the
consolidation cell.
The specimen was then placed centrally between the bottom porous stone and the
upper porous stone. A filter paper was provided in between specimen and porous
stones. Then the loading cap was placed on the top. The consolidometer was placed
in position in the loading device and suitably adjusted. The dial gauge is then
clamped into position for recording the relative movement between the base of
the cell and the loading cap. A seating pressure of 0.05 kg/cm2 was applied to the
specimen. The cell was kept filled with water. After 24 hr. the test was continued further
using a loading sequence on the soil specimen of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, & 8.0
kg/cm2. For each loading increment after application of load, readings of the dial

4
 gauge was taken using time sequence 0, 0.25, 1, 2.25, 2, 6.25, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49 ... up to
24 hrs. From the observations of all incremental pressures, void ratio versus log
(pressure) curve was obtained. The slope of the straight line portion was designated as
compression index cc

7.0 Interpretation of Soil Strata

i) On perusal of the strata chart indicates the sub-soil strata at the site is
heterogeneous in nature
ii) in Bore hole location No.1 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 1.5m Clay
was encountered following which up to 3.0 m silty sand was encountered and
following up to 15.0 m Rock was encountered.

iii) in Bore hole location No.2 and 3 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 15.0m
Rock was encountered.

iv) in Bore hole location N0. 4 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 4.5m Clay was
encountered following which up to 10.5 m Hard Clay having n-value above 50 was
encountered.
v) in Bore hole location N0. 5 and 6 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 10.5m Clayey
Weathered Rock in BH 5 whereas in BH6 sandy weathered rock was encountered.
vi) in Bore hole location N0. 7 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 4.5m Clay was
encountered following which up to 10.5 m Clayey weathered Rock was encountered.
vii) in Bore hole location No. 8 the majority of soil strata from NGL to 9.0m Clay was
encountered following which up to 15.0 m Hard Clay having N-value above 50 was
encountered.
The weathered rock quality encountered was very poor, largely which can be considered
as hard clay or sand collected in the form of core having negligible crushing strength and
point load resistace.

5
NOTATIONS USED
NSL - Natural Surface Level
SSWL - Sub-soil Water Level
B - Width of Footing
L - Length of Footing
D - Depth of Footing
P - Effective Pressure
P0 - Initial Effective Pressure at mid height of layer
∆P - Pressure Increment
q - Effective Surcharge at Base Level of foundation
Pn - Net Loading Intensity
qnf - Net Ultimate Bearing capacity
qa - Allowable b.c.
qns - Net safe b.c. against Shear Failure
N - SPT Value
Nn - Normalised SPT Value
CN - Correction Factor for N-Value
NC - Corrected SPT Value
CL - Clay of low plasticity
ML - Silt of low plasticity
SP - Poorly Graded Sand with no fines
SM - Silty Sand, Poorly Graded Sand-Silt Mixture
SW - Well Graded Sand with no fines
GW - Well Graded Gravels
GP - Poorly Graded Gravels
GM - Silty Gravels
GSF - General Shear Failure
LSF - Local Shear Failure
GC - Clayey Gravels
SC - Clayey Sands
MI - Silt of Medium Plasticity
CI - Clay of Medium Plasticity
MH - Silt of High Plasticity
CH - Clay of High Plasticity
M(NP) - Non Plastic Silt

6
ML-CL - Mixture of ML and CL
 - Angle of Internal Friction
' - Effective Angle of Internal Friction
m - Mobilised Angle of Internal Friction
Nc,Nq,Nγ - Bearing Capacity Factors
Sc,Sq,Sγ - Shape Factors
dc,dq,d γ - Depth Factors
w’ - Moisture Content
γ - Bulk Unit Weight
γsat - Saturated Bulk Unit Weight
γd - Dry Bulk Density
γ’ - Submerged Unit Weight
qu - Unconfined Compressive Strength
Cu - Undrained Shear Strength
C’ - Effective Cohesion
G - Specific Gravity
H - Thickness of Soil Layer
Ht - Thickness of sandy layer
Bt - Top width of sandy layer
∆Pt - Stress increment at top of sandy layer
Df - Depth factor
Lyf - Lateral yield factor
Rf - Rigidity factor
So - Settlement due to net unit foundation loading
intensity (1 Kg/Cm2)
Sob - Settlement due to net unit foundation loading
intensity under submerged conditions (1Kg/Cm2)
St - Total settlement
e0 - Void Ratio
FOS - Factor of Safety
LL - Liquid Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
CC - Compression Index
PI - Plasticity Index

7
 DETERMINATION OF THE CORRECTED N-VALUE
BH – 1
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5 14 2.36911 1.483 21

3.0 18 5.026178 1.232 22
4.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock)) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
12.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
13.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
15.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50

BH – 2
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5(Refusal)
>50
- - >50
3.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
4.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
12.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
13.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
15.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50

8
 BH – 3
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
2
(m) (N) t/m CN NC

1.5(Refusal)
>50
- - >50
3.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
4.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
12.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
13.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
15.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50

BH 4
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5 16 2.226923 1.504 24

3.0 33 4.984615 1.235 41
4.5 51 8.638743 1.051 54
6.0wheather rock >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50

9
 BH – 5
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50

3.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
4.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50

BH – 6

Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected

below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5(weather rock)
>50
- - >50
3.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
4.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50

10
 BH 7
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5 28 2.826871 1.424 40

3.0 41 5.81605 1.183 49
4.5 54 8.132992 1.071 58
6.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
7.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
9.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50

BH 8
Depth Observed Overburden Correction Corrected
below NGL N-value pressure factor N-value
(m) (N) t/m2 CN NC

1.5
14
2.504216 1.465 21
3.0 17 4.932546 1.238 21
4.5
23
7.430847 1.101 25
6.0
29
11.0582 0.968 28
7.5
34
13.5 0.901 31
9.0
52
16.22222 0.840 44
10.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
12.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50
13.5(weather rock) >50 - - >50
15.0(weather rock) >50 - - >50

11
 Computation of Bearing Capacity for BH (1,4 and 8)

Type and depth of foundation

For bearing capacity computations for the Isolated Footing is considered at

1.5 m below the ground level (NGL) for the isolated footing of size 1.5 m x1.5 m.
Determination of Bearing Capacity
Mode of computation,
As per shear failure consideration
Type of foundation = Isolated Footing
Width of foundation = 1.5m
Depth of foundation = 1.5m
Governing Soil Parameters
2
C = 0.94 kg/cm
 = 9°
’ = tan-1 (0.67 tan )
= 6°
(A) Shear failure Considerations:

Relevant B.C factors are

Nc 6.81 Sc 1.3 dc 1.22
Nq 1.72 Sq 1.2 dq 1.0
N 0.57 S 0.80 d 1.0

Net Ultimate b.c

qnf = 2/3 CN’c Sc dc + q (N’q-1) Sq dq + 0.5 Bγ N’y Sy dy W'
= 0.67 x 9.4 x 6.81 x 1.3 x 1.22 + 1.57 x 1.5 (1.72-1)
x 1.2 + 0.5 x 1.5 x 1.81 x 0.57 x 0.8 x 1.0
2
= 69.56 t/m
Net Safe b.c
2
‘qns’ = 27.82 t/m (f.o.s = 2.5)
Settlement Consideration (IS: 8009 (Part-I)-1976, Reaffirmed 1998)
Settlement Analysis of different Layers
Layer – I,

12
 Where
S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S1 = Cc H log10 p0 + p
1 + e0 p0

= 96.03mm
Layer – II
Where
S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S2 = Cc H log10 p0 + p

1 + e0 p0

= 56.33mm
Layer – III
Where
S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S3 = Cc H log10 p0 + p
1 + e0 p0

13
 = 23.74 mm

Total Settlement St = S1 + S2 + S3

= 176.1 mm

This settlement (176.1 mm ) is more than than the permissible settlement as 75mm
2
Hence the allowable b.c works out to be 27.82*75/176.1 =11.85 t/m
Computation of Bearing Capacity for BH (2,3,5,6 ,and 7 )

Type and depth of foundation

For bearing capacity computations for the Isolated Footing is considered at

1.5 m below the ground level (NGL) for the isolated footing of size 1.5 m x1.5 m.
Determination of Bearing Capacity
Mode of computation,
As per shear failure consideration
Type of foundation = Isolated Footing
Width of foundation = 1.5m
Depth of foundation = 1.5m
Governing Soil Parameters
2
C = 1.3 kg/cm

 = 8°
’ = tan-1 (0.67 tan )
= 5°

(A) Shear failure Considerations:

Relevant B.C factors are

Nc 6.49 Sc 1.3 dc 1.22
Nq 1.57 Sq 1.2 dq 1.0
N 0.45 S 0.80 d 1.0

Net Ultimate b.c

qnf = 2/3 CN’c Sc dc + q (N’q-1) Sq dq + 0.5 Bγ N’y Sy dy W'
14
 = 0.67 x 14 x 6.49x 1.3 x 1.22 + 2.56 x 1.5 (1.52-1) x 1.2
+ 0.5 x 1.5 x 2.73 x 0.45 x 0.8 x 1.0
2
= 98.10 t/m
Net Safe b.c
2
‘qns’ = 39.24t/m (f.o.s = 2.5)
Settlement Consideration (IS: 8009 (Part-I)-1976, Reaffirmed 1998)
Settlement Analysis of different Layers
Layer – I,
Where
S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S1 = Cc H log10 p0 + p
1 + e0 p0

= 111.1mm
Layer – II
Where
S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S2 = Cc H log10 p0 + p

1 + e0 p0

= 68.58 mm
Layer – III
Where

15
 S = Settlement
Cc = (Compression Index)
H = (Thickness of the compressible strip
e0 = (Initial void ratio at mid height of soil strip)

S3 = Cc H log10 p0 + p
1 + e0 p0

= 13.99 mm

Total Settlement St = S1 + S2 + S3

= 210.4 mm

This settlement (210.4 mm ) is more than than the permissible settlement as 75mm
2
Hence the allowable b.c works out to be 39.24*75/210.4 =13.99 t/m say 14 t/m2

RECOMENDATIONS

 On the basis of field & laboratory & calculation for investigation

bearing capacity values following reference have been drawn.

 The value of allowable b.c to be adopted for design consideration at

different depths are as follows
 This is the general recommendation. The designer may change the
recommendation & he may decide the depth of the foundation & type of
foundation as per the structural details of structure.

16
 SUMMARY

S. Location width of Depth Type of (qa)Net

No. fdn from Fondation t/m2
(B ) m NGL m

BH-1,4,8
1 1.5 m 1.5 Isolated 11.85

BH,2,3,5,6,7
2 1.5 m 1.5 Isolated 14

17
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 1 rock
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

Level Of Water Table

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
water absorption %
BLOWS

REPRESENTATION

moisture content
30cm
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

initial weight
I.S.C. GROUP
Point

final weight
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CURVE

length (L)
core Load

OR UDS
Density
recovery width Load Index

De²
(m)

% (W) (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

>>50 sandy weathered rock
4.5
(Refusal)
Rock 88.5 89.5 1.13 2.95 11 4.5 7 0 40.1 0 0.5
(weak)
DS
1.2
>>50 sandy weathered rock
6.0
(Refusal) Corre Rock 122 123 1.23 2.43 24 4.3 6.8 0 37.2 0 0.8
(weak)
UDS

6m
1 cted
>>50 sandy weathered rock
7.5
(Refusal)
Rock Nil 193 199 2.85 2.41 20 4.6 7.1 0 41.6 0 0.6
(weak)
DS
0.8 Obser
>>50 ved sandy weathered rock
9.0
(Refusal)
Rock 182 186 2.2 2.6 23 4.9 7.2 1.5 44.9 33.4 0.7
(weak)
UDS

9m
0.6
>> 50 sandy weathered rock
10.5
(Refusal)
Rock 94.5 96 1.59 2.92 24 4.5 7.5 1 43 23.3 0.2
(weak)
0.4
>> 50 sandy weathered rock
12.0
(Refusal)
Rock 156 159 1.92 2.87 25 5.1 6.9 0 44.8 0 1.1
(weak)
0.2
>> 50 sandy weathered rock
13.5
(Refusal)
Rock 104 107 2.4 2.76 28 4.8 7 1 42.8 23.4 0.1
(weak)
0
>> 50
0.0 Depth
2.0 in4.0
mtrs. 6.0 sandy weathered rock
15.0
(Refusal)
Rock 130 132 1.15 2.79 25 5 7.2 0 45.9 0 0.3
(weak)

GGC 17
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

UNCONFINED COMP.
% GRAVEL MODULES
Level Of Water Table

(-80 MM FRACTION)

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
COMPRESSION TEST

CC
BLOWS

% SILT + CLAY (-75

REPRESENTATION

STRN Kg/Cm2 (Cu)

ф0 DIRECT SHEAR
30cm DENSITY (gm/cc)

COMPRESSION
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

% MOISTURE
I.S.C. GROUP

SP. GRAVITY

VOID RATIO
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CURVE

MICRON)
FIELD DRY

TRIAXIAL
% SAND

OR UDS
INDEX
Density Density C'
(m)

LL PI gm/cc gm/cc Kg/Cm2 REMARKS

1.5 14 21 CI 13.6 1.7 19.9 78.4 39 12 1.81 1.579 2.68 0.7 - 0.94 9 0.18 Clay DS
25
3.0 18 22 SM Nil 20.5 0.0 66.9 33.1 - - 1.92 1.675 2.72 0.62 . - - - Silty Sand UDS

3m
Corre
>>50 cted sandy weathered
4.5 20 Rock 0.5 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - DS
(Refusal) rock (weak)

>>50 sandy weathered

6.0
(Refusal)
Obser Rock 0.8 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - - rock (weak)
UDS

6m
15 ved
>>50 sandy weathered
7.5 Rock 0.6 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - DS
(Refusal) rock (weak)

>>50 sandy weathered

9.0 10 Rock 0.7 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - UDS

9m
(Refusal) rock (weak)

>> 50 sandy weathered

10.5 Rock 0.2 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
(Refusal) rock (weak)

>> 50 5 sandy weathered

12.0 Rock 1.1 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
(Refusal) rock (weak)

>> 50 sandy weathered

13.5 Rock 0.1 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
(Refusal) 0 rock (weak)

>> 50 Depth in mtrs.

15.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Rock 0.3 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
sandy weathered
(Refusal) rock (weak)

GGC 16
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 2 rock
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
water absorption %
BLOWS

REPRESENTATION

moisture content
Level Of Water
30cm

initial weight
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

I.S.C. GROUP
Point

final weight

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CORRECTE

CURVE

length (L)
core Load

OR UDS
Density
recovery width Load Index

Table

De²
(m)

% (W) (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

D

>>50 clayey weathered

1.5
(Refusal) 1.2 128 132 2.73 2.56 13 4.5 7.1 0 40.7 0 rock (weak)

0.2
Rock
>>50 Corre sandy weathered
3
(Refusal) cted 128 129 0.78 2.56 19 5 12.1 0 77.07 0 rock (weak)

0.4
Rock
1
>>50 clayey weathered
4.5 Nil 0.5 DS
(Refusal) Rock 147 150 2.05 2.43 19 5.1 10.2 1.5 66.27 22.6 rock (weak)
>>50 0.8 Obser sandy weathered
6.0 0.1 UDS
(Refusal)

6m
ved Rock 203 207 1.98 2.53 20 4.8 9.3 0 56.87 0 rock (weak)

>>50 sandy weathered

7.5 0.6 0.2 DS
(Refusal) Rock 62 66 6.45 2.06 14.5 5.2 7 0 46.37 0 rock (weak)

>>50 sandy weathered

9.0 0.7 UDS
(Refusal)

9m
Rock 143 145 1.4 2.38 21.5 4.8 8.3 0 50.75 0 rock (weak)
0.4
>> 50 sandy weathered
10.5 0.5
(Refusal) Rock 106 106 0.47 2.63 20 4.7 6.3 1 37.72 26.5 rock (weak)
>> 50 0.2 clayey weathered
12.0 0.4
(Refusal) Rock 444 455 2.59 2.46 23 4.9 6.5 0 40.57 0 rock (weak)
>> 50 sandy weathered
13.5 0 0.3
(Refusal) Rock 80.5 84 4.35 2.68 16 5.3 9.6 0 64.82 0 rock (weak)
Depth in mtrs.
>> 50 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 sandy weathered
15.0 Rock 404 407 0.74 2.69 25 4 2.5 0.5 12.74 39.3 0.8
(Refusal) rock (weak)
GGC 18
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 3 rock
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
water absorption %
BLOWS

REPRESENTATION

moisture content
core recovery %
Level Of Water
30cm

initial weight
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

I.S.C. GROUP
Point

final weight

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CORRECTE

CURVE

length (L)
Load

OR UDS
Density
width Index

Table

De²
(m)

(W) Load (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

D

>>50 sandy weathered rock

1.5
(Refusal) 1.2
119 123 3.8 1.97 15.5 5.3 6 0 40.51 0 0.3
(weak)
Rock
>>50 Corre clayey weathered rock
3
(Refusal) 218 221 1.38 2.41 15.5 4.8 2.5 0 15.29 0 0.4
(weak)
cted Rock
1
>>50 sandy weathered rock
4.5
(Refusal) Rock
Nil 162 168 4.02 2.29 20.5 4.9 6.5 0 40.57 0 0.7 (weak)
DS

>>50 0.8 Obser sandy weathered rock

6.0
(Refusal) 135 141 4.44 2.1 25 4.7 6.9 0 41.31 0 0.8 (weak)
UDS

6m
ved Rock
>>50 sandy weathered rock
7.5
(Refusal) 0.6 105 107 1.9 2.62 23 4.9 9 0 56.18 0 0.1 (weak)
DS
Rock
>>50 sandy weathered rock
9.0
(Refusal) 169 177 4.73 2.11 23 5 8.2 0 52.23 0 0.6 (weak)
UDS

9m
0.4 Rock
>> 50 sandy weathered rock
10.5
(Refusal) 145 151 4.15 2.4 28.5 4.9 7.3 0 45.57 0 0.4 (weak)
Rock
>> 50 0.2 sandy weathered rock
12.0
(Refusal) Rock 248 255 2.83 2.47 28.5 4.8 7.2 0 44.03 0 0.9 (weak)
>> 50 sandy weathered rock
13.5
(Refusal) 0 Rock 115 118 2.17 2.55 28 4.6 7.5 0 43.95 0 0.5 (weak)
Depth in mtrs.
>> 50 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 sandy weathered rock
15.0
(Refusal) Rock 122 124 1.23 2.44 25.5 5.2 10 0 66.24 0 0.2 (weak)

GGC 19
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 4
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

UNCONFINED COMP.
% GRAVEL MODULES
Level Of Water Table

(-80 MM FRACTION)

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
COMPRESSION TEST

CC
BLOWS

% SILT + CLAY (-75

REPRESENTATION

STRN Kg/Cm2 (Cu)

ф0 DIRECT SHEAR
30cm DENSITY (gm/cc)

COMPRESSION
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

% MOISTURE
I.S.C. GROUP

SP. GRAVITY

VOID RATIO
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CURVE

MICRON)
FIELD DRY

TRIAXIAL
% SAND

OR UDS
INDEX
Density Density C'
(m)

LL PI gm/cc gm/cc Kg/Cm2 REMARKS

1.5 16 24 60 CI 29.0 0.0 3.9 96.1 35 12 1.93 1.485 2.69 0.81 - 0.9 9 0.19 Silty Clay DS

Correct
3.0 33 41 50 ed CI Nil 13.6 0.0 2.3 97.7 34 11 2.16 1.662 2.75 0.66 . - - - Silty Clay UDS

3m
40 Observ
4.5 51 54 CI 19.0 0.0 1.8 98.2 42 14 2.2 1.92 2.76 0.44 - 1.5 8 0.18 Silty Clay DS
ed

>>50
30
6.0 CI 13.6 0.0 1.1 98.9 37 11 2.21 1.842 2.67 0.45 - - - - Silty Clay UDS
(Refusal)

6m
20
>>50
7.5 CI 13.6 0.0 2.3 97.7 35 11 2.19 1.911 2.89 0.51 - - - Silty Clay DS
(Refusal)
10
>>50
9.0 CI 17.0 0.0 3.5 96.5 38 12 2.17 1.839 2.80 0.52 - - - Silty Clay UDS
(Refusal)

9m
0
>> 50
10.5
(Refusal)
0.0 Depth
2.0 in4.0
mtrs. 6.0 CI 19.0 0.0 2.4 97.6 2.23 1.858 2.85 0.53 - - - Silty Clay

GGC 20
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 5 rock
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL (m)

Level Of Water Table

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
water absorption %
BLOWS

REPRESENTATION

moisture content
core recovery %
30cm
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

initial weight
I.S.C. GROUP
Point

final weight
CORRECTED

UDS depth
CURVE
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC

length (L)
Load

OR UDS
Density
width Index

De²
(W) Load (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

>>50 sandy weathered rock

1.5 1.2 Rock
(Refusal) (weak)
99 102 3.03 2.47 15 4.6 10.5 0 61.53 0 0.8
Corre
>>50 clayey weathered rock
3 1 cted Rock
(Refusal) (weak)
132 136 2.65 2.2 26.5 4.7 12.5 3 74.84 40.09 0.5

>>50 0.8 Obser clayey weathered rock

4.5 Rock Nil 0.3 DS
(Refusal) (weak)
ved 135 143 5.93 2.25 18 4.6 9.3 0 54.5 0
>>50
0.6
clayey weathered rock
6.0 Rock 0.4 UDS
(Refusal) (weak)

6m
71.5 72.5 1.4 2.38 18 4 2.5 1 12.74 78.5
0.4
>>50 clayey weathered rock
7.5 Rock 0.6 DS
(Refusal) (weak)
0.2 124 125 1.21 3.08 18 4.7 7 3 41.91 71.58
>>50 clayey weathered rock
9.0 Rock 0.7 UDS
(Refusal) (weak)

9m
0 200 202 1 2.85 21 4.5 7.5 0.5 42.99 11.63
>> 50 0.0 Depth
2.0 in4.0
mtrs. 6.0 clayey weathered rock
10.5 Rock 0.1
(Refusal) (weak)
90.5 91 0.55 2.58 14 4.7 9.4 0 56.28 0

GGC 21
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 6 rock
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL (m)

Level Of Water Table

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
water absorption %
BLOWS

REPRESENTATION

moisture content
core recovery %
30cm
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

initial weight
I.S.C. GROUP
Point

final weight
CORRECTED

UDS depth
CURVE
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC

length (L)
Load

OR UDS
Density
width Index

De²
(W) Load (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

>>50 sandy weathered rock

1.5
(Refusal)
1.2 (weak)
Rock 126 129 1.98 2.25 19 5.1 8.3 0 53.92 0 0.9
Corre
>>50 1 sandy weathered rock
3 cted
(Refusal) (weak)
Rock 153 156 1.63 2.18 20 4.9 8.1 0.5 50.56 9.889 0.2

>>50 0.8 Obser clayey weathered rock

4.5 Nil 0.6 DS
(Refusal) ved (weak)
Rock 147 153 4.08 2.94 25 4.4 7.4 1.5 41.48 36.16
>>50 0.6 sandy weathered rock
6.0 0.7 UDS
(Refusal) (weak)

6m
Rock 389 398 2.32 2.42 20.5 5.2 5.9 0 39.08 0
0.4
>>50 clayey weathered rock
7.5 0.1 DS
(Refusal) (weak)
Rock 63 65 3.17 2.23 19.5 5.2 9.6 0 63.59 0
0.2
>>50 sandy weathered rock
9.0 0.6 UDS
(Refusal) (weak)

9m
0
Rock 102 103 0.49 2.55 25 4.5 7.4 2 42.42 47.15
>> 50
10.5 0.0 Depth
2.0 in4.0
mtrs. 6.0 0.3
clayey weathered rock
(Refusal) (weak)
Rock 320 324 1.09 2.66 26 4.7 7.2 0 43.11 0

GGC 22
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 7 rock

LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS OR
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL (m)

Level Of Water Table

BLOWS

water absorption %
REPRESENTATION

30cm

moisture content
core recovery %
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

initial weight
I.S.C. GROUP

CURVE Point

final weight
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC

length (L)
Load

Density
width Index

UDS
De²
(W) Load (P) (Mpa) REMARKS

>>50 1.2 sandy weathered rock

6.0
(Refusal) Corre Rock 92 92.5 0.54 3 16 4.9 9 0 56.18 0 0.3 (weak)
UDS
1

6m
cted
>>50 0.8 Obser clayey weathered rock
7.5
(Refusal)
Rock Nil 177 183 3.11 2.21 14 5.4 9.7 0 66.73 0 0.5 (weak)
DS
0.6 ved

>>50
0.4
sandy weathered rock
9.0
(Refusal)
Rock 55 56 1.82 2.75 17.5 4.9 7.1 0.5 44.32 11.28 0.7 (weak)
UDS
0.2

9m
0
>> 50 clayey weathered rock
10.5 0.0 Depth5.0 Rock 294 298 1.36 2.45 21 5 12.9 0 82.17 0 0.6
(Refusal) in mtrs.10.0 (weak)

GGC 24
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 7
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

UNCONFINED COMP.
% GRAVEL MODULES
Level Of Water Table

(-80 MM FRACTION)

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
COMPRESSION TEST

CC
BLOWS

% SILT + CLAY (-75

REPRESENTATION

STRN Kg/Cm2 (Cu)

ф0 DIRECT SHEAR
30cm DENSITY (gm/cc)

COMPRESSION
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

% MOISTURE
I.S.C. GROUP

SP. GRAVITY

VOID RATIO
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CURVE

MICRON)
FIELD DRY

TRIAXIAL
% SAND

OR UDS
INDEX
Density Density C'
(m)

LL PI gm/cc gm/cc Kg/Cm2 REMARKS

1.5 28 40 70 CI 9.9 0.0 2.2 97.8 39 12 2.09 1.885 2.81 0.49 - 0.7 9 0.19 Silty Clay DS

Correct
60 ed
3.0 41 49 CI Nil 16.3 0.0 1.7 98.3 38 11 2.15 1.939 2.86 0.48 . - - - Silty Clay UDS

3m
50
4.5 54 58 Observ CI 9.9 0.0 1.6 98.4 42 14 2.12 1.807 2.85 0.58 - - 33 - Silty Clay DS
40 ed

>>50 sandy weathered UDS

6.0 Rock 0.3 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - -
(Refusal) 30

6m
rock (weak)
clayey
>>50
7.5 20 Rock 0.5 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - - weathered rock DS
(Refusal)
(weak)

>>50 10 sandy weathered UDS

9.0 Rock 0.7 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
(Refusal)

9m
rock (weak)
0 clayey
>> 50 weathered rock
10.5 0.0 Depth
2.0 in4.0
mtrs. 6.0 Rock 0.6 Rock Rock Rock - - - - - -
(Refusal) (weak)

GGC 23
GEO GLOBE CONSULTANTS (GGC)
PLOT NO. 528, INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 9, MOHALI (pb)
BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET
PROJECT:-Construction of Proposed Structure at Mantalai REFERENCE POINT (RL) :- NGL
LOCATION- Mantalai DATE OF BORING :-
DIA OF CASING :- 150mm
BH NO.:- 8
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SPT (N)
DEPTH FROM NGL

UNCONFINED COMP.
% GRAVEL MODULES
Level Of Water Table

(-80 MM FRACTION)

TYPE OF SAMPLE DS
COMPRESSION TEST

CC
BLOWS

% SILT + CLAY (-75

REPRESENTATION

STRN Kg/Cm2 (Cu)

ф0 DIRECT SHEAR
30cm DENSITY (gm/cc)

COMPRESSION
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE

% MOISTURE
I.S.C. GROUP

SP. GRAVITY

VOID RATIO
CORRECTED

UDS depth
OBSERVED

SYMBOLIC
CURVE

MICRON)
FIELD DRY

TRIAXIAL
% SAND

OR UDS
INDEX
Density Density C'
(m)

LL PI gm/cc gm/cc Kg/Cm2 REMARKS

1.5 14 21 CI 17.6 0.0 1.8 98.2 39 12 1.98 1.669 2.71 0.62 - 0.94 9 0.18 Silty Clay DS
60
Silty Clay
3.0 17 21 Correct CI Nil 18.3 1.2 4.1 94.7 38 11 1.95 1.644 2.82 0.72 . - - - UDS

3m
+min% gravels
ed
50
Silty Clay +
4.5 23 25 CI 12.4 48.3 1.1 50.6 42 14 1.97 1.651 2.76 0.67 - 0.98 9 0.19 DS
Boulder

6.0 29 28 40 Observ CI 19.0 0.0 1.8 98.2 2.09 1.843 2.79 0.51 - - - - Silty Clay UDS

6m
ed
7.5 34 31 CI 19.0 0.0 2.4 97.6 35 11 2.16 1.8 2.81 0.56 1 10 0.19 Silty Clay DS
30
9.0 52 44 CI 20.5 0.0 1.8 98.2 38 12 2.19 1.802 2.86 0.59 Silty Clay UDS

9m
>> 50 20
10.5
(Refusal)
CI 19.0 0.0 1.2 98.8 2.21 1.842 2.80 0.52 1.2 8 0.18 Silty Clay DS

>> 50

12m
12.0 10 CI 27.4 0.0 1.3 98.7 35 11 2.08 1.62 2.85 0.76 - Silty Clay UDS
(Refusal)
>> 50
13.5 CI 27.4 0.0 0.6 99.4 2.16 1.682 2.89 0.72 - Silty Clay DS
(Refusal)
0
>> 50 Depth in mtrs.
15.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 CI 26.6 0.0 3.2 96.8 37 11 2.10 1.646 2.90 0.76 Silty Clay UDS

15m
(Refusal)

GGC 25