GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

Chandkheda, Ahmadabad
Affiliated

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN COLLEGE OF ENGG.& TECH.

SAIJ, KALOL

An UDP Project
On
“SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDING WITH AND
WITHOUT SHEAR WALL”
Under subject of
PROJECT - II

Sr.No. Name of Student Enrolment No.

1. Karkar Ankur Ramnikbhai 161153106010
2. Patel Prijesh Bharatbhai 161153106029
3. Rathod Sahil Prakashbhai 161153106035
4. Vala Krunal Rajeshbhai 161153106047

Prof. S.K. Patel Prof. S.K. Patel

(Faculty Guide) (Head of the Department)

I
 CERTIFICATE

Gujarat Technological University

This is to certify that MR.ANKUR R. KARKAR (161153106010), MR.PRIJESH B.

PATEL (161153106029), MR.SAHIL P. RATHOD (161153106035), and MR.KRUNAL
R. VALA (161153106047) from SHREE SWAMINARAYAN COLLEGE OF ENGG.
&TECH. SAIJ (KALOL) has completed Project-II in 8TH Semester of BE-Civil having title
Seismic analysis of multistory building with and without shear wall using STAAD-PRO
Software, In A Group Consisting Of 4 (Four) Persons Under the guidance of the faculty guide.

Prof. S.K. Patel Prof. S.K. Patel

(Faculty Guide) (Head of the Department)

Examiner sign

II
 ACKNOWLEGMENT

Gujarat Technological University

We take the opportunity to express our first gratitude towards Shree Swaminarayan Collage of
Engg. &Tech. for giving us opportunity to develop this project. We thank our guidance Prof. S.K.
Patel their comments on various aspects of this draft and for thoughtful contribution to our effort.
Without their support and co-operation we would not have completed this work. We also thanks my
friends for their help and putting document together and also my parents and family member who
have played important role strengthen our carrier. Under these responsible personalities we were able
to complete our project field’s study of Seismic analysis of multi-storied building with and
without shear wall on time with success. I am made this project not just for marks but to also
enhance my knowledge.
Last, but not least, we would like to thank the writer of various research articles and books that were
referred to.

Guide By: H.O.D.

Prof. S. K. Patel Prof. S. K. Patel

III
 ABSTRACT
In the seismic design of structure, reinforced concrete structural wall, or shear wall, acts as a major
earthquake resisting member. Structural walls give an able bracing system and offer great potential
for lateral load resistance. Shear wall system are one of the most typically used lateral-load resisting
systems in high-rise buildings. Shear walls have very high in-plane rigidity and strength, which can
be used to at the same time oppose large horizontal loads and support gravity loads, making them
pretty helpful in lots of structural engineering applications.

In this study the major focus is to study the response spectrum analysis method of frame structure
with and without shear wall. Models are generated with and without shear wall & analysis carry out
by Dynamic method using STAAD Pro vi8.

Here the problem taken is on G+8 storied regular building. These buildings have the plan area of
21m x 20m with a storey height 3.050 m each and depth of foundation is 2.593 m. The dynamic
analysis has done on computer with the help of STAAD-Pro software using the parameters for the
design as per the IS-1893- 2002-Part-1 for the zones- 3 and the post processing result obtained has
summarized.

IV
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sr no Description Page
Title Page I
Certificate II
Acknowledgement III
Abstract IV
Table content V
Chapter: 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.1.1. The Advantages of the Modern Method 1
1.2 Introduction about shear wall 2
1.3 Introduction to STAAD pro software 4
1.3.1. Types of structure 4
1.3.2. Starting the program 4
1.3.3. Grid 4
1.3.4. Structure wizard 4
1.3.5. 3-D Rendering 5
1.3.6. Design 5
1.3.7. Buildings were analyzed for 5
1.4 Seismic zones in India 5
Chapter: 2 Canvas mapping 7
2.1 Empathy mapping canvas 7
2.1.2 Environment 7
2.2.3 Interaction 8
2.2.4 Objects 8
2.2.5 Users 9
2.2 Ideation canvas 10
2.2.1. People 10 V
 2.2.2 Activity 10
2.2.3 Situation / Context / Location 11
2.2.4 Props or Possible Solution 11
2.3 Product development canvas 12
2.3.1 Purpose 13
2.3.2 Product experience / Product functions / Product features 14
2.3.3 Components 14
2.3.4 Redesign 14
2.4 Empathy mapping canvas 15
2.4.1User / Stakeholder / Activity 15
2.4.2 Happy & sad story 15
Chapter: 3 Literature Review 18
3.1 Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storeyed Frame-Shear Wall Building Considering SSI 17
3.2 Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Building by Response Spectrum Method 17
3.3 Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storied Building with and without Shear Wall and
Bracing 18
3.4 Comparative Study on Design Results of Building using STAAD PRO and ETABS
For Regular and Irregular Plan 19
3.5 Seismic analysis and design of G+ 15 multistory residential building reviews 20
3.6 Dynamic Analysis of Building using Response Spectrum Method and Seismic
Coefficient Method a Comparison 20
3.7 Analysis, Design and Estimation of G +7 Storey Building Structure by
Using IS Code Methods and by Software's 21
3.8 To Study the Effect of Shear Wall at Different Locations by Using Staad. Pro

By using Bare Frame System and In Infilled Frame System 22

Chapter: 4 Static Analysis 24

4.1 Equivalent Static analysis 24
4.2 Preliminary data required for static analysis 25 VI
4.3 Analysis of building in STAAD pro 26
4.4 Node Displacement Floor Wise 31
4.4.1 Node displacement summery 32
4.5 Total seismic weight of building 33
4.6 S.F & B.M diagram for building with shear wall 34
4.6.1 S.F & B.M diagram for building without shear wall: 34
4.7 Result and comparison 35
Chapter: 5 Dynamic Analysis 37
5.1 Dynamic Analysis 37
5.2 Response Spectrum Analysis 37
5.3 Preliminary data required for dynamic analysis 38
5.4 3D images of structure 39
5.5 Geometrical images of structure 41
5.6 Dynamic analysis of building in STAAD pro 43
5.7 Results of dynamic analysis 47
5.7.1 Displacement of structure 49
5.7.2 Maximum S.F. and B.M. 50
Chapter: 6 Conclusion and Future scope 51
6.1 Conclusion 51
6.2 Future Scope 51
Reference

VII
 List of Figures:-
Fig. No. Description Page No.
1.1 Shear wall 3
1.2 Seismic zonetion and intensity map in India 6
2.1 Activity 7
2.2 Environment 7
2.3 Interactions 8
2.4 Objects 8
2.5 Users 9
2.6 Peoples 10
2.7 Activity 10
2.8 Situation & Location 11
2.9 Props 11
2.1O purpose and people 12
2.11 Product experience 13
2.12 Components 14
2.13 Redesign 14
2.14 User/ Stakeholders / Activity 15
2.15 Happy & Sad story 15
2.16 Happy & Sad story 16
4.1 Axes of building 24
4.2 Grid 26
4.3 Geometry of structure 26
4.4 Property of beam & Column 27
4.5 Support 27
4.6 Seismic Definition 28
4.7 Add Seismic definition 28
4.8 Building with shear wall 29
4.9 Building without shear wall 29
4.1O Dead load 30
4.11 Live load 30
4.12 Node displacement graph 31
4.13 Node displacement 32
4.14 Total Seismic Weight 33
4.15 S.F & B.M diagram for building with shear wall: 34
4.16 S.F & B.M diagram for building without shear wall: 34
4.17 Displacement or deflection of building with shear wall 35
4.18 Displacement or deflection of building without shear wall 35
4.19 B.M Diagram 36
4.2O Displacement of building 36
5.1 Model 1(Structure without shear wall) 39
5.2 Model 2 (Shear wall at core) 39
5.3 Model 3 (Shear wall at opposite side) 39
5.4 Model 4 (Shear wall at two opposite corner) 39
5.5 Model 5 (Shear wall at corner of building) 40
5.6 Geometrical image of Structure without shear wall 41
VII
5.7 Geometrical image of Shear wall at core 41
5.8 Geometrical image of Shear wall at opposite side 41
5.9 Geometrical image of Shear wall at two opposite corner 41
5.1O Geometrical image of Shear wall at corner of building 42
5.11 Grid 43
5.12 Geometry of structure 43
5.13 Property of beam & Column 44
5.14 Support 44
5.15 Seismic Definition 45
5.16 Add Seismic definition 45
5.17 Dead load 46
5.18 Live load 46
5.19 Storey Drift in X - Direction 47
5.2O Storey Drift in Z - Direction 48
5.21 Displacement of structure in X - direction 49
5.22 Displacement of structure in Z – direction 49
5.23 Maximum Shear Force on structure 50
5.24 Maximum Bending Moment on Structure 50

IX
 No of tables

Sr No. Description Page No.

1 Preliminary data required for analysis 25

2 Node Displacement Floor Wise 31
3 Node displacement summery 32
4 Storey Drift in X – Direction 47
5 Storey Drift in Z– Direction 48

X
Chapter - 1 Introduction

1.1 – Introduction:
The vision that designing newest buildings to be shaking resistant will cause broad-spectrum
extra costs is still amongst the constructional professionals. In a country of modest seismicity
adequate seismic resistance of new buildings may be completed at no or no significant additional
cost however the spending required to ensure sufficient seismic resistance may depend strongly
on the technique selected during the abstract design phase and the relevant design technique.
Regarding the theoretical design phase timely relationship between the architect and civil
engineering is necessary.

All over world, there is further demand for construction of tall buildings due to growing
urbanization and growth population, and earthquakes contain the likely for causing the
furthermost damages to those high structures. Reinforced concrete multi-storied or high rise
buildings are especially complex to model as structural systems for analysis. Normally, they are
modeled as two-dimensional or three-dimensional frame systems using finite beam element.

The major parameters of the seismic analysis of building are load carrying capability, ductility,
firmness, damping and mass. The plan can be separated into two major steps. Primary, a linear
analysis is conducted with suitable dimensioning of all structural elements, ensuring the
functionality of the structure after small earthquakes, and after that the behavior of structures
through strong earthquakes has to be controlled by nonlinear method. Dynamic analysis should
be performed for symmetrical as well as unsymmetrical building. Due to irregular section of
building the main parameter to be considered is torque. The structural engineers perform for both
regular as well as irregular buildings.”

1.1.1 The Advantages of the Modern Method:

• Better resistance against collapse.

• Good twist control
• Prevention of damage for earthquake up to a chosen strength (damage limit state earthquake)
• Larger elasticity in case of changes in building use.
• Virtually equal costs.

The 2001 Gujarat earthquake is a current example of disaster. It was the first main earthquake to
hit a town area of India in the last 50 years. It Killed 13,800 public, wounded 167,000 and a large
quantity of reinforced concrete multi-storied frame buildings were a lot damaged and many of
them be warped totally in the towns of Kutch district. Destruction of total probable to be about
US$ 5 billion. It is attractive to think that this risk strong only in areas of high seismicity but this
analysis does not hold. In regions of low to modest seismicity can be major risk as well.
Buildings that are very weak and at danger from even a fairly weak earthquake continue to built
today. Still for new buildings the basic philosophy of earthquake anti design and also the basic
earthquake provision of building codes are not followed. The reason is lack of knowledge, ease
or intentional ignorance. As a result the earthquake risk continues to increase unnecessarily. The
opinion to designing new buildings to be earthquake resistant will cause extensive additional
expenses is still general with construction professionals. Furthermore appropriate official
controls and checks are missing.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 1
Chapter - 1 Introduction

Earlier than approaching these techniques it’s also evenly essential to recognize earthquakes.
Earthquakes do happen when tectonic plates move and rub next to each other. The case becomes
powerful while big earthquakes may strike rarely as a result of this movement. They crack and
come again to their original position which is also coined as Elastic Rebound Theory. When this
earthquake’s earth motion occurs below a building and it is strong sufficient, it sets the building
in motion, starting with the structure base, and transfers the motion all through the rest of
structure in a very complex way. These motions in turn create forces which can make break.

Structure may be of unusual shapes except for earthquake-resistant design; an easy and ordinary
shape such as rectangular can be precious. Shear wall is a most exceptional walling system for
earthquake-resistant buildings but it can be a bit exclusive. In such cases, cross-bracing can be
provided which also helps in dispatching the forces with very big usefulness. While taking into
account tallness of the structure, the ground area and the overall breadth of the region must be in
a declining form as stories increase. As all the load will be transferred to a base column, so the
width of base column should also be correctly reinforced. Proper spacing must be maintained
between two buildings.

Proper selection of material for construction also plays a vital role. More cheap material which is
nearby available, extracted from renewable resources can be ecological in the construction and
also add up great aesthetical benefits. Light material can be used which makes the structure more
physically powerful in a non-load bearing structure. Retrofitting for presented structure in accord
with code can make the pre-existing structure safe. Being alert about the disaster well in advance
is one of the means to get rid of the harms and implementing the safety in need and save lives.

1.2- Introduction about shear wall:

Here structural engineering, a shear wall is a structural arrangement quiet of braced panels (also
familiar as shear panels) to oppose the property of on the side load acting on a structure. Wind
and seismic loads are the superior part ordinary loads that shear walls are planned to carry. Shear
walls resist in-plane loads that are applied near its height. The applied load is usually transferred
to the wall by a diaphragm or collector or drag element. They are built in timber, concrete. Shear
walls must give the essential lateral strength to oppose horizontal tremor forces. While shear
walls are tough enough, they will move these flat forces to the next part in the load path beneath
them. These other mechanism in the load path may be other shear walls, floors, foundation walls,
slabs or footings.

Shear walls also offer lateral rigidity to stop the roof or floor above from great side-sway. As
shear walls are rigid enough, they will stop floor to floor and roof to roof framing members as of
moving off their supports. Also, building that is capably stiff will normally suffer less
nonstructural damage.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 2
Chapter - 1 Introduction

The strength of the shear wall depends on the joint strengths of its three mechanisms load, casing
and fastener. Later on in this element we will learn how each part affects the power and how
strength is gone by offensive installations. After all of the components are properly input, the
shear wall can recommend its projected strength.

Fig.1.1 Shear wall

Shear walls in structure have to be symmetrically situated in plan to decrease ill-effects of twist in
structure (Figure 1.1). They can be placed symmetrically alongside one or equally directions in plan.
Shear walls are more helpful when positioned along external outside of the structure – such a layout
increase resistance of the structure to twisting.

Shear walls in high seismic or earthquake regions need special detailing. On the other hand, in
history earthquakes, even buildings through adequate amount of walls that were not particularly
extensive for seismic performance were saved from fall down. Shear wall buildings are a well-liked
choice in many earthquake prone countries, like Chile, New Zealand and USA. Shear walls are
simple to build, as steel detailing of shear walls is relatively simple or easy and therefore easily
implemented at site. Shear walls are well-organized, both in terms of construction price and
efficiency in minimizing earthquake damage in structural and non structural element like glass
windows and building contents.

Now similar to (RC) beams and columns, RC shear walls also do much enhanced if designed to be
elastic. Overall geometric dimension of the wall, types and quantity of reinforcement, and link with
lasting elements in the structure assist in improving the ductility of walls. The Indian Standard
Ductile Detailing Code for RC members (IS: 13920-1993) provides particular design plan for ductile
detailing of shear walls.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 3
Chapter - 1 Introduction

1.3 - Introduction to STAAD pro software:

STAAD.Pro is an ordinary use for structural analysis and design program between applications
mostly in the structure industry - commercial buildings, bridges and highway structures, industrial
structures, chemical plant structures, dams, retaining walls, turbine foundations, culverts and other
surrounded structures, etc.

1.3.1 Types of structure:

In STAAD Pro we can calculate the structures in 2D and 3D, for the facilities of modeling and
defining the construction for analysis, STAAD uses unlike templates for 2Dimentional and
3Dimentional structures. In STAAD we use the following types of structures.

I. Space Structure
II. Plane Structure
III. Truss Structure

1.3.2 Starting the program:

STAAD Pro can be started from the programs menu in windows or from the desktop Icon. All time
you start the programmed a fresh dialogue box will open. The box contain of types of structure of
space, plane, floor and truss. Choose the suitable structure to be worked out, file name and position to
be saved. The span or length and force units must be particular to be used in the portrayal. After this
step the STAAD Pro boundary appears.
In the middle of there is a white space with various grids, this is the drawing area presentation the
entire structure. We are able to model our structure and allocate the load in this edge. In the left part
there are so many “tab” which is called page organize. Different processes of STAAD Pro like
modeling, analysis, post analysis, design are accessed. To the correct there does dissimilar window or
panel exist. Options for dissimilar tabs in page control are accessed in this area. By default typically
snap and grid setting is revealed or show in window.
1.3.3 Grid:
Vertical or perpendicular construction lines which can be used as to modeling the structure are called
GRID lines. Grid lines are typically set to a default value by the program when it starts, but of course
we can modify the mass of grid lines in the snap/grid settings window. It is suggested to draw only
the necessary grid lines to draw our structure to precisely model the structure with no puzzlement.
We can change the no of grid lines in X, Y & Z directions and spacing in each axis.
1.3.4 Structure wizard:

Templates of some structures are approach filled with STAAD Pro. We are able to use these
templates by structure wizard. We can decide on a template and give the essential details to model
the structure with no trouble. If uneven beams be to be drawn, select the pick icon (…) on the side
and give obligatory data values. Transport model icon will relocate the model to the STAAD
interface. You have to identify the coordinates which the structure is to be located then.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 4
Chapter - 1 Introduction

1.3.5 3-D rendering:

You can examination a 3-D picture of the structure for a enhanced visualization of what you
modeled. Loading arrangements can be also seen and better understand to pull out errors if any. 3-D
rendering can be view by selecting view 3-D Rendering

1.3.6 Design:
Design in STAAD supports more than 10 codes. INDIAN standard codes (Concrete and steel) are
also supported; Limit state method is used for the design. Design of concrete sections.
Later than the analysis the design can be complete basically by just giving the design guidelines.
Even though you have to set the parameters for design in the design tab. Code check is the majority
generally used parameter used as we are giving the section sizes.
Design of steel sections can be more inexpensively done by addition new orders to the
design. Choose best command for design can be successfully used to design inexpensive sections.
The over command will choose an best size for all members by a procedure consisting of many
cycles of analysis as well as iteration on part sizes until an on the whole structure least weight is
obtained.

1.3.7 Buildings were analyzed for:

1. Static coefficient method

2. Dynamic method
a. Response spectrum analysis
b. Time history method

1.4 Seismic zones in India:

The Indian subcontinent has a past of shocking earthquakes with 59% of the earth being weak to
earthquakes. The Indian plate is driving Asia at a time of roughly 47 mm/year. Intra plate
earthquakes as of Himalayan area and lay to rest plate earthquakes of local supply are the key
reasons used for seismic design of buildings. As well as due to earthquake Structures into two in
addition to movement develop stresses due to inertial force.

Vertical shaking adds or subtract to mass of structure.

These lateral inertia forces are transferred by the base slab to the walls or columns, to the
foundations, plus lastly to the soil system beneath. This occasionally leads to decision of
foundation allocated to soil liquefaction.

Thus, there is a huge need to set up a Seismic Disaster management plan for India which can
only be complete through analysis and modeling of structures. Modeling and reproduction of
structural components and compound structures through software's is the most complicated way
of analysis.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 5
Chapter - 1 Introduction

Fig.1.2 Seismic zonetion and intensity map in India

Computers can execute complex computations at a high speed consequently computer programs
are used for analysis and design of structural member. Hand computations are appropriate for
small problem and boring for even for medium sized calculations and 3-D analysis is almost not
possible. On the further hand in computer analysis 3-D analysis can be easily performed with a
high degree of precision. STAAD Pro V8i is a principally leading which be capable to be used
future for 3-D analysis and be useful for analysis and design of multi-storied buildings. Full
range of analysis with static, P-delta, response spectrum, time-history, cable etc and steel design,
concrete design and timber design exists in STAAD Pro.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software page 6
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.1 Empathy mapping canvas:

2.1.1 Activity

In this figure we study different activity observed at construction sites or any place like foundation
work, plastering work, site engineer guide labors, Labors are working etc.

Fig no. 2.1 Activities

2.1.2 Environment

For the environment how‘s environment during observation and also you can draw sketch for
describing scenes like rainy season, Humid, Cloudy etc.

Fig no. 2.2 Environment

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 7
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.2.3 Interaction

Interaction means we have to tells about interactions along people we observed. Like Site engineer
conversation with labours, Labours are conversation to each other, etc.

Fig no. 2.3 Interactions

2.2.4 Objects

What are the things and devices people have in their environments and how do they communicate to
their activities? You have to explain observed object.

Fig no. 2.4 Objects

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 8
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.2.5 Users

We have to describe different user related to project or product like Labour, Engineers, Project
manager, Supervisor etc.

Fig no 2.5 Users

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 9
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.2 Ideation Canvas:

2.2.1People

We have to mentions different peoples like Super visor, Engineer, Project manager, structural
engineer, Client, etc.

Fig no. 2.6 Peoples

2.2.2 Activity

Activity like studying, operating machines means this activity becomes in picture when we are
talking about our project or problem like Foundation work, plastering work etc.

Fig no.2.7 Activity

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 10
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.2.3 Situation / Context / Location

In situation or context or location we write about activity during work like stacking cement begs,
Foundation work, workers are working etc.

Fig no. 2.8 Situation & Location

2.2.4 Props or Possible Solution

In this part we write about all possible props or solution about our project like static method,
Dynamic method, and Shear wall etc.

Fig no. 2.9 Props

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 11
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.3 Product development canvas:

2.3.1 Purpose

The purpose of our project to design a handy product or material that should performed the all
functions.

Fig no. 2.10 purpose and people

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 12
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.3.2 Product experience / Product functions / Product features

Fig no. 2.11 Product experience

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 13
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.3.3 Components

In this part we mention about all components or method used in our project

Fig no. 2.12 Components

2.3.4 Redesign

The building are redesign or analyzed for better performance

Fig no. 2.13 Redesign

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 14
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

2.4 Empathy mapping canvas:

2.4.1User / Stakeholder / Activity

Fig no. 2.14 User/ Stakeholders / Activity

2.4.2 Happy & Sad story

Fig no. 2.15 Happy & Sad story

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 15
Chapter – 2 Canvas Mapping

Fig no. 2.16 Happy & Sad story

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 16
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

3.1-Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storeyed Frame-Shear Wall Building

Considering SSI
The structural system of a high-rise building often has a more pronounced effect than a low rise
building on the total building cost and the architecture aspect of building. Shear walls are lateral load
resisting structural systems which provide stability to structures from lateral loads like wind and
seismic Loads. The design of multi storey building is to have good lateral load resisting System along
with gravity load system for safety of occupant and for better performance of structure even in most
adverse condition. The main scope of this project is to apply class room knowledge in the real world
by designing a multi-storied residential building. Shear walls are more efficient in resisting lateral
loads in multi storied buildings. Steel and reinforced concrete shear walls are kept in major positions
of multi storied buildings which are made in consideration of seismic forces and wind forces. To
solve this purpose shear walls are a very powerful structural elements, if used judiciously can reduce
deflections and stresses to a very great extent. Our project contains a brief description of building
with shear wall and without shear wall thoroughly discussed structural analysis of a building to
explain the application of shear wall. The design analysis of the multi storied building in our project
is done through STAAD-PRO, most popular structural engineering software. It is featured with some
ultimate power tool, analysis and design facilities which make it more users friendly

CONCLUSION: Lateral response of multi storied building is studied by dynamic analysis. Dynamic
characteristics of the same building are compared with shear wall building. Change in axial force,
shear force, bending moment, seismic base shear and building drift due to change in zone factor and
soil conditions are studied.

KEYWORD: Shear wall, Building Drift, Response spectrum method, Time period, OMRF, Base
shear

3.2-Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Building by Response Spectrum

Method
This paper describes seismic analysis of high-rise building using program in STAADPro.with various
conditions of lateral stiffness system. Some models are prepared that is bare frame, brace frame and
shear wall frame. Analysis is done with response spectrum method. This analysis will produce the
effect of higher modes of vibration & actual distribution of forces in elastic range in a better way.
Test results including base shear, story drift and story deflections are presented and get effective
lateral load resisting system.

CONCLUSION: A significant amount of decrease in story drift has been observed in case 2 and 3
i.e. lateral stiffness system is centrally located at exterior frame of X direction throughout height and
lateral stiffness system is centrally located at exterior frame of X & Z direction throughout height in
both brace frame and shear wall frame compared to other models. Also shear wall models in case 3
gives less storey deflection and storey drift than bare frame and brace frame.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 17
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

A significant amount of decrease in time period of model in case 2 and 3 i.e. lateral stiffness system
is centrally located at exterior frame of X direction throughout height and lateral stiffness system is
centrally located at exterior frame of X & Z direction throughout height in both brace frame and
shear wall frame compared to other models, therefore displacements in the structure are minimized.
Building with short time period tends to suffer higher accelerations but smaller displacement.
Comparing the top storey drift in the longitudinal direction, it can be seen that it decrease by 52.59%,
52.08% & 41.63% in case 2, 3 and 4 of brace frame as compared to bare frame and it decreases by
52.59%, 52.94 & 48.38% in case 2, 3 and 4 of shear wall frame as compared to bare frame. The
models with shear wall located at exterior frame of X & Z direction throughout height is found most
effective in resisting lateral loads because it shows least deflection as compare with other models. A
significant amount of increase in the lateral stiffness has been observed in all models of brace frame
and shear wall frame as compared to bare frame. More accurate values of response may be obtained
for buildings by the modal analysis method, using modified design response spectra for inelastic
analysis.

KEYWORD: High-rise building, response spectrum method, seismic analysis, story deflection, time
period, lateral load resisting system, storey drift.

3.3-Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storied Building with and without Shear

Wall and Bracing
Now a day the number of buildings are constructed and designed on the basis of architectural
requirement and aesthetic view. Most of buildings are constructed in some spatial configuration like
X shape, V shape with x and y co-ordinates non parallel to the structure. Earthquake is causing more
damage to different configuration of building and their main problem is in the slenderness ratio. The
main goal of this project is to make a comparative study of dynamic behavior of buildings with
different configuration of structure in all seismic zones and different types of soils. In this study, a
spatial configuration structure of 20stories up to 70m height of each storey height of 3.5m, with
Shear wall and bracing at a different location in building is considered. The dynamic behavior of the
building in all seismic zones II, III, IV, V and on different types of soil say hard, medium and soft
soil was studied .The structure has outer periphery beams carrying R.C Shear wall of 200 mm
thickness. The response spectrum analysis was carried out by using software of ETAB’s version
9.7.4.considering bracing and shear wall at a different location in the building. The following seismic
parameters were analyzed and the behavior of the structure was studied in detail.

CONCLUSION: Shear wall at external frame corner is a better option in case of tall building where
the storey shear, storey drift, displacement and time period can be brought well into control.Provision
of shear walls ideally at the corner yield satisfactory results to modulate seismic response parameters
effectively. The infill can have a good bond with the shear wall and thus generate a satisfactory
seismic resistant structure. Shear wall at external frame middle is also a good option of regulating
seismic responses compared to bracing.

KEYWORD: Drift and Displacement, Base Shear and Storey Shear, Time Period and Natural
Frequency

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 18
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

3.4-Comparative Study on Design Results of a Multi-storied Building

using STAAD PRO and ETABS for Regular and Irregular Plan
Configuration
Structural Analysis and design are predominant in finding out significant threats to integrity and
stability of a structure. Multi storied structures, when designed, are made to fulfill basic aspects and
serviceability. Since Robustness of structure depends on loads imposed, it requires attention. All the
challenges faced by structural engineers were taken as opportunities to develop software’s such as
STAAD PRO, ETABS & SAFE, SAP etc., with ease of use. Software’s such as ETABS and
STAAD-pro are leading commercial software’s worldwide for structural analysis. The design results
using STAAD PRO and ETABS of a rectangular RCC building, for both regular and irregular plan
configuration, are obtained and compared.

CONCLUSION: Some of the sample analysis and design results have been shown below for beams
and columns of various floor of the building. As per above graph it has been concluded that the
storey shear decreases with increase in storey height in both x and y-directions for EQ length and EQ
width respectively. Results of max vertical reactions of a 12-storey regular building. As per table 5.1
it has been concluded that the max reaction produced is 4572.12kN in ETABS and 4624.92kN in
STAAD Pro. Due to load 1.5(Self +Dead +Live).  Max Deformation of members of 12-storey
regular and irregular building As per above table it has been concluded that the maximum
displacement is along x- direction and its value is 106.25mm (in STAAD Pro.) for irregular building
and 53.47mm (in ETABS) along z direction for regular building. So, more precise results are
generated by ETABS which leads to economical design of the building.  Design Results of sample
beam and column C13 of storey 6 from ETABS and Column 851 of storey 6 from STAAD Pro. Of
12 storey’s – regular building are taken for comparison. As per above table it has been concluded that
the ETABS gave lesser area of steel required as compared to STAAD Pro. In case of beam whereas
in case of column steel calculated is same by both software’s.  Comparison of Storey Overturning
Moments As per above graph it has been concluded that the storey overturning moment decreases
with increase in storey height along x-direction for EQ length load and they are more in regular
building than the irregular building. Maximum Steel Reinforcement of beam and column of regular
and irregular building in ETABS. As per above table it has been concluded that the ETABS gave
lesser area of steel reinforcement for irregular building as compared to regular building in case of
beams and columns.

KEYWORD: Shear wall, Building Drift, Storey Shear, Time Period and Natural Frequency

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 19
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

3.5-SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+15 MULTISTOREY

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING-A REVIEW
Seismic analysis is that the calculation of the response of a structure subjected to earthquake
excitation. Numerous seismic knowledge area units necessary to hold out the seismic analysis of the
structures during this study the seismic response of the structures is investigated underneath
earthquake excitation expressed within the kind of member forces, joint displacement, support
reaction and story drift. This paper describes seismic analysis of high-rise building victimization
program in STAAD .Pro. This paper provides complete guide line for manual stills software package
analysis of seismic constant technique.

CONCLUSION: The analysis and style of the G+15 building was done mistreatment code
furthermore as manually. A comparative study was done on the planning of the building to visualize
that was the foremost economical. it had been all over that the Indian standards served to be the
foremost economical style and therefore the Indian Standards were the smallest amount economical.
The response of a tall building beneath wind and seismic load as per IS codes of observe is studied.
seismic analysis and wind load analysis with gust factor methodology square measure used for
analysis of a RCC high rise building as per IS1893(Part1):2002 and IS875(Part3):1987codes
severally. The building is modeled as 3D area frame mistreatment STAAD.Pro code.

KEYWORD: seismic Analysis, Earthquake Excitation, normal Moment Resisting Frame, Member
Forces, Joint Displacement, Support Reaction, construction Drift, STAAD.Pro V8i. Equivalent Static
Analysis, Response spectrometry, Lateral Force.

3.6-Dynamic Analysis of Multistory Building using Response Spectrum

Method and Seismic Coefficient Method – A Comparison
Earthquakes are very disastrous and cause a great harm to living life, material life and buildings.
Hence proper dynamic analysis for building having earthquake threat is needed. This will ensure
proper designs resulting in an earthquake proof structure. Different dynamic investigation techniques
are accessible for tremor examination of multi-storey structures which are response spectrum method
(RSM), seismic coefficient method (SCM), time history strategy and Codal provision technique
(CPT). Many authors tried to study analysis of multi- storied structures using one or the other method
stated above. However, there is no consensus on the particular method being the best one. The most
popular among them being Seismic Coefficient Method and Response Spectrum Method. This study
aims at reviewing few of the available research reports on analysis of multistory building using
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD and SEISMIC COEFFICIENT METHOD. A comparison of
dynamic analysis of multistory building for earthquakes is presented. It was found that only few
authors could present a faint idea of comparison of various methods for earthquake analysis of
multistory building. The present study suggests that the Response Spectrum Method, which is widely
used for analysis of multistory buildings and incorporated in most of the codes related to earthquake
analysis of buildings, is found most suitable for earthquake analysis of multistory buildings by most
of the authors.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 20
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

CONCLUSION: The literature review presented above indicates that no author has under taken the
comparative study of use of response spectrum method and dynamic analysis method for earthquake
analysis of multistory structure. However following conclusions can be drawn after studying existing
research reports on dynamic analysis of multistoried building for earthquake.To reduce the response
reduction factor 6% of steel is required in columns. B. Any building suffers damage is not only
caused by blasting vibration forces but also due to characteristic of building under goes damage.
Effect of response of seismic forces to any individual, crowd or any structural building depends on
type of floor on the stand. D. For non linear dynamic analysis time history method and response
spectrum methods are compared and concluded as various modifications are required in
accelerograph in time history method and response spectrum is accurate method for non linear
dynamic analysis. E. RSM can for both elastic and inelastic also be calculated by artificial modling
structures under combine quadratic combination F. For different ductility different response
reduction factor are considered. G. Seismic analysis of soil layer is done by calculating shear stress
and displacement along the depth of layer and by plotting a stress-strain backbone curve. H. SCM is
used to estimate maximum roof displacement in any inelastic structure and accurate result is obtained
when compared to statistics method. I. Using software’s related to seismic analysis makes analysis
more accurate and is easy and takes less time to find results. J. Various codes are studied for analysis
of seismic forces but every code as per time need to be revised and none of the code can be used for
different area.

KEYWORD: Dynamic analysis methods, Response spectrum method (RSM), Seismic coefficient
method (SCM), Multi-storey building, Comparison of reviews.

3.7-Analysis, Design and Estimation of G +7 Storey Building Structure

by using IS Code Methods and by Software's
Analysis, Design and Estimation of G +7 Storey Building Structure by using IS Code Methods and
by Software's

CONCLUSION: After analysing the G+7 storey building structure, concluded that structure is safe
in loading like dead load, live load, wind load and seismic load. Member dimensions (Beam,
Column, Slab, Footing) are changed by calculating the load type and it’s quantity applied on it.
Manual calculations gives min. diameter of bars, thickness of slab and same for column, footing while
software also gives required sizes of bar and members but with factor of safety. Auto-cad plan gives
detailed information of the structure member’s length, height, depth, count etc. After running model in
Revit software it gives more plan details and various design options. This software gives more decorative
building structure. STAAD PRO has the capability to calculate the reinforcement needed for any concrete
section. The program contains a number of parameters which are designed as per IS: 456(2000). Beams
are designed for flexure, shear and torsion. From the STAAD PRO result required different types, size
and number of bars are found. And final evaluation and valuation is confirmed by estimation and costing
software. Due to manual and software calculations, the required amount and material will be minimize

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 21
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

so the structure comes under healthy for environment and safe for human beings. All the analysis can
be repeated by changing plan dimensions and height of the structure. A comparison of cost may be
studied by changing different grade of steel and concrete. Analysis and design of frames with dual
systems. 4. Analysis and design of frames with dual systems (moment resisting frames with shear walls)
5. A comparison of cost may be studied by changing different grade of steel and concrete.

KEYWORD: SMRF, Seismic behavior and design, AutoCAD, STAAD Pro, Revit, Estimation and
costing, IS code -Limit State methods.

3.8-To Study the Effect of Shear Wall at Different Locations by Using

Staad. Pro Software in Bare Frame System and In Infilled Frame System

The purpose of this study is to find the prime location of shear wall and then investigate the
effectiveness of best shear wall in bare frame system and infill frame system. The structure is
analyzed for earthquake and wind forces in both the types of structural system i.e. Bare frame system
and Unfilled frame system. From the past records of earthquake, there is increase in demand to
construct the earthquake resisting building which can be done by providing the shear wall systems in
the buildings. Shear wall is the best structural element which is used for resisting lateral load in
multi-storey reinforced concrete structures. Wall which is mainly designed to resist lateral forces in
its own plane is called shear wall according to IS 13920:1993. Shear walls are generally provided in
high rise buildings to avoid failure of building under lateral forces. They are provided in multistory
reinforced concrete structures to improve the response of the structure. Past experiences show that
shear wall plays a vital role in increasing the strength and stiffness of the building. Shear walls are
mainly flexural members which are specially designed to resist lateral forces which are caused by
seismic forces, wind forces and others forces. They provide an efficient bracing system and also offer
great resistance to horizontal forces. Shear walls start from the foundation level and should be
continuous throughout the height of the building.

CONCLUSION: When Bare Frame System without and with shear wall is considered
a) Total displacement of the building decreases considerably when the frame building is provided
with shear wall.
b) From the results it has been concluded that the model-4 (when shear walls are placed as a core)
shows best location of shear Wall since lateral displacement and axial forces are less as compared to
other models. (In model 4 lateral displacements is equal To 16.41 mm and 44.43 mm in X and Y
direction respectively which are less than the values of other model)
C) About 67% of the lateral displacement in X direction & 58% of the lateral displacement in Y
Direction get reduced when shear Wall is incorporated in the Bare Frame System. (Without shear
wall lateral displacement is equal to 50.97 mm & 107.24 mm in X and Y direction which get reduced
to 16.41 mm and 44.43 mm in X and Y direction respectively when shear wall is placed in Bare
frame system. About 15% of the axial force in the column gets reduced when the shear wall is
incorporated in the Bare Frame System.(Without shear wall axial force in columns is equal to
359.81kN which get reduced to 303.51kN when shear wall is placed in Bare frame system.)

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 22
Chapter – 3 Literature Review

KEYWORD: Shear wall, lateral load, Bare frame structure, Infilled frame Structure, Static method.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 23
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.1 Linear Static analysis:

It is one of the methods for calculating the seismic loads. The high rise structures are not considered
for the design simple static method. In practical as it does not take into account all the factors that are
the importance of the foundation condition. The equivalent static analysis is used to design only for
the small structures. In this method only one mode is considered for each direction. The earthquake
resistant designing for the shorter low rise structures the equivalent static method is adequate. Tall
structures are required more than two modes and mass weight of each story to design earthquake
resistant loads. This is not suitable to design those structures and dynamic analysis method to be used
for high rise structures.

The equivalent static lateral force method is a basic technique to alternate the result of dynamic
load of a predictable earthquake by a static force distributed tangentially on a structure for design
purpose. The total applied seismic force V is generally evaluated in two horizontal directions
parallel to the main axes of the building (Fig. 4.1). It assumes that the structure respond in its
primary tangential mode. For this to be right, the structure must be small rise and must be fairly
symmetric to avoid tensional movement underground motions. The structure must be able to
defend against effects caused through seismic forces in either direction, but not in both directions
at the same time.

Fig 4.1 Axes of building

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 24
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.2 Preliminary data required for analysis:

1 No of stories G+8

2 Floor to floor height 3050mm

3 Column size 900 x 600 mm

4 Beam size 600 x 300 mm

5 Thickness of slab 115 mm

6 Thickness of external wall 230 mm

7 Thickness of internal wall 115 mm

8 Grade of concrete M-20 & Fe 415 Grade

9 Seismic zone III

10 Specific weight of RCC 25 Kn/M3

11 Types of structure Ordinary RC Framed Structure

12 Location Sanand

Table no: 1

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 25
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.3 Analysis of building in STAAD pro

i. Grid Appears

Fig.4.2 Grid

ii. Geometry of structure.

Fig.4.3 Geometry of structure

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 26
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

iii. Provide column and beam property or thickness

Fig 4.4 Property of beam & Column

iv. Provide supports or foundation to structure.

Fig 4.5 Support

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 27
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

v. Calculating natural frequency of building by static coefficient method

Fig 4.6 Seismic Definition

Fig 4.7 Add Seismic definition

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 28
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

Building with shear wall provided at side by side.

Fig no 4.8 Building with shear wall

vi. Building Without shear wall.

Fig no 4.9 Building without shear wall

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 29
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

vii. Dead load

Fig no 4.10 Dead load

viii. Live load

Fig no 4.11 Live load

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 30
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.4 Node Displacement Floor Wise:

FLOOR Building with shear wall Building without shear wall

Ground 4.013 6.775
1 9.904 15.829
2 17.517 25.748
3 25.734 35.826
4 34.015 45.665

5 41.975 54.916
6 49.318 63.222
7 55.318 70.196
8 61.476 75.468
Table no 2

80

70

60

50
Displacement

40

30

20

10

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Floor

Fig. no 4.12 Node displacement graph

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 31
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.4.1 Node displacement summery

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Resultant Rotational

Node L/C X in Y in Z in in rX rad rY rad rZ rad
Max X 836 1 EQ-X 115.065 1.46 -26.827 118.16 -0.017 0.089 -0.003
Min X 836 2 EQ-Z -6.934 -3.402 42.199 42.9 0.041 -0.061 -0.009
Max Y 394 1 EQ-X 25.733 3.717 1.11 26.024 -0.039 -0.014 -0.049
Min Y 812 3 DL 0.636 -10.301 1.695 10.459 -0.026 0.002 0.004
Max Z 836 2 EQ-Z -6.934 -3.402 42.199 42.9 0.041 -0.061 -0.009
Min Z 835 1 EQ-X 105.494 -1.136 -26.827 108.857 -0.026 0.082 -0.018
Max rX 831 3 DL 1.081 -5.702 1.462 5.985 0.086 -0.006 0.018
Min rX 394 1 EQ-X 25.733 3.717 1.11 26.024 -0.039 -0.014 -0.049
Max rY 804 1 EQ-X 74.724 -0.459 -12.309 75.732 -0.008 0.137 -0.045
Min rY 834 2 EQ-Z -6.927 -1.908 24.881 25.897 0.024 -0.094 -0.008
Max rZ 816 3 DL 0.634 -1.577 1.472 2.249 -0.009 0 0.095
Min rZ 443 1 EQ-X 56.824 0.041 5.678 57.107 0.012 0.037 -0.117
Table no. 3

Node displacement

5
4
3
2
1
0
X Z

With shear wall Witout shear wall

Fig no.4.13 Node displacement

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 32
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.5 Total seismic weight of building:

The Seismic Weight of each floor is the self weight of all members associated with that particular
floor diaphragm as well as any applied loads utilizing the Dynamic Mass load category.The total
seismic weight of the whole structure is the sum of the seismic weights associated with all floors and
the weight associated with the base level. The base shear is always computed using the total seismic
weight.

Seismic weight
With shear wall Without shear wall

7199.35
7006.77

6361.84
6191.67

X Z

Fig no. 4.14 Total Seismic Weight

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 33
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.6 S.F & B.M diagram for building with shear wall:

10000

5000
Fx kN
0 My kip-in
Fy kN
Fz kN
2 EQ- 2 EQ- 1 EQ-
-5000 Z
1 EQ- 1 EQ- 2 EQ- Fx kN Fz kN
Z X X 1 EQ- 1 EQ- 1 EQ-
X Z 1 EQ- 1 EQ- Mx kip-in
X X 1 EQ-
X X
-10000 162 163 411 242 X X My kip-in
1302 1151 642
498 119 560 132
Max Min Max 162
Min Max Min
Fx Fx Fy Max Min
Fy Fz Fz Max Min
Mx Mx Max Min
My My Mz Mz

Fig no 4.15

4.6.1 S.F & B.M diagram for building without shear wall:

25000
20000
15000 Node
10000 Fx kN
5000 Mz kip-in Fy kN
0 Mx kip-in
Fz kN
Fy kN
1 EQ-X

-5000
1 EQ-X
1 EQ-X

1 EQ-X

Node
1 EQ-X

Mx kip-in
1 EQ-X

2 EQ-Z

1 EQ-X

-10000
1 EQ-X

1 EQ-X

1 EQ-X

1 EQ-X

-15000 My kip-in
-20000 103 119 441 Mz kip-in
525 1264 299
-25000 470 466 103
139 525 525
Max Min Max
Min Max Min
Fx Fx Fy Max Min Max
Fy Fz Fz Min Max Min
Mx Mx My
My Mz Mz

Fig no. 4.16

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 34
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

4.7 Result and comparison:

At present we compare the results of building with or without shear wall by static
analysis the result obtain are given below. In fig 4.16 we show that the displacements of
building are less as compare to without shear wall. Also the node displacement and shear
force & bending force is less.

Fig 4.17 Displacement or deflection of building with shear wall

Fig no 4.18 Displacement or deflection of building without shear wall

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 35
Chapter – 4 Static Analysis

Bending Moment
80
70
Название оси 60
50
Building with shear
40 wall
30 Building without shear
20 wall

10
0
My

Fig no 4.19 B.M Diagram

4.345
4.025
4.5
4
2.992
3.5
3
2.5
2 1.071
1.5
1
0.5
0
X Z

With shear wall Witout shear wall

Fig no 4.20 Displacement of building

In this fig 4.19 we shows that the displacement of structure in X- Direction and Y- Direction are
comparatively less when shear wall is provided at two parallel side of structure or building.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 36
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.1Dynamic analysis:

All actual physical structures, when subjected to loads or displacements, behave dynamically. The
further inertia forces, as of Newton’s second law, be equal to the mass times the acceleration. If the
loads or displacements are applied very gradually then the inertia forces can be ignored and a static
load analysis can be justified. Hence, dynamic analysis is a simple addition of static analysis.

In adding, all actual structures potentially have an endless number of displacements. Therefore, the
primarily crucial point of a structural analysis is to create a computer model, with a limited number
of mass less members and a limited number of joint displacements that will simulate the behavior of
the actual structure. The mass of a structural system, which can be exactly estimated, is lumped at
the nodes. Also, for linear elastic structures the stiffness properties of the member, by the help of
experimental data, can be approximated with a high amount of confidence.

However, the dynamic loading, energy dissipation property and boundary conditions for several
structures are complex to estimate. This is always true for the cases of seismic input or wind loads.

In simple language dynamic analysis means a technique to determine response of structure to

arbitrary time varying load such as explosion etc.

5.2 Response Spectrum Analysis

Response-spectrum analysis (RSA) is a linear-dynamic statistical analysis method which measures

the part from all natural mode of vibration to confirm the probable maximum seismic response of a
fundamentally elastic structure. Response-spectrum analysis provides insight into dynamic behavior
by measuring pseudo-spectral acceleration, velocity, displacement as a utility of structural period for
a known time history and stage of damping. It is sensible to envelope response spectra such that a
smooth curve represents the peak response for each realization of structural period.

Response-spectrum analysis is sensible for design decision-making as it relates structural type-

selection to dynamic performance. Structures of shorter period experience superior acceleration,
where those of longer period experience superior displacement. Structural performance objectives
must be taken into account during beginning of response-spectrum analysis.

Modal response may be combined using CQC (complete quadratic combination) is best when periods
are closely spaced, with cross-correlation among mode shapes.

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 37
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.3 Preliminary data required for analysis:

1 No of stories G+8

2 Floor to floor height 3050mm

3 Column size 900 x600 mm

4 Beam size 600 x 300 mm

5 Thickness of slab 115 mm

6 Thickness of external wall 230 mm

7 Thickness of internal wall 115 mm

8 Grade of concrete M-20 & Fe 415 Grade

9 Seismic zone III

10 Specific weight of RCC 25 Kn/M3

11 Types of structure Ordinary RC Framed Structure

12 Location Sanand

Table no: 5.1

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 38
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.4 3d images of structure

Fig 5.1 Model - 1 Fig 5.2 Model - 2

Fig 5.3 Model - 3

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 39
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

Fig 5.4 Model - 4

Fig 5.5 Model - 5

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 40
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.5 Geometrical images of structure

Fig 5.6 Model 1 Fig 5.7 Model 2

Fig 5.8 Model 3

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 41
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

Fig 5.9 Model 4

Fig 5.10 Model 5

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 42
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.6 Dynamic analysis of building in STAAD pro

1. Grid Appears

Fig.5.11Grid

2. Geometry of structure.

Fig.5.12Geometry of structure

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 43
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

3. Provide column and beam property or thickness

Fig 5.13 Property of beam & Column

4. Provide supports or foundation to structure.

Fig 5.14 Support

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 44
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5. Calculating natural frequency & storey drift of building by response spectrum analysis.

Fig 5.15 Seismic Definition

Fig 5.16 Add Seismic definition

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 45
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

6. Dead load

Fig 5.17 Dead load

7. Live load

Fig 5.18 Live load

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 46
 Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.7 Results of dynamic analysis

Storey No Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Model 1 0.1725 0.5464 0.9677 1.4067 1.8477 2.2758 2.6748 3.0268 3.3114 3.5086

Model 2 0.0526 0.1578 0.2805 0.4161 0.5607 0.7098 0.8579 0.9982 1.122 1.2178

Model 3 0.048 0.1718 0.326 0.4912 0.6577 0.8185 0.9675 1.0988 1.2073 1.2918

Model 4 0.0258 0.085 0.1598 0.244 0.3334 0.4246 0.5144 0.5997 0.6772 0.7444

Model 5 0.0761 0.2826 0.5515 0.8462 1.1457 1.4345 1.703 1.9379 2.1325 2.2882
Table No. 5.2 Storey Drift in X – Direction

Storey Drift In X- Direction

4

3.5

2.5
Storey Drift

Model 1
2 Model 2
1.5 Model 3

1 Model 4
Model 5
0.5

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Storey No.

Fig 5.19 Storey Drift in X - Direction

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 47
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

Storey
No Base 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Model 1 0.0019 0.0074 0.0151 0.0244 0.0348 0.046 0.0577 0.0695 0.0813 0.0927

Model 2 0.0021 0.0078 0.0145 0.0213 0.0279 0.0338 0.0389 0.043 0.0458 0.048

Model 3 0.0005 0.0018 0.0038 0.0064 0.0095 0.0131 0.0171 0.0213 0.0257 0.03

Model 4 0.0019 0.0078 0.0154 0.0239 0.0325 0.0409 0.0485 0.0551 0.0602 0.0636

Model 5 0.0005 0.0022 0.005 0.0088 0.0136 0.0191 0.0253 0.032 0.0391 0.0464
Table No. 5.2 Storey Drift in Z– Direction

Storey Drift In Z- Direction

0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
Storey Drift

0.06 Model 1
0.05 Model 2
0.04 Model 3
0.03 Model 4
0.02 Model 5
0.01
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Storey No.

Fig 5.20Storey Drift in Z - Direction

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 48
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.7.1 Displacement of structure

Displacement in X-Direction
5
4.5
4 4.37
3.5
3
2.5 Displacement in X-
2 Direction
1.5 1.824
1
0.5 0.761 0.707 0.339
0
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5

Fig no 5.21 Displacement of structure in X - direction

Displacement in Z-Direction
1.2

0.8

0.6 Displacement in Z-
Direction
0.4

0.2

0
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5

Fig no 5.22 Displacement of structure in Z –direction

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 49
Chapter – 5 Dynamic Analysis

5.7.2 Maximum S.F. and B.M.

Maximum Shear Force

4304.79

2459.57 2475.711
1957.42 2013.69

Model 1 Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5

Fig no 5.23 Maximum Shear Force on structure

Maximum Bending Moment

325.427
290.717 278.462

200.405
146.558

Model 1 Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5

Fig no 5.24 Maximum Bending Moment on Structure

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 50
Chapter – 5 Conclusion and future scope

6.1 Conclusion:
 In this project we carried out Linear static analysis and Dynamic Analysis of (G+8)
residential building using STAAD pro Vi8 software to find natural frequency, Shear force
,Bending moment ,Peak storey shear of building under seismic load conditions. Also we
carried out analysis of building with and without shear wall at different location and take
result.
 From the results we conclude that presence of shear wall in structure reduces lateral force in
building to large extend.
 Shear force and bending moment is less when shear wall is provided at two corners
(Model 4) of structure.
 We are obtained maximum shear force and bending moment at without shear wall.
 Deflection of building or structure of Model -4 (Shear wall at two opposite corner) is
very less as compared to other case for G+8 building.
 Peak storey shear is also reduced when shear wall is provided in structure.
 If shear wall is provided on building it’s significantly reduce seismic weight of
building and also it’s reduce node displacement of structure.
 Model no 3 and model no 4 are best place for provide shear wall in G+8 structure
 After analysis of above results it is clear that shear wall system are very effective in
resisting lateral forces produced by earthquake. Result’s obtain are reliable and are
within safe limits.

6.2 Future Scope

 Pushover analysis can be done for future course of study.
 Carry out analysis of structure with braced panels.
 To calculate natural frequency of a building by Rayleigh method
 Carry out analysis of structure with base isolation

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 51
References

STAAD pro V8i technical reference manual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/

https://nptel.ac.in/

https://www.asce.org

https://www.ijariit.com/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321481158

IS 456-2000 - BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS.

IS 1893-2002 - BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

Https: //www.ijera.com/papers/Vol6_issue12/Part-2/B6120205011. (Analysis of Building with and

without Shear Wall at Various Heights and Variation of Zone III and Zone V)

Https: //www.irjet.net/archives/V5/i1/IRJET-V5I176. (Behavior of multistory building with different

shear wall arrangements with and without central cross shear wall)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shear_wall

Chandurkar, P.P., and Pajgade, P.S., “Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Building for Different
Position of Shear wall", International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and
Technology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp.3346-3353, 2015.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887 Volume 5 Issues X, October 2017.

Amita Baghel.et.al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application www.ijera.com ISSN:
2248-9622, Vol. 7, Issue 2, (Part -2) February 2017, pp.48-51 Best Position of R.C. Shear Wall due
to seismic loads

ISSN No.: 2454- 2024 (online)International Journal of Technical Research & Science DOI Number:
10.30780/IJTRS.V2.I12.2018.030 pg. 68www.ijtrs.comwww.ijtrs.orgPaper Id: IJTRS-V2-I12-030
Volume 3 Issue III, April 2018@2017, IJTRS All Right Reserved BEHAVIOR OF RCC
STRUCTURE WITHALTERED SHEAR WALL LOCATIONBYUSING STAAD.PRO
V8ISurender Kumar1, Hakam Singh2, Dr. R.S. Bharj3E-Mail Id: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

Seismic analysis of building with or without shear wall using STAAD pro Vi8 software Page 52