0% found this document useful (0 votes)
132 views3 pages

Digest Syllab

This document contains summaries of various court cases that relate to different sections of Rules 44 and 45 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The cases cited include those decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines from 2005 to 2020 and cover topics such as evidence, discovery of evidence, and offers of documentary evidence.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
132 views3 pages

Digest Syllab

This document contains summaries of various court cases that relate to different sections of Rules 44 and 45 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The cases cited include those decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines from 2005 to 2020 and cover topics such as evidence, discovery of evidence, and offers of documentary evidence.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

RULE 44

Sec. 2

(Garrucho v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 143791, [January 14, 2005], 489 PHIL
150-158)
 (Edquibal v. Ferrer, Jr., A.C. No. 5687 (Resolution), [February 3, 2005], 491 PHIL
|||

1-8)

SEC.7

(Spouses Gimena v. Vijiga, A.C. No. 11828, [November 22, 2017])

(Government of the Kingdom of Belgium v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 164150,


[April 14, 2008], 574 PHIL 380-400)

HEIRS OF THE LATE GERRY * ECARMA, NAMELY: AVELINA SUIZA-


ECARMA, DENNIS ECARMA, JERRY LYN ECARMA PEÑA, ANTONIO
ECARMA and NATALIA ECARMA
SANGALANG, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and RENATO A.
ECARMA,  (Heirs of the Late Ecarma v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 193374, [June
|||

8, 2016])

DAMASO STA. MARIA, JUANITO TAPANG and LIBERATO


OMANIA, complainants, vs. ATTY. RICARDO ATAYDE, JR., respondent.  (Sta. |||

Maria v. Atayde, Jr., A.C. No. 9197, [February 12, 2020]

Sec.12

|||  (Manalo v. BPI Family Savings Bank, G.R. No. 239991 (Notice), [June 17, 2019])

Sec. 13

 (De Castro v. Spouses Santiago, G.R. No. 239873 (Notice), [August 15, 2018])
|||

 (Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Royal Ferry Services, Inc., G.R. No. 188146,
|||

[February 1, 2017], 805 PHIL 13-36)

Sec. 15

|||  (Mandin-Trotin v. Bongo, G.R. No. 212840 (Resolution), [August 28, 2019])
(RCBC Bankard Services Corp. v. Oracion, Jr., G.R. No. 223274, [June 19, 2019])
 (Ereñeta v. Asian Bank Corp., G.R. Nos. 217034 & 221032 (Notice), [July 24,
|||

2019])

RULE 45

Sec. 1

(National Power Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 206167, [March 19, 2018])

|||  (Zambales v. Zambales, G.R. No. 216878, [April 3, 2019])

Sec. 2

(Department of Agrarian Reform Multi-Purpose Cooperative v. Diaz, G.R. No.


206331, [June 4, 2018])

Sec. 3&5
(Aluag v. BIR Multi-Purpose Cooperative, G.R. No. 228449, [December 6, 2017])

Sec. 4

(BF Citiland Corp. v. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, G.R. No. 224912, [October 16,
2019])

Sec. 5

(Interphil Laboratories, Inc. v. OEP Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 203697, [March 20,
2019])

Sec. 6
 (Noell Whessoe, Inc. v. Independent Testing Consultants, Inc., G.R. No. 199851,
|||

[November 7, 2018])

Sec. 7

(Cancio v. Performance Foreign Exchange Corp., G.R. No. 182307, [June 6, 2018])

Sec 8
 (Board of Investments v. SR Metals, Inc., G.R. No. 219927, [October 3, 2018])
Sec. 9

You might also like