Millet Processing Machinery Guide
Millet Processing Machinery Guide
3/1/2021
1
Primary processing of Millets and
Validation of machinery
3/1/2021 2
Introduction:
*Millets are more nutritious than wheat and rice and it contains
more amount of vitamin b and beriberi disease can be controlled.
*Millets are of major and minor types, major millets include, sorg
-hum, bajra and ragi and minor millets includes foxtail, little,
proso, barnyard and kodo millet.
3/1/2021 4
•Cleaning and grading use different type of sieves and the perfor -
ation in the sieve varies in shape, square, rectangle, oblong depen-
ding upon the shape of the millet that is to be cleaned and graded.
•The material factors include particle size and shape, particle stic-
kiness and abrasiveness.
3/1/2021 5
•The sieve slope is adjusted in such a way that each and every
grain comes in contact with the screen surface and cleaning
efficiency is high for a particular type of grain to be cleaned.
•The first sieve has three segments and the time taken for the
grain to move by gravity becomes less and efficient cleaning take
place.
•The grain in the first sieve gets removed from brokens and irreg -
ular shaped grain gets separated in the separate outlet and the
good grain gets collected in the down sieve.
1 Capacity 500kg/h
2 Power 1-1.5 hp
3 Voltage 220 V
4 Phase Single Phase
Frequency 50-60 Hz
3/1/2021 7
Millets Destoner Cum Grader Cum Aspirator
3/1/2021 8
Perfura Grader Cum Aspirator
3/1/2021 9
Why dehulling of millets
3/1/2021 10
*Most producers and consumers of sorghum and pearl millet
face a daily task of dehulling and pulverizing the grains manually
before being able to prepare the daily meal. Traditionally,
sorghum and millet are dehulled.
*To remove the outer layers, that contain primarily fibre, the
presence of that affects cooking quality and taste and texture of
the product, and adds bulk to the daily meal.
*Low shelf life of the processed rice and grits due to pest infesta -
-tion and rancidity.
3/1/2021 11
*The output of the millet dehuller will contain a mixture of whole
millet rice along with few percentage of broken rice, unhulled
grain and husk.
*This post hulling destoner is used for separating the whole rice
from the broken rice. An aspirator is used for removing the husk.
*Finally in the grader the broken rice and unhulled grain are
separated. At the end of this process we can get 98% dehulled
unpolished milled rice.
Sieve Screens:
*The destoner incorporates two layers of sieve screens mesh size
can be selected to suit the process requirements.
*They can be quickly removed from the machine for cleaning. The
upper sieve is composed of three separate segments and the lower
single unit.
3/1/2021 13
Specification:
1) Mode of Operation: Continuous type
2) Overall Dimension: 860mmX842mm
X1460 mm
3) Power requirement:1hp,Single/Three
Phase Motor
4) Capacity: 100kg/h
5) Weight:112kg (excluding motor)
6) Floor Area: 860 mmX842mm
7) Purpose: Dehulling of minor millets
(with or without bran)
8) Working Principle: Gentle Abrasion/
Attrition and (aerodynamic),Cyclone
Separator
9) Dehulling Efficiency: > 95%
*It operates with one horse power single or three phase electric
motor and can process even one kg of grains. It is provided with
provisions to adjust between the dehulling surfaces to suit the
different sizes of minor grains.
3/1/2021 15
*This millet dehuller comes with
single chambers and used for
removing skin on millets like little
and foxtail millets.
*The centrifugal millet huller has provision for box type aspirat -
or in that the rice is separated from the husk removed, so that the
husk is not mixed up much with the dehulled rice obtained from
the output of centrifugal millet huller.
3/1/2021 17
*It comes in two capacities as 100kg/h with 3hp three phase or
single phase electric motor and 300kg/h with 7.5hp three phase
electric motor. In order to get best efficiency, two chambered
centrifugal millet huller model machine is highly recommended.
3/1/2021 18
*Vertical dehuller consists of a stationary stone and a rotating
stone, controlling nut and cyclone separator to remove the husk
from the selected small millets with the drawbacks of more brok -
ens and need for skilled operator.
3/1/2021 19
*The double chamber millet dehull -
er is the most advanced and robust
dehuller for millets in the market.
3/1/2021 21
*Victor model, kodo millet dehuller consists of the infrastruct -
ure remains same as that of foxtail and little millet dehuller but
the speed is more and the size of the impeller and casing are
larger.
3/1/2021 22
ADVANTAGES:-
•Millet dehusking machine reduces the human effort.
• The operation is simple compared to manual method.
• Its implementation increases the millet production rate.
• It is a time saving process.
•Its maintenance is easy.
•Simple in construction and occupy less space.
•It can be carried from one place to another easily.
3/1/2021 23
DISADVANTAGES:-
•The initial investment is high.
• The operation is noisy.
• It consumes more power.
• Complete dehusking of millet is not possible and
•Wear and tear of machine.
3/1/2021 24
*This machine is suitable for
softening the skin of proso,
kodo, barnyard and browntop
millet.
3/1/2021 26
major millet polisher
3/1/2021 27
Cost: Rs 1.5 Lakh/Unit
Capacity 100-300 Kg/h
Material Mild Steel
Kalanjium Thozhilagam Limited,
Madurai, TamilNadu
millet huller
3/1/2021 28
*This machine is most suitable for
dehulling small millets like foxtail,
little, kodo, proso and barnyard
millets. It has processing capacity of
80 kg/h.
3/1/2021 30
VALIDATION OF MILLET PROCESS MACHINES
3/1/2021 31
*Machinery validation or Qualification is a mandatory requir-
ement as and then machine is used in a way that can affect the
quality, safety, efficacy of a controlled product or jeopardize the
integrity of any predicated data, relating to that product.
3/1/2021 32
EVALUATION OF DEHULLER'S PERFORMANCE AND IMPACT
3/1/2021 33
Planning for the validation should include the following elem -
ents as well as any other relevant issues that must be addressed
to conduct the validation study:
1. Identification of the subject matter to be validated.
2. Criteria for a successful study.
3. Length and duration of the study.
4. Assumptions (shifts, operators, equipment components)
5. Identification of equipment to be used in the process.
6. Identification of utilities required.
7. Identification of operators required qualifications.
8. Complete description of the process and
9. Conditions to be placed on preceding processes during the
validation.
3/1/2021 34
10. Process parameters to be controlled and monitored.
11. Product characteristics to be monitored and methods to be
used.
12. Any subjective criteria used to evaluate the product.
13. Definition of what is non conformance.
14. Statistical methods for data collection and analysis.
15. Consideration of maintenance and repairs.
16. Indications that the process should be revalidated.
17. Stages of the study and the design review is required.
18. Approval(s) of the protocol.
*The validation plan should also cover the installation and opera
-tion qualification of any equipment used in the process, process
performance qualification, and product performance qualificat -
ion.
3/1/2021 35
General details that must be adhered to.
*The test result must be initialled (or signed) by the person exec
-uting the tests, on completion or at each significant stage.
*Each test must be designed to verify an element of the equipm -
ent functionality.
*Each test must have a result that is clear, unambiguous and
known.
*The test method must call up for the recording of the test result
parameters. (no ticks or tick boxes, no generalities).
*Each test must be witnessed or the results must be reviewed by
a competent person.
*The overall test results must be approved by a competent pers -
on.
3/1/2021 36
*The evaluation of the mill can be facilitated by arranging for
records to be kept for quantities of grain dehulled and flour
produced, fuel or electric power used, maintenance costs, and
frequency of breakdowns.
*In order to improve the efficiency of the huller and reduce the
breakage, a double chamber dehuller was developed by TNAU
team.
3/1/2021 38
Revalidation on Relocation:
*When equipment is moved to a new location, installation and
operation should be requalified.
*By comparing data from the original installation and operation
qualification (IQ and OQ) and the requalification, the manufact -
urer can determine whether there have been any changes in equ -
ipment performance as a result of the move.
*Changes in equipment performance should be evaluated to det –
ermine that it is necessary to revalidate the process.
*Validation Risk Assessment (VRA) takes, through this assessment
process and enables to make a documented and justified decision
as to the level of validation each piece of equipment will receive.
This fulfils your obligation to ensure that all software is assessed,
as to FLCV(Full Life Cycle Validation) applicability.
*ThisVRA will take through the under listed points and allow to
make
3/1/2021accurate justifiable assessments of risk for any system or 39
piece of equipment. This will enable you to adjust your level or
scope of validation effort and deliver soundly based validation
risk assessment methodologies.
*Outline, Approvals, Determination of Classification,
*Prospective Validation and Retrospective Validation,
*Impact Assessment and Impact Assessment Process,
*Validation Risk Assessment Scenario,
*Likelihood,
*Impact Severity,
*Probability of Detection,
*Impact Priority,
*Impact Mitigation and
*Assessment of Change.
VALIDATION RISK ASSESSMENT:
*design is of critical importance then regulatory compliance and
clarity of purpose are prerequisites.
3/1/2021 40
*In these circumstances it is only the bold and confident that will
actually strike out using innovative and intuitive thinking to prod
-uce templates that can actually save in time and cost.
Each test must be justified and verified as fit for purpose compr -
ise of
Main sub heading in Test Scripts
*Rationale; giving the reason and or object of the test.
*Test Method; giving details of the desired test methodology.
*Acceptance Criteria, giving details of the anticipated accepta -
ble results of the tests.
*Test Result, giving details of the actual results obtained that sati
-sfied the acceptance criteria.
*General details that must be adhered to,
*The test result must be initialled (or signed) by the person exec -
uting the tests, on completion or at each significant stage.
3/1/2021 41
*Each test must be designed to verify an element of the equipm –
ent functionality.
*Each test must a have a result that is clear, unambiguous and
known.
*The test method must call up for the recording of the test result
parameters. (No ticks or tick boxes, no generalities).
*Each test must be witnessed or the results must be reviewed by a
competent person.
*The overall test results must be approved by a competent
person.
*Validation of storage climatic conditions must verify that all
shelf and free standing areas where product is to be stored; must
remain within the temperature and humidity levels specified in
the storage specifications for the product.
3/1/2021 42
*These storage conditions must be maintained regardless of
seasonal variations in the local ambient weather system. Where
these are extreme it may require the validation task to be run
continuously through these seasons or simply repeated during
their occurrence.
*This matter should be discussed and a documented justification
included in the Validation Plan. For many years warehouse clima -
tic mapping tasks involved running hundreds of metres of sensor
cable and weaving in out shelving, across access passages and gen
erally making life difficult for the often exasperated warehouses
staff.
*Now using wireless individual data loggers the task has become
a lot less intrusive, individual data logger sensors can be attached
to shelving support structure (using adhesive tape), so keeping
them clear from the routine product movement that the shelves43
3/1/2021
are subjected to.
*In fact the sensors can be installed discretely in a matter of minu
-tes and left unattended for the complete duration of the map -
ping exercise.
*The number of and location of individual data logger sensors
required for successful warehouse climatic mapping is governed
by several factors, disruptive air flow entering or leaving the stor
-age area, distribution of conditioned air inlet and exhausts, open
doorways and or windows and generally the environmental insul
-ation to walls and ceilings.
*Each manufacturer shall develop, conduct, control, and moni -
tor production processes to ensure that a device conforms to its
specifications. Where deviations from device specifications could
occur as a result of the manufacturing process, the manufacturer
3/1/2021 44
shall establish and maintain process control procedures that des -
cribe any process controls necessary to ensure conformance to
specifications.
Process controls are needed they shall include:
1) Documented instructions, standard operating procedures
(SOP’s)
(2)Monitoring and control of process parameters.
(3)Compliance with specified reference standards or codes.
(4)The approval of processes and process equipment.
(5)Criteria for quality of workmanship.
*The developed dehuller was evaluated for its performance with
four millets namely little, foxtail, kodo and barnyard millet.
*The trials were carried out by changing the grain parameters
(viz. type of millet, moisture content, parboiling) and machine
3/1/2021 45
parameters (number of impellers, type of casing, speed of the
impeller, number of vanes etc.) and the hulling efficiency and
broken percentage were calculated.
*In other words, the normal operating range is close to the prov -
en acceptable range. If the risk is low because the proven accept -
able range is relatively large and the parameter is easily controll -
ed, the parameter is still of interest, but it does not need to be
3/1/2021 47
evaluated during process validation. These are deemed “quality”
or “important” parameters”.
Prospective Validation:
3/1/2021
49
*Proposed batch records and standard operating procedures.
*Initialization of cleaning process validation.
*Recommended in process validation of controls.
*Data to support upper control limit and lower control limit.
*Validated analytical methods, References to development
studies.
*Reference to previous process validation, if any
*PQ(Performance Qualification/PV(Performance Validation)
protocols available prior to execution.
3/1/2021 50
3/1/2021 51
(1)Verification that all loop installations.
(2)Insert a brief description of what part of the validated product
process.
(3)Insert a brief description of the operational function.
(4)An integrated loop test verification.
(5)Testing of alarms.
(6)Testing of interlocks and permissive conditions.
(7)Testing of database or data storage integrity.
(8)Testing of report generation and event chronicle.
(9)Verification of the functionality of the equipment.
(10)Challenge of software, where required.
(11)Review of system functionality to verify compliance.
(12) If system must be compliant verification;
(13)Testing of security levels to prevent.
3/1/2021 52
(14)Testing to verify and document 'Power loss Recovery'.
(15)Testing of all interfaces between.
Retrospective Validation:
*Resurrecting an out of use facility.
*The initial validation was weak.
*New product has higher risk assessment therefore validation
scope must be reviewed accordingly.
*It was thought it did not require validation.
3/1/2021 54
*Initiate a requirement for revalidation to be carried out on a
calendar basis.
*Health and safety legislation has changed.
*Food Development Act(FDA) rules and or guidelines have chan
-ged.
*Poor advise from consultants.
*This will enable to adjust the level or scope of validation effort
and deliver soundly based validation risk assessment methodol-
ogies.
•Outline, approvals and Determination of Classification,
•Prospective Validation, Retrospective Validation,
•Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment Process.
•Validation Risk Assessment Scenario.
•Likelihood, Impact Severity.
•Probability of Detection, Impact Priority.
•Impact
3/1/2021
Mitigation and Assessment of Change. 55
Why to go for validation in millet processing
3/1/2021 56
(6)What is the consumption of energy per unit weight of process -
ed grain?
(7)What quantities of grain are processed daily, weekly, monthly
and on a seasonal basis?
(8)What is the average weight of grain dehulled per customer?
(9) Is the mill making a fair profit?
(10)What is the trend in the number of clients, dehull grains?
(11)What, in the users opinions, are the benefits of the mill?
(12)What are the changes in food preparation, eating habits and
nutritional status of the people?
(13)How do the women use the time released by using the mill?
3/1/2021 57
Table.1 Chemical properties of millets
carbo-
moist prot hydr
-ure -ein fat ash -ate fibre
sn millets (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
1 Finger millet 11.84 7.95 1.87 1.97 65.19 11.18
2 Kodo millet 14.19 9.82 2.65 1.63 65.32 6.39
3 Foxtail millet 12.13 11.75 3.79 3.23 62.41 6.70
4 Pearl millet 8.97 11.12 5.21 1.13 62.12 11.45
5 Barnyard millet 12.35 10.98 3.32 4.21 55.54 13.60
6 Little millet 11.53 10.25 3.92 1.26 65.32 7.72
7 Proso millet 12.97 11.65 3.46 2.97 63.75 5.20
8 Sorghum 10.98 9.49 1.69 1.42 66.21 10.22
(Ojediran et.al.,2010,African Jr. of Gen.Agril.,2010)
(Madhavi Reddy et.al.,2019), (Int. Jr. of mulitidisc.R&D,2019)
3/1/2021 58
Table.2 Physical properties of millets:
3/1/2021 59
Table 3 Physical parameter of selected varieties
variety Ex-Borno SOSATC88
%mc(wb) 10 13 15 20 10 13 15 20
sn parameters
1 length 3.16 3.57 3.33 3.80 3.87 3.80 3.79 4.46
2 width 2.30 2.65 2.45 2.66 2.93 2.77 2.62 3.39
3 thickness 1.54 1.64 1.49 1.60 2.05 1.78 2.19 2.51
4 sphericity 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.73 0.69 0.73 0.74
5 1000seed mass 7.30 9.08 9.99 0.06 9.47 11.42 11.09 11.95
6 bulk density 811.40 684.4 670.20 646.40 817.64 728.80 726.00 745.60
7 solid density 958.10 953.3 956.13 960.59 905.24 982.48 985.21 988.61
8 porosity 15.17 27.26 26.18 32.64 17.28 20.37 26.30 26.60
9 angle of repose 32.67 37.67 34.67 40.00 29.33 34.67 34.67 40.00
2 13 0.39 0.40 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.39 0.40
3 15 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.41
4 20 0.37 0.37 0.41 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.37 0.38
3/1/2021 62
Table.6 Typical performance rates of the dehuller on Botswana
cereals
source: RHC(1980b)
3/1/2021 63
Table. 7 Effect of daily throughout on fuel consumptions for mills
using the Mini-SISMAR/ISRAI dehusker
mean specific fuel mean daily thr‘ total qty. dehulled
consumption output over 10 month
sn location (ml/kg) kg/day period(kg)
1 Baila 20.41 34 8 38
2 B.Tialene 13.84 64 13 15
3 Bignana 12.51 179 42 12
4 HamdallayeTesan 18.83 38 7 11
5 Kartiack 24.77 22 4 98
6 K.S.Kane 16.93 96 18 20
7 Khandiar 10.15 145 22 56
8 Lambaye 14.4 34 8 06
9 Mont Roalnd 15.81 30 4 29
source: Mbengue(1988)
3/1/2021 64
Table.8 Performance of the mini dehuller in proc -
essing various grains
sn Grain yield(%)
1 Millet 90-95
2 Sorghum 73-89
3 Brown rice 84-92
4 Wheat 77-93
5 Soybean 90
6 Faba bean 83
7 Lentil 85
8 Kidney bean 84
9 Mung bean 74
10 Black eyed cowpea 80
11 Brown cowpea 74
Source: Adapted from York,1981
3/1/2021 65
Grain cleaner cum grader equipment validation
(1) required capacity – 1.25kg/s
(2) drum angular velocity – 0-240rpm
(3) sieve drum angular velocity – 0-80rpm
(4) sieve opening size, fine impurity size – 2.50mm
(5) fine grain size-4mm
(6) sieve drum inclination angle -10ᵒ
(7) blower angular velocity – 0-720rpm
3/1/2021 66
VALIDATION REPORT:
*Dehullers were first compared looking at the average annual
cost per pound to dehull spelt operating at the rated capacity
and estimated optimum efficiency.
*At top speeds, quality degrades with more hulls and other chaff
or more damage to the grain, sometimes both.
3/1/2021 69