Rania Wright
March 19, 2021
AFAM Section 002
Essay 1, Question 7
The Relationship Between Race and American Democracy
The foundation of American democracy was built on a system that prioritizes a hierarchy
of wealth and status. This has led to the relationship between race and democracy as being one in
the same; your race determines whether you are considered a citizen or not. This relationship
began during colonization and slavery, becoming more enhanced as time went on. The passage
of the 13th amendment, the women’s suffrage movement, and the timeless tradition of migration
to the U.S. all contribute to this relationship. These historic moments have all asked the question
who counts as “white”, leaving many Americans attempting to fulfill this image. The issue of
race and American Democracy can unfortunately be found in today’s world. It is seen in who
votes (in terms of demographics and gerrymandering) today, opportunities from the government
(such as access to jobs and education), violence against minority communities, and many more
moments. As students, we must be hyper aware of this relationship and factor it into all our
future career decisions, as we attempt to make this world a better place.
The idea of “whiteness,” which is what one must be to be considered an American
citizen, is a social construct and not a race. To help you understand this label’s history, its
development began because colonization and enslavement developed in tandem. This status was
invented by European colonizers and enslavers to establish a difference between them and their
slaves as well as the natives. Contrary to how “whiteness” may be used today, it began as a
“noxious cross-class unifier” (Horne 24) among settlers of all incomes, allowing everyone in the
Pan-European group to bond together. Gerald Horne tells us in his work, The Apocalypse of
Settler Colonialism, that this Pan-European group were “all bound by petrified unity in reaction
to the prospect of a slave rebellion that would liquidate them all” (Horne 24). The colonization of
Jamaica is one specific example that can be used to pinpoint “whiteness” at an extreme level.
Horne describes the taking of Jamaica as something that was “not a victory for Africans. It led to
an even more voracious appetite for enslaved African labor to produce the fabulously profitable
crop that was sugar. This, as much as anything else, contributed mightily to the heightening of
the already degraded status of Africans, as a by-product and rationalization of their enhanced
reputation” (Horne 24). This appetite for enslaved labor and profitable crop carried over into the
discovery that even the “poorer among this group could profit from the pillaging of the
Cherokees (and countless other indigenes) and Mexicans and Hawaiians” (Horne 24). This
identity of "whiteness" served as way to bring all Europeans together, and for all of them to
make a profit, including those on the lower end of the totem pole. Most importantly, this identity
served as a method of successfully colonizing the Americas at the expense of the Natives and
through the labor of Black Americans. The label of “whiteness,” as you can clearly now see, was
built upon the extortion of another group by the extorters using means of violence and
intimidation (themes within enslavement) to prove their superiority. This foundation for the
social construct of “whiteness” has persisted into modern times.
“Whiteness” today is “not a biological status but a political color. [It] distinguishes[s] the
free from the unfree, the equal from the inferior, and the citizen from the slave” (Olson 43). The
relationship between race and citizenship is one of wealth and status in the United States. Joe
Olson, in his work, The Abolition of White Democracy: Chapter Two, The Problem of the White
Citizen, gives us another excellent example of how “whiteness” is a social construct/political
color and defines your role in democracy. Olson tells us about the Irish immigrant struggle for
“whiteness” and why this is different from other Pan-European groups. Post-colonization, in the
Antebellum South, “Irish immigrants were not guaranteed admission into the white club... [and
were] one of the most discriminated-against ethnic groups” (Olson 38). As a result, the Irish
“took up anti-Black discrimination with zeal. They were at the forefront of the many anti-Black
riots that convulsed the North. They also led efforts to exclude Black labor from work sites, to
contain and repress Black neighborhoods through policing, and to keep Black people away from
the polls in places where they were allowed to vote” (Olson 45). This was especially surprising
behavior from the Irish, because they had settled in America after “escaping a land from which
they had suffered something akin to racial oppression” (Olson 45). This example just goes to
show that the struggle to be “white” in America is entirely a political battle, because while the
Irish visibly appear “white,” upon their arrival they were not immediately treated as such. The
Irish had to prove their “whiteness” and the method to do so was to disenfranchise Black
Americans. While this incident occurred after the original colonization of the Americas, it goes
to show you how the upholding of “whiteness” and the desperation to fit into this group has
persisted throughout the history of America’s democracy.
In today’s world, there is both a struggle to fit the image of “whiteness” from all races
and classes of people. While visible appearance certainly does play some role (I would be lying
if I said it did not), it is not the only factor. When you are “white,” you have a vote and a voice.
Throughout America’s history, it has not only been Black Americans who have not had this
voice and vote. The women’s suffrage movement is an excellent example of this. At the time,
while some women enjoyed the benefits of a nice suburban lifestyle, many women did not,
especially Black women. They had to fight for their right to have a voice. In the modern day, so
many groups of people, primarily based on income (and by default, zip code) voices are unheard
in the American democracy. The people who are considered “white” in this country today, who
have wealth and status, are taking many measures to keep themselves there, just as the “white”
people did decades ago. Voter ID laws is just one method, as of 2020, over 21 million Americans
do not have government-issued photo identification (ACLU). The reasoning for this is, because
“ID cards aren’t always accessible for everyone. The ID itself can be costly, and even when IDs
are free, applicants must incur other expenses to obtain the underlying documents that are needed
to get an ID. This can be a significant burden on people in lower-income communities. Further,
the travel required is an obstacle for people with disabilities, the elderly, and people living in
rural areas” (ACLU). In addition, voter registration restrictions can be an obstacle as
“Restrictions can include requiring documents to prove citizenship or identification, onerous
penalties for voter registration drives or limiting the window of time in which voters can
register” (ACLU). Felony disenfranchisement is also an issue “due to racial bias in the criminal
justice system, felony disenfranchisement laws disproportionately affect Black people, who often
face harsher sentences than white people for the same offenses” (ACLU). It is important to note
that many of these laws are rooted in the Jim Crow era when legislators attempted to prevent
Black American’s newly won right to vote by “enforcing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other
barriers that were nearly impossible to meet” (ACLU). I would keep in mind that there is a
common theme in each of these instances of the government being the ones who attempt to
preserve the social construct. Finally, gerrymandering plays a key role in elections as “too often,
states use redistricting as a political tool to manipulate the outcome of elections” (ACLU). All of
these are tools used in the modern day to keep the “white” population in the U.S. reaping all the
benefits at the expense of many other Americans. All of these are widespread, undemocratic
practices that is stifle the voice of millions of voters. Voter suppression affects people of color,
young people, the elderly, and people with disabilities. There’s proof that certain groups have
been deliberately targeted over time through statics and uncovered government documents
(census case). From the colonization of America to today’s society, the relationship between race
and democracy has been the same, if you have money and status, you will do anything to
preserve your voice that automatically come with it.
The link between American Democracy and race has always been that you cannot
participate in democracy without being of the “white” race. The image of “whiteness” persisting
for as long as it has, is due to the hierarchy that has been established through this image. From
the colonization of America to today’s government elections, there has been a silent debate over
what qualifies you as a citizen or not. Race has always a social construct. The question becomes,
what do we do with this information now that we know it. As I previously mentioned as students,
it is important not only to be aware of this, however, also to act in order to give a voice to the
voiceless, where that’s others in your community or yourself.
Works Cited
"Block the Vote: Voter Suppression in 2020." American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, 3 Feb.
2020, www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/. Accessed
19 Mar. 2021.
Horne, Gerald. "Introduction." The Apocalypse of Settler Colonialism.
Olson, Joel. "Chapter Two: The Problem of the White Citizen." The Abolition of White
Democracy.