SHREE VAISHNAV
ACADEMY
Session : 2022-23
Subject : English Project
Topic : SHOULD ANIMAL TESTING
BE BANNED?
Submitted to : Mrs. Kirti Anurag
Malviya
Submitted by : Tanishq Durgesh
Bhawsar
Certificate
This is to certify that .... TANISHQ
BHAWSAR.... student of XII science has
successfully prepared the report on project
entitled
“Should Animal Testing be Banned”
under the guidance of
Mrs. Kirti Anurag Malviya
This report is the result of her endeavour
and efforts
The report is found worthy of acceptance as
the final project for subject English of
class XII.
Signature of English teacher Signatureof External Examiner
Signature of Principal
Declaration
I hereby declare that the project work
entitled
“SHOULD ANIMAL TESTING BE
BANNED?”
Submitted to Department of English,
SHREE VAISHNAV ACADEMY
is prepared by me.
.....Tanishq Durgesh Bhawsar.....
Acknowledgement
I would like to express deep thanks of
gratitude to my project guide
Mrs.Kirti Anurag Malviya for guiding me
immensely through the project. Her constant
guidance and advices are responsible for the
successful completion of this project.
I would like to thanks our Principal, Mrs.
RichaTiwari Diwan for coordinating in every
possible way for the project
I must appreciate my classmates as well as my
dear family for being there with me
throughout the ups and downs of the project .
Last but not the least I would like to thank all
those who helped me directly or indirectly for
the completions of the project.
.....Tanishq Durgesh Bhawsar.....
Should Animal Testing be
Banned ?
Favour:Yes Animal Testing Should be
Banned
INTRODUCTION
For centuries, animals have been known as man’s
companions, a form of therapeutic relief, and a source
for human joy and entertainment. However, animals
are being tortured and treated cruelly for the sake of
human prosperity all over the country. Animal testing
as a means of researching medical advancements and
product quality for consumers is a large problem in
today’s society. The research experiments executed
with animals in the name of scientific discovery call
into question the compassion and integrity of the
human spirit. If we do not put an end to animal
testing in the United States, many animals will suffer
in anguish through the torment inflicted upon them in
a product testing lab. Product testing on animals
should be illegal, because animals are killed or kept in
captivity their entire life, substances that are tested on
animals may never be released for human use, and
there are alternatives available to testing on animals.
Product testing on animals should be illegal due to the
fact that animals are killed or kept in captivity their
entire lives. Just imagine another feeling, breathing,
living being sitting in a cold, wet cage, waiting to have
a cruel test administered to them. After the
excruciating experiment which tests their tolerance
towards pain and endurance to keep living, the
researcher ends abruptly ends their life. That is what
animals all across the world experience waiting in a
science lab to be tested on. This is the life of an animal
in a clinical testing trial. The testing lab environments
animals are kept in are horrendous. Animals that are
kept for research purposes usually live in confined,
cramped spaces their entire lives inhibiting healthy
growth for any living being.
If animal testing
continues to be a legal source of research for products
and medications, many animals will continue to die
cruel and unusual deaths with little benefit to
humanity. Animal testing should be ruled illegal.
These animals are forced to live in science labs under
inhumane circumstances for the testing of products
which rarely ending up being used for humans and
could have been measured for safety by using
alternative methods to animal testing. Animals are
important to humans for companionship,
rehabilitation, and quite necessarily depended on for
sustenance.
HISTORY OF ANIMAL TESTIMG
Vivisection or what is described as animal testing
is an old practice. It could be dated back at a time
of the primitive man, who could feed new food to
some wild dogs to determine if it would be edible.
Importantly, some princes utilized human guinea
pigs to test whether their food was suitable for
consumption (Rowan 194).
The act of animal testing is dated back to Greeks.
1n 450 BCE a Greek philosopher Alcmaeon did a
vivisection and interfered with the dog’s optic
nerve, which was essential for physicians to
evaluate the cause of blindness in human.
(Watson 11). In the third and fourth centuries
BCE, Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304-
258 BCE) utilized animals for their experiments
(Watson 11).
In the second century Rome, Claudius Galen, a
physician experimenter performed dissections on
goats as well as pigs to get knowledge of muscles
and nerves and thus is renowned as the father of
Vivisection (Watson 11). Moreover, in the twelfth
century, another Arabic physician, Avenzoar
dissected animals and established animal testing
experiment in testing surgical processes prior to
their application to man.
HARASING ANIMALS DURING TEST
Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it
still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most
people agree that animal experimentation should be
banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome
would be. Although, there are other ways of getting
results without testing on animals which
are, human tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc.
Other people think animal testing is the best way
because some animals have an organism as a human
like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc.
Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely
match with a human body reaction towards the
outcome of the research from an animal.
CONCLUSION
Although humans often benefit from successful
animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the
deaths of animals are not worth the possible
human benefits. Therefore, animals should not be
used in research or to test the safety of
products.First, animals' rights are violated when
they are used in research. Although humans often
benefit from successful animal research, the pain,
the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not
worth the possible human benefits. Therefore,
animals should not be used in research or to test
the safety of products. Researchers can test the
potential damage that a product can do to the skin
by using this artificial "skin" instead of testing on
animals.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• www.google.com
• www.documents.mx
• www.wikipedia.org •
www.docfoc.com
• www.slideshare.net
