0% found this document useful (0 votes)
279 views4 pages

Geometric Inequalities - Tran Quang Hung - MR 2008

This document summarizes an article that uses an algebraic inequality to prove various geometric inequalities. The article begins by proving an inequality relating sums of products to sums of terms. It then shows how this inequality can prove that certain ratios involving distances from a point P to the vertices of a triangle ABC are greater than or equal to 1. Finally, the article applies these results to solve three problems about sums of distances from P to the vertices of ABC.

Uploaded by

David David
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
279 views4 pages

Geometric Inequalities - Tran Quang Hung - MR 2008

This document summarizes an article that uses an algebraic inequality to prove various geometric inequalities. The article begins by proving an inequality relating sums of products to sums of terms. It then shows how this inequality can prove that certain ratios involving distances from a point P to the vertices of a triangle ABC are greater than or equal to 1. Finally, the article applies these results to solve three problems about sums of distances from P to the vertices of ABC.

Uploaded by

David David
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

On some geometric inequalities

Tran Quang Hung

Abstract
In this article we use a purely algebraic inequality to prove a variety of
geometric inequalities.

1 Introduction

In the recently published article: An unexpectedly useful inequality by Pham Huu


Duc [1], the following inequality was proved
p
(b + c)x + (c + a)y + (a + b)z ≥ 2 (xy + yz + zx)(ab + bc + ca) ∀a, b, c, x, y, z ≥ 0.

The inequality was presented along with its algebraic applications. This inequality
not only has many applications in algebra but also it has many applications in
geometry. We start with a nice proof of this result that appeared in [2]:

Proposition 1. For all real numbers a, b, c, x, y, z such that ab + bc + ca ≥ 0 and


xy + yz + zx ≥ 0 the following inequality holds
p
(b + c)x + (c + a)y + (a + b)z ≥ 2 (xy + yz + zx)(ab + bc + ca).

Proof. Using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality we get

(b + c)x + (c + a)y + (a + b)z = (a + b + c)(x + y + z) − (ax + by + cz)


p
= [a2 + b2 + c2 + 2(ab + bc + ca)][x2 + y 2 + z 2 + 2(xy + yz + zx)] − (ax + by + cz)
p p
≥ 2 (xy + yz + zx)(ab + bc + ca) + (a2 + b2 + c2 )(x2 + y 2 + z 2 ) − (ax + by + cz)
p
≥ 2 (xy + yz + zx)(ab + bc + ca).

The next inequality can be proved as a corollary:


Corollary 1. For all real positive numbers a, b, c, x, y, z the following inequality is
true
x y z p
a+ b+ c ≥ 3(ab + bc + ca).
y+z z+x x+y
 
x y z
Proof. Let us replace in Proposition 1 (x, y, z) with y+z , z+x , x+y . Note that

xy yz zx 3
+ + ≥ ,
(z + x)(z + y) (x + y)(x + z) (y + z)(y + x) 4
and the conclusion follows.

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 1


Proposition 2. Let P be a point in the plane of triangle ABC, then
PA · PC PC · PA PA · PB
+ + ≥ 1.
bc ca ab
where a, b, c are the sides of the triangle.
Proof. There are many ways to prove this inequality; we use complex numbers. Let
the complex coordinates of A, B, C and P be A(a), B(b), C(c) and P (p), respectively.
Using identity

(b − c)(p − b)(p − c) + (c − a)(p − c)(p − a) + (a − b)(p − a)(p − b) = (a − b)(b − c)(c − a),

we have

BC · P B · P C + CA · P C · P A + AB · P A · P B
= |(b − c)(p − b)(p − c)| + |(c − a)(p − c)(p − a)| + |(a − b)(p − a)(p − b)|
≥ |(b − c)(p − b)(p − c) + (c − a)(p − c)(p − a) + (a − b)(p − a)(p − b)|
= |(a − b)(b − c)(c − a)| = AB · BC · CA.

Dividing both sides by AB · BC · CA we get


PB · PC PC · PA PA · PB
+ + ≥ 1.
bc ca ab
Note that the equality holds if and only if P = H, where H is the orthocenter of
triangle ABC.
Let us combine the ideas of the first two propositions in the following statement:

Proposition 3. Let P be a point in the plane of triangle ABC, and let x, y, z be


real numbers such that xy + yz + zx ≥ 0. Then
PA PB PC √
(y + z)
+ (z + x) + (x + y) ≥ 2 xy + yz + zx.
a b c

Proof. We apply Proposition 1 for PaA , PbB , PcC and (x, y, z) to get


PA PB PC
(y + z) + (z + x) + (x + y)
s a b c
 
PA · PC PC · PA PA · PB
≥ 2 (xy + yz + zx) + +
bc ca ab

≥ 2 xy + yz + zx,

as desired.
We continue with a few classical problems that can be solved with the help of the
established results.

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 2


2 Applications

Problem 1. Consider triangle ABC and a point P in its plane. Prove that
PA PB PC √
+ + ≥ 3.
a b c

Solution. Plugging x = y = z = 1 in the Proposition 3, we get


 
PA PB PC
2 + + ≥ 2 3,
a b c
and we are done.

Problem 2. Consider triangle ABC and a point P in its plane. Prove that

a · P A + b · P B + c · P C ≥ 4KABC ,

where KABC is the area of triangle ABC.


b2 +c2 −a2 a2 +c2 −b2
Solution. Let a, b, c be the triangle’s sides. Denote x = 2 ,y = 2 ,z =
a2 +b2 −c2
2 . Then

2(a2 b2 + b2 c2 + c2 a2 ) − (a4 + b4 + c4 ) 2
xy + yz + zx = = 4KABC ≥ 0.
4
Hence using Proposition 3 for these (x, y, z) we get
PA PB PC
a2 · + b2 · + c2 · = a · P A + b · P B + c · P C ≥ 4KABC .
a b c

Problem 3. Let P be a point in the plane of triangle ABC. Prove that

P A + P B + P C ≥ 6r,

where r is the inradius of the incircle of triangle ABC.

Solution. Let x = s − a, y = s − b, z = s − c, where a, b, c are the triangle’s sides


and s is the semiperimeter. Then using Proposition 3 we get
p
P A + P B + P C ≥ 2 (s − a)(s − b) + (s − b)(s − c) + (s − c)(s − a).

Recall that (s − a)(s − b) + (s − b)(s − c) + (s − c)(s − a) = r(4R + r), where R


and r are the circumradius and inradius, respectively. Thus we get a much stronger
inequality p
P A + P B + P C ≥ 2 r(4R + r).

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 3


3 References
[1] Pham Huu Duc, An unexpectedly useful inequality, Mathematical Reflections
2008, Issue 1.
[2] Manlio, Blackmouse, Canhang, Mathlinks Forum 2007,
http://www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?t=187355.
[3] Dragoslav S. Mitrinovic, J. Pecaric,V. Volenec, Recent Advances in Geometric
Inequalities.
[4] Bottema, Oene; Djordjevic, R.Z.; Janic, R.; Mitrinovic, D.S.; and Vasic, P.M.,
Geometric Inequalities.

Tran Quang Hung


Ha Noi National University, Vietnam
email: [email protected]

Mathematical Reflections 3 (2008) 4

You might also like