Between Synchromysticism and Paganism TR
Between Synchromysticism and Paganism TR
Between Synchromysticism
and Paganism: Tracing some
metaphysical uses of popular
fictions
a
Danielle Lee Kirby
a
School of Media and Communication, RMIT University,
Building 9, 124 Latrobe Street, Melbourne, Victoria
3000, Australia
Published online: 10 Oct 2013.
To cite this article: Danielle Lee Kirby , Culture and Religion (2013): Between
Synchromysticism and Paganism: Tracing some metaphysical uses of popular fictions,
Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or
suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed
in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the
views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should
not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions,
claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities
whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection
with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-
licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly
forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Culture and Religion, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2013.838796
School of Media and Communication, RMIT University, Building 9, 124 Latrobe Street,
Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
Beliefs that directly draw on fictional material constitute a small but notable
element of contemporary ‘occulture’. Interestingly, the utilisation of popular
source material in the formation of personal idiosyncratic beliefs and
practices seems to be increasing in its presence. This paper explores the role
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
*Email: [email protected]
relationship.
The classifications proposed here are intended as a starting point only, and are
envisaged as a useful tool to assist in discussing textual relations within the
realms of occultural metaphysics. This proposition is a development and
expansion of earlier suggestions regarding the types of engagement, in those
cases constructed variously as the text as inspiration, as evocative support and the
object of belief (Kirby 2009, 2013). The types articulated here are not intended to
be exclusive or singular. Indeed, in every example, at least two of the uses of the
text characterised in this framework can be seen within the same practitioner’s
accounts. Moreover, across the spectrum of contemporary Paganism, for
instance, all five of the proposed types of engagement with texts can be seen,
alongside many other variations. Given this, then, these classifications are best
viewed as a spectrum, and an attempt to articulate some discrete positions within
a context of highly individualised belief and practice: they are intended to be read
as general and useful characterisations of engagement, not proscriptive limits
firmly demarcating how individuals or groups engage with texts.
The communities, metaphysics and practices used as examples here are not
chosen on any substantive philosophical continuum, but rather because they share
a common situation within the alternative and occultural milieu (Partridge 2004 –
2005) and explicitly engage with fictional narrative in direct relation to their
particular beliefs: in other words, they are chosen on the basis that they represent
a range of relationships, rather than a uniform approach, to popular fictional texts.
It is also important to note that within the instances of relations to texts explored
here, there is no unified position on the attribution of such stances as ‘religious’ or
otherwise, either within specific communities or across the occultural field at
large. Individuals may, dependent upon their personal relation to their particular
ideology, frame the following positions and practices as, respectively, religious,
spiritual, metaphysical, philosophical, psychological and even unproblematically
secular. Also, in many cases, these positions may be seen as complementary to,
or an element of, a broader religious or spiritual belief. In the contrary case, these
various paradigms may be framed outside the realms of metaphysical inquiry,
Culture and Religion 3
rather constituting a lived practice situated entirely within an everyday
desacralised world. Treatment here is premised upon academic categories of
religion, and does not necessarily reflect self-identification on behalf of
participants (Kirby 2013, 7– 21).
For the sake of precision, it is worth digressing briefly to clarify some of the
terminology used here. Use of the term ‘metaphysical’ in this context denotes a
world view that encompasses some form of the superempirical within its bounds.
The term ‘spirituality’ indicates religiosity without the necessity of religion:
idiosyncratic, informal or unstructured, yet undeniably concerned with the
substantive content of the religious. Continuing from this, where ‘alternative’
religion is utilised, it reflects a notion of alternative culture which highlights a
divergence from normative or generally acceptable approaches to religiosity:
these fall within the ‘alternative’ category of Robbins’ framework (Robbins
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
2005), and within the ‘alternative’ and ‘emergent’ religions of Bromley and
Melton’s most recent construction of the category of new religious movements
(Bromley and Melton 2012). In short, approaches to the experience of the
superempirical drawn on here are substantively, rather than functionally,
religious (Barker 1994, 101), and should not be taken to imply particular social
structures, prescriptive doctrine or defined religious institutions, but rather denote
an orientation towards the superempirical aspects of lived experience.
Text as catalyst
One of the ways that texts can be seen to function within occultural metaphysics
is in instigating and framing beliefs, functioning as a catalyst. While by no means
suggesting that texts are likely to be the only factor in spiritual formation,
characterising the text as a catalyst focuses upon the role a text can play in the
initial inspiration for metaphysical or spiritual engagement. In this framing, the
text functions to motivate a distinct spiritual position, and is considered central
enough by participants that the text itself, or particular aspects of it such as
specific terminology or characters, is explicitly given place within the paradigm.
While a text functioning as a catalyst is highly likely to be coupled with the use of
a text (or texts) as an ideal type in a more sustained fashion, as explored below,
these two functions of the text seem distinct enough to warrant separate
treatment. In the case of text as catalyst, emphasis is placed on the formative role
texts can play in inspiring discrete metaphysical positions as well as more general
spiritual engagement.
such as sharing water and the corollary waterkin, which refer to familial-like
relations within the narrative, and the structuring of community sub-groups as
nests, are ideas directly drawn from within the narrative. Although the Church of
All Worlds is not limited to spiritual exploration as articulated within the frame of
Stranger in a Strange Land, the text’s role within the formation of the group
serves as arguably the premier example of the catalytic potentials of textual
relations within non-traditional spirituality.
Jediism
Jediism is a far more recent example of the use of a popular fictional text as a
catalyst for this worldly metaphysical/spiritual engagement (Possamai 2005,
2011). Similarly to the Church of All Worlds, Jediism, in both its name and
ideology, centrally positions itself in relation to popular fictional narrative
(Davidsen 2011). In this case, the textual referent is George Lucas’ Star Wars
films (Lucas 1977 and continuing), in particular the characters of the Jedis and the
notion of ‘the force’, which have inspired the constitution of the community.
In the narrative of the Star Wars series, the Jedi are warriors for peace, attuned to
the universe and able to utilise energy, ‘the force’, to their ends, and are
emphatically situated on the ‘good’ end of the ethical spectrum. In the lived
philosophy of Jediism, the text is situated front and centre, as with the Church of
All Worlds, and does not particularly support truth claims regarding the fictional
worlds depicted in the text. Rather, the Star Wars films articulate a language and a
structure for this way of life. There are, however, regular disclaimers made from
within the community about the role of the text within the metaphysic, with the
predominant stance emphasising the text as an exemplary and evocative
demonstration of good practice. The following quote illustrates clearly the
centrality of the text as a language and a point of orientation for participants:
Our faith in the Force existed well before the fictional Star Wars movies brought
popular recognition to the terminology and concepts that our members always
innately held, but had difficultly describing in a shared forum . . .
Culture and Religion 5
Here, it is clear that the Star Wars texts have an illustrative capacity to express
metaphysical truths that are not limited to the text, and serve to provide a
descriptive language that enables group discourse. The author goes on to clarify:
The terminology used by the Jedi Church were introduced by the fictional Star Wars
movies, and often references are made to the movies by our members, as a
conceptual demonstration of how some might ascribe [sic ] to the higher levels of a
Jedi faith, in a far away land, a long time ago. The fact remains, that these concepts
merely reflect a deep held innate morality, that we all have inside us, and now we
have some common terminology and place to share our thoughts with each other.
This morality existed prior to the movies. The movies do not in any way legitimise
nor negate the legitimacy of the Jedi Church. They are merely a discussion point.
(Jedi Church)
This explanation must, of course, be seen within the group’s broader adoption of
language and concepts: the Jedi Church is so named from the films, and even if it
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Sithism
Interestingly, recent developments in Star Wars-oriented metaphysics have
introduced the ‘dark side’ into the field of fictionally oriented metaphysical
engagement. Within the Star Wars narrative, the Sith are the ‘dark’ counterparts
to the Jedi, committed to power and dominance rather than peace and equality,
and practicing their nefarious arts in secrecy. A small but strident online Sith
community now exists, promoting the Sith path and offering initiatory learning
(Sithacademy 2012b).1 To all appearances, this group of individuals is sincere in
their embrace of what seems like a notably antisocial and imperialist position that
articulates explicit political and social ideologies as well as magical and occult
orientations. In particular, their assertion of political ideals is unusual within
emergent spirituality of this type, as priority is more usually given to personal
lived experience. However, the site clearly states that the order ‘opposes
socialism, democracy and egalitarianism and favours oligarchy, theocracy and
imperialism’ (Sithacademy 2012a). Highly indebted to Western Esotericism and
Left Hand path ideologies (Granholm 2009), and directly citing Nietzsche,
among others, as a prophet of Sithism, this group seems strongly oriented towards
gaining techniques of power and control over others. In many ways, ideologically
6 D.L. Kirby
continuous with current forms of religious Satanism (Lewis 2002), Sithism
appears to invert Christian notions of good and relies more on a brutalist reading
of social Darwinism for its ethical structures. It is also comfortably occultural and
typically eclectic in the array of practices and techniques utilised.
The Sith Path is a path of inner and outer empowerment designed to produce the first
generation of Sith masters in this galaxy. The Sith Path incorporates elements from
many traditions, including Eastern disciplines such as Zen meditation, Kundalini
Yoga and Qigong, “mind tricks”, persuasion and seduction techniques, left-hand
path occultism, Machiavellian political skills, cosmic science and imperialist
ideology. (Sithacademy 2012a)
Beyond the clear referent in the nomenclature (as, obviously, also Jediism), the
Star Wars texts clearly function as paradigmatic support, as well as being highly
important within the metaphysic itself. A recent discussion which took place
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
between Sith on the associated forum illustrates this point very clearly (Dark
Council 2012). The question was raised as to whether or not the Sith Academy
should consider adopting a non-Star Wars name, which was strongly argued
against by other participants in the discussion. Most explicitly, the word ‘Sith’
was posited as a word of power, owning explicitly magical properties that are not
interchangeable with other words. Another participant emphasised the linage of
the Sith, citing an ideological provenance predominantly populated by fictional
sources, including references to Tolkien’s Middle Earth and the DC Universe.
‘Sith’ to me is just one name for an eternal order of sorcerers which takes different
forms in different times and places throughout the multiverse. In Hyboria we were
called the Black Ring; in the 30th century DC universe we’re the Dark Circle; in
Middle Earth we’re the Nazgul; in ancient Egypt perhaps we were the Cult of
Nephren-Ka; in imperial China we were the Wu Sorcerers; in recent times some of
the more sinister sects of chaos magicians come closest to our vision. We are
beyond names and forms, but we use whatever names and forms have the most
magical power in any era. (Dark Council 2012, Imperius)
While clearly a site of discussion and dispute, Sithism, like the Church of All
Worlds and Jediism, nonetheless demonstrates a formative relationship with
popular fictional narrative. As well as providing an ideal type, as will be explored
below, the respective texts of Stranger in a Strange Land and Star Wars
functioned as catalysts for group formation.
Paganism
Paganism, in its regular use of fantasy narrative, seems the clearest example of
this type of textual engagement. Paganism is perhaps most usefully thought of
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Text as reality
In this type of relationship, the text is constructed as a reality in itself, not simply
within the internal logics of the narrative, but also possessing a form of extra-
textual ontological status. This may include the text as a whole, in the sense of the
narrative world owning actual existence, perhaps as a world in a different solar
system or on a spiritual and intangible plane of existence. Alternatively,
particular textual elements such as characters or worlds may be attributed reality
beyond the text without the same level of reality ascribed to the rest of the text.
Constructing the text as reality is arguably on the more radical side of textual
positioning within metaphysical contexts, and is certainly not particularly
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Otherkin
Perhaps the best example of this characterisation of the text as reality is evident
within various elements of the Otherkin community. The Otherkin, and broader
Otherkin-like beliefs outside of the particular community, are particularly
interesting in demonstrating a range of approaches to popular texts. In brief, the
Otherkin believe that they are, in some way and to some extent, non-human
(Kirby 2009, 2013). In its simplest statement, ‘Otherkin is a collective noun for
an assortment of people who have come to the somewhat unorthodox, and
possibly quite bizarre, conclusion that they identify themselves as being
something other than human’ (Windtree 2005). The particular nature of the
individual non-humanness is idiosyncratic and positions range across a wide
spectrum, from taking an archetypal, perhaps even totemic, approach to non-
human entities in regard to the self, through to a belief in the soul as non-human.
An archetypal approach in this context might posit a dragon, for instance, as a
quintessential universal form, perhaps with particular attributes or characteristics
that may serve as a personal guide or totem. Whatever the particular construction
of the non-human elements of the self, the entities referenced in this context
include mythological, literary and natural entities, as well as beings more
explicitly sourced from popular cultural: dragons, angels, vampires and elves as
well as various natural animals and Japanese anime characters regularly comprise
the site of the more-than-human self. Insofar as any generalisation can be made
about such unique and individualised beliefs, it seems that generally Otherkin are
more likely to situate the self in relation to various tropes of the fantasy canon,
rather than specific entities from particular narratives. In this, perhaps, the
Culture and Religion 9
majority of those who hold to an Otherkin-type metaphysics would tend to fall
more towards the ideal-type classification. That said, however, there are also
clear instances of more direct relations to specific texts, with particular entities
and worlds attributed concrete, rather than metaphoric or evocative, reality.
One of the more explicit practices where textual creations are ascribed extra-
textual reality can be seen in ‘soulbonding’. Soulbonding is a type of relationship
associated with, but not necessarily a part of, an Otherkin-type paradigm. The
term itself carries a wide range of implications, and indeed is present within
creative writing discourse as well as in the more explicitly superempirical context
discussed here. Soulbonding refers to the relationship experienced between an
individual and a fictional character. In its creative writing context, typically less
‘spiritually’ oriented, soulbonding, or soulbonds, can refer to the experience
authors may have of feeling like a character they are writing has desires and
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
intentions of their own. At the other end of the spectrum, and more within the
scope of this discussion, a soulbond is a relationship with a character from a
fictional source that occurs outside of the immediate experience of the text.
A character from a computer game, for instance, may be perceived as an entity in
their own right, existing outside of the game within which they were first
experienced. Characters in this light may be conceived, for instance, as coexisting
within personal mental space, on a different plane of existence such as the
‘astral’, or externally in the world in an intangible form, as a spiritual being.
In this relationship, characters, and implicitly texts, are attributed a far higher
degree of ‘realness’ than in other contexts.
Of course, the question arises of how a fictional text can hold extra-textual
‘realness’ outside of a fundamental confusion between the fictive and the real.
This can occur through a number of ways, such as treating the author as a channel
or medium for a world or entity understood as already in existence, or even
asserting the creative and actualising power of an audience’s attention, and its
corollary capacity for world creation (Kirby 2009, 150 – 152). Whatever the
particular logics utilised by individuals, in the case of soulbonding it can be seen
that textual elements are attributed direct status outside the bounds of the text.
Unlike the two previous categories, this approach is distinguished by a less
metaphoric and more definite assertion of the ‘really real’ (Luhrmann 2012, 139)
nature of fictional entities.
The Otherkin, and particular relationships like soulbonding, constitute a very
specific manifestation of alternative metaphysics insofar as they attribute some
degree of reality and actuality to fictional content. The fictions they access in the
creation of their metaphysic range from traditional mythologies through to pulp
fiction. Their relationship to these texts is complex and nonlinear, and tends
towards extension and expansion, and often the outright creation of new texts.
In terms of their particular source texts, though, it is interesting to see that the
Otherkin generally do not adopt texts wholesale, but rather tend to assert the
actual existence of specific textual elements such as characters or worlds. This
10 D.L. Kirby
point is of particular interest as it constitutes one of the primary distinctions
between this position and a more evocative or metaphoric reading of texts.
Text as practice
Situating the text as practice highlights its role as a site through which religious,
spiritual or magical activity may take place, most evidently within contexts
where the text itself becomes the tool of practice. This type falls towards the more
instrumental end of textual engagement, with the content of the texts more likely
to be framed as a means to an end than as material to be enjoyed in its own right.
The particular nature of the text as tool is highly specific, but examples of such
an approach include treating texts as conglomerates of symbolic forms to be
manipulated by the practitioner, as archetypal statements of being, or as power
sources. This approach is often highly evident within magical practices across a
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
range of traditions, although perhaps most explicit within less traditional forms of
occultism, such as chaos magic.
Chaos magic
Chaos magic is a particular form of late modern magical practice highly indebted
to the occultist experimentation of earlier practitioners such as Aleister Crowley
and Austin Osman Spare and the schools of thought associated with them, but
also generally highly oriented towards the late modern digitised world (Urban
2006, 222– 254). Although most usually associated with sex magic and
anarchism in their connection to Crowlian forms of magic, what is rather of
particular interest in this context is their openness towards practices that utilise
popular culture source material within magical practice. One proponent, Taylor
Ellwood, describes a popular text-based approach to magic in his practitioners’
manual, Pop Culture Magic (Ellwood 2004). Ellwood outlines a practice in
which characters within particular narrative contexts can be treated as power
sources or god forms, and where narrative content can serve as a site for ritual
practice. In this framework, popular culture icons such as the character Buffy are
framed as god forms (Ellwood 2004, 16), and can be magically utilised in the
same way as traditional gods and goddesses. An individual can charge their sigils
while watching TV or playing a computer game, or wear specific characters to
empower the self (Ellwood 2004, 142). Wearing specific characters in this
context does not imply a costume, but instead a sort of variant of channelling –
the magician pulls down the god form (in this case Buffy the Vampire Slayer)
into his or herself, and takes on their attributes and, perhaps, strength. In this case,
the popular text becomes a part of the magician’s ritual armoury – an important
and powerful element of spiritual practice.
It is interesting to note that, in this case, there is a distinctly different approach
to the source texts to previous examples. This more explicitly magical approach
may, at first, appear to lack the specificity of text that was more obvious in some
of the previous cases discussed, and indeed perhaps seem arbitrary. And to a
Culture and Religion 11
degree this seems true. But on the other hand, it is important to recognise that
Buffy potentially has, for instance, particular attributes that are different to, say,
Sephiroth (a character from a popular game series, Final Fantasy VII (Square
Co., Ltd 1997). They are precisely not generic or arbitrarily interchangeable, but
rather treated as archetypal. In any case, this type of magical practice gives a clear
illustration of the use of popular narrative as a tool for spiritual and magical
practice.
heritage as chaos magic of the Discordian type (Urban 2006, 233 –235), and
coupled with a deep and gleeful sense of the absurd, a highly performative
approach, and a firm grip on popular as well as occultural sources (Cusack 2010,
83– 111; Kirby 2012). While the group’s beliefs and practices are eclectic,
complex and defy simply rendition, of particular interest here is their penchant
for utilising science fiction tropes (Cusack 2010, 83), as can be seen in their
various publications (Stang 1983, 2006). Central tenets include the coming of the
alien Xists on the good spaceship JEHOVA1 in 1996; the awesome power of Bob
Dobbs, the ultimate 1950s salesman; the Yeti heritage of all Sub Genii and the
general unpleasantness of the elder gods of a Lovecraftian type. The Church of
the SubGenius seems intent upon shocking people out of normative patterns of
thinking with regard to all areas of human engagement, be they personal, political
or spiritual. It is inherently postmodern insofar as, while materials are presented
with ironic and subversive humour, this is indeed part of the philosophy that is
being propounded.
Both their philosophy and brutal use of conceptual, visual and narrative
juxtaposition is notoriously difficult to approach from an etic position, but it is, at
minimum, evident that the Church of the SubGenius uses popular narrative as a
deliberate mechanism of metaphysical awakening or awareness: a kind of pulp
fiction kenshō. Similar to the practices of the chaos magician, the Church of the
SubGenius recasts the popular into new contexts to forge a metaphysical tool.
Text as proof
The final characterisation proposed here locates the text as a proof of
metaphysical and/or occluded realities. Popular texts, in such cases, are taken to
have revelatory or evidential force in certain contexts, pointing towards hitherto
unknown or unacknowledged connections that can constitute a more meaningful
or knowing engagement with the world. This type is quite continuous with the
previous category of text as tool, but again seems worthy of distinction on the
basis of both reading strategies and related practices.
12 D.L. Kirby
Synchromysticism2
Arguably one of the more obscure of all the textual relations explored thus far,
Synchromysticism can perhaps best be characterised as part artistic practice, part
spiritual or metaphysical system, part conspiracy culture. Less a group, movement,
or belief, it seems rather a very particular way of reading texts, and denotes an area
of interest that tends to manifest in, and be read through, new media art. Clearly
showing the eclecticism native to much contemporary occultural thought and
practice, Synchromysticism incorporates, among other things, Jungian mysticism,
conspiracy theory and alternative histories and science, and has been characterised
as an approach that ‘attempts to see beyond the darker aspects of society, politics,
and popular culture, to a cosmic design’ (Horsley 2009, 96). A more participant-
oriented understanding, attributed to Jake Kotze, is ‘The art of realizing
meaningful coincidence in the seemingly mundane with mystical or esoteric
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Conclusion
Theorising the particular ways in which texts are utilised within religious,
spiritual or metaphysical contexts is a fraught endeavour at the best of times,
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Notes
1. There were 27 members at the time of writing.
2. Acknowledgement should be given to Jaimie Leonarder of Mu-Meson Archives,
Sydney, whose presentation ‘Synchromysticism and the Decoding of Mainstream
Hollywood Cinema’ (ACMI, Melbourne, 3 April 2009) first brought this practice to my
attention.
14 D.L. Kirby
References
Barker, E. 1994. “But is it a Genuine Religion?” In Between Sacred and Secular: Research
and Theory on Quasi-Religion, edited by A. L. Griel, and T. Robbins, 97 – 110.
Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Barkun, M. 2003. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary
America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bromley, D. G., and J. G. Melton. 2012. “Reconceptualizing Types of Religious
Organization.” Nova Religio 15 (3): 4 – 28.
Campbell, C. 1972. “The Cult, the Cultic Milieu, and Secularisation.” A Sociological
Yearbook of Religion in Britain 5: 119–136.
Clelland, M. 2010. “Audio Conversation with Jake Kotze.” In Hidden Experience Audio,
[Online] edited by M. Clelland. Blog Post and Audio Interview: http://
hiddenexperience.podbean.com/2010/11/27/jake-kotze-interview/
Cusack, C. M. 2010. Invented Religions: Imagination, Fiction and Faith. Farnham and
Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013
Dark Council. 2012. A Non-Star Wars Name for Our Order? [Online]. http://www.
sithacademy.com: Administrative Forum.
Davidsen, M. 2011. “Jedism: A Convergence of Star Wars Fan Culture and Salad Bar
Spirituality.” De Filosoof: Departementsblad Wijbegeerte Universiteit Utrecht 51: 24.
Dedroidify.com. Synchromysticism, [Online]. Accessed September 24, 2012. http://www.
dedroidify.com/synchromystic.htm
Ellwood, T. 2004. Pop Culture Magic. Stafford: Immanion Press.
Granholm, K. 2009. “Left Hand Path Magic and Animal Rights.” Nova Religio 12 (4):
28 – 49.
Harvey, G. 2000a. “Boggarts and Books: Towards an Appreciation of Pagan Spirituality.”
In Beyond New Age: Exploring Alternative Spirituality, edited by S. J. Sutcliffe, and
M. Bowman, 155– 168. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Harvey, G. 2000b. “Fantasy in the Study of Religions: Paganism as Observed and
Enhanced by Terry Pratchett [Online].” Diskus 6.
Harvey, G. 2006. “Discworld and Otherworld: The Imaginative Use of Fantasy Literature
Among Pagans.” In Popular Spiritualites: The Politics of Contemporary Enchant-
ment, edited by L. Hume, and K. McPhillips, 41 – 52. England: Ashgate.
Harvey, G. 2009. “Paganism.” In Religions in the Modern World, edited by Linda
Woodhead, Hiroko Kawanami, and Christopher Partridge, 357–377. London and New
York: Routledge (Orig. pub. 2001).
Heinlein, R. A. 1961. Stranger in a Strange Land. New York: Putnam.
Horsley, J. 2009. The Secret Life of Movies: Schizophrenic and Shamanic Journeys in
American Cinema. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland & Company,
Inc.
Hume, L. 1997. Witchcraft and Paganism in Australia. Carlton South: Melbourne
University Press.
Jedi Church. Jedi Doctrine [Online]. Accessed September 28, 2012. http://www.
jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.html
Kirby, D. 2009. “From Pulp Fiction to Revealed Text: A Study of the Role of the Text in
the Otherkin Community.” In Exploring Religion and the Sacred in a Media Age,
edited by C. Deacy, and E. Arweck, 141– 154. England: Ashgate.
Kirby, D. 2012. “Occultural Bricolage and Popular Culture: Remix and Art in
Discordianism, the Church of the Subgenius, and the Temple of Psychick Youth.”
In The Handbook of Hyper-Real Religions, edited by A. Possamai, 39 – 57. Leiden:
Brill.
Kirby, D. 2013. Fantasy and Belief: Alternative Religions, Popular Narratives, and
Digital Cultures. Sheffield and Bristol, CT: Equinox.
Culture and Religion 15
Lewis, J. R. 1999. Witchcraft Today: An Encyclopedia of Wiccan and Neopagan
Traditions. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Lewis, J. R. 2002. “Diabolical Authority: Anton LaVey, the Satanic Bible and the Satanist
‘Tradition’ [Online].” Marburg Journal of Religion 7 (1): 1 – 16.
Luhrmann, T. M. 2012. “Touching the Divine: Recent Research on New-Paganism and
Neo-Shamanism.” Reviews in Anthropology 41 (2): 136– 150.
Partridge, C. 2004– 2005. The Re-Enchantment of the West: Alternative Spiritualities,
Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occulture. Vols. 1 and 2. London; New York:
T&T Clark International.
Pinchbeck, D. 2012. “Exploring the Edge Realms of Consciousness: An Introduction.”
In Exploring the Edge Realms of Consciousness: Liminal Zones, Psychic Science, and
Hidden Dimensions of the Mind, edited by D. Pinchbeck, 62 – 127. Berkeley, CA:
Evolver Editions.
Possamai, A. 2005. Religion and Popular Culture: A Hyperreal Testament Gods, Humans
and Religion. New York and Oxford: Peter Lang.
Possamai, A. 2011. “Gramsci, Jedism, the Standardisation of Popular Religion and the
Downloaded by [Danielle Kirby] at 22:19 15 October 2013