Scribd
Upload
68 views1 page

44.) in Re Charges of LILIAN F. VILLASANTA, G.R. AC-UNAV, April 30, 1957

The respondent sought to be admitted to the bar but was accused of immoral conduct. He had married Rizalina E. Valdez in 1939 but then courted the complainant in 1951, procuring a fake marriage contract for them to sign so he could have carnal knowledge of her. The complainant later discovered the respondent was already married, so she filed criminal charges against him and this complaint. The court found the respondent guilty of immorality for making a mockery of marriage, which is a sacred institution. His conviction in the criminal case involved moral turpitude. By contracting a second marriage while still validly married to his first wife, the respondent acted contrary to honesty, justice, decency and morality.

Uploaded by

Darryl Catalan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
68 views1 page

44.) in Re Charges of LILIAN F. VILLASANTA, G.R. AC-UNAV, April 30, 1957

The respondent sought to be admitted to the bar but was accused of immoral conduct. He had married Rizalina E. Valdez in 1939 but then courted the complainant in 1951, procuring a fake marriage contract for them to sign so he could have carnal knowledge of her. The complainant later discovered the respondent was already married, so she filed criminal charges against him and this complaint. The court found the respondent guilty of immorality for making a mockery of marriage, which is a sacred institution. His conviction in the criminal case involved moral turpitude. By contracting a second marriage while still validly married to his first wife, the respondent acted contrary to honesty, justice, decency and morality.

Uploaded by

Darryl Catalan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

In Re Charges of LILIAN F. VILLASANTA, G.R.

AC-UNAV, April 30, 1957

Facts of the case:

The complaint seeks to disqualify the respondent, a 1954 successful bar candidate, from being admitted to
the bar. The basic facts are the same as those found by the Court of Appeals, to wit: On April 16, 1939,
the respondent was married to Rizalina E. Valdez in Rizal, Nueva Ecija. On or before March 8, 1951, he
courted the complainant who fell in love with him. To have carnal knowledge of her, the respondent
procured the preparation of a fake marriage contract which was then a blank document. He made her sign
it on March 8, 1951. A week after, the document was brought back by the respondent to the complainant,
signed by the Justice of the Peace and the Civil Registrar of San Manuel, Tarlac, and by two witnesses.
Since then the complainant and the respondent lived together as husband and wife.

The complainant then discovered that the respondent was previously married to someone else;
whereupon, she filed the criminal action for a violation of Article 350 of the Revised Penal Code in the
Court of First Instance of Cagayan and the present complaint for immorality in this court.

Issue:

Whether respondent is engaged in immoral conduct.

Held:

YES. Upon consideration of the records of G. R. No. L-9513 and the complaint, this Court is of the
opinion that the respondent is immoral. He made a mockery of marriage which is a sacred institution
demanding respect and dignity. His conviction in the criminal case involves moral turpitude. The act of
respondent in contracting the second marriage (even his act in making love to another woman while his
first wife is still alive and their marriage still valid and existing) is contrary to honesty, justice, decency
and morality.

Thus lacking the good moral character required by the Rules of Court, the respondent is hereby declared
disqualified from being admitted to the bar.

You might also like