Neurotoxicology 102 (2024) 121–122
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Neurotoxicology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuro
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Promoting TFEB nuclear localization with curcumin
analog C1 attenuates sensory hair cell injury and delays age-related hearing
loss in C57BL/6 mice” [Neurotoxicology, 95 (2023) 218–231]
Wuhui He a, b, c, Fan Wu a, b, c, Hao Xiong a, b, Junbo Zeng a, b, Yiming Gao a, b, c, Ziyi Cai a, b, c,
Jiaqi Pang a, b, c, *, Yiqing Zheng a, b, *
a
Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
b
Institute of Hearing and Speech-Language Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
c
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen
University, Guangzhou, China
The authors regret that errors occurred in the project names of analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 12 M vs 12 M+C1
Table 3 on page 224 and Table 4 on page 226. The project name "Dis groups) is incorrect. The correct name is "Genes", as shown in the below
tance from apex (mm)" in Table 3 (Statistical analysis of quantitative tables.
real-time PCR between 3 M vs 12 M groups) and Table 4 (Statistical The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2023.02.004.
* Correspondence to: Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Yanjiang West Road 107, Guangzhou, Guangdong
Province, China.
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (J. Pang),
[email protected] (Y. Zheng).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2024.04.006
Available online 6 May 2024
0161-813X/© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
W. He et al. Neurotoxicology 102 (2024) 121–122
Table 3
Statistical analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 3 M vs 12 M groups.
Groups Genes p value
3 M vs 12 M Atg3 p = 0.0125
Atg4 p = 0.0458
Atg5 p = 0.0435
Atg6 p = 0.0157
Atg7 p = 0.187
Atg10 p = 0.2172
Atg13 p = 0.8449
Atg14 p = 0.0457
Atg16 p = 0.0043
Lamp1 p = 0.155
Lamp2 p = 0.459
Ctsb p = 0.0398
Ctsd p = 0.0033
Table 4
Statistical analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 12 M vs 12 M+C1
groups.
Groups Genes p value
12 M vs 12 M+C1 Atg3 p = 0.0223
Atg4 p = 0.0271
Atg5 p = 0.0442
Atg6 p = 0.0020
Atg7 p = 0.0257
Atg14 p = 0.0864
Atg16 p = 0.0076
Lamp1 p = 0.2779
Lamp2 p = 0.8522
Ctsb p = 0.2934
Ctsd p = 0.4951
122