0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Corrigendum To Promoting TFEB Nuclear Localization With Curcumin 2024 Neur

Uploaded by

Nubi James
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Corrigendum To Promoting TFEB Nuclear Localization With Curcumin 2024 Neur

Uploaded by

Nubi James
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Neurotoxicology 102 (2024) 121–122

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Neurotoxicology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuro

Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “Promoting TFEB nuclear localization with curcumin


analog C1 attenuates sensory hair cell injury and delays age-related hearing
loss in C57BL/6 mice” [Neurotoxicology, 95 (2023) 218–231]
Wuhui He a, b, c, Fan Wu a, b, c, Hao Xiong a, b, Junbo Zeng a, b, Yiming Gao a, b, c, Ziyi Cai a, b, c,
Jiaqi Pang a, b, c, *, Yiqing Zheng a, b, *
a
Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
b
Institute of Hearing and Speech-Language Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
c
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen
University, Guangzhou, China

The authors regret that errors occurred in the project names of analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 12 M vs 12 M+C1
Table 3 on page 224 and Table 4 on page 226. The project name "Dis­ groups) is incorrect. The correct name is "Genes", as shown in the below
tance from apex (mm)" in Table 3 (Statistical analysis of quantitative tables.
real-time PCR between 3 M vs 12 M groups) and Table 4 (Statistical The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2023.02.004.


* Correspondence to: Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Yanjiang West Road 107, Guangzhou, Guangdong
Province, China.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J. Pang), [email protected] (Y. Zheng).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2024.04.006

Available online 6 May 2024


0161-813X/© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
W. He et al. Neurotoxicology 102 (2024) 121–122

Table 3
Statistical analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 3 M vs 12 M groups.
Groups Genes p value

3 M vs 12 M Atg3 p = 0.0125
Atg4 p = 0.0458
Atg5 p = 0.0435
Atg6 p = 0.0157
Atg7 p = 0.187
Atg10 p = 0.2172
Atg13 p = 0.8449
Atg14 p = 0.0457
Atg16 p = 0.0043
Lamp1 p = 0.155
Lamp2 p = 0.459
Ctsb p = 0.0398
Ctsd p = 0.0033

Table 4
Statistical analysis of quantitative real-time PCR between 12 M vs 12 M+C1
groups.
Groups Genes p value

12 M vs 12 M+C1 Atg3 p = 0.0223


Atg4 p = 0.0271
Atg5 p = 0.0442
Atg6 p = 0.0020
Atg7 p = 0.0257
Atg14 p = 0.0864
Atg16 p = 0.0076
Lamp1 p = 0.2779
Lamp2 p = 0.8522
Ctsb p = 0.2934
Ctsd p = 0.4951

122

You might also like