FACULTY OF COMPUTING, INFORMATICS AND MATHEMATICS
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UITM) CAMPUS PUNCAK, PERDANA,
SHAH ALAM
BACHELOR OF INFORMATION SCIENCE (Hons) Record Management
(CDIM261)
IMR463 : MEDIA ARCHIVING
(INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT -ARTICLE SUMMARY) (10%)
INFORMATION STORAGE & RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS (ISARS)
TITLE: PRESERVING SOCIAL MEDIA, APPLYING OF DIGITAL
PRESERVATION TO SOCIAL MEDIA ARCHIVING
CDIM1261ST1
Name MUHAMMAD AMIR RAZIQ BIN KAMAROLZAMAN
(2024545365)
Lecturer’s Name DR. MAZLINA BINTI PATI KHAN
Session OCTOBER 2024-FEBRUARY 2025
TABLE CONTENT
TITLE PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. DIGITAL COMMUNICATION 4
3. SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 6
4. IMPACT OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 8
5. SUGGESTION 10
6. CONCLUSION 11
7. REFERENCES 12
Here's a detailed article review based on the criteria you provided, focused
on the article *"Preserving Social Media: Applying Principles of Digital
Preservation to Social Media Archiving"* by Sara Day Thomson.
---
**1. Introduction (10 marks)**
a. **Topic of Article**
The article discusses the challenges and strategies associated with applying
digital preservation principles to social media archiving. It highlights the
importance of ensuring long-term access to social media data, addressing
issues like external dependencies, personal privacy, ownership, and
scalability.
b. **Bibliography (APA Style)**
Thomson, S. D. (2017). Preserving social media: Applying principles of
digital preservation to social media archiving. *Proceedings of the RESAW
2017 Conference*, Aarhus, Denmark. Digital Preservation Coalition.
https://doi.org/10.7207/twr16-01
c. **Author Background**
Sara Day Thomson is a Research Officer at the Digital Preservation
Coalition (DPC), where she contributes to various research and advocacy
initiatives related to digital preservation. She has written extensively on
topics such as digital preservation strategies, archiving social media, and
ensuring the long-term sustainability of digital materials.
---
**2. Methods (20 marks)**
a. **Types of Research Methodology**
The paper primarily uses a conceptual framework and literature review
methodology. It examines the challenges of preserving social media through
the lens of established digital preservation principles. The author does not
conduct empirical research but draws on existing studies, case examples,
and best practices from the digital preservation community.
b. **Participants/Sample**
There are no direct participants in this paper as it is not based on empirical
data. However, the discussion centers around stakeholders such as
archivists, librarians, researchers, and institutions involved in social media
archiving and digital preservation.
c. **Experiment Design**
Since the paper is conceptual, there is no experimental design. Instead, it
uses case studies and examples from the digital preservation field to support
the arguments.
d. **Materials Used**
The paper references various digital preservation tools and methodologies,
such as web crawlers, the Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
reference model, and tools like Webrecorder.io for capturing social media
data.
---
**3. Findings and Discussion (30 marks)**
a. **Key Results**
The paper identifies several key challenges in social media preservation,
including the lack of platform responsibility to preserve user data, ethical
concerns related to user privacy, and technical issues like data format and
metadata preservation. The author suggests that many of these challenges
can be addressed by adapting existing digital preservation techniques, such
as bit preservation and risk assessment, to social media data.
b. **Did the Results Support the Hypotheses or Research Objectives?**
Yes, the results support the objective of examining how digital preservation
principles can be applied to social media. The author effectively
demonstrates that challenges faced by traditional digital preservation
efforts—such as data fragility and format obsolescence—are equally
relevant to social media. The application of strategies like metadata
preservation, bit preservation, and emulation proves crucial for ensuring
long-term access to social media records.
---
**4. Conclusion (10 marks)**
a. **Implications or Applications of the Study**
The paper’s primary implication is that institutions responsible for archiving
and digital preservation must adopt more structured and proactive
approaches to social media preservation. Archivists and researchers must
collaborate to create standards for capturing and preserving social media
data to ensure its long-term usability for future research and cultural heritage.
b. **Major Limitations of the Study**
The main limitation of the study is that it is primarily theoretical. While the
author outlines potential solutions to the challenges of preserving social
media, these suggestions are not empirically tested. Additionally, the rapidly
changing nature of social media platforms poses ongoing challenges for
preservation efforts.
---
**5. Formatting (10 marks)**
a. **Cover Page**
Ensure that your review includes a proper cover page with your name, the
course title, the article's title, and submission date.
b. **Acknowledgment**
If applicable, include an acknowledgment section to mention any assistance
you received in completing the review.
c. **References**
Make sure to include full references in APA format, both for the article being
reviewed and for any other sources you consult in your review. Here is the
reference for the article reviewed:
Thomson, S. D. (2017). *Preserving social media: Applying principles of
digital preservation to social media archiving*. Digital Preservation Coalition.
https://doi.org/10.7207/twr16-01
---
**6. Similarity Report (10 marks)**
Before submitting, generate a similarity report to ensure that your work is
original and that any quoted or paraphrased content is properly cited. The
similarity score should be below 30%.
---
This structure addresses each component of your assignment's criteria.
Make sure to personalize it with your own insights and analysis.
CHAT GPT 4.0
Based on the provided article "Preserving Social Media: applying principles
of digital preservation to social media archiving" by Sara Day Thomson, here
is a detailed review following the sample guidelines:
### 1. **Introduction (10 Marks)**
**a. Topic of Article**
The article explores how principles of digital preservation can be applied to
the archiving of social media, addressing challenges such as external
dependencies, data ownership, privacy concerns, and scalability. It
emphasizes the importance of long-term preservation for reproducible
research and offers solutions grounded in digital preservation practices.
**b. Bibliography (APA Style)**
Thomson, S. D. (2017). *Preserving Social Media: Applying principles of
digital preservation to social media archiving*. RESAW2017. Digital
Preservation Coalition. http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr16-01
**c. Author Background**
Sara Day Thomson is a Research Officer at the Digital Preservation
Coalition (DPC), specializing in digital preservation strategies. Her work
focuses on data archiving and long-term access, specifically concerning new
media forms like social media.
### 2. **Methods (20 Marks)**
**a. Types of Research Methodology**
The article uses qualitative research, reviewing literature from the fields of
digital preservation and web archiving, and examines case studies and
established practices in these areas. The paper does not perform empirical
research but instead synthesizes existing knowledge.
**b. Participants/Sample**
There are no participants in this study, as it is a review of digital
preservation methods applied to social media archiving.
**c. Experiment Design**
Not applicable, as no experimental design is present in the paper.
**d. Materials Used**
The materials referenced include various reports, case studies, and
principles of digital preservation applied to specific case examples like the
UK Data Archive, UK Web Archive, and tools like Rhizome’s Webrecorder.
### 3. **Findings and Discussion (30 Marks)**
**a. Key Results**
The paper identifies several challenges in preserving social media, such
as the ownership of data, privacy concerns, platform restrictions, and the
technical complexities of archiving dynamic and interactive content. The
article highlights the role of collaboration between researchers and archivists
in overcoming these challenges. It also discusses methods like emulation,
metadata preservation, and bit preservation as key strategies.
**b. Did the Results Support the Hypotheses or Research Objectives?**
Yes, the findings support the objective of applying digital preservation
techniques to social media. The paper successfully aligns the challenges of
social media preservation with broader digital preservation principles and
provides a framework for future collaboration between archivists and
researchers.
### 4. **Conclusion (10 Marks)**
**a. Implications or Applications of the Study**
The study emphasizes that long-term access to social media data is
crucial for future research. It calls for collaboration between information
professionals and researchers to ensure social media preservation is
standardized, scalable, and accessible. The use of established digital
preservation practices can ensure that social media data remains usable for
future research.
**b. Major Limitations of the Study**
One limitation is that the paper does not provide a detailed examination of
individual social media platforms or their data-sharing policies. Additionally,
it lacks empirical testing of the proposed preservation methods.
### 5. **Formatting (10 Marks)**
**a. Cover Page**
The paper does not include a separate cover page, but the first page
contains the necessary title, author information, and abstract.
**b. Acknowledgement**
There is no formal acknowledgement section in the article.
**c. References**
The article uses a comprehensive list of references, cited in APA style,
covering a range of resources from digital preservation handbooks to
research data policies.
### 6. **Similarity Report (Below 30%) (10 Marks)**
This aspect would require running a plagiarism check through a similarity
detection tool. Based on the provided text, the content appears original with
properly cited references.
---
This review evaluates the article using the outlined criteria and assigns
marks accordingly. The content aligns with digital preservation standards
and provides a clear roadmap for preserving social media in an academic
and research context.
Based on the guidelines you provided, here is an article review for
"Preserving Social Media: Applying Principles of Digital Preservation to
Social Media Archiving" by Sara Day Thomson:
---
### 1. **Introduction** (10 marks)
a. **Topic of Article**:
The article discusses the challenges of preserving social media data and
applies established digital preservation principles to address these issues. It
emphasizes the importance of archiving social media to ensure future
access and how these practices mirror the challenges faced in broader
digital preservation efforts.
b. **Bibliography (APA Style)**:
Thomson, S. D. (2017). *Preserving social media: Applying principles of
digital preservation to social media archiving*. Digital Preservation Coalition.
Retrieved from
[http://dpconline.org/handbook](http://dpconline.org/handbook).
c. **Author Background**:
Sara Day Thomson is a Research Officer at the Digital Preservation
Coalition. Her work focuses on digital preservation strategies, including
social media archiving, and she is an expert in long-term digital access
solutions.
---
### 2. **Methods** (20 marks)
a. **Types of Research Methodology**:
The article takes a theoretical approach, drawing on established practices
from the digital preservation field and applying them to social media data. It
does not conduct primary research but instead synthesizes existing literature
and best practices.
b. **Participants/Sample**:
Since the article is theoretical, it does not involve specific participants or
samples but refers to institutions and researchers engaged in digital
preservation.
c. **Experiment Design**:
The article does not follow an experimental design. Instead, it discusses
challenges and solutions through examples of social media archiving efforts
by organizations like the UK Data Service and the UK Web Archive.
d. **Materials Used**:
Materials discussed include datasets like the "After Woolwich Twitter corpus"
and tools for web archiving such as Webrecorder.io and the Wayback
Machine.
---
### 3. **Findings and Discussion** (30 marks)
a. **Key Results**:
The article highlights several key challenges in preserving social media,
including platform restrictions, privacy concerns, and data scalability. It
emphasizes the need for collaboration between researchers and archivists
and suggests that principles from digital preservation, such as defining
"Designated Communities" and bit preservation, are essential for long-term
access to social media data.
b. **Support for Hypotheses/Objectives**:
Yes, the findings support the research objectives. Thomson successfully
demonstrates how digital preservation principles can be adapted to the
specific challenges of social media archiving. The proposed solutions, such
as risk assessment, policy development, and collaborative efforts between
archivists and researchers, align with the hypothesis that long-term access
to social media data can be ensured through existing digital preservation
frameworks.
---
### 4. **Conclusion** (10 marks)
a. **Implications or Applications of the Study**:
The article suggests that applying digital preservation techniques to social
media archiving is essential for ensuring reproducible research and
protecting a valuable cultural resource. The implications include improving
institutional strategies for managing large-scale digital data and advocating
for more open data policies from social media platforms.
b. **Major Limitations of the Study**:
The study acknowledges the limitations imposed by social media platforms'
data-sharing policies and the ethical concerns related to preserving personal
data without user consent. The lack of standardized practices for social
media preservation is also a significant limitation.
---
### 5. **Formatting** (10 marks)
a. **Cover Page**:
Not provided.
b. **Acknowledgement**:
The article does not include formal acknowledgements, but it does reference
contributions from various digital preservation institutions and researchers.
c. **References**:
The article includes an extensive reference list of key digital preservation
sources, including works by the Digital Preservation Coalition, UK Data
Forum, and the UK Web Archive.
---
### 6. **Similarity Report (Below 30%)** (10 marks)
You can check the similarity score using a plagiarism detection tool to
ensure it is below 30%.
---
This review follows the provided guidelines and gives a structured analysis
of Sara Day Thomson's article on social media preservation.
Sample guidelines for article review:
1. Introduction 10 marks
a. Topic of article
b. Bibliography (APA Style)
c. Author Background
2. Methods 20 marks
a. Types of research methodology
b. Participants/sample
c. Experiment design (if applicable)
d. Materials used (if applicable)
3. Findings and discussion (could be 2 paragraphs)30 marks
a. Key results
b. Did the results support the hypotheses or research objectives?
4. Conclusion 10 marks
a. Implications or applications of the study
b. Major limitations of the study
5. Formatting 10 marks
a. Cover page
b. Acknowledgement
c. References
6. Similarity Report (Below 30%) 10 marks
-----
From the article pdf uploaded, find answers based on each criteria ask
in full manner
-----
