IX. EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit # Hof Pages 1 2025 Invite Inns of Distinction Gala 1 2 Inns of Distinction Gala - About the Event 1 3 Celebration of Excellence is held annually at the Supreme Court of the USA | 4 4 ‘Awards & Scholarships - Highlighted group: Temple Bar 1 5 Middle Temple England Inns The Hon John Roberts Jr. - Honorary Bencher | 4 6 Edward Bennett Williams American Inn of Court - Address same as 4 Americans Inns of Court in the City of Alexandria 7 Edward Coke Appellate Inn of Court 1 8 JWG Email - 1 of the responses from the SCOTUS to accept online email. | 1 9 JWG 2 Emails sent to the PIO@SupremeCourt. gov 2 10 ye New Nationworld on Roberts & Boasberg affiations with the Inns of || 2 oul " ‘Article: Is the “Obama Crime Family” Blackmailing Chief Justice John 1 Roberts? 12 Article: John Roberts is worried about all the wrong things 36 13 Article: 4 4 Justice John Roberts end of the year letter 2024 15 https://www.supremecourt govipublicinfolyear-end/2024year-endreport. pdf 15 Articles of Impeachment for the West Virginia Supreme Court 14 16 Petitioner's Order & Mental-Health Evaluation April 2025 by the State | 6 of Virginia 47 Judicial Misconduct Complaints Dismissed filed on March 27, 2024 | 411 and ignored with letter dated April 3, 2024- This then became the attached Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition that was filed in SCOTUS and accepted with Chief Justice John Roberts ignoring Docket No. 23-7758 RE: Janice Wolk Grenadier Petitioner Link to Audio Recording of April 2025 Telephone Call hites://studio youtube, com/video/1 4IWSNigkYa/edit "men 7262025 500 PM-9:00 PM Where Supreme Cour of the Unted States One Firat Seo HE Washington, BC Program Sete programs by 7si2025 5009 Aeceplon Honoring Pegasus Scholars Te S500PM-700 PM Leadershin Networking Breaktst <<< Click Ado tart the elation eat Jin nn ears ave breakfast for casual Conversation about in strap planning, program devopiment mentoring and more Time ODAM- 1000M (ons of Distinction ala Ones EXHIBIT Program Availability Status {your deste program epi is ot vadabl please contact, ‘uastinadnciars =e sed te male sone 108 spots ie fegsrton SSspots itt tae Inns of Distinction Gal Dioner Sr spors te725, 244 PA 2025 nns of istinction Gala Inns of Distinction Gala ‘About the Event ‘Te tnns of Distinction Gla ecgrize high performing Amann nef Court Hom 295 he nation that have chev ‘rentence inion monagement and prota, eaders wagner at the Supreme Cor ofthe Ute Sates 0 ‘Bbroteu accompustments oovencigpotessonalamin elegant rough exept lan preparing Sh meaningldmenber engagement ‘Schedule ae Pegasus Scholarships Celebration Reception ‘hs optional everng eer atthe Beata ion n.d Na Caton Farag Square be an evening of Cocbroten a he Pega Scelrship progam eke ae lmted andrea optinal aon to your repstaton, ‘everapen coca aed hos ocovres rence, Hendy restr othe Gl? Be sre to ups yer tren and Fay your ches tothe Pegs celeron athe Ary and Nay Chin Poe roe he is cues fo appropiate ‘Satur. ly 26 2005 Leadership Networking Breakfast Jain you eto bn ears er bret for caeun conmerstins abut nn sate planning. progam devon Irertrtg and mre This breaks vet cluded n your tepstvoton and eh of 2:0 AM at our headquater ott The Mayflower, Washington ‘our sernoon fret explore Washington DC ‘The Inns of Distinction Gala at the Supreme Court of the United States ‘Tne gaa cc ever tht bins wth a oct reception inthe East and West Conference rooms of he Supreme Cour othe Used Sates. flowed by der and 9 Tecopitan program inthe Great al The event cages ls tht hve ached Patusn snon nthe 204-2025 hie Excellence pogrom os wellas Inns een, {2s rrogam Anards Umed seat remain—Ree: Now Hotel Accommodations ‘Wehave seared a grouphatel com bok fr he 2025 gata athe Mayflower Noel. she Mayotte so mae auc hate cesta. Aeserve your sat ty ano us ths summer Washington DC fr is prestigious lt qi EXHIBIT lnns Represented at the 2025 inns of Distinction Gala 2 hntps we innsolcour.org/AICIEventsinns_of_Distincton_Gala/AICIAIC. Events:2025_Inns_of Distinction Gala aspx7hkey=64dd4320-1278-4131-0... V2 The Experience... “vein tn opportunity to serves Presiden of the al. Canin of Cour on ofthe retest honors hae received ny Metin, nd caor apnea ore ect experience than celeroing oun athe US. Supreme Court. To spend an evry wer ‘presetaves sro te county wna share he sare pasion Yor Cty ar exceerce the practic of aw was. lg HOW ay ‘Drtvetacreon ly hor vos ns for hi etcton program, and canna wot take bcs soe wha ewed fo my | would iy recommend hs experience to anyane bot 50 fortunate to have the opportuni (attend “ year ee “paw le, anes Registration ‘Dont ms ths pportuney tbe among selec few who can experience ts ancein2:ifetine moment.325, 246 PM Celebration of Excellence Celebration of Excellence ‘The American Inns of Court Celebration of Excellence is held annually at the Supreme Court of the United States to honor individuals who have contributed their talent, time, energy, and resources to furthering the ideals of the ‘American Inns of Court. The black-tie event begins with an awards presentation in the Court Room, followed by the reception in the Great Hall, and dinner in the East and West Conference Rooms. The A. Sherman Christensen Award, the Lewis F. Powell, Je Award for Professionalism and Ethics, the Sandra Da ©Connor Aviard for Professional Service and the Warren E. Burger Prize for Writing are presented, The most recent Professionalism Awards recipients are recognized as well The 2025 Celebration of Excellence will take place on Saturday, October 25, 2025. EXHIBIT Photos: ©www_kevinkennedy.com 4 e = 718 : ; : rtp: innsofcourt.org/AICrEvents/Celebraton_of_Excolence/AICIAIC_Events/Celebraton_of Excellence. aspx ?hkey=c94GaB19-4eSe-4071-D160.. 1/2Lew F Pomel. ard Sandra Day Conner ard Warren €. Burger Prise Temple Bar ify ‘he Temple Bar Foundation a tated n 1981 bythe ight Honerabe Lord Denning ot \whtcure former Master othe Rls, and Chit use of he Untad States Warren. ‘urge to strengen es between landing mere’ ofthe Eng and Amercan bos arto SSvecote peste’ aero ote pretesuonal thea standard the estabishments sare What is the Temple Bar? ‘The Teme Bara great arched stone gate, desired by Se Chvstopher Wren when once ‘Hood son entrance to central Landen The area surtoundng the Trl Sar was where folds ef wyerscrpried a what woud bcome the ou Englsh res of Cour. Ti same ‘res tsnom conseredLrpl Landon he archway odin pace wt 1878, when mace {rfc ered a remova tothe courte, With last of the nga atest Londen ‘emain standing. The Temple Ba gat ws tered othe Ci of Landon and opened tothe publics Novae 2004 8 pow serves as an entance lo Patorester Square jus north ot ‘net rans cher rea achlavement, St Pals Cathedral. Temple Bar Program Highlights ‘Thestholarship irom September 28 hrouph October 24,2028, First week highlights: -Atendthe ceremanal opening a legal yar a Westin Abbey ‘tend. mek ecepon et atthe C14 Hal. incl sna ‘fate tour ne of Core ‘Mot wi precrnent waders ofthe English bach andar Other highlights: 1 Shadow" a barter ard abaarve arses English al practce 1 Spondeme with juste of te Supreme Court ofthe Unied Kingdom (Obsore apple agumeres 1 Dicuslopa sues tthe countrys highest udgas How are Temple Bar Scholars selected? ‘etme principal selcion teria for Teme Bar Scholars ae + Hah academic cheveret in aw chook {Emons va law clr for ude or tie leatng apple coun inching the Supreme Cou of be United tates + Demonsatedinerest in sxernatona lw ssues What are the costs? + Schlarsate provided tr raneportation loging nda modest separa a help ever thor expenses or the dation of he proper + Extetarent and additions tel expanses ar the responsbity of he schol, 2 ‘xe ary conta sncised wth alegshened 2. How do | apply for a Temple Bar Scholarship? + Te sninegpeicsuon mov be oun 1 niaduas Peres n paring asa Teele Bar scol must submit resumé a Help Support This Program ‘Temple Bar Scholarships. Gift amount 25000 C1000 O2sna0 & otter 000 you wan to donate by eheck, make checks yatta Ameran ne of Cur, note Toop Bar ser 225 heinehars ane ‘Nevandia,VA22314 you woul ie to help support the og yer sedge please ws our Howard EXHIBIT —Pa ri Masters of the Bench The Hon John Roberts Jr. EXHIBIT =613725, 327 PM. Officers - American ts of Court (itps:zimwinnsofcourt.ora/) “Enor parsing XSLT file: innPageTopNavigation xsit More Edward Bennett Williams American Inn of Court EXHIBIT relia © 2025 American inns of Court 225 Reinekers Lane, Suite 770, Alexandria, VA22314 | Phone: (703) 684-3590 | Fax: (703) 684-3607 | ‘nfo@ innsofcourtorg,(mailio:info@innsofcourto15) Lear tps ceeov ro nea tse aaa Dates eH ede A ak Ba AMA hkey667c07b7-b61b-Achd-ad0a 01I9S5H297ad) © 2025 American Inns of Court Foundation Intpsensinsoleour orgnsoticers.aspx?inid=30072 wnpe EDWARD COKE INN (/) nome (7 ABouT ABOUT THE INN (/ABOUT-THE-INN) ‘OFFICERS (/OFFICER: MEMBERSHIP (/MEMBERSHIP) An Inn Dedicated to Appellate Practice EXHIBIT 4 The Edward Coke Appellate Inn of Courts the first American Inn ‘of Court dedicated co appellate practice. Based in Washington, D.C, the Inn's members include many ofthe premier appellate advocates in the country. The Inn holds periodic meetings during the Supreme Court rerm to exchange ideas and discuss the latest topics in appellate and Supreme Court practice.sas, 12:7 Pu Cemal- Supreme Cou Submission (P10) M Gmail JWG Supreme Court Submission (PIO) [email protected] Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 12:14 PM To: [email protected] ‘Thank you for your message. In order for your message to be received by the intended recipient at the Supreme Court of the United States, please verify your email address by clicking this lini.{f you did not send a message to the Supreme Court, you ean ignore this email or click this link to report the error.-Supreme Court Webmaster EXHIBIT 3 ntpsimail.google.comnallul7ik=SbcSaeid08éview=pldsearch=allspermid=thrend f18287610877016211818simpl=msq-:1826761067701621181 4/1.eves zea xml oman on Hoo 2 Oke Supra Cou Bung M Gmail ludicial Padia Information on Hosting a Dinner at the Supreme Court Building 3 messages Judicial Pedia Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 1:25 PM 3: [email protected] Good Afternoon, 1am looking at getting the Information on hosting a dinner at the Supreme Court Building. Tam looking to get what the criteria is for the building so we can fit it into your schedule and requirements. Thank you for your help in this matter. Warmly, JW Grenadier Certified ADA Advocate & Mediator 202-368-7178 Founder: JudicialPedia.com Coming Soon: MyWarPedia.com Founder AmLegalNews.Blogspot.com Founder: What's in Your Tool Box? For Justice: The Grand Jury aka Special Grand Jury, the 4th Arm of Government ‘owned by the people, the Declaration of Independence, the United States and State Constitutions, the Four Freedoms, Worship FEAR Speech Want This message has been sent as a part of the discussion between Janice Wolk Grenadier and the addressee whose name is specified above. Should you receive this message by mistake, | would be most grateful if you informed me that the message has been sent to you. In this case, | also ask that you delete this message from your mailbox, and do not forward it or any part of it to anyone else. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. As the content of this ‘email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in the message only. Thank you Judicial Pedia Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Good Morning, am following up on trying to get a name and or information on hosting a dinner at the Supreme Court Building. I was told to send an email to this email address. I have also sent two emails through the website and have not received a response. T would appreciate someone getting in touch with me. Thank you for your time and consideration. Warm Regards, Pane Janice Wolk Grenadier q Certified ADA Advocate & Mediator 202-368-7178 Founder: JudicialPedia.com hntpssimail google. comimals2/7k=9961 Tothecsview=piasearch=alapermthid=thread-a:r701277107OSS33125asimpixmsyt1A2876S513051578.. 121825, 12:48 PM ‘Gmail -nformaton on Hosting Dinner athe Supreme Court Building Coming Soon: MyWarPedia.com Founder AmLegalNews.Blogspot.com Founder: What's in Your Too! Box? For Justice: The Grand Jury aka Special Grand Jury, the 4th Arm of Government ‘owned by the people, the Declaration of Independence, the United States and State Constitutions, the Four Freedoms, Worship FEAR Speech Want This message has been sent as a part of the discussion between Janice Wolk Grenadier and the addressee whose name is specified above. Should you recetve this message by mistake, | would be most grateful if you informed me that the message has been sent to you. In this case, | also ask that you delete this message from your malibox, and do not forward it or any part of it to anyone else. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding, As the content of this ‘email is confidentia! and intended for the recipient specified in the message only. Thank you Judicial Pedia Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 4:05 PM To: [email protected], Adam.miles@usdoj gov Good Afternoon, To confirm the conversation I had with the Supreme Court of the United States Public Information Office. called because my prior calls I was told to email the court for a response - 1. They ignored 2 emails off their site website approximately a month ago 2. These emails were ignored so I called the court and was told I needed to email them to get a response which I did: 3. The emails were sent on April 7 & 17th 4. These emails were also ignored ‘The woman who answered the phone was curt and could be considered rude as she "HUNG-UP" on me, refusing to answer my question. ‘The request apparently is being denied for a function at the Supreme Court as they don't do things like that, I would like this confirmed in writing please. ‘Thank you, Respectfully, IW Grenadier Certified ADA Advocate & Mediator 202-368-7178 Founder: JudicialPedia.com ‘Coming Soon: MyWarPedia.com Founder AmLegalNews.Blogspot.com Founder: What's in Your Tool Box? For Justice: The Grand Jury aka Special Grand Jury, the 4th Arm of Government ‘owned by the people, the Declaration of Independence, the United States and State Constitutions, the Four Freedoms, Worship FEAR Speech Want This message has been sent as a part of the discussion between Janice Wolk Grenadier and the addressee whose name is specified above. Should you receive this message by mistake, | would be most grateful if you informed me that the message has been sent to you. In this case, | also ask that you delete this message from your mailbox, and do not forward itor any part of it to anyone else. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. As the content of this ‘email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in the message only. Thank you ‘ntps:mall google.comtmallu2/7k=0961 7bebockview=plasearch=allépermthid-tread-a1-70127721107069331254simpl=msg-£1828765S13051578... 2NEWSNATION/WORLD FACT FOCUS: Posts falsely claim federal judiciary members are in secret club, undermining Trump Court Chief Justice John Roberts speaks at the University of Nebraska Lincoln in Lincoln, Neb. 2014. Credit: AP/Nati Harik Associated Press March 21, 2025 HARE After Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked calls this week by the Trump administration to impeach judges, social media users falsely claimed that he and other high-level legal professionals are part of a “secretive, invite only club.” Many questioned the motives of members, hinting at coordinated efforts to oppose President Donald Trump. ‘Among those named was U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, who Trump had demanded be removed from the bench for his order blocking deportation flights that the president was carrying out by invoking wartime authorities from 18th century law. But the group in question — the American Inns of Court — is hardly secretive given its large public presence, and there is no evidence that members are involved in nefarious activities targeting Trump. Roberts is no longer an active member and Boasberg is the president of a chapter that is no longer affiliated with the parent association. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: Roberts, Boasberg and other powerful legal professionals are part of a secret, invite-only club that is working against Trump. ‘THE FACTS: This is false. Roberts was a member of the Edward Coke Appellate Inn of Court chapter of the organization prior to his confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2005, but he is not currently an active member of the organization, according to Executive Director Malinda Dunn. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, stands for a portrait at E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, March 16, 2023. Credit: AP/Carolyn Van Houten Boasberg is the president of the Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court, but the chapter disaffiliated from the parent association about 10 years ago when it decided it no longer wanted to pay dues to the national group, Dunn said. He was an active member prior to the chapter's decision to operate independently. EXHIBIT \D 1Information on the American Inns of Court is readily available online. Chapters also have their own websites, which often include details about programs they host for members, typically focused on networking, education and mentorship. Dunn said that members have a wide range of political opinions, but that the organization itself is “assiduously apolitical.” ‘Some on social media, however, baselessly claimed that there is more to the group than meets the eye. “Ht has been revealed that Chief Justice John Roberts is part of an elite, invite-only group called the American Inns of Court, alongside some of the most openly anti-Trump judges in D.C.,” reads one X post. ‘And yet a check of other members reveals a diverse group. Many current and former Supreme Court justices have been members of the American Inns of Court, according to Dunn, including Sandra Day O'Connor, Neil Gorsuch, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Clarence Thomas. Inns of Court have existed in the United Kingdom for hundreds of years. The American system, founded in 1980 out of discussions among legal professionals, including Chief Justice Warren Burger, is loosely based on this concept from across the pond. The American Inns of Court states on its website that it is “dedicated to professionalism, ethics, civility, and excellence” and that its mission is to “inspire the legal community to advance the rule of law by achieving the highest level of professionalism through example, education, and mentoring.” O'Connor said in a 2015 video that “maintaining and improving an ethics of professionalism is what the American Inns of Court are all about,” ‘There are more than 300 active chapters across the U.S. Each one manages its own membership and some are limited to practitioners in a certain legal field. Roberts’ former chapter, for example, states that “members are elected to the Inn after being nominated by a current member” and that they must be “actively engaged in appellate practice.” Dunn said chapters are advised to ensure that their members include legal professionals with different levels of experience. Some may hold membership drives to recruit new faces Roberts is currently an honorary bencher in The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, an inn of court in the U.K. This is a purely ceremonial role that, according to Dunn. British inns of court will always offer such a position to Supreme Court justices when they are confirmed, she said, Representatives for Roberts and Boasberg did not respond to a request for comment.Is the “Obama Crime Family" blackmailing Chief Justice John Roberts?* For conservative commentator Wayne Root, it’s the only possible answer for his decisions of late EXHIBIT By SCOTT ERIC KAUFMAN PUBLISHED JUNE 29,2018 3:28PM (€OT) | In his column for The Blaze, conservative commentator Wayne Root proffered a unique theory for why Chief Justice John Roberts has twice voted to save the Affordable Care Act - like former House ‘Speaker Dennis Hastert, the "lifelong conservative warrior appointed by George W. Bush to become the Key conservative vote in important decisions" is being blackmailed, “Justice Roberts was born, raised and groomed for one job in this life,” Root wrote, "to join that Supreme Court, strike down Obamacare, protect the Constitution and end big government overreach. Yet he is the man responsible for saving Obamacare — twice.” This doesn't seem odd to you?" he asked. "This doesn't smell rotten?” Root noted that Democrats would only need to blackmail one or two key Republican figures —- the other Possibility he floats is House Majority Leader John Boehner —- in order to effectively nullify all of the GOP's recent electoral victories. The "Obama Crime Family" certainly has the means to acquire information on conservative targets, after all "What makes anyone think the government and its three-letter agencies (IRS, NSA, DOJ, FBI, SEC) don't know everything bad about everyone in key positions in Washington, D.C.2" Root asked. "What makes you think that blackmail isn’t happening every day to conservative politicians -- except it's the government doing the blackmailing?" Most conspiracy theorists are smart enough to know that asking paranoid-sounding questions is an effective way to communicate the possibility of a conspiracy without actually being required to provide proof — which is why Root deserves a modicum of applause for treating his readers to some baseless speculation: | think the Obama Crime Family meets with a key politician like Boehner of Justice Roberts and they offer both a carrot and stick. They threaten to expose something terrible like an affair, or corruption, or malfeasance, or immorality that would shock the nation, ruin their career, destroy their legacy, cost their marriage, destroy their relationship with their children and leave them unemployable by any respectable law firm or lobbyist. That's what's behind door number one. Or if you see the light and vote Obama's way, they get to continue playing national leader and hero, their legacy is untouched, their family loves them, and they retire someday to a $5 million per year lobbying job (ike Dennis Hastert). That's what's behind door number two. He does end with a question -- "Which would you choose?” — before asserting, sans evidence, that "those options are being offered every day by the Obama Crime Family to key political figures." "That explains why conservatives keep winning elections,” he continued, "yet we keep gaining nothing and losing everything." Obviously conservatives couldn't be losing ground on social issues because they've retreated to the friendly confines of the Nineteenth Century ~ it must be blackmail.By SCOTT ERIC KAUFMANsalon Opinion John Roberts is worried about all the wrong things” David Daley ‘Sat, January 4, 2025 at 9:00 AM EST7 min read 30 John Roberts Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post via Getty Images ‘As New Year's Eve traditions go, this one is pretty tame. At 6 p.m., exactly when one might release news if the goal is the smallest possible audience, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts delivered his annual report on the state of the federal judiciary The previous 12 months had certainly been consequential. A flag flown by insurrectionists al the Capitol flew before the home of Justice Samuel Alito, who then refused to recuse himselt from cases involving Jan. 6. Clarence Thomas acknowledaed that he should have reported luxury vacations aifted to him by a billionaire, which several legal experts suggested could have run afoul of the law. Roberts himself slow-walked a case involving charges against Trump for January 6, then in a stunninaly awful decision, awarded him absolute immunity for prosecution for “official acts.” He greased his path back to power complete with a get-out-of jail-free card. ‘Americans responded by expressing a staggering lack of faith in the judiciary and the Supreme Court. According to a new Gallup poll, confidence in the judicial system not only plunged to a record low of 35 percent in 2024, but this was one of the fastest and steepest collapses Gallup has measured anywhere in the world, across the many decades it has asked this question. The most comparable cases? Nations under newly authoritarian rule or the grasp of civil war. None of this, however, eams a mention in Roberts's nine-page report. The word “ethics” does not appear at all. Neither does any awareness that the justices’ own behavior ~ and a broader conservative legal movement that has worked for decades and built a billion dollar dark money entity to capture the courts ~ have played a role in birthing a crisis of confidence so massive that nearly 70 percent of Americans (and sometimes more) now back stringent ethics codes, term limits, and mandatory retirement ages for the justices. No, John Roberts is exasperated and disappointed with all of us. He’s bothered not by the stench of corruption but the anticism, which, he sniffs is not informed or “anything remotely resembling it.” The mere suggestion of political bias in a decision ‘without a credible basis for such allegations’ is an effort to “intimidate judges.” This not only threatens the independence of the courts, Roberts writes, but creates the potential for violence against judges. ? https Jimwrw.yahoo com/newsirump-defense-secretary-accidentally-texted-183229963 him!This hackneyed slippery slope argument — conflating entirely fair criticism of the court with fears of political violence — would be laughed out of any serious courtroom. Indeed, it's difficult to say whether this report is more disingenuous or oblivious regarding the dire situation created by this crisis of confidence. It's not the doxing of judges. The solution is not for critics to keep silent — even if Donald Trump has suggested they be jailed. itis for those who profess concern about the Court's integrity and credibility to step forward and address ethical failures, excessive partisanship, and, you know, celebratory spiking of the football at Federalist Society galas and while being feted overseas. Roberts likely doesn't even believe what he is selling. He was long ago cast in the role of front man for the conservative takeover. The conservative legal project is his life's work. When Roberts testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee 20 years ago, he pledged to be nothing but a humble umpire, merely calling balls ‘and strikes without any rooting interest in the game, dedicated to nothing except upholding the rule of law. He charmed the Senate and then the Supreme Court media with this modest, midwestern institutionalist act. This choir boy act curdied jong ago. How rude of us to suggest that the conservative legal project's long, patient strategy to win supemacy over the courts has been a political project at all. How discourteous to observe that Roberts's umpiring act is just that - a means to obscure his role as the most effective Republican politician of his generation, delivering victories on abortion, gun rights, and the regulatory state through the courts, couched in faux-constitutionalese, that his side could never win at the ballot box. ‘Today, majorities of Americans look at Roberts's handiwork and a Supreme Court hand-picked from approved lists of conservative ideologues and see the courts as an unelected super- legislature operating above a system of checks and balances ‘They see a court that pends precedent, reuftes the law a8 they wish itto appear, © and ts elections toward the wealthy and the pattons on the lah. The nation long ago recognized the Jus should wear red and blue robes, and that some should be festooned with patches of those who fund their lavish lifestyles, like race car drivers proclaim their sponsors. Alas, the Roberts court won't even offer as much transparency as NASCAR. They act as partisans, then hide behind their robes when criticized for egregious misbehavior. The chief justice, meanwhile, every additional scandal and every new revelation about the justices’ unbecoming financial habits, continues to resist calls to protect judicial independence from the threat that is otherwise clear to all: The untouchable, unelected justices themselves who have asserted themselves as the final arbiter, and become the ultimate source of GOP political power. At some point, everyone must conclude that John Roberts is simply OK with it. Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course. Conservatives have not hidden their court-capture strategy. Donald Trump promised to select justices from an approved list of Federalist Society ideologues whose views were known to all because that was how they made the list in the first place. The court has delivered a series of democracy-damaging decisions that have unleashed billions in dark money, gutted the Voting Rights Act, and protected and enabled coast-to-coast gerrymanders of U.S. House and state legislative districts, all of which has helped ensured GOP wins even with fewer votes. Roberts himself delivered the crushing blow to the VRA with a dishonest edit of actual precedent and by making up a leaal tradition of equal sovereianty among states. Now, in this moment of victory, Roberts and the GOP supermajority wants it every way possible: They seek to impose out of themainstream and deeply unpopular views on the entire nation and also have them accepted as objective, historical readings of the law, rather than grubby politics. In this respect, Roberts's report echoes something Justice Neil Gorsuch said this summer while promoting a new book. Court reform, hie suggested on Fox News, even the term limits supported so broadly, threatened judicial independence. The Fox interviewer, naturally, did not follow up to ask whether Gorsuch believed that the $10 million spent by conservatives in 2016 to keep his seat warm after Justice Alito died in 2016, or the additional $10 million spent on his confirmation, represented judicial independence or just a stunning return on investment for his work overthrowing the regulatory state on behalf of the wealthy benefactors who installed him, The state of the federal judiciary? One might look instead to the words of Abraham Lincoln, who declared in his first inaugural that “the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government upon the vital questions of the day is to be irrevocably fixed by the decisions of the supreme court” that “the people will have ceased to be their own rulers.” John Roberts, meanwhile, anneared on C-SPAN in 2009 and noted that “the most important thing for the public to understand is that we're not a political branch of government. They do not elect us. If they do not like what we are doing, it's more or less just too bad.” You can say that again. In his year-end report, John Roberts just did Notes on the Inns of Court hittps:/mww.innsofcourtorg/ American Inns of Court are groups of judges, lawyers, law professors, and students who meet regularly to discuss legal ethics and professionalism, aiming to enhance the quality of legal advocacy. They are not a fraternal order, social club, or continuing legal education course, but rather a unique forum for learning and mentorship. From Twitter: X https://x.com/pepesgrandma/status/1902750686 145810716 Bad Kitty Unleashed @pepesgrandma Breaking exposé! FIVE anti Trump judges are involved in a secretive, INVITE ONLY club for judges and lawyers called the American Inns of Court. Even the membership andmeetings are secret. But somehow the DOJ has shown up at meetings, At least since Biden had been in office. Is hobnobbing with the DOJ in court matters acceptable? Let alone meeting in secret? So who allis linked to this selective and secretive club? And recall all of their negative Trump rulings? - Judge James Boasberg (President) - Scotus Ketanji Brown Jackson (Vice President) - Judge Amit Mehta (Secretary and a meeting held at her court.) - Judge Beryl Howell Justice (Professionalism Award) -Justice John Roberts (Honorary Bencher of the Middle Temple) Wasn't it something else that Judge John Roberts broke ethical conduct and stuck up for his, “brother Boasberg”? George Soros has funded a fellowship at Middle Temple where John Roberts is a master of ‘the bench. First let me very quickly explain how this secret society called, the American Inns of Court came about. In the UK, they have the four Inns of Court that dates back hundreds of years. One of those is called Middle Temple (see Roberts photo). Well, the US created the American version of this in recent decades. There's a massive list of branches. The branch many of our judges belong to is The Edward Bennett Williams (EBW) Inn of Court. It's so secretive, they deleted most signs of this branch from their website although they still met. Now here's Judge Beryl Howell. She was nominated by President Judge Boasberg, and VP Ketanji Brown Jackson approved of her nomination, Boasberg claims it was her work on Jan 6 that contributed to his choosing her for the American Inns Of Court Professionalism award. Let me show you the scant meeting info that I found which included the DOJ and Inspector General Horowitz in attendance. 1. The Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court: BOP Custody / Current Status of BOP / Early Release & Reentry: Washington DC, 2/15/24“Joel Sickler ~ invited panelist at EBW Inn of Court (February15, 2024, Washington DC). The Meeting held in the District of Columbia Court of Judge Amit Mehta. In addition to panelists, approximately 150 lawyers including several Federal District Judges were also present. The panel was presented primarily with Michael Horowitz, DOJ Inspector General and Seth Eichenholtz, Deputy Assistant Attorney General - also featuring Vanessa Rojas, a returning citizen with direct and learned perspective regarding constructive reforms within the Bureau of Prisons.” Also there was: “Seth Rosenthal, Chief Deputy Attorney General for Office of AG District of Columbia.” 2. Mathew Bester, 3 years ago in a quote Linkdn post: “Ireally enjoyed talking about the latest DOJ developments last week on a great panel” Matthew was reposting Brent Gurney’s Post and yes the DOJ was there: “want to thank my co-hosts, Erin K. of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Lisa Phelan of Morrison & Foerster LLP, Inn member G. Zachary Terwilliger of Vinson & Elkins and our guest Panelists Jim Fredricks of the DOJ Antitrust Division, Tiffany Rider of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Matthew Bester of Accenture, for a robust and fascinating discussion of the issues.” 3. Yearly gala, I'll review this later. But the Assistant United States Attorney at U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia replied in a comment, Was he there? “Great job, Rebecca!” l've seen lawsuits online for this secret org over recusal worries with this private club. | also saw a lawsuit that stated their secrecy is dangerous to democracy, Sources to follow.HeMoH “y ueg aBpneux unoyosuur Suny da4/e¥er61509091L02/=m ‘anuoay "yosunod 10) 998 pur 1 one w punase 949 on yun 1 Cuneous ox sy sOupeou pu siopee an dear fo sroqUIeUs 05 5] a=K8 A LOK ‘soar oxp yotees 01 pey 1728) s29p09} |uneg yo uu ueopoury sure HeUuog prem OH Jo I 87 “senInoUH YEO IM PUTO “woysion sopous stp snot eve ayeHI“SenuNayP e130} Se\So}Ode‘peype uodd sey od don UL, or susqou “. Luyor eonsnr Jou UoH OU. 2M Hm YD HOH AHL Ne yDUSET SUT oF BEE ap syaqoy "5 uyor aansne 09 Yyousg 94} Jo sasjsvyy » = < woe aATdNAL anaan ay Illoo 2onev sr aanur ‘pei yo uopnoee0i U} 20u9]90%3 10} prom SfowONY ‘S'N.eiA popUeMe oem 9102 m anya woe in wn wSouoay “FT oem Us oe Pom ISIC 24110} 29y)0 sAoweny ‘SoM panies Gujrey Yoyroesaud jrepoy UL 5] aU Dos ucproner! oye ngoo su Burpee ing jo mn majo ry -eonoesd soo oyun oy peroxep uopeztuebso(euojesajoud fquo-YORE YA Ue uNoD Jo UL veojowly Swe NowUeG RIBAS 8 1 PeMIIPE UeeR ey eZLeyOHL a Ay epUNEA-09, uno Jo uu ueoUoWry suHEHNIN. EUUOG RIEMPS WOT ©> por ZION “vou smn mays 1 ~mpoiq neg 40 sun weoyoury oyu peuonwour ys yom PopNIM BOM eA eM SHURE 8 KN, “souepi 24 st04 uo uopeyAu Bujoq nog Jo UL] UED|OLIY SUEUR HOULER PrENPR OY 20} SYFLO TTOATFIEIR ‘aunoo op eeaice wou sKouone pue SSH se yom se UNG oyun jo seonsn| yw savas payun a Jo uneg suoxéns 04 SoU8] 8913 Jo LORENSI2D 9 PLR + 1eatoux uounuoo Jo sense uo san sno qu ayeoqunusoe pu 0} 90 ypea! oy sveEU es Kn} JaquIR LNeD Jo HUY UEDLOUY UL -ooeud uonen @ ate ou op oy sset40 Ue ‘sBKve eBnot eUEap ean NOK ue siossojod mo ‘ote 202816 ueyyp uy sfauowe or pat2autG0 pu 9 Feo} wi IM ILO Aes» yp jeuonau pus yeuofer Yeo © uo sap es PUE e095 SEIU PU BOM + ‘SsmoVaTIOO 01 SS300¥ NIVD GNY HLIM XBOMIEN “au 0 yong Aan wade yusa0p sn Siakue} pu roa.in‘satpal a um Buagougoy s98pnr fy syou0g eRIPNUnoD Jo su UEOUAY 94 SPH ez eupuesoeedod® pauseoun fun pea20 oun poy;08e8 0 sequoU OnE ave CUM sob axoyq sda uM 4 10 ssoquious ae oy shows ayy sya yo soumseedde ue oxeoto seonen/eeton en py si2e.0> ‘rend eos yu Goes eyeayd e yous ur woneDOSse 4 GusseqUIONL ane Send BANE uo vou nou a foxy uonePoese 104 © oso wofeAnbe VEER anny 22u0 YER NED J BUY, _umoyoury tn HUM “4 BIBAHG FO BY aR=HaONzEND oY BLE suORoUN POS FeRURPYLOD EL (osov “92-41 "0N u eens0y 105 ysonboy) urd 00:9 BuUiog wesBoud oxy pe “urd oe 8 Gum 908 "HM "uous yee yo Aepsoupoy puso ai uo poynpayoe x8 Moog peu se ideoreCunoou i, ‘sbugsous wy Jo uopauny poe oun AUD9} Sou eIpoLee Eupeou aL poppe seus ‘Si °V'952-L1 ON uonted uYesnooy Jo} wonbey] :uzye20s spun) eueg ‘pe weiBard aM yy “wd 90:2 spun pue urd og:9 8 sousumes dnoup ob rtn @ fq weford yeuno; ein swueusounouUe axyenEUPE UY “esNneOp si04 Pu Sure}00 209 9's ¥ sou of (eBine0U UN exp OU) sBUNSOW AUWUOU OW 104 POND OAL, seme op jo wu weopoury WeLBU"y WHIM Xf 20} YOORPUEH Ou Cre-zeov'982-21 oN uoned uw feenony 09 sonbeu 980") w007 w ope "uno Jo uy ueapouy Kudo frIy=Hu fag OoeoNRL ‘wes yo distequie oun 0 eave ue 5 Suu 24 90 suey ye 20} Ao}enp © jo voREONRM yo] oy) ‘oes 1p J0 wsneoeg sgn; vone}oosse eq @ se Seanqin eS uno Jo SUL] UEDUMLY e ‘eenpueg |Pvotesoyie o em uoyne9 3 00-5 oy Jo UoRO} Ueda, sn YsIQEIe 61 woe U BOB ‘sun your or youeg sfowions og uo yng 5 Ned o su WE pOUNY aig Jo Kyadeasd puw seouEnG ML (L10-) odes en yougese 0 21 Kypas pus Bue zoe ey wooRin0 ‘4 opine yous cy sounys ¥oney 20g yn ou 0 Buoyg spn pue soda ax ey Mowry |e wonezjueBuo Kuo 8m 8 i, peas "za42URE nue AoW ‘agro, ot UO pettod uo8q ee 14, _Fujaueg érsoquioy uno Jo su weopoury, yo oop eM U UNOYE Se 'Siyouag sIeqUIBL feu 8u0 -seqnenr 40 suopepuouauodes Bupyeu jo sod 18 ney Kon 8 (2)008-s oma REO sUmO OKO sy BuFyEN PU MEP ON BuORIUOD“roEUL, feu 2002 u swnowes aye une Jo swH Ye 10} anBoPRIP Wo JeWePYLOD Ko}rENp dlequeNL (241 oper dow se suonepcest eq x erzerey> 46 pebumyp ana NOD Joey UEOLOUY Ou, “s01a jo soueseoday ‘941 setra19 eons, Bunuasesdoy showsouy puy s86por Jo dtyequiey YouNog “aND IPOS Y ‘Sapanr anv sAawuoLy ‘ONOWLS ATIVIONYN! KEBAB SNOLLVOINNYNNOD aLavd x3 134035 YO¥ 3OIAOWd LYELL SITIO “TWi908 ZV 1nd SNOLLVIOOSSY ava TWNOLLOVaiL JNTINN ZY 18ND 40 SNNI NVORISWY 3H.z WO 3q1A0Ud LVHL SAMTIO TVI00S 3A LNG SNOLLVIOOSSY uve TWNOLLIAVeLL DITINA IY 181900 40 SNNI NVORESWY 3H. “Ano 0!908 ayenud v 9 2:0W Bunce B31 pue hoa10—8 ‘Jo gsneo9g roquiou no Jo Suu uesueUy Ue Jo yesroas oy Supse NEMO} © 5a:0}4 ‘uspunsssocsd@ eyseonn Aunt pea myo ok ee oy in gna Noone May a PaMote Rr oe a eanouoa Be umoyoa XO aw yen Buon Buyowos 996010 nok ‘now fut Zoesnooy 7 vo neo "yenard shame WN WN e4L, _"UEDY TE 0 J00D' WI eupuasSsadod@ Pp‘das snok ysog 6 J "vo yms Puy or prey fe JMS O40 UEBE AAI , UU, Jeadde Suu) a Jo S10quIeW 219 It paterposse 10 siequiow oF hysiequiay “qnyo arenid ‘20u01yB\u uneg Jo Suu] UEDL UY ay ‘suoyuny jrp0s jenuepyuco asaus (0S0'V ‘98 1 paisod usoq Sey eM ,s4RUDG SUsIAqUIAW nod Jo Buu UEOLOUIY, 38.0914 9. uous se "s2U09 ssoquHOU lew aug “seanenr a1a oh SuOREpUOUILIOODS Supjeusyo somod an ancy fata se (Jo0es ny ae|On SH9I> 9901 sy BuPeL PU ‘S¥9 oun Bunoeweo’210}2:041 "Yonsi09 sonsnp W2ox SBO|EN a Jo SHeFO 94 40 LOLS ‘4 uo pase pamoyras uood Sey uex0R499 Jo UM 30) Uo OU "S4P6 pe si2eINCD eed +9 Buymoye fq anpuog JeveISSojo1d Jo Sry BIOGIED Jo FLOOES BIE Pa.joNoste sdnosB beydnd pue dissejo4os 20g oydwoy Jo eandex! =U "e002 Ul eUNaWS JeYe UnoD Jo SUL 110} ensopsip wey jenuepyiod hoop dysiequiow ay apeUs foxp Se suoRe;D0B0e 184 52 J2128189 jt pobueyo enB4 LNo9 4 Suu] URDLALLY UL “SENG 40 2oURIBaddy a EOIB019 sequeg Bunueseidey sfawony Puy s96par Jo cysequle/| Uwe ania Feb0S V S30aNr ‘ONY SASNAOLLY SNOULS ATIVIONVN NE3ALL3E SNOLLVOINNNINOD 2ua¥d ¥3 134038nang erqwnjoo 1 jo1ns1q 9420) prem wspeuoysssyorg 1no9 jo SUL UEDHONY CzOz somo WemoH “y Weg ebpnr povaaysrannne— _Moneuwou somoH {Jo wodns uw aroun on ‘sates power 24 Jo uno ewaxins eu jo uosreer umcig fue 2ON=N sxeoossy seu fuoesnnitg Buouaues ovo eB: BupyoN sp ee|ee I SOU Bu CL UOPHAD beg Sey you 39p00| upuEINO Ue se aM Se YEU] pueAaLIONE aM PUR WENN es FEMOH BEN, +£1202'9 oerwer vo Buparg Jovdeg 7a wo spen a ou wopeBnsany an Jono Bu oussp su pes 89929 PULAHD000'L ‘vey 210 jo af an Buynp nc a oy Kyep, OB JOMOH "sen oy /oEUpIOSNN® BOM OLOPUEG ‘aun Suunp dysiope9| syemoy op. sveN9 peizedzaun fesaies fa pees wy eu opr ONO ‘52 dysopeo|eyanoH posed ‘pms a4 10} amor poreuoU oUM BioqsEog "3 sower 9PM ON “sovarajvog eipar noun 9 au Bus PEM yy wooed jr yang 9c 20} Seddy Jo neg BA JO UeSEAWNS HS ABNF JID UNEHD DOK 10 plenty wsyeuoyssejoig uno jo Suu ueoyaLry EzOZ 9 @ARORL or PEDDIE UBEG Se IBNOH VY Ke8, -yvoidde von sy 986 vesyper unorg fesry ‘sonEnr SMG WepIesiA BIN UL paanguoo Buypuey 9 ver soy yey Baqeeag fe peton ee nok a}eULOY OL JaquU 8 44 xno! Sy BiogsEOg SOW 9pnruncg Jo uy SwRI eUUEG preps ay Jo Wasa aA Aa PAEUIUOU sem JawOH Kile BOAT we ewpuesteodod pouseonn Ant pea“SN 949 01 v99q sey YedawuNOD WN StiNOd Jo Suu] UEDLOWY ay "IELIDL O|PPIAN eupueiisodoed Pouseonn Apt Pee yousg 9y) Jo sasjsey > | . wor it emia oiniee Sonsh/ne~ Ay eT a ue wonspuny hares undo 4 wonepines age Kgseo mq paved av edyMO|aO4L, soy u0uny aqui or ebueyp eae Y9}Y0 01 fox € uo pom or SdUBNO}a] 2187 KUO\RUY, co 180 pe croydon) ado appa a J0 AIDS OREOUOH aL ayeD 8H "AN aH Bo ITE SINE 4J0.Uu UeoUmLy ap Wy preme Youag 94 SATSEW® pence! IF suqoy Wer eOHSNr nog Bu woe, upuesteodedg) oyseonan Aunt pes-vorbuysenn 2601 pu jon au yo Pood pu woud ay yo Avews papnyou) s¥sen5 9410 - sade Any pus uum © apeus pue uotdeoas 1 uondadas uedyluBeu! 2 oy payee a1eM am ‘sousiyuoo ayn jo Aep 381) a4) Jo PUB BLA IY, al ‘961099 s91S8/\ pur YeNaIS UEYdars JaISeH SISHaued IN uUWNEL UEP-YOqDE JeISEN sayeods yn) abaqiic wario-Kourony pue (se}geis UYOr puE YS Auo\uY sIseM SySHIOUEG jeads Wn enN810 8YdoISUID J9\SEW JOIEIOPOU yn) FORA JO YAN {Jo sysa124u a4} ut SuojeojunuiMog eIPEPY UO suOHIsee“(UEMODOWN J0\8eW puE Aoqye pnp 201seyy sis}}2Ued yn "weYWED IFN 28188" -9Y2edS yn 'Sa}00q SOLLIYEIUEYD seys0W\ Jo\e!epoU yn) WISL0N2| Jo aBy au) Uy SIYBRY UEUINH @12M Aep ys.4 24, UO SO}GOH 94 8 “enuea 20uaiayu09 wapows pipuaids e ‘sowed Jo ayMASU! Sf ayy Ie SUECIEUNCO Leoyoury yum euojsenoeip Jo Shep ry ony poy ax YoquIIdog SL pu Joquiades 71 9 UD ‘ouup 0} 78H x9 OW WOM UN PLE UORdSDe:e 404 swsooy 20UaH2;40D 480y4 pue 1803 ay 01 paxoU an ‘yones0D aonSNe hq asuodeos Burenuse pue snoqoesb e yy ‘ueNoponl eine J8.8EN Aq YOUNG aun cL PA}ED UatA SEM Yone109 aonSNe jeehu pu -2ansnr yuo an Aq apew aia aulonjan jo saxpaeds uoUs ‘peqwiesse Apeoy amt S18KR0 ue dnos6 sno aieyu wwoowunco iweoyuBeu ay oh pa}0O89 Ue Asam sn JO.90NN OL, ovapnidsin si Jo UsENesUOD ssn JeUrE ‘uo fquo sn00} oy as04} 01 asudins @ jo Buyjaws ag Aews SIAL “SsOUIPUELY puE MyeULO}UL “quem sty kq onus Aore;pow Som | ow 814 JO} YONsIOD BoNSNr YoU! | BO -(ezeyoueg A1e:0U0H sno jo auc) seyeis payin eyo eansnT JID out UT SOGOU ‘9 Wor Jo siequieua Pipueids ein oy porscose sem Uojee00 ey Jo Had OO BNR BIO}OR “spienyoeg diy uOKo 49 “O19 Se abled 1 promo dy Ut Heyday 2/ppAN SUL J0 s19pe: ak OL WOU 94 YOU I ‘uy seneceq Aidwis squedonied sn 2up pawsou you ancy | siuedjoq.6d sno Jo je pp se soxdon ‘24 01 Gute yt 40 Lnog atwaidag ax 0 1U—N “tno puy 04 fe1oyouaq Kou 9q pnoM stUL “OANAIDGS Ay Bye AOU ‘uo Uoee uo suojssnoeip BuneUuns pu Aan} 1 peInquueD fou “sqwopeDe pu SKN} ieee ani ee eee een eee cae ang Sunnive poy pao} soe so 00 or we Jo BEAU Mu 4} CF OU oNa4| 0K (nung vogo 0 sya yn PUP OAT a gee eee eee sure aay premp3 Jersey soywiepour yn) Me7 axa pue s6ueu%a aJeUIO pue (uapjOD KayjOr Je1SeW PU AL no Aq 40} pred ‘B10 SANE 18/49 fEOIPE & ‘eoBad JO SININSUI yp Ie SKB ONY JUOds AOU, ydjopuay snbxe, s91Se~ s}StJaUEd yn “soURWY UEYJeLO J2ySe/j J8yeads yn) SIMO 105 9104, ‘sjeued peyesepow pey syuNod Jo Ul UBDWALIY ‘epdoxddy ue so 7 oxneLed\uo9 pu jeuoHeUAIL a10M Kep pudoes a4 UO SoIdo} 24 ‘ayy vere7 Assequie ysnug e418 uondace:e pey four s1equieya Linco ey BUTISIA20UY— unnisay meme oy guy pe APS 4uoday 2 Groen © 080d, pur 6021p, 40) sopow se aysqem gaign Uo paveys o:0M ,BuIpung sow YeR19 0 stBPMISAyssORN SAIC opin [ow pus] aes aun Guynuewsp "sod ay, Ounysyoge'se.0x8 wo}o4 4) FoOAPE BuO C, ‘Unig esr Supmou euoyoo pur panodl FyNnoee, Aq ,pasn pus payee. Sipfoo1 SeN0u ISKO.CUY -sbusydn ences 19083 pave6nouyaxcy oy sisAo°[eype! yim sjooyeo U eM Ya Xn pus 300d 4a popes ent SEM TELL Fovebe wourexo6 gp isu eevMNSU a0eeq oy noqeR pEAKA POD! EMU fH of BuI10008 05 810: oupopepuen® ounog spams vu eyeenog wod‘smeis pewun a fyoq eapex0WEp szNIEOP PUR TIS NL tony Yess utuzepunfewsoqtep 01 suondooiod oqo Burdens pe sanpeeU BuneSUEU-SpUNL ‘ve ‘sniept 89499 ‘sre no 840} UeduES eek @ Jo Wed se pasBoU}Oue BM YO ‘noouewode ven Ons eM KiN220 UoHesoey UEUNSeIe YOGE YUN WEURHOM SUSE Ld OL + -vorénsoau undone Upp au, WOH} moyOxS 8 =9:0H teu sey souapya Busad wouseroy asofed 00/4 8 Jo ox PUP O4N pow UoReOHFaAW DUO} 0K ces ina 00101 uth Jehu nok GuuNssOUN oF 9D0UL| 8 ROWE Joyo BuAaLLS Bq SUNOS W “$.20ua; oun sus eau 9f0poL zInoqy mou J2AON 9 JauLeYD 18295 € ane} eS elleseS pue 20:08 061000 00 40438 IMS ‘up 3u 230 am ang ‘yssoVOIP @ MongUaKO oY S9NDE esaxp Pash he wakous (s0uB}s0) socio ay 0 SsB00ns otf BUROWIOLKe nouynoopurswaBe 20804, 8 papne} v8 "sdno1S "uEouoUysi Yl pou 's040 ue LEN -5'7 ue pue oes ue ot Sa tp sdnosS wyBinods plnom pe = ERA ESTREVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson hitps:/mmw.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/ by Jim Hoft Mar. 20, 2025 6:09 pm2785 Comments ‘Members of the invite-only inns of Court Club in Washington DC — James Boasbrg, Chief Justice John Roberts, Amit Mehta, Beryl Howell, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Investigative journalist Bad Kitty Unleashed reported on Thursday that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is involved in a secretive, invite-only club for elite judges in Washington, DC. The secretive club America Inns of Court also includes the radical America-hating judges James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Amit Mehta—all hard-left judges and Trump-haters. John Roberts has been Chief Justice of the Supreme Court since September 2005. What in the world is he doing fraternizing in a secret group with far-left colleagues? This is a shocking development. EXHIBIT a a& ‘244, said osye atam saSpnc 29.51q re9pod resones Buypnjou s1ohmey ost oveusrosdds ‘ersjaued 01 uomppe uSayoyt yy @Bpne jo unoo viquinjen 30 19iNsIa eM ul Prey Cupaaus ‘ui {00 woxtuniseny‘y20z ‘st Arango) uno Jo UU AES Ye SHo\C PsyAL — 49PHIS 00C ‘yastie ‘00 uonbuysem Aavo0ns ‘ses Aue J doa Jo sus WaUND /APEASNO JOR 7uNOd Jo WH SWEIAM HOLLER DIEM AULT ‘9 uepUayE U ZIMOIOH ereu29 s09edsu1 pue POG ata apMPU YM Puno} tN oj) GunBeL! WEDS BY NOK MOUS OUT paw wsqeutsmais uno 1 Su vee 8 Buse So; peo ‘51 260i 0 20 “109K Jo spaupuny 204 sare Yeu UN Jo SUL Mo} ax aney AaK NBL THOGE ‘eno Jo Sut eau Bin ;PaFEDfIBDOSYeDNs SH WOU URED A ABN BUH {xno mare SvORCY Wo 84 UAL 9A SHOFR @ popUR ay AINE aN efteqsw0, Jann, 120) dn onus pue onpvoo jee @x019 stOgOY UYOC @Blre Te ase BULLIES ULUSEM {so pnf ous soup yn cnc a:096 © SEM SuEqOL UNO YUN 2OU9PIAGONEY BM MOU Puy Ipoysveduy aq o1 sofpn{ youts1q payoo:9 ours esoip uo Duy 10} duunay predog weptsaid ‘Supyoeme wewerers peswojeu sueqou! eoqsnt JojyD ‘epsent Uo ‘oBe Shep ons UNL NE 2 une 10 UU! UeLeWY swENIM NoUuES prEmps oUL s10910. -youdojorap oy su sams pawUN 949 wopFEAK Wau aa UO daca EIT ‘bux ave oun sober asi yore uum SBuaous etsioas Cues SOREN Fu uNdD au“Aoeroouap a snossbuep 6 h501098 Xn paras exp yA ‘mes oof 1 "q erenud ska ta souioM feenaes JN G10 FDe8 By JO} OUIUD SANE] UBRE OA Fesc0qae ‘Gof 0025, _zoiin 24 59 uoUsLI00 © uy paydos EUBAA jo uSIa WEE Ou JO} 2omo SAowony S'7 We Kawiony Sareis PaNUN AUEISSSY aip NG Yee SKB MOL LED AONE .Sanss| ay jo Uossnosp Bupeusw pur gos © 04 esraanny Jo 216g MOLTEN PLE ET eps 9 doaien “uy Jo 0p Ave, “LOIS SURLY COO ous Jo SoHE we ESOS "ond mo pu Sua UOsUA 0 saa, KEYTEZ "9 s9qUOU! ULI ETT saISIE03 ® UOSLION {eo uml Bsr BoM UoRDetel4 ADUEULS JOUINsUOD JO" WU 'SEOY- C9 AL ANEW OIE, stow sem cod 94 SOK ue isd 8 feu 31019 Buasoda! SoM mOUTEML feud 018 © uo ya6m se swouidownep roa sa] ay noe BLE PerO{ue AS! I, 0d upyun ron w wy oBe E12OK YaIEOR OMRON Z .BrquTI09 102810 DY 40 BOM 20} ENED KowLORY Andod JHND TEYUSEOU WS, som avo ost rsuosud Jo esung avn unm suuoj0, annoninsuoa Bulprabel axpoodsied pou) pue enp ayR UAE ‘Buuirau ‘sefou essouen Suunsees ose ~ peiouon Aowiony wsjssy Anded "A}OUUeLES Bg pus eseuaD Jor2edsUI COG "ZIMMOIOH PEL uPA AeUid paruesasd Sem jouRd‘poysvojun AnD pes vA var ay 1 sandbeayoo dor ya romyau pue gougoy or ajge Bulag apnouy dysiaquiaW! yo syed ays sevinsscpeay nwt ue euoiBes 800} © Lo sabpnf azeis pue fexep9} yu 19eI2IUN PUE BOW - ‘S3NOVITION 01 SS3OOV NIVS ONY HAIMA IHOMISN ian wia9s 3us90p isnt Burqgougoy sa6pnr WU] UBDUaLIY al S 13H 0 “Brmvmn cea wor ‘sadnte] pue roa aug ‘sa6pah ‘ady 61y2U29 eroipnf neo © Brosenun sore EF spe 5 1 © @ poysesun ypesiadnej pue Fog aya ‘sabpnl vady syauag feraipn! uno, 198 3uS30p ysn/6 up ube ed so i1z02 "9 Arenuer uo joydeg sn ou ‘9PISul Supyem 404 sueak pu suRUOW! Jo} uosud or seuoddns-duurus jo spaxpuny GuIpuss 2H" BupuRrSIno sno 10} unoD jo Suu] WeaHOWY 24R O} PaIEURUON SEN FANOH IKio@ OBA Iup(o0ys 1snfs! wodsu ay yo wed sig sada ge peay me" Wand = a10u 101210810 oun 401 piemy wsyeuoyssa}0r4 LIND Jo un WEDHeUY C2Oe HeMoH -y Muog eBpnp ‘y290] & uo sabipni ayeys pue | © pue ‘jeuoiBar jesapay yyla JOesAYU! PUR ayy +“eJoy Se} 8:Y0H WHE Jo 810U pees PUR 9x04 OH WHE ee URE NOR “Shremy Auagr UeoYatY auf Te PLeMY BIPAW Wid PSISNUL ISON ‘aun pana ypung femate9 24 '6202 W9102 Key Lorepune4 Kyedsoig Jo} SuESPOUTY 24 wioy wsyeunor aujuo uy 20u}20% 20} plemy VEG 24) Jo wayEoe4 pnox! if s1pue £102 u promy wipey uy fosuncoy eu peed ol PepoMe SEM WHE eaVeUT U SIeANO ‘SoU aneNaCuOD doy 9440 2uD "ypung ABN} BL Jo J0HPe PUB opuNO} a4! YOH WE HOH WIT “tuewdojanep eBny e S| sys “pousee|un Any pea we 1881 BM PEEL BSERICo 10 "1 12 13 14 15 16 7 ‘As Adopted by Judiciary Committee, Aug. 7 (Articles may be renuritered, but content wll rat change.) ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FOR THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Resolved by the House of Delegates: BE IT RESOLVED, That, pursuant to the authority granted by the House of Delegates of ‘West Virginia to the House Committee on the Judiciary in House Resolution 201, dated June 26, 2018, the Committee on the Judiciary recommends to the House of Delegates of West Virginia THAT, pursuant to the authority granted to the House of Delegates in Section 9, Article IV of the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, that Chief Justice Margaret Workman, Justice Allen Loughry, Justice Robin Davis, and Justice Elizabeth Walker, Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, be impeached for maladministration, corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty, and certain high crimes and misdemeanors committed in their capacity and by virtue of their offices as Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, and that said Articles of Impeachment, being fourteen in number, be and are hereby adopted by the House of Delegates, and that the same shall be exhibited to the Senate in the following words and figures, to wit: ARTICLES exhibited by the House of Delegates of the State of West Virginia in the name of themselves and all of the people of the State of West Virgi against: Margaret Workman, who was at the general election held in November 2008, duly elected to the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia EXHIBIT iis ht‘As Adopted by Judiciary Committee, Aug. 7 (Aticles may be renumbered, but content wil not change.) 1 and on the 29 day of December 2008, after having duly qualified as a Justice by 2 taking the required oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the 3 Constitution of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of that 4 office to the best of her skill and judgment, entered upon the discharge of the duties 5 thereof, and on the 16" day of February 2018, was elevated to the position of Chief 6 Justice and entered upon the discharge of the duties thereof; and 7 Allen Loughry, who was at the general election held in November 2012, duly 8 elected to the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia 9 and on the 14" day of December 2012, after having duly qualified as a Justice by 10 taking the required oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the 1 Constitution of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of that 2 office to the best of her skill and judgment, entered upon the discharge of the duties 8 thereof, and 14 Robin Davis, who was at the general election held in November 2012 duly elected 15 to the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and on 16 the 13" day of January 2013, after having duly qualified as a Justice by taking the 7 required oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution 18 of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of that office to the 19 best of her skill and judgment, entered upon the discharge of the duties thereof; 20 and 24 Elizabeth Walker, who was at the general election held in November 2016 duly 22 elected to the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia 23 and on the 5% day of December 2016, after having duly qualified as a Justice by 210 "1 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 ‘As Adopted by Judiciary Committee, Aug. 7 (Aaticles may be renumbered, but content wil not change.) taking the required oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of that office to the best of her skill and judgment, entered upon the discharge of the duties thereof, and In maintenance and support of their impeachment against them Margaret Workman, Allen Loughry, Robin Davis, and Elizabeth Walker for maladministration, corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty, and certain high crimes and misdemeanors. Article That the said Chief Justice Margaret Workman, and Justice Robin Davis, being at all times relevant Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, and at various relevant times individually each Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia unmindful of the duties of their high offices, and contrary to the oaths taken by them to support the Constitution of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of their offices as such Justices, while in the exercise of the functions of the office of Justices, in violation of their oaths of office, then and there, with regard to the discharge of the duties of their offices, commencing in or about 2012, did knowingly and intentionally act, and each subsequently oversee in their capacity as Chief Justice, and did in that capacity as Chief Justice severally sign and approve the contracts necessary to facilitate, at each such relevant time, to overpay certain Senior Status Judges in violati of the statutory limited maximum salary for such Judges, which overpayment is a violation of the provisions of W.Va. Code §51-2-13 and W.Va. Code §51-9-10, and, in violation of an Administrative Order of the Supreme Court of Appeals, in potential violation of the provisions of W.Va. Code §61-3-22, relating to the crime of falsification of accounts with intent to enable or assist any person to obtain money to which he was not entitled, and in potential violation of the a.10 "1 12 13, 14 18 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 As Adopted by Judiciary Committee, Aug. 7 (Articles may be renumbered, but content wil not change.) provisions of W.Va. Code §5-10-45, relating to the crime of fraud against the West Virginia Public Employees Retirement System, and, in potential violation of the provisions set forth in W.Va. Code ‘§61-3-24, relating to the crime of obtaining money, property and services by false pretenses, and, all of the above are in violation of the provisions of Canon | and Canon II of the West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct. Article 11 That the said Chief Justice Margaret Workman, Justice Allen Loughry, Justice Robin Davis, and Justice Elizabeth Walker, being at all times relevant Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, unmindful of the duties of their high offices, and contrary to the oaths taken by them to support the Constitution of the State of West Virginia and faithfully discharge the duties of their offices as such Justices, while in the exercise of the functions of the office of Justices, in violation of their oaths of office, then and there, with regard to the discharge of the duties of the offices, did, in the absence of any policy to prevent or control expenditure, waste state funds with little or no concern for the costs to be borne by the tax payers for unnecessary and lavish spending for various purposes including, but without limitation, to certain examples, such as: to remodel state offices, for large increases in travel budgets—including unaccountable Personal use of state vehicles, for unneeded computers for home use, for regular lunches from restaurants, and for framing of personal items and other such wasteful expenditure not necessary for the administration of justice and the execution of the duties of the Court; and, did fail to provide or prepare reasonable and proper supervisory oversight of the operations of the Court and the subordinate courts by failing to carry out one or more of the following necessary and proper administrative activities: A) To prepare and adopt sufficient and effective travel policies prior to October of 2016, and failed thereafter to properly effectuate such policy by excepting the Justices from10 1 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 As Adopted by Judiciary Committee, Aug. 7 (Aaticles may be renumbered, but content wil nt change.) said policies, and subjected subordinates and employees to a greater burden than the Justices; B) To report taxable fringe benefits, such as car use and regular lunches, on Federal W- 2s, despite full knowledge of the Internal Revenue Service Regulations, and further subjected subordinates and employees to a greater burden than the Justices, in this regard, and upon notification of such violation, failed to speedily comply with requests to make such reporting consistent with applicable law; ©) To provide proper supervision, control, and auditing of the use of state purchasing cards leading to multiple violations of state statutes and policies regulating the proper Use of such cards, including feiling to obtain proper prior approval for large purchases; D) To prepare and adopt sufficient and effective home office policies which would govern the Justices’ home computer use, and which led to @ lack of oversight which encouraged the conversion of property; E) To provide effective supervision and control over record keeping with respect to the use of state automobiles, whi has already resulted in an executed information upon ‘one former Justice and the indictment of another Justice. F) To provide effective supervision and control over inventories of state property owned by the Court and subordinate courts, which led directly to the undetected absence of valuable state property, including, but not limited to, a state-owned desk and a state- ‘owned computer, G) To provide effective supervision and control over purchasing procedures which directly lead to inadequate cost containment methods, including the rebidding of the purchases of goods and services utilizing @ system of large unsupervised change orders, all of which encouraged waste of taxpayer funds.