Critical Companion To George Orwell A Literary Reference To His Life and Work 2009 1st Edition Edward Quinn Download
Critical Companion To George Orwell A Literary Reference To His Life and Work 2009 1st Edition Edward Quinn Download
https://ebookname.com/product/critical-companion-to-george-
orwell-a-literary-reference-to-his-life-and-work-2009-1st-
edition-edward-quinn/
Get the full ebook with Bonus Features for a Better Reading Experience on ebookname.com
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...
https://ebookname.com/product/critical-companion-to-t-s-eliot-a-
literary-reference-to-his-life-and-work-1st-edition-russell-
elliott-murphy/
https://ebookname.com/product/critical-companion-to-j-k-rowling-
a-literary-reference-to-her-life-and-work-1st-edition-karley-
adney/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-cambridge-introduction-to-
george-orwell-1st-edition-edition-john-rodden/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-syntax-of-old-romanian-1st-
edition-pana-dindelegan/
Hacking the Xbox An Introduction to Reverse Engineering
Andrew Huang
https://ebookname.com/product/hacking-the-xbox-an-introduction-
to-reverse-engineering-andrew-huang/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-war-crime-of-child-soldier-
recruitment-1st-edition-julie-mcbride-auth/
https://ebookname.com/product/chemistry-of-the-climate-
system-1st-edition-detlev-moller/
https://ebookname.com/product/beyond-bibliometrics-harnessing-
multidimensional-indicators-of-scholarly-impact-1st-edition-arun-
sundararajan/
https://ebookname.com/product/case-examples-of-music-therapy-for-
mood-disorders-1st-edition-kenneth-e-bruscia/
The Taming of Free Speech America s Civil Liberties
Compromise 1st Edition Laura M. Weinrib
https://ebookname.com/product/the-taming-of-free-speech-america-
s-civil-liberties-compromise-1st-edition-laura-m-weinrib/
Critical C ompanion TO
George Orwell
Critical C ompanion TO
George Orwell
A Literary Reference to His Life and Work
Edward Quinn
Critical Companion to George Orwell
Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk
quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions.
Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or
(800) 322-8755.
You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com
MV Hermitage 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction ix
Part I: Biography 1
Index 427
Acknowledgments
vii
Introduction
ix
Critical Companion to George Orwell
was the Soviet Union, but he knew that Joseph rably, King Lear, “Speak what we feel, not what we
Stalin would not live forever and even entertained ought to say.”
the remote possibility that a new generation of Rus- It is this sense of authenticity that has created
sians might arise “eager for more freedom.” His a personal presence we do not want to lose. Com-
permanent target, of which, after the defeat of Nazi bine that with a willingness to face “unpleasant
Germany, Stalinism was the current example, was facts,” and you have the hint of an explanation for
the totalitarian impulse. He believed that modern Orwell’s extraordinary influence. Some examples
technology, weaponry (nuclear and otherwise), and of that influence: In Lenin’s Tomb, his compel-
the decay of the Judeo-Christian ethical and reli- ling account of the collapse of the Soviet Union,
gious order had unleashed on a global scale the David Remnick records a conversation with the
chimera of absolute power. He set out to combat Russian philosopher Grigori Pomerants, in which
the lure of that power, using the satirist’s weapons, Pomerants remarks that Russians, reading out-
exposure and ridicule, while tacitly affirming free- lawed copies of Nineteen Eighteen-Four, realized
dom and justice. that Orwell “. . . discovered the soul or soullessness
He was particularly keen to recognize the impor- of our society better that anyone else.” In Finding
tance to the totalitarian mind of the control of lan- George Orwell in Burma, Emma Larkin’s descrip-
guage. In his two great satires, he placed language tion of her recent travels in Burma (Myammar),
center stage. In Animal Farm he employed the sim- she writes of encountering a very old man, living
ple device of adding qualifiers to each of the seven the last decades of his life in the police state that is
commandments in order to advance the interests of present-day Myanmar. When asked if he recognizes
the pigs, while pretending to adhere to the original the name George Orwell, after a few moments, the
text. This gradual accretion eventually leads to the man answers, “Ah! The prophet.” One need hardly
linguistically absurd “more equal” proposition, the add that Orwell’s works are banned in Myanmar,
final corruption of the ideals of “animalism.” Nine- with the single exception of Burmese Days, viewed
teen Eighty-Four makes a quantum leap from here, by the government as an anti-imperialist novel.
with its tongue-in-cheek description of a language Closer to home, we have seen the more than 50
that makes a dissenting thought impossible. Orwell years of Orwell’s roller-coaster reputation in Britain
would doubtless enjoy the irony that some NEW- and America. Like Stephen Sondheim’s ex-Follies
SPEAK words are now entries in standard English star, he’s “been through” the CIA/ MI 6 cold war-
dictionaries. riors, the Angry Young Men of the ’50s, the student
His attention to language grew out of his search radicals of the ’60s, the neo-con “body snatchers,”
for his own authorial voice. At first, he found it in of the ’70s, the pop media celebrity of the year
his essay writing. As early as 1931, he had written 1984, the academic Marxist “de-mythifiers” of the
“A Hanging,” an essay that reads like a modern 80s, the theorists of the 90s—and he’s “still here,”
short story, with its agonizing epiphany, the pris- alternately praised and pilloried but very much a
oner avoiding a puddle as he stumbles toward the presence. The year 2003 marked the centenary
gallows. But the formal excellence of “A Hanging” of Eric Blair’s birth, an occasion celebrated, not
should not blind us to the fact that Orwell had a alone by literary and political people, but by a wide
social, even moral, purpose in writing it. This pur- range of specialists. It seems that a fair number
pose always took first place but never to the neglect of philosophers, theologians, social psychologists,
of the language he chose, always adhering to the economists, technologists, and historians still have
principle of letting the meaning choose the words. Orwell on their radar screens. Among recent social
As a result, Orwell developed a variety of styles, and moral issues in which his authority has been
all of which, however, were marked by a clarity invoked are animal rights (now seen as a major
and vitality that was recognizably his. Although he theme of Animal Farm and of “Some Thoughts on
makes no specific reference to it, he may have been the Spotted Toad,” an essay revealing Orwell as his
guided by a line from a play he wrote about memo- light-hearted best), the conservation of nature (in
Introduction xi
Coming Up for Air and the essay “A Good Word This may seem to some a far-fetched interpreta-
for the Vicar of Bray”), and the threat to indi- tion, but it stands as an example of Orwell’s ongo-
vidual privacy by technological advances (of which ing engagement, through his interpreters, with the
Nineteen Eighty-Four’s telescreen was an early and life of the mind.
ominous portent).
Perhaps the most compelling appearance of About This Book
Orwell on the current scene relates to the issue This volume aims to serve as a guide to students
of torture. Writing in the 1980s, long before Abu and readers wishing to know more of Orwell, learn-
Ghraib and related tactical innovations in Anglo- ing about the man, being introduced to many of
American foreign policy, the philosopher Richard his lesser known works, or deepening their knowl-
Rorty identified torture as a critical theme in Nine- edge of his best-known ones. Part I provides a
teen Eighty-Four. He argued that the entire third mini-biography, both of his life and his reputation.
section of the novel is not, as one might expect, Part II gives detailed accounts of his nine full-
about being tortured but about torturing, not length books, his major essays, his wartime writ-
about Winston Smith but about O’Brien. Rorty ing for the BBC, and his other journalism. Part
suggests that O’Brien represents the logical fate III provides brief accounts of family members, of
of the humanist intellectual in a totalitarian state, friends, an enemy or two, and fellow writers (those
the kind of figure who in earlier times might have who influenced him as well as those whom he
adopted an “art for the sake of art” posture. In a influenced) and brief sketches of his relation to
totalitarian world, there would seem to be no obvi- schools of thought, the various -isms he contended
ous place for such a person. His/her only viable with in his career. Part IV contains a chronology
function would be to identify, torture, and crush and a bibliography of Orwell’s writings and the
people of a comparable temperament, thereby many books and articles about the man and his
removing potentially dangerous dissidents from the writings. References to other entries are given in
scene. The torturer’s particular satisfaction might small capital letters the first time that they
be described as “torture for the sake of torture.” appear in an entry.
Part I
Biography
Biography
Orwell, George
(Eric Arthur Blair)
(1903–1950)
Left to right: Prosper Buddicom, Guinever Buddicom, Eric Blair (George Orwell), September 1917 (Orwell Archive,
UCL Library Services, Special Collections)
arship factories, that is, by the number of honors of the caning was the sense that his oppressors were
their students would win. To enhance their reputa- right. He did wet the bed, and he had no control
tions, the schools would admit talented prospects at over it. In one part of his mind, he was guilty and
reduced rates. This was the possibility Ida Blair was got what he deserved. Therefore, he saw himself as
hoping for when she visited St Cyprian’s School a victim, but not an innocent one. He would go on
in Eastbourne. Instead of 180 pounds a year—a to have two poems published in a local newspaper
crippling fee for a family living on a civil servant’s (with one of them being read aloud to the entire
pension—tuition for Eric would be 90 pounds. This school), win scholarships to Eton and Westminster,
half-scholarship was not revealed to the boy until and yet come away from St Cyprian’s convinced
he had already been at the school for a few years, that, on some fundamental moral level, he was a
long enough to have endured the humiliation of failure.
seeing himself as one of the poor students at a rich Thirty years later, near the end of his life, George
boys’ school. The revelation of his status by the Orwell would exact revenge for eight-year-old Eric
headmistress and headmaster, Cecily and Lewis Blair in his essay “such, such were the joys,” an
Vaughan Wilkes, (who accused him of ingrati- indictment of his English boarding school as sear-
tude), cemented the hatred he felt for the school ing as the one he was bringing against the totali-
where he, as a child of eight, had been publicly tarian world of Nineteen Eighty-Four. Indeed,
caned on a number of occasions for chronic bed- the two are closely related in time. Orwell took
wetting. And worse than the pain and humiliation time out from writing the novel in order to finish
Critical Companion to George Orwell
least in winter, social life in Southwold. He spent by Gandhi had won concessions in the Govern-
the winter cramming for the eight-day competi- ment of India Act (1921), but at first, no such
tive entrance exam. Having successfully passed the accommodations applied to Burma. (Under British
exams, he chose to serve in Burma, where he still rule, Burma was treated as an administrative prov-
had relatives, including his maternal grandmother, ince of India.) The result was a marked Burmese
Thérèse Limouzin, living in Moulmein, the town increase in activist resistance to the colonial gov-
alluded to in the memorable opening lines of ernment, often led by Buddhist monks. Ambiva-
Kipling’s “The Road to Mandalay” (“From the old lent at first and later fiercely anti-imperialist, Eric
Moulmein pagoda. . . .”) and in Orwell’s “Shooting confessed to an early feeling that the greatest joy
an Elephant.” in the world would be to “drive a bayonet into a
He was not prepared for the hostility that Buddhist priest’s guts.” But doing “the dirty work
greeted him as a member of the Imperial Police. of empire” and expected to restrict his socializing
In the 1920s, the anger he encountered was not to the whites-only club in whatever town he was
personal but the product of a nationalist spirit that stationed in (Burmese Days contains a remorseless
had begun to surface across a broad spectrum of account of such a club), he eventually came to
the Burmese people. The reform movement led see British colonialism as hypocritical—“the white
Police training school in Mandalay, Burma, 1922. Orwell is in the rear row, third from the left. (Orwell Archive, UCL
Library Services, Special Collections)
Biography
man’s burden” lie—and mutually corrupting for ing his five years in Burma. Did he, like John Flory,
both colonizers and colonized. the novel’s protagonist, keep a Burmese mistress?
In addition to its role in Burmese Days, Burma Anecdotal evidence suggests the strong probability
is the setting for the memorable Orwell essays “A that, at the least, he frequented Burmese broth-
Hanging” and “Shooting an Elephant.” As with els. Witness his poems “The Lesser Evil” and “My
“Such, Such Were the Joys,” some have raised ques- Epitaph by John Flory” from an early draft of the
tions about the truthfulness of these two essays, novel, which includes the couplet “He has spent
wondering whether Orwell actually witnessed an sweat enough to swim in / Making love to stupid
execution or did in fact shoot an elephant; in short, women.” The “stupid women” phrase is an early
do the two essays constitute fact or fiction of some example of the sexism, not to say misogyny, that
mixture of both? Although the preponderance of Orwell exhibited periodically in his writing. If he
evidence testifies to their historical and biographical were looking for examples of miscegenation, he
truth, one school of thought argues for the overrid- could have found precedents in his own family.
ing importance of the two essays, not as journalism His maternal great-uncle William, brother of his
but as literature, a sphere in which the fact/fiction grandfather Frank, had fathered a Eurasian child,
question becomes irrelevant. In both essays (or sto- and Frank’s son, also called Frank, had married a
ries), we are being forced to participate in, not just Burmese woman, who had given birth to his cousin
witness, an event we would prefer not to be caught Kathleen.
up in. In “Shooting an Elephant,” we are uncom- In her highly interesting Finding George Orwell
fortably aware that the killing of the animal is a in Burma, Emma Larkin reports meeting a Eur-
face-saving act. Not to kill would be interpreted by asian man whose father had known Orwell dur-
the large local population as a sign of weakness and ing his tour of duty in Moulmein. He maintained
would undermine British control at a time when that Orwell fraternized widely with members of
that control was coming increasingly into question. the Anglo-Burmese community. Harold Acton,
In “A Hanging,” we see the death penalty, another an Eton colleague, recalls Orwell’s rhapsodizing
form of governmental control, exposed as an act about the physical allure of Burmese women. On
that sullies and paradoxically imprisons its perpetra- the other hand, Roger Beadon, a fellow Imperial
tors as well as its victims. Both are powerful exam- Police officer, observed, “. . . as for female com-
ples of the dirty work of empire and are beautifully pany, I don’t honestly think I ever saw him with a
written truths that transcend facts. woman.” (Coppard and Crick, 62). In any case, the
As for Burmese Days, which is clearly identi- one indisputable autobiographical element in the
fied as fiction, there are, as in all of Orwell’s nov- novel is not sexual passion but John Flory’s passion-
els, direct biographical connections. One example ate denunciations of British imperialism. Whatever
is the incident in which a member of the British grievances the author harbored against Burmese
colony viciously attacks a young native student, college students and Buddhist monks, he never lost
precipitating a Burmese uprising. Apparently, sight of the fact that colonialism was a radically
before boarding a train, Eric was once jostled by a unjust system that victimized both the oppressor
Burmese university student fooling around with his and the oppressed, even when its form was rela-
friends and fell downstairs. “Blair was furious and tively benevolent. The fact that English colonizers
raised the heavy cane which he was carrying to hit were probably the best of a bad lot did not amelio-
the boy on the back on the head, checked himself rate the situation; it only supported the hypocrisy
and struck him on the back instead” (Aung). An that served to justify the system.
angry discussion ensued between Blair and the stu- In 1927, having served five years with the Impe-
dents on the train ride but was resolved without rial Police, Orwell returned to England on home
further incident. leave. A year earlier, England had endured a gen-
Another biographical question that Burmese eral strike, which had paralyzed the nation for a
Days gives rise to concerns Blair’s sexual life dur- week. The strike was symptomatic of the economic
10 Critical Companion to George Orwell
crisis Europe was experiencing in the 1920s, the dicom family, but Jacintha was not there. Dione
prelude to the worldwide depression that would Venables’s postscript to Eric and Us supplies the
be ignited by the stock market crash on Wall surprising reason for her absence. Shortly before
Street in October 1929. Much to the distress of his his return, she gave birth to a child out of wedlock,
mother and the shocked incredulity of his father, which she eventually gave up for adoption. Not
he announced his decision to resign from the Bur- knowing this, Orwell doubtless took her absence as
mese police force in order to pursue a career as a a sign of a continuing rejection.
writer. As if that announcement alone were not In the spring of 1928, he moved to Paris to join
bad enough for a respectable “lower-upper-middle- the small army of young writers and artists who had
class” family (Orwell’s own characterization), it was converged on the city in the aftermath of World
followed by his determination to explore “tramp- War I. That was a late date to qualify as a mem-
ing” in order to experience the lives of those on the ber of the lost generation (Ernest Hemingway how-
bottom rung of society. In late 1927 he spent some ever, was still living there, only a few blocks from
time in “spikes” (sleeping wards where tramps were Orwell’s rooming house in the rue du Pot de Fer).
allowed to stay one night before moving on the Orwell lived there for 18 months, working continu-
next day). While he was home, he visited the Bud- ally, producing one or possibly two novels, which
The Closerie des Lilas café in Paris. The Closerie may have been the model for the Chestnut Tree Café in Nineteen
Eighty-Four. (Photo by William Herman)
Biography 11
were rejected by publishers and later destroyed by He had never liked his first name, in any case.
the discouraged author. A few short stories met a Apparently, he believed, as he wrote to his friend
similar fate. He did achieve some success publish- Rayner Heppenstall in 1940, that “[p]eople
ing his short articles in French and English journals. always grow up like their names. It took me nearly
His first article in an English publication was “A thirty years to work off the effects of being called
Farthing Newspaper” in G. K.’s Weekly, published Eric” (CEJL, 2, 22.). Orwell is the name of a river
by G. K. Chesterton. When he was not writing, in East Anglia and a small rural parish in Cam-
he explored the city, visiting local cafés such as bridgeshire; George is the name of the patron saint
the Deux Magots, where he thought he saw James of England. Orwell felt certain that his first book
Joyce, and restaurants, like the Closerie des Lilas, a would be a failure, but Down and Out, while not a
favorite haunt of writers and revolutionaries. Lenin commercial success, was seen by critics as a promis-
and Trotsky frequented it at one time, playing chess ing debut. Although most of his reviewers had seri-
at one of the tables. Peter Davison suggests that the ous qualms about the book’s structural weaknesses,
Closerie was the model for the Chestnut Tree Café many of them recognized that a fresh and inter-
in Nineteen Eighty-Four, where the old revolution- esting new voice had arrived, dealing with a sub-
aries Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford sit before ject to which too little attention had been paid. In
a chess board, awaiting their final arrest (Davison, America, which had plunged into the Depression,
Literary, 26). He was also a regular visitor at the the book was reviewed by the novelist James T.
home of his mother’s sister Helene “Nellie” Lim- Farrell as driving home a very clear point: “Poverty
ouzin and her husband, Eugene Adam, one of the is an unnecessary and disgusting waste of human
founders of the Esperanto movement. Adam had life” (Meyers, Critical, 46). In general, the critics
fought on the Bolshevik side during the 1917 Rus- recognized that the name George Orwell was one
sian Revolution but was completely disillusioned that they would be hearing more of, suggesting
with the Soviet system, even under Lenin. At this new possibilities of growth and achievement. The
time Orwell appears to have been somewhat sym- positive critical response may have contributed to
pathetic toward the Soviets, thus prompting some Orwell’s decision to continue to use the pen name.
loud arguments between nephew and uncle. Some have detected in the choice of a pseudonym
In March 1929, Orwell spent two weeks in a the expression of a deeper impulse, hinted at in the
public hospital in Paris recovering from the flu, an comment to Heppenstall, to escape from his past,
experience he recounted later in his essay “How and with it the self-image of a failure, acquired at
the Poor Die.” After his release, he found work as St Cyprian’s. If so, it seems odd that in his private
a dishwasher in a posh Paris hotel, an experience life he never repudiated his real name, even when
he memorably described in Down and Out in it would have been to his advantage to be known
Paris and London. Shortly before Christmas 1929, as George Orwell. Up until the very end, when he
he returned to his parents’ home in Southwold, gave explicit instructions that his tombstone dis-
where he lived off and on while writing three drafts play the name Eric Arthur Blair and no other, he
of Down and Out and submitting them to publish- acknowledged his past.
ers with no success. Finally, through the interces- Critical esteem was one thing, but it didn’t pay
sion of a friend, Mabel Fierz, he acquired an agent, the rent. In April 1932, he took a position teach-
Leonard Moore, who placed the work with the ing at Hawthorns, a boys’ prep school at Hayes,
publisher Victor Gollancz. in Middlesex, where he wrote and directed a play,
Down and Out was published in January 1933 King Charles II. He was also charged with making
under the pseudonym George Orwell. Blair had the costumes, an experience that created “untold
decided not to use his own name partly to save agonies” for him. He was later to describe the expe-
his family any embarrassment they might feel over rience in detail in A Clergyman’s Daughter, in which
some of the personal details of the book and partly the heroine, Dorothy, struggles with the costumes
because of Orwell’s own sense of its unworthiness. for a play called Charles I. It may be worth noting
12 Critical Companion to George Orwell
that King Charles II, set in 1651, takes a distinctly opinion of the book himself, and would later stipu-
pro-royalist stance, treating Cromwell as a cruel late that it and Keep the Aspidistra Flying should
usurper. Meanwhile, working on his first novel, never be reprinted. But, in fact, these two early
Burmese Days, during this period, he was inter- efforts, while far from perfect, mark important steps
ested in two women, Eleanor Jaques, a Southwold in Orwell’s formation as a novelist and thinker. The
neighbor, with whom he had a sexual relationship crisis of the loss of faith that he explores in Clergy-
but who married a friend, Dennis Collings, and man was not so much a part of his personal experi-
Brenda Salkeld, to whom he proposed marriage. ence as it was his view of modern Western society.
Brenda, however, was intent on keeping their rela- Although by no means a conventional Christian,
tionship on a platonic level and apparently suc- he was acutely aware of the value of religion as
ceeded. Orwell always regarded her as the one a center that had kept the social fabric together
who got away. In the fall of 1933, he took another until the 20th century, when the center, in W. B.
teaching position but soon was hospitalized with Yeats’s terms, could no longer hold. It is interesting
pneumonia and had to give up teaching. While to note that, while Orwell was writing the book, he
convalescing, he finished A Clergyman’s Daughter, befriended an Anglican clergyman and posed as a
his second novel. In October 1934, he moved to devout believer in order to absorb the experience
London to take a job as a part-time clerk in the he wanted to describe, much as he did posing as a
Booklovers’ Corner, a bookshop near Hampstead tramp for Down and Out. In this case, though, he
Heath, in North London. had qualms about deceiving others.
In the same month, Harper’s published Burmese Another lesson he derived in writing Clergyman
Days in New York, where it sold modestly well, was that he was not James Joyce. However much he
prompting Gollancz to bring out an English edition admired the author of Ulysses, he learned that his
the following year. Gollancz had originally rejected talents lay not in the mode of symbolic, modernist
the book on the grounds that he might be sued for prose but in the traditional style of realistic story-
libel. Having relented, following the modest suc- telling. His flirtation with the former style is evi-
cess of the American edition, he still insisted on dent in the novel’s Trafalgar Square scene, which
a number of minor changes in the names of some owes much to the Nighttown episode in Ulysses.
characters and locations. The English edition, in Although a failure, this foray into expressionist sur-
Orwell’s view botched because of the changes, was realism reveals a writer willing to test his limits and
published in June 1935 to mixed reviews. Most one willing to take pains to do it well in represent-
reviewers felt that the negative picture of the Raj ing the unnerved, near-delusional state of Dorothy
was overdone. In a later look at the novel, writ- Hare, the novel’s protagonist (Fowler, 109–118).
ten shortly after Orwell’s death in 1950, Malcolm In a more traditional mode in another section of
Muggeridge, his conservative friend, thought he the novel, he successfully brings to life a Dicken-
detected an ambivalence toward rather than a total sian character, Mrs. Creevy, the headmistress from
rejection of British imperialism. Muggeridge went hell. Unfortunately, he fails to breathe life into
on to compare Orwell to Rudyard Kipling, the his main character. Peter Quennell’s review sums
two sharing the same inner conflict, with Kipling up the other reviewers’ reactions: “Dorothy, alas!
coming down on one side and Orwell on the other. remains a cipher. She is a literary abstraction to
Muggeridge’s comment seems less relevant to the whom things happen. . . . We have no feeling that
mature Orwell, who was a consistently commit- her flight from home and her return to the rectory
ted anti-imperialist, even in his presocialist phase, have any valid connection with the young woman
when he described himself as a “Tory radical.” herself.” (Meyers, Critical, 61).
In the same year, 1935, Gollancz published A While working at the bookstore, he used his
Clergyman’s Daughter, which received fewer favor- experiences as the background of a new novel,
able responses than Down and Out and Burmese Keep the Aspidistra Flying. At this time, he was
Days. By this time Orwell had developed a very low struggling financially, though he was developing a
Biography 13
reputation as much for his reviews and essays as for utter solemnity the degradation of an honest man.
his novels. He renewed his prep-school friendship What is clear, in any case, is the presence of auto-
with Cyril Connolly, editor of the literary magazine biographical elements in the book, suggesting that
Horizon. He spent his mornings writing Aspidistra, Orwell is reflecting an earlier phase of his life, when
some book reviews, such as his important critique he was having no success in finding a publisher.
of Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer, and even the Perhaps the “happy ending,” so distasteful to read-
occasional poem, such as “St Andrew’s Day,” which ers determined to take the novel at face value, is
appears in Aspidistra as an example of the protago- a reflection of the presence in his life of Eileen, a
nist’s work. He also developed a fairly active social partial model for the character of Rosemary Water-
life with Mabel Fierz, Kay Ekeval (a girlfriend), low, who breathes fresh air into Gordon’s solipsistic
and Richard Rees, editor and publisher of Adelphi, misery. It is Rosemary who, taking matters into
a socialist journal to which he became a frequent her own hands, rescues Gordon from himself. She
contributor. In the spring of 1935, at a party he co- also rescues her creator from the not unreasonable
hosted, he saw “a stranger across a crowded room,” feminist allegation that Orwell was incapable of
Eileen Maud O’Shaughnessy, a graduate student creating a credible, well-rounded female character.
in psychology at University College, London. By A few months before the publication of Aspi-
the end of the evening, he had confided to his distra, at the end of January, Orwell had set forth
cohost and landlady, Rosalind Obermeyer, “That’s on a journey, commissioned by Gollancz to write
the sort of girl I’d like to marry.” This he would do a book on unemployment in the industrial north
in June of the following year. Meanwhile, he moved of England. He spent the next two months trav-
into a three-room flat in Kentish Town, which he eling to the cities of Liverpool, Birmingham, and
shared with two young writers, Rayner Heppenstall Manchester, with his longest stay being in the coal
and Michael Sayers. The arrangement lasted only town of Wigan. In the 1920s, most of the mines in
a short while, ending in a brawl between Orwell Wigan had shut down and, along with them, the
and an inebriated Heppenstall. town’s semi-mythical pier, the one appealing aspect
The next eighteen months proved to be decisive of a place that had become a dreary industrial slum.
ones in Orwell’s life. In January 1936, he completed The often reported statement that Orwell received
the manuscript of Aspidistra and then submitted a 500-pound advance from his publisher has been
himself to a list of changes required to avoid libel effectively refuted (Davison, Literary 67–69). That
suits. The book was published in April to disap- he was on a strict budget (possibly self-imposed) is
pointing reviews. As with his two earlier novels, he clear from his “Wigan Pier Diary,” a collection of
seemed to be having trouble with his main char- his notes and comments that illuminate the back-
acter. Gordon Comstock, a would-be poet, has set ground of the book. He spent two months in the
out on a crusade against the money god who rules North visiting the factories, homes, and, on three
modern life. But what begins as a young writer’s occasions, coal mines.
admirable rebellion—throwing over a well-paid In June, Eileen completed her coursework at
position as an advertising copywriter in order to the university and was ready to take on the formi-
pursue his writing career—soon degenerates into a dable task of becoming George Orwell’s wife. The
whiny, adolescent wallowing in the sense of failure, wedding took place on June 9, 1936. Eileen was a
demonstrating that money assumes much greater warm, attractive, intelligent, and sympathetic per-
significance to one who tries to do without it than son, and she really loved George. The 300-year-old
to the average person. What seems to be the inevi- cottage in Wallington, a village in Hertsfordshire,
table conclusion is that the novel is satirizing its into which they moved after the wedding, doubled
protagonist, a notion supported by its jaunty title. as a sort of local general store. In the latter capac-
However, this interpretation flies in the face of the ity, as a source of additional income, it was a dismal
alternative view that it was written in the somber, failure. The minute profit it yielded derived mostly
realistic mode of George Gissing, depicting with from the penny candy sold to local children. But
14 Critical Companion to George Orwell
what the cottage lacked as an income producer, the exchanges between Gordon and Rosemary in
it more than made up for in satisfying Orwell’s Keep the Aspidistra Flying: “There was a merry war
perverse taste for ascetic living. There was no elec- between them. Even as they disputed arm in arm,
tricity, hot water, or indoor plumbing. The roof they pressed their bodies delightedly together. They
leaked in a dozen places, and the outdoor privy was were very happy. . . . Each was to the other a stand-
located some distance from the house. Orwell was ing joke and an object infinitely precious.”
not the easiest or most thoughtful of husbands in During this period in Wallington, Orwell com-
the best of times, and when he inevitably fell ill, pleted the manuscript of The Road to Wigan Pier,
the burden of keeping the place going, including at which he delivered to Gollancz on December 15.
one point cleaning out the backed-up privy, fell to For his ironically employed title, he drew on the
Eileen. famous Kipling poem “The Road to Mandalay,” in
Until recently, Eileen’s reaction to these less- order to contrast the dreary, mining town of Wigan
than-ideal conditions was unknown, but a newly and its nonexistent pier with the imperial splendor
discovered cache of letters she wrote to a close that Kipling’s poem evoked for the English pub-
friend, Norah Myles (1906–94), sheds a sobering lic: “Mandalay,” yesterday’s myth; “Wigan,” today’s
light on the situation. In a letter dated Novem- reality. The book opens with a celebrated descrip-
ber 1936, Eileen apologizes for not having writ- tion of the boarding house/tripe shop in which he
ten sooner. She offers her friend a sardonic stayed for two weeks. This account received the
explanation: highest praise in a letter from an unlikely reader,
the aristocratic, modernist poet Edith Sitwell: “The
I lost my habit of punctual correspondence dur-
horror of the beginning is unsurpassable. He seems
ing the first few weeks of marriage because we
to be doing for the modern world what Engels did
quarreled so continuously and really bitterly
for the world of 1840–50. But with this difference.
that I thought I’d save time & just write one
That Orwell is a born writer” (Quoted in Meyers,
letter to everyone when the murder or sepa-
137). Equally impressive is the suffocatingly pow-
ration had been accomplished. . . . I forgot to
erful account of his trip through an underground
mention that he had his “bronchitis” for three
coal mine from the lift to the coal face, a distance
weeks in July & that it rained for six weeks dur-
of a mile, from which it took him days to recover.
ing the whole of which the kitchen was flooded
The notion that someone with his medical history
& all the food went mouldy in a few hours.
(and six-foot-two-inch frame) would find himself
(Davison, Lost, 64).
anywhere near a coal mine is part of the mystery of
Adding to this grim situation is the news that the the man, but as a writer, at least he could justify it
newlyweds had a visitor for two months, Orwell’s in the light of the artistic result.
bohemian aunt Nellie fresh from Paris. From this Wigan Pier is divided into two sections, the first
letter alone, it is clear that those admirers who being somewhat like the descriptive documentary
referred to Orwell as a “saint” after his death were that Gollancz had in mind. The second, however,
canonizing the wrong member of the family. turned into a problem that had the publisher tearing
Nevertheless, the two appeared to be happy. out what little hair he had left. What had occurred
Orwell’s friend Geoffrey Gorer visited the cou- between the time Orwell left for the North and
ple—his training as an anthropologist doubtless his return was Gollancz’s inauguration of the Left
stood him in good stead in adjusting to the cot- Book Club, a book-of-the-month club appealing
tage—and later recalled that he had never seen largely to socialist and communist readers. Know-
Orwell happier than he was in the first year of ing that he was jeopardizing his chances of having
his marriage (Bowker, 190). One feature of the the book chosen as a selection, Orwell used the sec-
couple’s relationship, a war of words, triggered by ond half of it to focus on two subjects, the English
an outlandish generalization on Orwell’s part—for class system and a critique of English socialism. On
example, “All tailors are fascists”—is replicated in the first topic, he offers a brief autobiography of his
Biography 15
own class consciousness, from his early years, when trousers. The previous Christmas, he had left Eng-
he was warned against playing with the plumber’s land, ostensibly to serve as a correspondent for the
children, to his teenage time at Eton as “an odious Independent Labour Party (ILP). On his way to
little snob,” to his last years at the college, when Spain, he stopped off in Paris, paying a visit to
he joined with his classmates in being “both a snob Henry Miller, whose Tropic of Cancer he had so
and a revolutionary.” In effect, everything about much admired. He was startled when Miller told
him, even his sense of good and evil, is the product him he was a fool to join the fight against fascism
of his “lower-upper-middle-class” background. His out of a sense of duty. A few years later, Orwell
own history—the most shocking example of which would consider Miller’s position at considerable
is the imbued view that the lower classes smell— length in his Inside the Whale.
would suggest that class consciousness seems to Arriving in Barcelona, while the city was still
him to be an ineradicable feature of the English basking in its initial victory over Franco’s forces, he
character, not to say of human nature in general. was immediately caught up in the general euphoria.
These comments, however provocative, were At last he was seeing a genuine socialist society in
not what raised the red flag for Gollancz. That action: “It was the first time I had ever been in a
occurred in the final section of the book, when town where the working class was in the saddle. . . .
Orwell confronts the question of why, in the midst I recognized it immediately as a state of affairs worth
of the depression, when capitalism gives every indi- fighting for.” He encountered the English socialist
cation of being in its death throes, socialism has Jennie Lee on his first day and asked her how he
failed to develop a significant following in England. could join. The next day, he enlisted in the POUM
Orwell’s answer to the question is first to exam- (Partido Obrero de Unificacion Marxista), an
ine the problem not of socialism but of socialists. independent group affiliated with the British ILP.
Typical socialists, largely comfortable, middle-class At this point, Orwell was completely innocent of the
types, are so busy talking to one another that they infighting taking place on the Loyalist side. As the
have never reached out effectively to the work- supply of arms from the Soviet Union increased, so,
ing classes. This is due to the fact that, at heart, too, did the influence of the communists in the con-
they have no intention of giving up their privileges. duct of the war. However, Orwell’s principal concern
Many of them, “cranks” addicted to drinking fruit as he took up his duties on the Aragon front was
juice, wearing sandals, and advocating birth con- that he was missing the real action, which was then
trol, are hopelessly out of touch with “real people.” taking place in the Madrid area. He intended at the
As for socialism itself, it projects an image of a first opportunity to transfer to the International Bri-
soulless, dehumanized, mechanized future of which gades fighting there. In the meantime, Eileen arrived
decent people want no part. Also, it needs to rid in Barcelona to take a secretarial job at the ILP
itself of an association with Russian communism headquarters as an assistant to John McNair. On
if it expects to withstand the growing threat of the verge of leaving England, she wrote to Norah
fascism. With Orwell refusing to accept an abbrevi- Myles, illustrating her ironic wit. She speaks of John
ated text as a Left Book selection, Gollancz finally McNair as being very kind but “having an unfortu-
agreed to publish the book both in a regular trade nate telephone voice and a quite calamitous prose
version and as a selection for the club. He reserved style.” She indicates that George was currently on
the right however, to write a preface to the book the Aragon Front, where the Loyalists “ought to be
club version, expressing his disagreement with attacking,” and hoping “that that is a sufficient safe-
Orwell’s arguments. guard against their doing so” (Davison, Lost, 68). She
But by the time the book was published, in soon won over everyone who came in contact with
March 1937, Gollancz’s uncontrollable author had her, particularly Georges Kopp, a Belgian soldier of
other things on his mind. Stationed on the Ara- fortune who was Orwell’s battalion commander. At
gon front as a Loyalist soldier in the Spanish civil one point, she convinced Kopp to drive her to the
war, he was busy combating the lice invading his front to visit her husband. During the visit, there
16 Critical Companion to George Orwell
Eileen O’Shaughnessy Blair’s visit to the Aragon front, March 1937. Orwell is standing slightly behind and to her left. The
kneeling rifleman wearing a beret is American Harry Milton. (Orwell Archive, UCL Library Services, Special Collections)
was a slight skirmish, which she described in a let- When, after four months on the line, Orwell’s
ter to Orwell’s agent, Leonard Moore: “The Fascists company was granted leave back to Barcelona,
threw in a small bombardment and quite a lot of they found themselves enmeshed in street fighting
machine gun fire . . . so it was quite an interesting with the newly reconstituted national police. As a
visit—indeed I never enjoyed anything more.” At result, Orwell abandoned his attempt to transfer
one point, Eileen’s relationship with Kopp took an to the International Brigades and, not surprisingly,
amorous turn, which she confessed to in another opted to remain with the underdogs: “When I see
letter to Myles, written on New Year’s Day 1938, an actual flesh and blood worker in conflict with
but she makes it clear that her husband is the love his natural enemy, the policeman, I do not have
of her life. to ask which side I am on.” The skirmishing in
Eileen’s high spirits following her visit to the the streets of Barcelona in May was represented
front did not last long. When Sir Richard Rees in the European left-wing press as an uprising by
visited her in Barcelona a month later he noticed irresponsible POUMists and others. The truth,
that “she seemed absentminded, preoccupied and later confirmed by documents from Soviet archives,
dazed. . . . When she began talking about the risk, show that the fighting was part of a carefully cal-
for me, of being seen in the street with her . . . culated effort on the part of Moscow to eliminate
I realized afterwards, she was the first person in the POUM and other dissidents. Shortly after his
whom I had witnessed the effects of living under a return to the front, while talking to an American
political terror” (Rees, 139). The Moscow-dictated comrade, Harry Milton, Orwell was shot in the
suppression of the POUM had begun. throat by a sniper, the bullet miraculously passing
Biography 17
through, perilously close to the carotid artery, with- case of the anonymous TLS critic, misrepresented
out causing permanent damage, although partially it: “Mr. Orwell . . . concludes by recording his hope
paralyzing his vocal chords and his right arm. Even- that all the foreigners will be driven out of Spain”
tually, both the voice and the arm regained their (Meyers, Critical, 119). Orwell was convinced that
near-normal functions. the poor sales and scanty reviews were part of a
Meanwhile, in Barcelona, the anti-POUM plot by Gollancz and his communist friends to sup-
activity had intensified. A communist spy, David press its message. If so, the plot was successful:
Crook, a young Englishman, had infiltrated the The book sold only 500 copies. The proper hom-
ILP office, carefully compiling dossiers on McNair, age to Homage would have to wait for the first
Kopp, and “Eric and Eileen Blair,” which were duti- American edition (1952), in which the introduc-
fully transmitted to the KGB archives in Moscow. tory essay by Lionel Trilling not only paid respect
After a brief recuperation in a local sanitorium, to a work now regarded as among Orwell’s fin-
Orwell, having been discharged from the army, est but also established an image of the author as
returned to Barcelona, where Eileen met him in “a virtuous man,” contributing significantly to the
the lobby of her hotel and whispered in his ear, “Orwell Myth” in the years to come (Rodden, Poli-
“Get out.” They were in imminent danger. Earlier tics, 73–82).
that day, the police had invaded her room while One month before the publication of Homage,
she was still in bed and confiscated all their papers Orwell was hospitalized with a tubercular lesion
and personal items. Fortunately, they did not find (later confirmed as an early stage of tuberculosis) in
their passports and checkbooks, which were hid- his lungs and spent the next six months recuperat-
den under the mattress she was lying on. He spent ing in a sanitorium in Kent, his progress monitored
the next few days hiding out while they waited for
travel documents from the British consulate. Mean-
while, Kopp had been arrested, and Bob Smillie,
a particularly admirable young comrade, had died
while in police custody. After a heroic attempt to
aid the imprisoned Kopp, the couple crossed the
border into France. Shortly thereafter, they were
indicted for treason in absentia by the communist-
controlled Spanish authorities.
Once Orwell was back in England, his anger
at the misrepresentation of events in the English
press intensified when his article “Eye-Witness in
Barcelona” was rejected by Kingsley Martin, editor
of the highly regarded left-wing journal New States-
man and Nation, on the grounds that its revela-
tions of communist perfidy would undermine the
antifascist cause. Orwell met the same fate with
Gollancz after proposing a book on the subject. He
was later able to place the book, memorably titled
Homage to Catalonia, with the firm of Secker
& Warburg, who published it in April 1938. Sales
were disappointing. In the words of the publisher,
Fredric Warburg, Homage “caused barely a ripple
on the political pond. It was ignored or hectored
into failure.” There were some positive reviews, but George Orwell’s identity card photo, September 1938
many of the major reviewers ignored, or, as in the (Orwell Archive, UCL Library Services, Special Collections)
18 Critical Companion to George Orwell
by Eileen’s brother, Dr. Laurence O’Shaughnessy. which was soon overwhelmed by the outbreak of
(That Eileen was the sister of a prominent chest war on September 1. Later critics (not to men-
surgeon was another of the many reasons to con- tion Orwell himself) have looked at Coming Up
sider their marriage the best thing that ever hap- for Air as the completion of an important phase of
pened to him.) Convalescing under orders not to Orwell’s career, representing his efforts to produce
work, he nevertheless began outlining a new novel. a first-rate traditional, realist novel. Of the four
While in the hospital, he also joined the ILP, the novels he produced in this period, most critics see
first and only time he joined a political party, adopt- the first and last, Burmese Days and Coming Up, as
ing for a while the party’s position that a war with the most successful, largely because of the relative
Germany would be, like World War I, just another depth or appeal of the main characters, John Flory
“imperialist war.” and George Bowling. Interestingly enough, the two
In September 1938, in the mistaken belief that figures are generic opposites: Flory is tragic, and
the climate would be good for his lungs, he and Bowling, comic. But they share with their author
Eileen sailed to Marrakech in French Morocco, a vision of a rotten society, the one inherently so,
arriving on the eve of the signing of the Munich resting as it does on the profound injustice of colo-
Pact. The trip was financed by an anonymous gift nialism; the other acquiring rottenness, having
of 300 pounds. The donor proved to be the novel- fallen from the Eden that was pre-1914 England.
ist L. H. Myers, an admirer of Orwell’s work who The myth of the Edwardian past invoked in Com-
had visited him in the hospital. In Morocco, he ing Up was to assume a significant role in Orwell’s
kept a wary eye on the movement toward war in attempted synthesis of idyllic past and revolution-
Europe and on the fate of his friends in Spain, ary present.
where the war had drawn to an end with Franco’s These four novels have enjoyed little popular or
forces victorious. He also kept his eye on the local critical success, although many feel that they are
female population. According to the memoir of his better than Orwell thought they were, referring to
friend Tosco Fyvel, “He said that he found him- himself as “not a novelist at all, but a kind of pam-
self increasingly attracted by young Arab girls and phleteer.” It is true that he lacked the storyteller’s
the moment came when he told Eileen he had to gift of one of his favorite authors, W. Somerset
have one of these girls, on just one occasion. Eileen Maugham, or the ability to get inside the skin of an
agreed and he had his Arab girl.” Fyvel adds, “True average man, as James Joyce did in creating Leopold
or false. It does not matter” (Fyvel, 109). Of course, Bloom, or the depth and power of D. H. Lawrence,
there is a possibility that he was merely teasing but his four 1930s novels represent a kind of collec-
Fyvel, an ardent Zionist. tive work in progress. He is clearly learning as he
He began work on his new novel Coming Up for goes, experimenting, as the critic Lynette Hunter
Air, which he had completed by the time of their argues, with narrative techniques that might enable
return to England, in April 1939. Two months him and his readers to expand the limited confines
later, the book was published by Gollancz. Shortly of the naturalist novel (Hunter, Search). The critic
after, his father, Richard Blair, died at the age of and novelist David Lodge puts it another way,
82. Though the two were never close, their rela- maintaining that buried within Coming Up for Air is
tionship had improved as Orwell’s reputation grew. a “mythopoeic, metaphorical level,” hinted at, if not
In a letter to Leonard Moore, Orwell described his fully realized, in the chapter devoted to a mysteri-
end: “. . . his last moment of consciousness was ous, hidden pond. (Lodge, 192).
hearing that [favorable] review in the Sunday Times As for the three nonfiction books of the 1930s,
[of Coming Up for Air] . . . my sister took it in and Down and Out, The Road to Wigan Pier, and Homage
read it to him, and a little later he lost conscious- to Catalonia, they represent a progression in Orwell’s
ness for the last time” (CW, II, 365). political thought. Down and Out is the preparatory
Coming Up for Air had a brief flurry of popu- work, identifying poverty as an injustice that seems
lar as well as critical success, the importance of an inevitable consequence of the capitalist system
Biography 19
but never zeroing in on a possible political solution. highlighted by the title piece, dealing with the
With The Road to Wigan Pier, socialism is clearly on work of Henry Miller, whom Orwell compared to
his radar screen, but before he can commit to it, he the biblical Jonah. Like Jonah, Miller had chosen
feels duty bound not to shoot it down but to fire a to stay inside the whale—that is, he sealed him-
few warning shots to bring socialists to their senses. self off from active involvement in world affairs.
His case against the “sandal-wearing vegetarians” Given his own social and political commitments,
is that they were essentially middle class with the we might expect Orwell to condemn Miller’s posi-
no real understanding of the working class. But his tion, but in fact he expresses a deep sympathy
doubts about a socialist society dissolved in the first with its honesty and lack of pretense. He recog-
few days in Barcelona, where he saw the working nized that there is a type of writer who can be true
class in the driver’s seat for a brief period. Orwell’s to his work only by remaining inside the whale.
dream had become a reality, only to be destroyed However, in a later (1946) look at Miller’s work
by the force that was to become the major target of after Tropic of Cancer, Orwell criticizes Miller’s
his work for the rest of his life: Soviet Communism. “remaining passive in the face of war, revolution,
Homage to Catalonia, his nonfiction masterpiece, is fascism or anything else” while taking care “to
the eloquent, powerful portrait of that betrayal. stay inside bourgeois democratic society, making
With the world on the brink of war, the Hit- use of its protection while disclaiming any respon-
ler-Stalin Pact in August 1939 caused Orwell to sibility for it.”
abandon his ILP pacifist stance. In what seems like The collection also included his essay on
an overreaction on his part, he became a particu- Charles Dickens, his most extended foray into
larly severe critic of Pacifism, even falling into the literary criticism, and “Boys’ Weeklies,” a path-
Marxist jargon he despised, calling it “objectively breaking essay in what became the field of cultural
fascist.” He tried to enlist in the army but was studies. He also began writing Theater Reviews
rejected on health grounds. Eventually, he became and Film Reviews for Time & Tide magazine,
a sergeant in “Dad’s Army,” the Home Guard, assignments that he essentially “mailed in.”
whose duties he regarded with the utmost serious- February 1941 saw the publication of an attempt
ness, viewing the guard as the possible precursor to define the English national character and tie it
of a People’s Army. In May 1940, he moved into to the future of socialism. Written when the Battle
London, subordinating his preference for coun- of Britain and the Blitz were in full force, The Lion
try life not in spite of but because of the Blitz. and the Unicorn, Socialism and the English
As Cyril Connolly put it, “He felt enormously at Genius (1941) is an impressionistic pamphlet
home in the Blitz, among the bombs, the bravery, divided into two sections. The first part, “England
the rubble, the shortages, the homeless, the signs Your England,” celebrates the distinctive features
of rising revolutionary temper” (283). Here, once of English life. Orwell’s opening line (“As I write
again, Eileen matched, if not outdid, him. At their highly civilized human beings are flying overhead,
first London address, they rented a flat on the top, trying to kill me”) typified the wry humor mixed
the most dangerous, floor. Her friend Lydia Jack- with fear with which Londoners responded to the
son recalled that when the sirens went off, “Eileen bombings. His central proposition—the war could
would put out the lights . . . open the windows and not be won unless a socialist government came to
watch the happenings in the street. I don’t think power—he would later acknowledge to be mis-
she ever used the air raid shelter herself.” However, taken, while applauding the wartime leadership of
Eileen’s high spirits were permanently shattered by Winston Churchill. This faulty prediction may
the news that her brilliant, much-beloved brother have been the reason Orwell later included The
Laurence had been killed on the beach at Dunkirk Lion and the Unicorn among those of his works that
while attending the wounded. he did not want reprinted. One of Eileen’s recently
The year 1940 saw the publication of Inside discovered letters contains an ironic summary of
the Whale, Orwell’s first collection of essays, the pamphlet’s message: “Explaining how to be
20 Critical Companion to George Orwell
socialist though Tory” (Davison, Lost, 80). As Cyril hands much longer. This is a very serious
Connolly would put in a 1945 review of Animal piece of news, and even more serious for Asia
Farm, “Mr. Orwell is a revolutionary in love with than for the West. One American expert has
1910.” already estimated that the loss of Singapore will
In March, he published the first of fifteen “Letters lengthen the war by about a year.
from London” in Partisan Review, the respected . . . This is not an encouraging picture, and
literary and political journal, published by the group we have deliberately put it at its worst, in
that came to be known as the New York Intellectu- order to get a realistic and unvarnished view
als. The letters brought him to the attention of a of the situation. . . . With the loss of Singa-
new audience that would serve him well in the years pore, India becomes for the time being the
ahead. Among the Partisan Review circle were three centre of the war, one might say, the centre of
people who would play crucial roles in the recep- the world.
tion of Orwell’s work in America: Irving Howe,
Dwight MacDonald and Lionel Trilling. The second is from November 28, 1942, shortly
A few months later, he began working in the after the Soviet army had successfully surrounded
Indian Section of the BBC’s Eastern Service. Over the German Sixth Army at Stalingrad, thereby all
the next two years he would do an astonishing but guaranteeing a Soviet victory and marking a
amount of work, writing, producing, and often read- turning point in the war:
ing reports and commentaries on the war for audi-
Well, now that almost certainly the Germans
ences in India and other areas of Southeast Asia.
will be forced to retreat from Stalingrad even
He also produced a number of cultural programs,
that claim can’t be made any longer. The Ger-
drawing on the talents of figures such as T. S. Eliot,
man propagandists, therefore, will be in the
and writing the first chapter of a story for the radio
unenviable position of having to admit that
completed by four other authors. Although the
commentaries and reports were subject to wartime their military commanders have poured out
censorship and designed to present the Allies in lives and material on an enormous scale for
the best light they were a version of propaganda an objective which finally wasn’t achieved. The
that Orwell accepted with relative good grace. (See effects even on German morale must be bad,
BBC writings.) This writing was his contribution and on Germany’s so called allies they may
to a war effort in which his innate patriotism blos- be disastrous. The war has already lost most
somed. Orwell had always been an Anglo-centric of its meaning from the Italian point of view,
writer, but in the war years he became a patriot. and it will not make the Italians any happier to
The sheer volume of work he produced for the know that tens of thousands of their sons are
BBC is impressive but even more so is the quality being frozen in Russia for absolutely nothing,
of most of that work, which included commission- at the same time as their African empire is slip-
ing, editing, revising, and maneuvering through the ping away from them and their cities are being
thickets of wartime censorship a battalion of fight- bombed to pieces.
ers in the propaganda war against the Nazi and Jap-
He confined his griping to his private diary: “But
anese misinformation machines. Never descending
even when one manages to get something fairly
to their levels of lying, he would put the case in
good on the air, one is weighed down by the knowl-
clear windowpane prose, whether the news was bad
edge that hardly anybody is listening.” Neverthe-
or good. Here for example are excerpts from two of
less, he took pleasure in the literary programs he
his commentaries—the first for February 14, 1942,
developed, particularly “Voice,” in which a group
on the imminent fall of Singapore:
of poets would each read a poem, followed by a
. . . We must face the fact that it is unlikely panel discussion of one of the poems. The series
that Singapore can be kept out of Japanese ran for six episodes, each one with its own theme.
Biography 21
Eliot participated in one of the episodes, the two identified Koestler’s basic position as “revolutions
men enjoying an amiable but guarded (at least on always go wrong,” a point he had illustrated in his
Eliot’s part) relationship. Despite the political and not-yet-published Animal Farm.
social chasm between them, they respected each In this period, his roving eye had fixed on Sally
other. Orwell was an admirer of Eliot’s earlier work, McEwen, his secretary at Tribune. Eileen became
“The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” and The Waste aware of their affair and was extremely upset. Prior
Land, but less enthusiastic about the later religious to that time, he had assumed that they had an open
work, such as The Four Quartets. Even Eliot’s famous marriage as far as sexual affairs were concerned.
rejection of Animal Farm was qualified by his descrip- In any case, in May 1944, perhaps in an effort to
tion of it as “a distinguished piece of writing.” strengthen a marriage that was threatened, he and
In March of 1943, Orwell’s mother, Ida, died of Eileen adopted a newborn child, christened Rich-
a heart attack, but the death certificate also listed ard Horatio Blair. The following month, while they
two secondary causes, suggesting a hereditary ele- were absent, their apartment was flattened by a
ment in Orwell’s condition—acute bronchitis and “buzz bomb.” Prematurely, as it turned out, he had
emphysema. (Shelden, 362). In November, Orwell published a poem in Tribune earlier that year, titled
left the BBC to become literary editor and regular “Memories of the Blitz.” The couple and their new
columnist at Tribune, an independent leftist jour- baby settled down in a flat in Canonbury Square in
nal edited by Aneurin Bevan, the future minister London’s Islington district, Eileen leaving her job
of health in the first postwar Labour government. at the food ministry to take care of Richard full-
Orwell’s weekly column was titled “As I Please,” time. The baby brought her back from the prolonged
short, informal essays on any subject that caught depression she had suffered with her brother’s death.
his fancy. Unerringly, he would bring an original In the same month, October, Orwell published
point of view to his topic, couched in a relaxed, “Raffles and Miss Blandish” in Horizon. The essay
informal style. More often than not, the point of contrasted two works of popular crime fiction, the
view he adopted would be provocative, inviting earlier presenting a turn-of-the-century sophisti-
a large number of indignant replies from readers. cated burglar and the later, an American-influenced
Here is a sample from his column for February 11, best seller that featured violence and sadistic behav-
1944: “There are two journalistic activities that will ior. This essay, along with two earlier Horizon essays,
always bring you a come-back. One is to attack the “The Art of Donald Mcgill” and “Boys Week-
Catholics and the other is to defend the Jews” (CW, lies,” represented Orwell’s incursion into—some
16, 91). In addition to his Tribune duties and his let- say “discovery of”—the field of popular culture,
ters to Partisan Review, he also signed on as a regular a combined sociological/literary analysis of various
book reviewer for the Manchester Evening News. forms of popular entertainment. Unlike later studies
As if this were not enough, between November in this field, however, his analyses tended to dispar-
1943 and February 1944 he also completed a little age contemporary versions in favor of his “golden
“fairy story” he called Animal Farm. In composing age” of popular culture, the years of his childhood.
it, he abandoned his lone-wolf approach to writ- For example, “Raffles and Miss Blandish” looks at
ing and began sharing the work in progress with the gratuitous violence in the 1940s shocker No
Eileen. At the end of each day, he would read a Orchids for Miss Blandish as a disturbing develop-
portion of it to her for her reaction, often taking ment in English popular culture. In addition to this
her responses as clues to revising or expanding the work, as Peter Davison points out, in the thirteen
work. Having completed the manuscript, he was months from November 1943 to December 1944
to spend the better part of a year trying to find a Orwell reviewed 86 books (CW 16, xvi).
publisher on either side of the Atlantic. At the Early in 1945, with the war in Europe moving
same time, he produced an essay on an important toward its end, he was able to go abroad as a war
contemporary, Arthur Koestler, in which he correspondent for the Manchester Evening News
22 Critical Companion to George Orwell
and The Observer. While he was there, he received these very symptoms made having sex very dif-
notice of Eileen’s death on March 29, 1945. She ficult, Orwell had several affairs during the last
was to undergo surgery (a hysterectomy) but had years of the war. The paperweight that Win-
suffered heart failure when the anesthesia was ston treasures . . . in which a small piece of pink
applied. Characteristically, she had held off telling crimpled coral is embedded, may well memorial-
him about the operation until a few days before- ize Orwell’s feelings about this disaster. . . . The
hand. Her last letters reveal her lovely, self-sacrific- prefix of O’Brien’s name as a vehicle of guilt
ing character: links it with Orwell’s wife O’Shaughnessy . . .”
(Porter, 70).
I rather wish I’d talked it over with you before
you went. I knew I had a “growth.” But I wanted Porter overstates the case in asserting that
you to go away peacefully anyway, and I did Orwell “ignored” his wife’s symptoms. If anything,
not want to see Harvey Evers [her physician] the evidence indicates that she concealed her
before the adoption was through in case it was condition from him. As for the paperweight and
cancer. I thought it just possible that the judge O’Brien’s name, Porter’s conjectures join a long
might make some enquiry about our health as line of ingenious interpretations of those two fea-
we’re old for parenthood and anyway it would tures of the novel.
have been an uneasy sort of thing to be produc- Orwell traveled through France, Germany, and
ing oneself as an ideal parent a fortnight after Austria until after the German surrender. What
being told that one couldn’t live more than six he saw, particularly the postwar divisions of Berlin
months or something (CW XVII, 97). and Vienna into four “watertight” zones, left him
with the conviction that a cold war was inevitable.
And her unfailing high spirits:
(It is not certain that he was the first to use the
Dearest I’m just going to have the operation, phrase, but he was certainly among the first.) Back
already enema’d, injected (with morphia in in England, he was astonished, as he confessed in a
the right arm which is a nuisance), cleaned & Partisan Review letter (Summer 1945) to find that
packed up like a precious image in cotton wool “we could have gone through nearly six years of
& bandages. When it’s over I’ll add a note to war without arriving at either socialism or fascism
this & it can get off quickly. Judging by my fel- and with our civil liberties almost intact.” (This
low patients it will be a short note. They’ve all was written a few weeks before the 1945 election of
had their operations. Annoying-I shall never the Labour Party government.)
have a chance to feel superior (CW 17, 112). Two days after the Japanese surrender on
August 15, Secker & Warburg published Animal
He came home for the funeral, returning to
Farm. The book had been rejected by five English
Europe two weeks later, in an effort to shake off
publishers, notably T. S. Eliot’s firm, Faber and
the depression that had set in. No doubt a part
Faber, and some 15 in the USA. (The most memo-
of that depression was a sense of guilt. Like many
rable refusal came from Dial in America, assert-
people who are hard on themselves, he was hard
ing that “it was impossible to sell animal stories
on those close to him as well. He loved Eileen, but
in the USA.”) The initial run was 4,500 copies,
he had not been the best husband. One expres-
soon to be dwarfed by the Book of the Month
sion of that guilt, according to the psychoanalytic
Club selection’s 540,000. Within five years, the
critic Laurence Porter, may be Winston’s “guilt
book would be translated into 18 languages, the
and exaggerated sense of responsibility” in Nineteen
most significant of which from Orwell’s point of
Eighty-Four:
view was Ukrainian, in an edition intended to be
“He ignored his wife’s symptoms of uterine can- smuggled into that Soviet province. As a result,
cer . . . and seems to have opposed her having a he wrote a special introduction to that edition.
hysterectomy. Adding insult to injury, because (See Animal Farm: Prefaces.) Earlier in the year,
Biography 23
Orwell had met Ernest Hemingway in Paris and “written in a prose so plain and spare, so admira-
asked to borrow a pistol for protection against bly proportioned to its purpose, that Animal Farm
Soviet agents, for whom he suspected he was a seems very creditable if we compare it to Voltaire
target (Meyers, 234). It is not at all certain that he and Swift” (205); even T. S. Eliot, in his famous
was still a Soviet target, but had they known about rejection of the manuscript, allowed “. . . that it
Animal Farm, they doubtless would have had him is a distinguished piece of writing, that the fable
in their sights. A work that did incalculable dam- is very skillfully handled and that the narrative
age to the Soviet image worldwide, Animal Farm keeps one’s interest on its own plane—and that is
was soon enlisted as a powerful weapon in the cold something very few authors have achieved since
war. One striking example: In 1955, the CIA pro- Gulliver” (Crick, 315). (It is stunning to realize
vided the financial backing for an animated film that Eliot could write such a sentence in a letter of
production of the book, with the ending altered rejection.) Another distinguished critic, his BBC
to include a successful counterrevolution against colleague William Empson described its “beauti-
Napoleon’s regime (Shaw, 159). For Orwell, the fully limpid prose style,” but he also issued a warn-
success was dimmed by the fact that while the ing that “you must expect to be ‘misunderstood’ on
critics applauded it, nobody said that the writing a large scale about this book” (Bowker, 335–336).
was beautiful. Actually that was not true. Cyril Empson seems to be referring to the interpretation
Connolly called it “deliciously written, with some- of the book not merely as anti-Stalinist but anti-
thing of the feeling, the penetration and the verbal revolutionary in general. As Jeffrey Meyers puts
economy of Orwell’s master, Swift” (Meyers, Crti- it, “Once in power, the revolutionary becomes as
cal, 201); Edmund Wilson described it as being tyrannical as his oppressor” (Meyers, Guide, 145).
Barnhill, Orwell’s home on the island of Jura in the Hebrides, located off the coast of northern Scotland (Orwell
Archive, UCL Library Services, Special Collections)
24 Critical Companion to George Orwell
Animal Farm would turn out to be the pur- tricity, or telephone. For three months of summer,
est example of his ultimate goal as a writer, as he it was bearable, but after that, the wind, rain, and
expressed it in “Why I Write,”: “to make political cold made it the last place someone with Orwell’s
writing into an art.” In 1946, he published “Why I lungs should be living. In her fierce, mean-spirited,
Write,” in which he outlines his writing efforts from but perceptive analysis of Orwell, Mary McCarthy
the age of four, citing as the most significant event cast a cold eye on his asceticism, suggesting some
the Spanish civil war. “Every line of serious work life-denying pathology at its core. One answer to
I have written since 1936 has been written against McCarthy’s charge lies in the fact that he was not
totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I a hermit. He encouraged visitors. The hardships of
understand it.” travel (and of living there, once you had arrived)
The end of 1945 saw him writing one of his did not prevent a goodly number of people from
most influential essays, “Politics and the English making the trip. And it suited him perfectly. He
Language,” published in Horizon (April 1946), in was joined there by his sister Avril, who became
which he lays down a fundamental principle: “If housekeeper and guardian of Richard after success-
thought corrupts language, language can also cor- fully routing Susan Watson, who had played that
rupt thought.” As for 1946, the title of volume role in London. After three months on the island,
18 in Peter Davison’s Complete Works tells it all: the family—Orwell, Avril, and Richard—returned
“Smothered by Journalism.” In the course of the to London.
year he produced a number of major essays, in Ever since Eileen’s death, he had had to come
addition to “Why I Write” and “Politics and the to grips with a dual problem—his own mortality
English Language;” his study of his master, Jona- and the welfare of his son. He figured he would be
than Swift; “The Decline of the English Murder,” lucky to have 10 more years, given the state of his
another foray into popular culture; the pamphlet lungs, his addiction to the particularly foul tobacco
James Burnham and the Managerial Revolution, a in his roll-your-own cigarettes, and his affinity for
detailed critique of a fashionable postwar theory damp, cold, leaky places in which to live. He began
(see Burnham, James); two delightful short pieces, looking for a young, preferably attractive, intelli-
“A Nice Cup of Tea” and “The Moon under gent woman who might serve as a suitable com-
Water”; two BBC radio plays, “The Voyage of panion for him and as a stepmother for Richard. To
the Beagle” and a version of “Red Riding Hood,” that end, he proposed to several different women.
the latter for a children’s program; and a Partisan One was Celia Kirwan, a beautiful, accomplished
Review “letter” that required extensive subsequent woman whose twin sister was married to Arthur
correspondence. By the summer of that year, he Koestler. Koestler revered Orwell and begged his
had had enough of journalism. sister-in-law to accept the proposal, but she was not
Delighted by the sales of Animal Farm but in love with or even physically attracted to Orwell.
appalled by the fact that he was becoming a celeb- Another prospect was his downstairs neighbor at
rity, he looked for a retreat where he could con- Canonbury Square, Anne Popham, to whom he
tinue work on a new book he had in mind and wrote an extraordinary proposal letter: “What I am
provide Richard a taste of country life. To that really asking you is whether you would like to be
end, he moved to the remote island of Jura, in the a widow of a literary man. If things remain more
Hebrides, off the coast of northern Scotland. If the or less as they are there is a certain amount of fun
island was remote, Orwell’s home, Barnhill, was in this, as you would probably get royalties coming
even more so. Once having arrived on Jura, no in and you might find it interesting to edit unpub-
small feat in itself, a visitor would have to hire a car lished stuff. . . .” (CW, 18, 248–249).
and drive to the village of Ardlussa. The final seven The years 1947 and 1948 were devoted to the
miles of the trip would be on foot, carrying what- composition of a book tentatively titled “The Last
ever luggage he or she had, on a broken path. The Man in Europe,” which would eventually evolve
house itself was large, but it had no hot water, elec- into Nineteen Eighty-Four. Unfortunately, a good
Biography 25
deal of this period would find Orwell in an ongoing, Were the Joys.” Orwell had begun a version of this
steadily losing battle against ill health. After spend- essay, probably as early as 1938, the year of the
ing winter 1946 in London, he returned to Barnhill publication of Cyril Connolly’s Enemies of Promise,
the following April. The winter had been one of which contained a bittersweet memoir of St Cypri-
the worst in years, resulting in a serious shortage an’s, too sweet for Orwell’s taste. However, he real-
of coal. The lack of heat took an additional toll on ized that his account of the school could never be
his lungs. Once at Barnhill, he settled into work on printed as long as the principal figures, Lewis and
the new book, finishing the first draft by the end Cecily Vaughan Wilkes, were alive. The essay was
of 1947. The summer had been sunny and dry. He not published until 1952; even then it appeared
had a number of visitors, including at one point in the American Partisan Review, presumably still
his nephew, Henry Dakin and two nieces, Jane too hot to handle for a British publisher, given the
and Lucy, the children of his sister Marjorie. Along prevailing libel laws.
with Avril and Richard, they sailed in Orwell’s boat In July, he returned to Barnhill, where he
around the northern tip of the island. On their began working again, revising the first draft of his
return, Orwell misread the tide schedule and, as a novel. It was November by the time the revision
consequence, their boat was caught up in currents was completed but by then the manuscript had
from one of the whirlpools in the area. They man- to be completely retyped. Having no success in
aged to get ashore onto a little island, “just rocks securing a typist who would come to Barnhill, he
covered with sea birds,” from which they were res- set about retyping it himself, a task that left him
cued a few hours later by a fishing boat. He, his exhausted. His publisher, Warburg, later confessed,
son, two nieces, and a nephew had come very close “This failure on my part still haunts me.” Well,
to being drowned. In a letter to Brenda Salkeld, it might, considering the stakes. Warburg should
Orwell concludes his description of the adventure have made a greater effort to send a typist to Barn-
with a typically stiff-upper-lip, Etonian understate- hill. In December, having completed the typing,
ment: “Our boat luckily wasn’t damaged, apart Orwell suffered a relapse, again spitting up blood.
from the loss of the engine, but I’m trying to get This time he was removed to a sanatorium in the
hold of a bigger one as these trips are really a bit too Cotswolds, where doctors experimented with new
unsafe in a little rowing boat” (CW, 19, 196). drugs, including streptomycin, but without positive
Happily ensconced on Jura, Orwell intended results. Strict bed rest was ordered; anything that
to stay through the winter, but in November, he resembled work, proscribed.
began spitting up blood, requiring his removal to June saw the publication of the new novel, Orwell
the Scottish mainland, at Hairmyres Hospital, near having agreed upon Nineteen Eighty-Four as the title.
Glasgow. There he was diagnosed for the first time The book was published in the United States by
with a disease, long hinted at in his case, tuber- Harcourt, Brace, but for a special edition of their
culosis. One promising possibility was a new drug own, the Book of the Month Club wanted permis-
from the United States, streptomycin. The prob- sion to delete two sections: Emmanuel Goldstein’s
lem was that the drug had yet to be approved by “Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectiv-
British authorities. At this point Orwell’s friend ism” and the appendix on Newspeak. Orwell held
David Astor stepped in to help, using his wealth his ground, refusing to agree to the cuts. Eventually
to pay for the expensive new drug and his influ- the club gave in, resulting in the sale of more than
ence to bring the case to the attention of the new 190,000 copies of the book club edition in the first
Labor Minister of Health, Aneurin Bevan, who had year alone. As usual his own worst critic, he wrote
been Orwell’s boss at Tribune. The drug seemed to to Julian Symons, “My new book is a Utopia in the
work, its powerful side effects nothwithstanding, form of a novel. I ballsed it up rather, partly owing to
including hair loss and skin rashes, but his lungs being so ill when I was writing it. . . .” The review-
improved. While still in the hospital, he completed ers did not agree. The praise came from critics of
the passionate autobiographical essay “Such, Such the most discriminating literary temperament: V. S.
26 Critical Companion to George Orwell
Pritchett in the New Statesman and Nation, who them, invite interpretations beyond the author’s
ranked the author with Swift; Lionel Trilling in the intention. But the academic world was only a small,
New Yorker, who characterized it as a “momentous if important, part of the book’s phenomenally wide
book,” dealing with the “mystique of power.” readership. The point was that Orwell had probably
One feature of the novel that raised—and made the mistake of assuming that he was address-
continues to raise—a serious question about the ing an inside-the-family group, such as the read-
author’s intention relates to his identification of ers of his Tribune column. These socialist readers
the ruling party in Oceania as Ingsoc. When Fred- would understand that as V. S. Pritchett’s obituary
ric Warburg first read the novel, he wrote a detailed put it, “. . . in politics [Orwell] was more likely to
internal memorandum to this staff. He included chasten his own side than the enemy.” But in fact
among his observations the opinion that the choice he did see the threat of totalitarianism, latent as
of Ingsoc constituted “an attack on socialism and much in a socialist government as in a fascist one.
socialists generally . . .” and that the book is “worth How could he not, looking at the example of the
a cool million votes for the Conservative party.” Soviet Union? As it turned out, of course, it was
Thus Orwell’s publisher was the first of many read- the countries behind the iron curtain that came
ers to see political possibilities inherent in the novel closest to the world of Nineteen Eighty-Four, all of
that deviated widely from his intention. As soon as which ultimately added to the novel’s appeal to
Orwell heard of this reading, he issued a disclaimer, partisans on the right. That being said, on Orwell’s
and then did so more than once. In a letter to a part, the Ingsoc name was, as Bernard Crick put it,
United Auto Workers official, he made his inten- “at best incautious, at worst, foolish” (397).
tion clear: Meanwhile, as his health worsened, a letter
arrived that momentarily revived his spirits. It
My recent novel is NOT intended as an attack
came from Jacintha Buddicom, breaking a nearly
on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of
30-year silence. Orwell responded with two let-
which I am a supporter) but a show up of the
ters, expressing the hope of renewing their friend-
perversions to which a centralized economy is
ship. Jacintha never responded, possibly because
liable and which have already been partly real-
she may have feared his asking her to become the
ized in Communism and Fascism (Crick, 398).
mother of Richard. At one point, after describing
But as it happened, in 1946, two New Critics, the boy, he asks, “Are you fond of children? I think
William Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley, had intro- you must be.”
duced the idea of the “intentional fallacy,” in which While he was at the sanatorium, he had a
an author’s conscious intention was relegated to steady stream of visitors. One of these was Celia
second place behind the text itself as the most reli- Kirwan, whose earlier rejection of his marriage
able guide to its meaning. It was one of those pro- proposal had not interfered with their friendship.
nouncements that gained immediate attention and During one of her visits, she wondered whether
prestige in academic circles, at least in the United he would be interested in writing something for
States. Of course, those who insisted on reading the agency where she was working, the Informa-
Orwell’s novel as an attack on English socialism tion Research Department of the British Foreign
might well have been guilty of the obverse of the Office. He replied that he was too ill to tackle any
“intentional fallacy,” what the same authors dubbed new writing assignments, but he offered to suggest
the “affective fallacy,” determining the meaning of names of some anticommunist writers. A short
a text from “its results in the minds of its audience.” while later he wrote to her saying that he had
Thus a New Critic might pronounce a pox on both a list of names of people he considered “crypto-
approaches in favor of a formalist reading. William communists, fellow travelers or inclined that way
Empson had warned Orwell of this possibility in & should not be trusted as propagandists.” The
connection with Animal Farm, when he suggested list, which he subsequently submitted, had been
that certain literary forms, the fable being one of compiled with Sir Richard Rees as a kind of game
Biography 27
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookname.com