Happy Leader Biofouling Management Plan
Happy Leader Biofouling Management Plan
ADD: No. 275, LACH TRAY STREET, DANG GIANG WARD, NGO QUYEN DISTRICT, HAI
PHONG CITY, VIET NAM
Mobile: +84901599212
Email: [email protected]
Owner/Operator/Management Information
Company: HK LINE CO.,LTD
Address: 275A Lach Tray Stree, Dang Giang Ward , Hai Phong city, Viet Nam
Telephone: +84974185399
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person:
Name/Title: Trinh Van Truong
Email: [email protected]
Vessel-Specific Information:
Vessel: TAN BINH 279
Call Sign: 3EUZ4
Flag: PANAMA
Port of Registry: PANAMA
IMO Number: 9641912
Hull Type: Single Hull
Year Built: 2013
Vessel Type: Bulk Carrier
Dimensions:
Metter Feet
Length Over All: 169.37 555.67
Beam: 27.2 89.23
Draft max: F: 9.819/A: 9.819 F: 32.21/A: 32.21
Draft min: F: 3.68/A: 5.57 F: 12.07/A: 18.27
Tonnages:
Gross: Net: Deadweight:
17,019 10,108 28,222
PREAMBLE
The function of the Biofouling and Sediment Management Plan is to assist in complying with port state
and quarantine measures intended to minimize the risk of transplanting harmful aquatic organisms and
pathogens from ships' hull, internal seawater piping and ballast water tanks, while maintaining ship safety.
As part of this function the plan will provide information to quarantine or Port State Control officers who
wish to learn about a ship's biofouling and sediment management system, or to confirm that biofouling
and sediment management has been effectively planned.
The plan should be used as a guide to biofouling and sediment control but does not replace biofouling
planning or use of maintenance and operation manuals for ship's equipment for ship's safety and stability.
Training and shipboard operational practices should already be well established.
This Biofouling and Sediment Management Plan is consistent with the company Safety Management
System, is intended as a supplement to the Ballast Water Management Plan, and contains the information
required by the IMO Resolution, and is compliant with the guidelines and requirements of:
•IMO Resolution MEPC.378(80) “2023 Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships'
Biofouling to Minimize the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species.”
•The applicable portions of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Vessel General Permit
effective 19 December,2008
•U.S. regulations as published in 33 CFR Part 151.2050, effective 21 June,2012
•“California Biofouling Management Regulations for Vessels Operating in California Waters”
which entered into force on 1 October 2017.
INTRODUCTION
This Appendix is written in accordance with the recommendations of MEPC.378(80) and the associated
guidelines, referenced in this Appendix as “the Guidelines”.
The purpose of the Appendix is to meet the requirements for the control and management of ship's
biofouling in accordance with the “2023 Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships' Biofouling
to Minimize the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species", IMO Resolution MEPC.378(80) It provides
standard operational guidance for the planning and management of ship's biofouling prevention and
maintenance, and sediment management, and describes safe procedures to be followed.
This Appendix is not required to be approved by either the Administration or the Classification Society.
No alteration or revision shall be made to any part of it without the prior approval of the vessel owners or
operators.
APPLICATION
The Guidelines are intended to provide useful recommendations on general measures to minimize the
risks associated with biofouling for al types of ships and are directed to States, shipmasters, operators and
owners, shipbuilders, ship cleaning and maintenance operators, port authorities, ship repair, dry-docking
and recycling facilities, ship designers, classification societies, anti-fouling paint manufacturers and
suppliers and any other interested parties. A State should determine the extent that the Guidelines are
applied within that particular State.
A separate guidance document, based on these Guideline, provides advice relevant to owners and/or
operators of recreational craft less than 24 metres in length, using terminology appropriate for that sector.
States should inform the Organization of any relevant biofouling regulations, management requirements or
restrictions they are applying to international shipping.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of these Guidelines are to provide practical guidance to States, ship masters, operators and
owners, shipbuilders, ship repair, dry-docking and recycling facilities, ship cleaning and maintenance
operators, ship designers, classification societies, anti-fouling paint manufacturers and suppliers and any
other interested parties, on measures to minimize the risk of transferring invasive aquatic species from
ships' biofouling. It is important that biofouling management procedures be effective as well as
environmentally safe, practical, designed to minimize costs and delays to the ship, and based upon these
Guidelines whenever possible.
The objective of this Appendix is to summarize the biofouling and sediment management techniques used
on board this ship to control and prevent marine growth.
To minimize the transfer of invasive aquatic species, a ship should implement biofouling and
sediment management practices, including the use of anti-fouling systems and other operational
management practices to reduce the development of biofouling. The intent of such practices is to keep
the ship's submerged surfaces, and internal seawater cooling systems, as free of biofoling as practical.
A ship following this guidance and minimizing macrofouling would have a reduced potential for
transferring invasive aquatic species via biofouling.
The management measures outlined within these Guidelines are intended to complement current
maintenance practices carried out within the industry.
If the ship operates for extended periods outside of its normal operating profile (such as longer than usual
amount of time at anchor or berthed, or long periods operating in tropical waters, extended drydock cycle
beyond anticipated drydocking interval) the company shall assess the need to take additional actions to
address hull biofouling. These actions could include:
• Underwater survey of the hull
• In-water hull cleaning
• Drydocking the vessel
The anti-fouling system used should comply with the AFS Convention, where necessary. Anti-Fouling
Systems on Board-List the Types of Systems on Board.
1 Anti-fouling hull coating: Organotin-free self-polishing type
2 Biocides in AFC: Dicopper oxide, zineb, Copper Pyrithione .
3 Paint coating thickness (dry spec.): Vertical bottom 135 Microns / Flat bottom 80 Microns
4 Expected life of this coating: valid until February 2026
5 Expected life of this coating: valid until February 2026
6 Operating profiles which are suitable for the AFC including temperature, salinity, speed, periods of
inactivity: 250C/ 12 knots / 36 months.
7 Recommended regime for repairs, maintenance and/or renewal to receive the AFC optimal
performance:
8 Cleaning methods recommended for AFC: soft brushed
9 Cleaning methods not appropriate for AFC: hard brushed
10 IAFS Certificate: LR number 2186111
11 MGPS (Marine Growth Prevention System). : YUNISHELL SYSTEM
12 What is protected by the system?: Chemical
13 How often is the MGPS run? : Anchorage
14 Is cleaning or maintenance of the MGPS required once use is finished? Yes No
15 Service life of MGPS : N/A
16 Use of treatment chemical (describe the procedure and how often it is conducted). Yes
No
Different anti-fouling systems are designed for different ship operating profiles, so it is essential that ship
operators, designers and builders obtain appropriate technical advice to ensure an appropriate system is
applied or installed. If an appropriate anti-fouling system is not applied, biofouling accumulation
increases.
Some factors to consider when choosing an anti-fouling system include the following:
• Planned periods between dry-docking - including any mandatory requirements for ships survey.
• Ship speed - different anti-fouling systems are designed to optimize anti-fouling performance for
specific ship speeds.
• Operating profile - patterns of use, trade routes and activity levels, including periods of inactivity,
influence the rate of biofouling accumulation.
• Ship type and construction; and
• Any legal requirements for the sale and use of the anti-fouling systems.
Consideration should also be given to the need for tailored, differential installation of anti-fouling coating
systems for different areas of the ship to match the required performance and longevity of the coating with
the expected wear, abrasion, and water flow rates in specific areas, such as the bow, rudder, or internal
seawater cooling systems and sea chest interiors.
DESCRIPTION OF HULL AND NICHE AREAS WHERE BIOFOULING MAY ACCUMULATE
The hull and niche areas where biofouling may accumulate are described below.
Areas on hull flat-bottom- front
flat-bottom- mid
flat-bottom- aft
bow dome
boot top
vertical sides – port side
vertical sides – starboard side
vertical side – aft
rudder and stabilizer fin apertures
Niche areas Bow dome
Cathodic protection anodes
Bilge keels
Anchor chain and Chain locker
Rudder hinges
Dock block positions
A-brackets/stern tube
Cathodic protection anodes and systems
Inlet gratings
Sea inlet pipes
Stern thruster
Thruster body
Propeller
Stern tube seal
Rope guards
Low Sea chest
High Sea chest
Inlet gratings
Internal pipework
Ballast uptake system
Engine cooling system
fire-fighting system
auxiliary service system
Heat exchanger
These niche areas can be particularly susceptible to biofouling growth. Management measures for niche
areas are outlined below.
6. Stern tube seal assemblies and the internal surfaces of rope guards:
Exposed sections of stern tube seal assemblies and the interna! The surfaces of rope guards should be
carefully painted with anti-fouling coating systems appropriate to the degree of water movement over and
around these surfaces.
8. Pitot tubes:
Where retractable pitot tubes are fitted, the housing should be internally coated with an anti-fouling
coating system suitable for static conditions.
CLEANING
Reactive cleaning should be performed as a result of any inspection with a fouling rating ≥2. It should be
performed in line with procedures of the ship cleaning operator or the dry-dock facilities used, and the
cleaning practices should be conducted in accordance with the jurisdiction's policies or regulations of the
relevant authority. Preferred cleaning methods and procedures that can be used are described below. The
methods and cleaning operator used in each cleaning occasion should be recorded in the BFRB.
The biofouling risk parameters given below should be monitored when the ship is in operation.
When a parameter goes beyond the deviation limit, the risk of biofouling is increased, and the
recommended contingency actions should be used as described.
Biofouling risk Evaluation of a Contingency Long-term actions
parameters to deviation including actions
monitor deviation limit of the
risk parameter
When the ship operates If the maintenance and An inspection should be Regular maintenance
outside the expected service time, specified carried out for the and repair (e.g.) may be
operating profile by the manufacturer, is relevant area. necessary actions for
specified in the BFMP exceeded, the risk of proper protection by the
(e.g. speed, temperature biofouling is elevated, AFC.
or salinity) and contingency actions
should be implemented
Maintenance/service or Failure caused by An inspection should be
damage to AFC mechanical damage carried out for the
to the AFC may result relevant area. Repair
in higher risk of should be performed at
biofouling in the areas earliest opportunity.
affected, if not More frequent
rectified within inspections of damaged
reasonable time. area should be
implemented until a
repair is undertaken
Maintenance/service or Observed downtime More frequent
downtime/malfunction of an MGPS could inspections of relevant
of MGPS have a direct impact area should be
on risk of biofouling implemented until
accumulation. the MGPS is back in
The impact will operation
depend on the
duration of
malfunction and
operating areas
Exceeding expected Once an AFS has More frequent The performance of
lifetime of AFS exceeded its lifetime, inspections should be the AFS, and any
as specified by the implemented until the necessary change in
manufacturer, the AFS is back in operation maintenance or
biofouling risk is inspection schedule,
increased. based on experience,
should be included in
the next update of this
BWMP
Ship idletime (berthed, If the idle time is If the idle time is Evaluate the need for a
anchored, moored) longer than estimated within the guarantee potential improvement
in the ship's operating of the AFS supplier, of the AFS selection
profile, it could lead to a short voyage with prior to the next dry-
an elevated risk of speed as specified docking
biofouling. for the AFS could be
If the idle time is conducted, sea
beyond the guarantee chests could be
of the AFS supplier, blanked off or, when
the risk of biofouling recommended by the
accumulation AFS manufacturer,
increases. more frequent
The risk also depends proactive cleaning
on biofouling activities could be
pressure, e.g. implemented.
temperature and If the idle time is
distance to the beyond the
coastline. If the ship is guarantee of the
idle in an area far AFS supplier, an
from shore (>200 nm inspection should be
and >200 m depth) carried out.
and far from other
installations, the risk
may still be
considered low.
Performance loss as Performance monitoring When the data show a Experience from
per Performance of fuel consumption trend in performance fuel consumption
Monitoring System may give indication on loss over time, the time and cleaning activity
possible biofouling since last cleaning over time may lead
accumulation on the activity in combination to optimization and
hull Percentage of the with operating profile changes to the cleaning
speed loss and should be evaluated schedule.
percentage of increased to determine if an
fuel consumption, that inspection should be
may indicate light carried out.
biofouling on the ship
RECORDING REQUIREMENTS
Records associated with biofouling management shall be maintained in the following locations and made
available to port state control or quarantine officials:
Activity or waste Record Location
D. Particulars of vessel design and construction intended to minimize the uptake and undesirable
entrapment of sediments, facilitate removal of sediments, and provide safe access to allow for
sediment removal and sampling:
Manhole
2023 Guidelines for the control and management of ships' biofouling to minimize the transfer of invasive
aquatic species.
Period From: Jan. 2023 To: Jan. 2026
Name of Ship: TAN BINH 279
IMO Number: 9641912
Gross tonnage: 17,019 GT Flag:_PANAMA
1 Introduction
The Guidelines recommend that a Biofouling Record Book is maintained for each ship, in which
the details of all inspections and biofouling management measures undertaken on the ship are
recorded.
2 Entries in the Biofouling Record Book
The following information should be recorded in the Biofouling Record Book:
2.1 After each dry-docking:
a. Date and location that the ship was dry-docked.
b. Date that ship was re-floated.
c. Any hull cleaning that was performed while dry-docked, including areas cleaned, method used for
cleaning and the location of dry-dock support blocks.
d. Any anti-fouling coating system, including patch repairs, that was applied while dry-docking. Detail the
type of anti-fouling coating system, the area and locations It was applied to, the coating thickness
achieved and any surface preparation work undertaken (e.g., complete removal of underlying anti-fouling
coating system or application of new anti-fouling coating system over the top of existing anti-fouling
coating system).
e. Name, position and signature of the person in charge of the activity for the ship.
2.2 When the hull area, fittings, niches and voids below the waterline have been inspected by
divers:
a. Date and location of ship when dive surveyed and reason for survey.
b. Area or side of the ship surveyed.
c. General observations with regard to biofouling (i.e.extent of biofouling and predominant biofouling
types, e.g., mussels, barnacles, tubeworms, algae and slime).
d. What action was taken,if any, to remove or otherwise treat biofouling.
e. Any supporting evidence of the actions taken (e.g.,report from the classification society or
contractor, photographs and receipts).
f. Name, position, signature of the person in charge of the activity.
2.3 When the hull area, fittings, niches and voids below the waterline have been cleaned by
divers:
a. Date and location of ship when cleaning/treatment occurred.
b. Hull areas,fittings,niches and voids cleaned/treated.
c. Methods of cleaning or treatment used.
d. General observations with regard to biofouling (i.e. extent of biofouling and predominant
biofouling types, e.g., mussels, barnacles, tubeworms, algae and slime).
e. Any supporting evidence of the actions taken (e.g., report from the classification society or
contractor, photographs and receipts).
f. Records of permits required to undertake in-water cleaning if applicable.
g. Name, position and signature of the person in charge of the activity.
2.4 When the internal seawater cooling systems have been inspected and cleaned or treated:
a. Date and location of ship when inspection and/or cleaning occurred.
b. General observations with regard to biofouling of internal seawater cooling systems (i.e. extent
of biofouling and predominant biofouling types,e.g., mussels,barnacles,tube worms, algae, slime).
c. Any cleaning or treatment undertaken.
d. Methods of cleaning or treatment used.
e. Any supporting evidence of the actions taken (e.g., report from the classification society or
contractor, photographs and receipts).
f. Name, position and signature of the person in charge of the activity.
2.6 Periods of time when the ship was laid up/inactive for an extended period of time:
a. Date and location where ship was laid up.
b. Date when ship returned to normal operations.
c. Maintenance action taken prior to and following the period laid up.
d. Precautions taken to prevent biofouling accumulation (e.g.,sea chests blanked off).
2.7 Periods of time when ship operating outside its normal operating profile:
a. Duration and dates when ship not operating in accordance with its normal operating profile.
b. Reason for departure from normal operating profile (e.g., unexpected maintenance required).
2.8 Details of official inspection or review of ship biofouling risk (for ships arriving
internationally, if applicable):
a. Date and location of ship when inspection or review occurred.
b. Port State authority conducting the inspection/review and details of procedures followed or
protocol adhered to and inspector/s involved.
c. Result of inspection/review.
d. Name, position, signature of the person in charge of the activity for the ship.
Signature of Master:
RECORD OF BIOFOULING MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
Signature of Master: