TEACHING PLAN
Public Law Skills
Catalog Course Code: T1465
Course Code: 0102240506/0102230506
Credits: 2
Semester – V
Batch 2023-28
Academic Year 2025-26
July 01, 2025 to November 01, 2025
By
Mr. Ashish Jha (Course In-Charge)
Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA
Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune
1. INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
There are various perspectives, approaches, and methods to approach any
discipline and so is the case with Law. The learners of third year are expected to
be acquainted with approaches and theoretical frameworks that shape the
understanding of Law. They know the meaning, nature, definition, and scope of
law vary in a significant manner when one tries to read Law from one
jurisprudential approach to the other. Such basic understanding of the law aids
the learners of this course of Public Law Skills.
At the outset, the course on Public Law Skills is a practical course that enables
the learners / readers of the course to develop a basic skill set, acquire techniques
that are needed for practicing Public Law. Public Law is a blend of many acts /
rules and regulations, but more specifically anchored in Administrative Law and
Constitutional Law provisions and principles.
The practice of Public Law requires a lawyer / advocate to represent either the
State or appear against the State, as Public Law deals with relationships of the
State with its Citizens (including Corporates and Individuals, alike). Public Law
skills hence require learning the fine balance of the said relationship, its impact
on the society at large, the principles of majority good, rule of law and good
governance, in the backdrop of safeguarding rights of the Citizens.
The State often makes questionable policies, decisions, or rules, that have a
direct bearing on the society at large or on a certain segment of the society,
Public Law Skills enable an advocate / lawyer to find the path that is workable
and most suitable in the given confines of the legal principles, and sometimes the
State is directed to relook at its decisions / policies.
Public Law Skills enables learners to appreciate how leading authorities / state
bodies / regulators / policy makers govern society or protect citizens, and an
understanding of how unfair policies infringe their rights. Public law is a fusion of
different sections of the law, as well as public policies, government, and citizens’
rights. The study of Public Law therefore entails reading a broad range of legal
sectors as well, that coincide with the specific subject being dealt with in an issue
/ area.
This course, however, enables the learners to acquire a skill set to approach an
issue / matter with precision and having the basic knowledge of the core subjects
at play. The core subject includes, study of Special Leave Petitions, Public Interest
Litigations, Right to Information Act, Contempt of Court Act, Writ Jurisdiction of
Courts, Principles of Locus, Rule of Law, and other Administrative Law Principles
as well. Most importantly, the course does also focus on drafting of some of these
documents and their dos and don’ts.
Page | 1
2. OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE) FRAMEWORK
A. Course Objectives
The objective of this course is to develop in the students the following set of
skills: general cognitive intellectual skills; general communicative/ employability
skills; and subject specific skills. It aims at developing following set of skills
among the students:
COB1: To locate, identify and be able to critically analyze relevant statutes,
statutory provisions and legislative instruments, as well as pertinent judicial
authority. (Knowledge & Skills)
COB2: To Interpret the appropriate provisions using the accepted tools and
techniques of statutory interpretation. (Knowledge & Skills)
COB3: To Apply statutory provisions to fact scenarios and communicate the
interpretation, nature and effect of statutory provisions to relevant stakeholders,
such as clients and courts. (Skills & Employability)
COB4: To analyze problems and to produce well-supported conclusions in relation
to them. (Knowledge & Employability)
B. Course Outcomes
The students will have following set of outcomes when they will complete this
Course successfully:
CO1: To Develop basic skills and techniques needed for public law practice.
CO2: To Be Practice-ready at the end of the course
CO3: To Be market ready and employable
CO4: To Be able to use the skills learnt to practical situations
C. Mapping Table - Course Outcomes (COs) to Program Outcomes (POs)
Course Course Mapped Bloom’ Mapped Primary
Outcome Outcome Course s Programm Purpose
(COs) Statement Outcom Level e
e (CO) Outcomes
(CO) (POs)
COB1 To Develop basic CO1 BL 3 BBA LLB Knowledge
skills and PO1, PO4 & Skills
techniques
needed for BA LLB
public law PO1, PO4
practice
COB2 To Be Practice- CO2 BL 4 BBA LLB Knowledge,
ready at the PO2, PO8 Skills &
end of
Page | 2
the BA LLB Employabilit
course PO2, PO8 y
COB3 To Be market CO3 BL 3 BBA LLB Skills &
ready and PO9 Employabilit
employable BA LLB y
PO9
COB4 To Be able to use CO4 BL 3 BBA LLB Knowledge
the skills learnt PO5, PO6 &
to practical BALLB Employabilit
situations PO5, PO6 y
3. COURSE CONTENT AND SCHEDULE
A. Times and Attendance
One to Two lectures per week have been set aside for this course for each
division. Verify it from the Time Table assigned for each division. One should duly
check related notifications from ‘Academic Support’ as well as “Announcements‟
@ Moodle (LMS).
As per Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Regulations,
Students are expected to attend minimum 75% of all scheduled sessions
and other forms of instruction as defined by the programme of study.
The student will not be eligible to appear for the examination if he / she fails to
put in the required attendance. The students can daily update themselves online
about their attendance through LMS.
Attendance Correction Procedure:
If a student identifies a discrepancy in their attendance record, they must
promptly contact via email the Course in Charge or the Co-Faculty who conducted
the class within 48 hours of marking the attendance. The faculty member is
responsible for verifying the claim and making corrections within 24 hours of
receiving the communication, ensuring the student’s satisfaction upon
verification. This process ensures accuracy and fairness in attendance records.
If students do not receive a response within the specified timeframe, they should
email the Officer in Charge of their batch, keeping the earlier communications
regarding the attendance discrepancy in trail. A copy of this email should also be
marked to [email protected] for further review and resolution. This
ensures that the issue is escalated appropriately for timely correction.
Please adhere to the specified process. After the specified period, no concerns or
grievances regarding attendance will be considered or addressed.
Page | 3
B. Mode of Delivery
This Course will be delivered in 100% Face-to-Face/Synchronous mode. Session
Plan, Lecture outlines (principally in the form of PowerPoint slides), Hand-outs,
reading material including e-Books, and Articles as applicable in a given case, will
be made available in “Resource Materials‟ @ Moodle (LMS). To facilitate
understanding of these lectures, student should always read the relevant pages
of suggested readings in advance of each lecture.
Pedagogy
The pedagogy for this course shall include lecture method, discussions,
interactive sessions, brainstorming, and case studies. The students will also be
provided reading material and document/draft to enhance their understanding as
to the course. The idea is to create space for differing perspectives, developing
analytical approach and a critical thought.
C. Contingency Plan
Objective:
The Contingency Plan has been designed to promote self-learning among
students, ensuring that their intellectual growth and engagement continue
meaningfully even in the absence of a faculty member. It seeks to transform
unexpected disruptions into opportunities for students to engage critically
with course content through guided independent study, structured reflection,
and constructive feedback.
Standard Guidelines for All Contingency Plans
Step Responsibility
Submission by Handwritten drafts must be submitted to the Officer In-
Students Charge at the end of the session.
Handover to Officer In-Charge to hand over submissions to the faculty
Faculty member on their first day back post-leave.
Return of Faculty must return evaluated submissions in the next
Evaluated scheduled lecture with the same division/group. Faculty will
Submissions provide clear feedback on expectations and quality.
Page | 4
Feedback and Faculty to provide both general feedback to the entire class
Discussion and individual feedback where necessary.
Confirmation of Faculty to send an email confirmation to the Officer In-
Return Charge once submissions have been returned and feedback
provided in class. Individual doubts may be addressed
during faculty meeting hours.
Topic Relevance:
The contingency topic should ideally relate to a broad theme from the course
syllabus, preferably aligning with the ongoing topic/sub-topic being discussed in
regular sessions.
Implementation and Monitoring:
Stage Activity Responsible
Before Class Submission of reading and drafting plan Faculty Member
During Class Reading, drafting, and submission by Officer In-
students Charge
After Class Evaluation, return of submissions, feedback Faculty Member
Documentation Confirmation email after return of Faculty Member
submissions
Adherence to this contingency framework ensures that learning continues
seamlessly, that students receive constructive feedback, and that academic
integrity is maintained throughout unforeseen disruptions.
For detailed Models of Contingency plan, please refer to Annexure D to this
Teaching Plan.
D. Notification
You are informed that notice/s, if required, with respect to Academic-
Administration, will be sent either by Course-in-Charge or Officer-In-Charge,
Academic Coordination using “Announcements‟ @ Moodle (LMS). Students are
required to keep themselves duly informed.
Page | 5
E. Weekly Lecture Outline
Week Lecture Topics
No.
Week 1 1 Teaching Plan – Overview
July 01, 2025
Week 2 2 Teaching Plan - Assessment
July 7, 2025
Week 3 3 Topic 1: Introduction to Public Law areas
July 14, 2025 Definitions
Applicability of Public Law
Distinction between Private and Public
Law
Week 4 4 Significance of Statutes, Rules, Regulations in
July 21, 2025 Public Law
Applicability of Public Law vis a vis Public
Authorities, Bodies, Corporations and Private
Bodies
Wednesbury Principles, Promissory Estoppel,
Natural Justice, Non-Application of Mind, Bias
Doctrine of Proportionality, Irrationality
5 Definitions: Public Element, Public Interest,
Public Duty
Case Law Discussion UK & Indian
Modern Approach Conclusion & Discussions on
Comparative Case Law and Modern Approach in
Indian & UK Context
Week 5 6 Public Law III, Remedy & Judicial Review
July 28, 2025 Constitutional Remedies, Reference to Article
226/32
7 Topic 2: Right to Information
General Overview of the Right to Information
Act, 2005
Week 6 8 RTI: Discussion on themes and purposes of RTI
August 04, 2025 Act - Citizen Empowerment, Transparency and
Accountability, Combating Corruption,
Implementation, Issues and Constraints
Week 7 9 Drafting of RTI Applications
August 11, 2025
Week 8 10 Topic 3: Special Leave Petition
August 18, 2025 General view on Article 136 of the Constitution
Week 9 11 General view on Supreme Court Rules, 2013 &
August 25, 2025 Article 145 of the Constitution
Week 10 12 Case Law Discussion on Special Leave Petition
September 01, 13 Drafting of Special Leave Petition
2025
Page | 6
Week 11 14 Topic 4: Public Interest Litigation
September 08, Meaning & Purpose, Origin & Expansion,
2025 Maintainability
15 Judicial Review and Constitutional Remedies -
Reference to Article 226/32
Week 12 16 Judicial Review & Supervisory Jurisdiction –
September 15, Article 227
2025
Week 13 17 Topic 5: Contempt of Court
September 22, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - General view on
2025 the Act
Civil and Criminal Contempt
Week 14 18 Statutory Appeals under the Contempt of Courts
September 29, Act, 1971
2025 Case Law Discussion
19 Topic 6: Writ Petitions
Meaning and Purpose,
Constitutional Remedies of Article 32 and 226 -
Case law discussion
Week 15 20 General Rules of Drafting - High Court Rules and
October 06, 2025 Supreme Court Rules with regard to drafting and
pleadings
Week 16 21 Reference to Maintainability, Jurisdiction,
October 13, 2025 Limitation
Week 17 22 Drafting of Writ Petitions (For writs of
October 20, 2025 Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition etc.)
Week 18 23 Topic 7: Verification of Affidavit/Counter
October 27, 2025 Affidavit
24 Course Review
4. READING ASSIGNMENTS | COURSE MATERIAL
A. Text Books
• Mark Elliotand Robert Thomas, Public law, Oxford Publication, 2011
• C.K. Thakker and M.C. Thakker, Law of Writs 9 (Vol, I&2), EBC, 6thed, 2017
• Public Law , Michael Doherty, 2nd ed, Routledge publication, April 2018.
• Constitutional Remedies and Writs 4th Edition – D.D Basu
B. Supplementary Materials
• Reference Book
• Lord Denning, ‘The Due Process of Law’, Oxford University Press, First
Indian edition, 2006
• A B Kafaltiya, Text Book on Pleadings, Drafting and Conveyancing’,
Universal Lexis Nexis, Second Ed., 2019
Page | 7
• Justice B P Banerjee, ‘Writ Remedies, Remediable Rights under Public
Law’, 7 th Edition, Lexis Nexis, 2016
• Alternative Text
• Wade & Forsyth’s Administrative Law – 12th Edition
• Judicial Remedies in Public Law – 5th Edition UK
C. Online Resources
RemoteXs, our new Library Portal, is a cloud-based service designed to simplify
and enhance access to a wide range of e-content. With RemoteXs, you will benefit
from optimising our valuable eResources fostering research interests among
faculty and students. By bringing together scattered eResources under one
secure umbrella, RemoteXs ensures you can access subscribed eJournals,
eBooks, and other eContent anytime, anywhere. This new portal makes it easier
to stay connected to the latest information and research materials, no matter
where you are.
5. ASSESSMENT METHODS
This is a 2-credit internal course, so you will be examined in this course by 50
marks. In totality, you will be examined in this course by 100% Internal
Continuous Evaluation format.
This course's Internal Continuous Evaluation (ICE) is designed to assess students'
understanding and engagement throughout the semester comprehensively. The
total weightage for ICE is 50 marks, distributed across two components as
follows:
Tutorial Project
Mode of Assessment (ICE 1) (ICE 2)
Weightage in Marks 25 25
A. INTERNAL CONTINUOUS EVALUATION: MODE, SCHEDULE, FORMAT
AND STRUCTURE, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
• ICE 1- Tutorial: Schedule, Format and Structure, Assessment Criteria
The tutorial uses situation-based, open-ended illustrations that test each
learner's analytical and professional understanding.
Page | 8
Schedule:
Date Examination Result
September 29, 2025 October 13,
2025
Topic 2: Right to Information
Topic 3: Special Leave Petition
Topic 4: Public Interest Litigation
Examiner - Mr. Ashish Jha
Format and Structure:
Tutorial is an open-book examination. It is an assessment where students can
refer to their bare act/s, textbooks, notes, and other approved resources while
answering the exam questions. This format is designed to evaluate a student's
understanding and application of the material rather than their ability to
memorise information.
Situation-Based Questions: The tutorial includes open-ended, situation-based
questions that require students to think critically and analytically.
Open-Ended Illustrations: Students are presented with complex scenarios or
problems and must use their course materials to construct well-reasoned and
supported responses.
Assessment Criteria:
Marks are awarded based on the depth of analysis, relevance of the arguments
presented, and the ability to apply theoretical concepts to practical situations.
Criteria Marks %
Depth of Analysis – 10 – 40
Marks are awarded based on the student’s ability to analyse the scenarios and
provide insightful, well-reasoned answers.
– Relevance 7.5 – 30
Answers must be directly relevant to the questions and effectively apply the
course concepts.
– Logical Structure 7.5 – 30
Responses should be logically structured, with arguments presented and
supporting them with evidence from the course materials.
• ICE 2- Project: Schedule, Format and Structure, Assessment Criteria
The Project Topic will be allotted by Course In-Charge as per schedule. The
project is aimed at improving research and analytical skills to make students’
learning academically more challenging and rigorous than standard lecture
and test format courses.
Page | 9
The schedule of the Project is as follows:
Schedule:
Assignment Submission Result
Date September 20, October 03,
July 07, 2025
2025 2025
Examiner- Mr. Ashish Jha
General Guidelines:
Following are the guidelines for the project:
• Topic/Case will be allotted by Course In-Charge of the subject.
• Cover page should be as annexure A to this teaching plan.
• For detailed guidelines, refer to annexure B to this teaching plan.
• Submission should be accompanied with a declaration given as annexure C
to this teaching plan.
• Complete Plagiarism report generated via Turn-it-in shall be submitted.
• Turnitin report highlighting content similarity of Index should be
of ≤10%. Similarity index more than 10 % shall invite strict actions and the
learner shall be awarded “zero” marks for the submission.
• Despite the report’s content similarity being lower, if the Course-in-charge
identifies any form of plagiarism, undetected by Turnitin, the learner will
have to face a penalty of negative marking (Negative marking of up to five
marks).
• If your assignment is flagged for AI-generated content or any form of
plagiarism, it will not be graded and the learner shall be awarded “zero”
marks for the submission. Plagiarism includes:
o Copying text from other sources without proper citation.
o Using AI tools to generate text and submitting it as your own work.
o Rephrasing someone else's ideas without acknowledgment.
• Pertinent details respect to generation of Turnitin Report and its upload on
‘Moodle (LMS)' are as follows:
o Classes – course wise for Batch 2023-28 at Turnitin will be created.
o Upload complete assignment in your respective Class @Turnitin
o Once the Turnitin report is generated, download it and then upload the
same report as is generated on ‘Moodle (LMS)', as applicable in a given
case, for evaluation.
• Late submission will invite the deduction of 1.5 marks per day. Deduction of
the marks to be calculated from the last date of submission.
Assessment Criteria:
The learners shall be evaluated based on the following parameters:
Page | 10
Component Description Marks
(25)
Use of Resources and Effective use of legal texts, statutes, case- 7
Adherence to Guidelines laws, scholarly articles, and
compliance with submission deadlines,
formatting, and other criteria.
Originality, Innovation, Original contributions, creativity, 9
and Structure innovative approach, and well-
organized presentation or document structur
e.
Depth of In-depth understanding, critical 9
Analysis and analysis, and integration of the
Relevance to Law topic within the legal framework and subject
matter.
6. CLASSROOM POLICIES
A. Classroom Conduct
• Students and faculty must maintain a respectful and professional
demeanour towards each other and foster an inclusive learning
environment.
• Regular attendance is expected unless excused for valid reasons.
Punctuality is appreciated to minimize disruption.
• Use of electronic devices should be limited to permitted activities related to
the course. Disruptive use (e.g., texting, browsing social media) is
discouraged during class sessions.
• Raise hands or use designated methods to seek permission to speak or ask
questions during lectures or discussions.
• Follow any prescribed dress code guidelines that contribute to maintaining
a professional atmosphere conducive to learning
B. Policy on Punctuality and Attendance
• Students are required to be inside the classroom at the scheduled start
time of the class.
• Being late, even by a few seconds, is unacceptable and will not be
entertained as an excuse.
• Punctuality demonstrates respect for the instructor, fellow students, and
the learning process. It minimizes disruption and ensures that all students
can fully benefit from the instructional time.
• Students arriving late may miss important instructions, announcements, or
the beginning of lectures, impacting their understanding of course material.
Persistent tardiness may result in penalties such as losing participation
points or other disciplinary measures outlined in the course syllabus or
university policies.
Page | 11
• Faculty members are responsible for enforcing this policy consistently and
fairly.
• Students are encouraged to seek clarification from faculty or Officers in
Charge / administrators regarding any aspects of this policy they do not
understand.
By adhering to this policy, students contribute to a respectful and efficient
learning environment where punctuality is valued and contributes to overall
academic success.
7. ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Kindly respect the time of everyone involved in the Teaching, Learning and
Evaluation process. You are encouraged to get your queries related to the course
addressed during teaching session.
Course-in-Charge for ‘Public law Skills’ is Mr. Ashish Jha and he can be reached
at his e-mail id [email protected] If any doubt remains regarding
topics covered, kindly contact the respective faculty via email during office hours,
i.e., 9 am to 5 pm. The same shall be endeavoured to be responded within 48
hours.
If you wish to meet the Course In-Charge, please request an appointment by
emailing to their respective email addresses, for a slot on either Tuesday or
Saturday between 10:15 AM to 11:45 AM.
Page | 12
Annexure A – Cover Page
Project Topic: ________________________________
Internal Continuous Evaluation 2: PROJECT
For
Course Name: _______________________________
Submitted by:
Name of the Learner: ___________________
PRN: _______________________
Division/Group: ____________
Semester: _________
Batch: ___________
Academic Year: 2025-26
Submitted to:
Name of the Evaluator: _____________
Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA
Symbiosis International (Deemed University)
July – November 2025
Page | 13
Annexure B – Detailed Guidelines for Project
The following Headers are expected to be included in the submission:
Introduction
Analysis
Conclusion
Bibliography
● The Introduction, which introduces the topic, should provide relevant background,
explain the relevance of the topic, and defines essential concepts.
● The Analysis section is the core of the project, where learners are expected to explain
the topic in depth, examine different perspectives, and present their own critical insight
or viewpoint. Learners are also expected to relate the findings to their research questions,
if any, and use subheadings, if necessary for clarity. The project can include draft as per
requirements.
● Finally, the Conclusion should offer a concise summary of the main points covered,
present the learner’s final stance.
● The project should include a bibliography in 20th Edition bluebook format.
Page | 14
Annexure C – Declaration
This written submission based on the topic
“_____________________________________________________________________”,
submitted by the undersigned to Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA, Symbiosis International
(Deemed University), Pune for the course ‘_____________________’ as part of Internal
Continuous Evaluation (ICE 2): Project is my original work carried out for the course. The
research work has not been submitted elsewhere for award of any degree or any other
purpose whatsoever.
The material borrowed from other sources and incorporated in the submission has been duly
acknowledged.
I have also taken due care that the contents of my project are not similar or same as another
learner’s submission for the aforesaid course.
I confirm that my submission or any part of it is not AI-generated content or any form of
plagiarism.
I understand that I could be held responsible and accountable for plagiarism, if any, even if
detected later.
(Signature of the Learner/FULL NAME in Capital Letters)
Date: ______________
Name of the Learner: _____________________________
PRN: ____________________
Division/Group: ________________
Semester: _____________
Batch: ____________
Programme: _______
Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA
Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune
Page | 15
Annexure D – Models of Contingency Plan
Contingency Plan Model 1: Video, Reading, and Critical Reflection Note
The objective of this contingency plan is to promote self-directed learning by
engaging students with curated visual and textual materials that complement the
course content. It aims to develop learners’ critical thinking and analytical skills
through structured reflection, ensuring that academic engagement continues
meaningfully even in the temporary absence of the faculty member.
A. Components of the Plan
This model comprises three key components: Video Component, Reading
Material, and Critical Reflection Note (Student Submission). The activity will be
followed by an evaluation by the course in charge or co-faculty, as applicable,
along with individual feedback for each student.
1. Video Component
Purpose:
To provide structured exposure to course-relevant content in the absence of live
instruction.
Duration:
Maximum of 15 minutes.
Content:
Pre-recorded lecture by the faculty member, or
Educational material aligned with the syllabus, sourced from credible platforms.
Access and Submission:
Faculty must submit the content to the Officer-In-Charge before the scheduled
class.
Content format should preferably be .mp4 or a reliable, accessible web link.
2. Reading Material
Purpose:
To complement the video by providing deeper insight into the topic discussed.
Format:
Readable PDF (case laws, articles, editorials, notes, or working papers).
Reading Duration:
Approximately 25–30 minutes.
Submission: Sent to the Officer-In-Charge via email along with the video.
3. Critical Reflection Note (Student Submission)
Objective:
Encourage students to think critically and independently, ensuring active
engagement despite the faculty's absence.
Guidelines for Preparation:
Define the core question/problem raised in the video and reading.
Highlight key arguments and perspectives.
Reflect on the relevance, scope, and possible solutions to the issue.
Structure the note coherently with an introduction, analysis, and conclusion.
Page | 16
B. Standard Submission Instructions for Students
Mode of Submission:
Written submission only.
Material for Writing:
The Law School will provide pages at the time of the session.
Deadline:
Submission is to be completed during the scheduled class itself unless otherwise
communicated.
Marking and Feedback:
The faculty member shall independently review and provide feedback on each
student's submission.
The faculty member will discuss the feedback in the following week's class and
explain the intended learning outcome of the contingency activity.
Faculty will show the evaluated submission to each student who attended and
attempted the exercise for constructive feedback.
C. Faculty Responsibilities
Submit a video, reading, and clear instructions for the activity to the officer in
charge.
Upon return, review all submissions, provide individual feedback, and explain the
purpose and academic connection of the exercise in the next class session.
D. Implementation Protocol
Stage Action Responsible
Prior Preparation Faculty identifies and submits materials Faculty Member
Class Execution Video played, readings distributed, Officer In-
submissions collected Charge
Post-Class Review Submissions checked, feedback provided Faculty Member
Student Feedback and academic explanation in Faculty Member
Engagement class
E. Compliance Requirement:
After providing individual feedback and showing the evaluated critical notes to
the students in class, the faculty member shall submit all evaluated answer
scripts to the respective Officer-in-Charge on the same day for institutional
record-keeping. This ensures transparency, maintains academic records and
reinforces accountability in the evaluation process.
Page | 17
Contingency Plan Model 2:
Reading and Drafting
This contingency model has been designed to promote self-learning and skill
enhancement among students through critical reading and drafting practice. It
ensures that students remain meaningfully engaged in academic work, while also
developing their legal drafting and analytical skills in the absence of the faculty
member.
A. Components of the Plan
Reading and Drafting comprises three key components—Reading Material,
Drafting Activity, and the Student’s Reflection Draft (Submission). The
submissions will be evaluated by the Course-in-Charge or Co-Faculty, as
applicable, followed by individual feedback to each student.
1. Reading Material
Purpose:
To deepen student understanding of a broad topic or a specific sub-topic from the
course syllabus.
Type of Material:
Case-law, journal articles, editorials, faculty-prepared notes, or working papers.
Format:
Preferably readable PDF.
Time Allocation:
Suitable for reading within 30–40 minutes.
Submission Protocol:
Faculty must email the material to the Officer In-Charge before the scheduled
session.
2. Drafting Activity
Purpose:
To apply the knowledge gained from the reading through the preparation of
a practical draft or analytical piece.
Nature of Question/Task:
Faculty to frame a problem, issue, or question based on the reading.
The question may involve a factual situation requiring legal analysis or advice.
Suggested Drafting Formats:
Legal Applications (e.g., writ petition, appeal, plaint, or written statement)
Legal Opinion or General Opinion Piece (including context, analysis, and critical
reflection)
Case Note (in case of judgement reading), including:
Issue before the court, Arguments of both sides, Reasoning behind the decision
Expected Completion:
Students should be able to complete the drafting within the scheduled lecture
time.
Page | 18
B. Standard Submission Instructions for Students
Mode of Submission:
Written submission only.
Material for Writing:
The Law School will provide pages at the time of the session.
Deadline:
Submission is to be completed during the scheduled class itself unless otherwise
communicated.
Marking and Feedback:
The faculty member shall independently review and provide feedback on each
student's submission.
The faculty member will discuss the feedback in the following week's class and
explain the intended learning outcome of the contingency activity.
Faculty will show the evaluated submission to each student who attended and
attempted the exercise for constructive feedback.
C. Faculty Responsibilities
Submit the reading material, drafting question, and clear instructions for the
activity to the Officer-in-Charge in advance.
Upon return, review all student submissions, provide individual feedback, and
explain the purpose and academic connection of the contingency exercise in
the subsequent class session.
D. Implementation Protocol
Stage Action Responsible
Prior Preparation Faculty prepares and submits the Faculty Member
contingency materials
Class Execution Reading distributed, drafting task Officer In-Charge
executed, submissions collected
Post-Class Review Submissions evaluated, feedback Faculty Member
prepared
Student Engagement Feedback shared, submissions Faculty Member
shown, purpose explained in class
E. Compliance Requirement
After providing individual feedback and showing the evaluated critical notes to
the students in class, the faculty member shall submit all evaluated answer
scripts to the respective Officer-in-Charge on the same day for institutional
record-keeping. This ensures transparency, maintains academic records and
reinforces accountability in the evaluation process.
Page | 19
