“God loves you!
”
Aries Waffen Dorian
8 April 2024
No. That is simply not true. God, as you put it, does not love me. For I am not a jew, thus I am
not chosen. Thus, God, as you put it, does not love me, for he cannot. If you were to say, God,
as you put it, could love me, as though I were his own child, though I am not a jew, and his
children are jews, and do own and run this world and its system, and its reality, and reality of
realities, and culture, and culture of cultures, and matrix, and matrix of matrixes, if there was a
veil preventing me from knowing that I was not his own child, and this God of which you
speak was sincere in loving me as an adopted child, as we lowly, diminished, and
astoundingly insignificant members of mankind know, understand, and accept paternal love to
be, that would be true enough, so long as my ignorance and confusion of my own ancestry
and lineage remained, and so long as the ability and willingness of God, as you put it, to love
me as though I were his own child, was real and persisted. Yet you presume God, as you put
it, has the ability and the willingness to love me, so that you say, “God loves me!”, although I
am not his child. Say your presumption---of God, as you put it---was correct. As I have thus
far alluded to, we would need to define God, and make certain, beyond any reasonable doubt,
that we were referring to the same God.
And yet, still... What good is such love, when I am no orphan, for I have a Father of my own,
whose children’s kingdom is truly not of this world? So why should I be made to be adopted
by a different father, whose children’s kingdom is of this world, so that that different father
might “love” me as though I were his own, such that, now I suppose, it is, you say, “God loves
me!”--when I have a perfectly good Father already, as I always have, and always will. As I
always had, even when I was abducted and taken from my bedroom, in my father and
mother’s house, at night, at the perfectly and purely innocent age of 7,8,9,10, and otherwise
traumatized with horrific terrors of the night. Would not my acceptance of such love, if, as you
say, “God loves you!” be agreeable to me, be a form of knavery and idolatry if such were not
really my Father and His love?
Is God, as you refer to him, jewish? Is God, as you know and prefer him, a jew? Is God, as
you understand him, the race of jews? Because I am a White man, and a White man ought
not to worship a God that is not of his own race, much in the same regard that a White man
ought not to marry a woman of another race, including hybrids who are already mixed-race. In
fact, such a Golden Rule, in my estimation, does not only apply to the White race, but to all
peoples.
Besides, the conditional love of the foster father, even if genuine, would be, in my humble
view, both different and inferior to that of the unconditional love of my enduring and true
Father. What good is such contrived and coerced adoptive and adopted love, as though one
were grafted into a different tree, when God, as you put it, still could not love me, as his own
child, because, as I put it, I am not his own child? I am not a jew. I may be the dregs of my
race, the runt of the litter of my race, an ethnic mutt of my race, estranged, disavowed, and
disowned by my race, yet I am a pure White Indo-European Aryan man. And it is my race. I
am a White man, and White men, are a remnant race in this world, in no small part and
measure because of the jews and their inter-generational organized criminal plans and
conspiratorial actions, which have resulted in no less then two World Wars in the last century
alone, both of which, in my humble view, were nothing more than mortal wounds to my race,
from which my race has not, and never will, recover, and have included miscegenation
programs and breeding pogroms that date back to time immemorial.
He, that is, God, as you put it, would be, that is to say, is, in my view, a respecter of persons
in the sense that he is the father of the one, namely the jews, and his is not the father of the
other, namely me, a non-jewish, non-race mixed White man. Would my father look upon me
the same as he looks upon all other children? I would consider him a fool were he to so be.
How much more so, would God, as I put and place Him, be a respecter of persons? In the
sense that he would be overjoyed when His children prosper and sore sorrowful when His
children are downtrodden, would He then think, and feel, officiate towards, and treat
accordingly, those children that are not His, in the same manner? Does my father provide
“God loves you!”
Jonathan Charles Gillis
clothing to my best friends, let alone all the neighborhood children? No, of course not. It is not
his responsibility, nor are such matters within his jurisdiction or jurisprudence. They have, or
should have, their own fathers to provide for them. Even in helping those, truly in need, be
they friends or enemies, our charity to them is far inferior to the care and solace that we
naturally and normally express and give to our own kith and kinsmen, to our own folk and
clansmen. What then, should we feel guilty for that as well, as everything under the sun and
moon!? Nay!
Yet it is clear, we are forced to reside in a world, in a system, in a reality, that is so inverted
and backwards, that the rich in their plush comforts and flush extravagances, adorned in the
most expensive attire money can acquire, augmented and enhanced with the most advanced
technologies, are more often then not, the most abusive and wicked, whilst the poor,
impoverished, invisible little folks---whose half-starvation is, more often then not, mistaken by
fattened sheep being lead to the slaughter, as the appearance and result of a non-existent
drug addiction---are, more often then not, the most humble, gentle, and kind souls one ever
was fortunate to meet. The exploitation of the impoverished poor by the well to do classes
and castes, all of which have their place and position in the pyramidal hierarchical centralized
power structure of this world, its system, and its reality, is clear enough. What happens when
a church, for instance, outgrows its initial fledgling founding? It has excess capital to spend,
that is to say, it has so much money, it better spend it on much richer facilities, which then, of
course, will cost more money to maintain, which then in turn justifies the advanced
subsidization of the church, as it has climbed higher on the financial rungs of the monetary
system. Which is owned by…Well, the jews need not be brought up ad nauseam, as I have
already mentioned them earlier.
Financial value, material wealth, amassed fortunes, social success and acceptance, cultural
achievements, military accomplishments, trophy pieces hanging above fireplaces,
possessions and holdings, investments and speculations, class and caste access and status,
is not necessarily at all, if at all, an indication of whom God loves. None of the pomp and
display of this world, its system, reality, alternative realities, and culture, and matrix of cultures,
bespeaks of who is favored by God, of who He favors, and of who is not favored by God, of
who He does not so favor. Therefore, who are you, Sir, to dare presume to tell me that I am
one loved by God when in truth, in fact, and in reality, I might very well be one, hated by God?
Or will you dare to presume that you know the mind, heart, and spirit of God, and proclaim
that God does not hate, or that God is not hateful!? Are we made in the image and in the
likeness of God, save for our hatred? Who is to say, that I have not made myself so
painstakingly rich in hatred, through my own dogged toil and resolute effort, rich in my own
hatred of others, that God still loves me, insofar as He is my Father, and not the father of
another alien race, assembly of foreign nations, and confederacy of interloper tribes? All
conglomerated as these appear to my wind weary eyes, and mournfully wounded soul, and
without qualms about purposefully being mitigated and pitted against me, whilst I am, and my
remnant kinsfolk and clansmen are--as estranged and isolated as we are one from another in
forced diaspora--besieged by multitudes of our enemies, in the hundreds, thousands, and
tens of thousands. In the Old World, I would have gladly, and quite faithfully, and with the
skilled expertise of a master warrior, sought after, hunted down, and slaughtered them all---or
as many as was possible for me to, before myself falling on the battlefield, never to again rise,
least not on this blue-skied green earth---with my sharpened long and short sword, with my
bow and quiver of arrows. But that was way back then. And this, here, and now, I am reduced
to writing out my hatred on an Acer laptop. Thus, I am mostly, not dangerous.
All corporations of the world are---as has been thoroughly documented, witnessed, and
experienced first-hand, be they not for profit, religious, government, business firms, franchises,
501c3 churches, whatever, are clinically, definable and diagnoseable, by the world’s own
criteria---psychopathic. What does that then make the members of those corporations? Saints?
Christians beyond reproach!? The very notion is hysterically laughable and profusely absurd.
No Christian, no jew for that matter, was, is, or will every be, beyond reproach.
So then, as much as it is not good for man to be alone, it is better for man to be alone, than to
serve an alien god that auspicates to “love” man as though man were his progeny, when man
was, is, and never will be, in fact, his child, even though, this God, as you put it, might be so
2
“God loves you!”
Jonathan Charles Gillis
powerful as to influence and impress upon, every aspect and each element of existence, if not
absolutely control the self same said. At least for the time being, in the here and now.
Where the insatiably greedy appetites of the rich prove to be the god that controls most
people and that most people obey, and where each and every soul and opportunity and
choice and experience is reducible and enslaved to money taken or money spent. The very
bible you read and study you would not have, did you not agree to the monetary transaction
to procure it for yourself for such purpose. The blood and life, the innocent blood and life---
that the entire economic system, financial markets, banking institutions, and conglomerated
industries are predicated upon, are strictly dependent on---is alone worth infinitely more than
all the wealth of the whole damn, dirty, rotten world. But I guess, lucky for me and you, they
were snuffed out of existence, so they do not have a voice, they are invisible to us, so they do
not count, they have no real relevance or intrinsic value. To us, they do not exist.
Only our pretentious ego, and devouring self-centered selfishness, that we pathetically
pretend is our human nature, be it fallen or risen, exists, matters, and is meaningful. Only our
contentedness, whatever the expense is has and will cost others, we will exact it and be
ungrateful all the while. Only our disinterestedness in individual souls who God puts in our
way, or in those He would have us find to make a truly and profoundly and verily good
influence and impact on their walk in this treacherous life, makes sense from the vantage
point of our wonton pride and flippant arrogance, as we cast aspersions from the protective
barriers and layers of assurances we have with the routine and sameness of what is typical
and sure, we claim it the blessings of god, when more to the point, it is the wages we glean
from conforming to the world; we gravely bore of these others, these, divergent ones. These
are really not welcome in our church or our congregation, but they are who are burning with
the fire of truth, and so we will bring them into our very high value production, not because
they were invited, but they did impose themselves, and so more to humor ourselves, and be
given a pop, a bump in our quid quo pro relationship with the world and beast system, then
anything else, we will go thru the motions, and condescend, all of ours playing their parts and
roles well on the stage, in the theater, for a little while. And yet, how so very quickly and easily,
we tire of their novelty as fast as we pretended to gravitate towards them and welcome them
with open arms, as though they were our family.
If God were as emotionless as we are, I should robustly declare that He were an automaton
golem, who was little more than dirty old wet blanket thrown on the majestic fire of the truth.
Thankfully, for me, God is the majestic fire of the truth, and, like me, very, very emotional. We
find fault in them, these lone wolves, were there is none, yet we so brazenly showcase our
own faults, and even boast about it, as though it were a badge of faithfulness to God Himself.
This sheer mockery is upstaged only by the more quaint way that we know that our fellow
knows, that we know, that he is not a lone, stray wolf come to claim and devour our flock. No,
there was never any danger in that. For we recognize our own, and obliviously, he, this
individual, that somehow the cat dragged in, is not, like us, collectively or stand-alone
complexioned, a parasitical predator puppet that does the bidding of the overlords of this
world. Oh, besides, we have evil wolves in sheep’s clothing right here in our assembly, even
leading it, and they are uncontested in their predation and revered by all.
But do such have any fear whatsoever that a millstone will be tied around their neck, and that
they will be drowned at the bottom of the sea until death claims its tried and proven prize?
And that such a fate would be better for them. No! They are assured of their place and
confident in their position. Never-mind the nepotism that befouls the soviet-esque architecture
of the building, and the draconian crimes so replete within, that the crime of choice is literally
stained on the skin, or aura if I may, of the perpetrator. This one, child molestation, that one
judaizing the christian faith and grooming children for roles to fill and parts to play not at all
befitting a royal child of God Almighty Supreme. What a bunch of dragon shit, in a dragon shit
show, in a dragon shithole. My ancestors had no qualms about slaying dragons, not for sport
mind you, but because it was necessary. Little wonderment at that. Now, we live in a world
where everyone, no matter their age, race, or religion, beholds and accepts the beast as
forward motion in the right direction.
3
“God loves you!”
Jonathan Charles Gillis
Let us revisit, and perhaps in another way phrase this dimension of thought. If God, as you
put it, cuts off a branch from a Redwood tree, and artificially grafts it onto a branch of a
cypress tree, is the arborist right in believing that the father of the Redwood branch is the
cypress tree, when the one branch was physically, and quite violently, separated from his own
kind, from his own family tree, in our case here, the Redwood, and grafted onto an entirely
diametric tree? Or is the arborist lead into wrongly believing that God, as you put it,
responsible for such…for such absolute tampering with nature and what is natural, cloaked in
synthetic normalcy, and above-reprimand theocracy, is his God and loves him as though he
was/is his own? How can even the cypress tree love, or accept, the Redwood branch as its
own, when naturally and instinctively, all carbon-based sentient species of life will reject what
is foreign to it, be it an object, a person, a place, or a thing, be it a microorganism infesting
inside the body, or be it a large macro-organism pestering outside of the body, or a collection
of hostile entities affecting asinine malicious or serious deadly intent for that matter?
If such a god is guilty of such acedia and inversion of reality, I would and will to have nothing
whatsoever to do with him, his children, and his followers. And if they would solicit me in any
way, shape, or form, at any time, in any place, for anything or any reason, I would and will
consider such, criminal trespassing, stalking, and harassment to be investigated and
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the absolute legitimate law and authority of Creation.
For even if I were a father myself, which I tragically, and through no fault of my own, am not,
and had no less then two wonderful and beautiful children of my own, I and my wife may, or
may not, inevitably prefer and favor, and thus respect, or love more, one child over another,
intermittently, times be, and vice-a-versa, for a reason, or for reasons be, I, or we, might not
even understand let alone be conscious of.
Does the seedling of a White Pine Tree bear the fruit of an old majestic Oak? Of course not.
Does the arborist graft a branch of the Pine into the Oak and seriously consider that such a
branch thereafter is now to be considered part and parcel of the Oak tree? If he did, I would
posit that he were delusional and should not be at all trusted to the stewardship of the tree
and plant kingdoms. For his ideology, and presuming he would act on such as I have outlined,
would indicate, at best, that he is in the wrong career field. Now, if the scientist, say, the
microbiologist, cross-bred two trees and produced offspring, what but a hybrid would that
offspring be? He plays at god, but he is not God.
Keeping within the parameters of our context, if a jewish adult male sexually knows a White
woman, the offspring from such a race-mixed union---which fundamentally might rightfully be
argued not to be the will of Almighty God Supreme at all, but rather the will of humales, or
humanity, lusts of the flesh, social expedience, familial and peer pressures, economic
convenience, political agenda, and any number of other asinine, vain, trivial, and pathetic
excuses to force a marriage that was not, is not, and never will be right---will be a jewish-
hybrid, not a White child. And who, pray-tell is the father? It certainly is not Mother Nature.
The father is corrupted humale, human, corrupting Mother Nature, under the dishonest guise
of improving Her and helping “progress” along, be such “progress” wrongly assigned to Her or
greedily clutched by the humale, human, a particularly peculiar species in and of himself. Or,
under the guise that “God loves you!”, in which case, anything goes I suppose, the
consequences be damned. Unless, of course, you are actually on the side of the truth. But
what good is the truth, as told, from the point of view of the liar? It is wrong and arrogantly
presumptuous to conclude that any change, especially if it is forced, no matter how slight or
radical, and modification, no matter how much a violation of the law or revolutionary against
nature, is an improvement and constitutes a good. Much in the same way that it is wrong to
conclude, that merely because something is possible, it should then be done, and since it has
been done, it should continue, and it is right, because “God loves you!”, even if the act,
literally was, is, and always will be, wrong. But not to fret, because, “God loves you!”.
Because God loves me, do I then get back my past 20 years, that have been raped and
murdered by the multitudinous enemies of my soul, mind, and heart, through no fault of my
own? No, of course, those 20 years were already spent and wasted before they even
occurred, by the same dark side and sinister forces that benefit the second most from your
religion, your fellowship, and your church. And of course your Bible, that has been extremely
and heavily plagiarized and adulterated from ancient texts that were antecedent to the jewish
4
“God loves you!”
Jonathan Charles Gillis
rabbis and talmudists. Incidentally, who is it that owns and controls the media and publishing
industry?
Moreover, a father will not love his adopted son the same as, or more than, his own biological
son. He might respect and favor his adopted son, and show him more preference, but his own
biological son he would, and will, always love more, even when and where he of needs be
disowns and becomes estranged from his own son, for such is a literal, observable and
experiential and immovable law of Father God Supreme and Mother Nature’s Law. And, by
the way, a violation of the law of nature, is not a law, or the law of nature. A violation of nature
does not equate to nature. The consequence and negative effects of the violation of nature, or
multitudinous violations of nature, is not a law, is not the law, does not maketh the law. A
violation of nature, is not nature, the sinister reality imposed on man, and all of creation, as a
result of the violation of nature, is not nature. A violation of the law, a criminal act, or a series
of criminal actions, does not amount to the law, does not constitute the law, nor the
enforcement of the law. The negative consequences of a criminal act, a series of criminal
actions, or organized and regular criminal activity, particularly as befall and are enforced
against the victims of the same, does not amount to, does not constitute, is not, the law, or a
law, to then be upheld and enforced against those of us who are not criminals and not
perpetrators of organized crimes, as initiated members of collective groups who commit, for
instance, gangstalking and group harassment, molestation, and gaslighting against a targeted
individual victim, are themselves. This, notwithstanding that there are plenty of criminals in
government who preside as chiefs of police, lawyers, and judges. To name only a few. As
well as plenty of criminals who comfortably reside and live in the confines of the general
population, many of who identify themselves as christians and leaders at that. Also, a
counterfeit is not the real, authentic, genuine article. An identity thief is not the original person
whose identity has been stolen and utilized. The work of a plagiarist is not the original work,
and is not a trustworthy source.
A jew telling me his father loves me the same as he, is unbelievable, for it is literally contrary
to nature. If I, as a White man, were to tell a black male that my father is his father, and that
my father loves him, and no different than me, I would daresay that I would be a living oddity
that belonged in a circus freak show, or an insane asylum, and not in a high-trust, civilized
society where crime is practicably and practically non-existent. Me and the black male might
have a big laugh over such a stupid remark. This reality is suspicious for a variety of other
reasons, some of them novel, some of them not. Am I supposed to believe that spiritual
enlightenment is found in what is antithetical to nature, in what is a violation of nature? Is
eternal life found in the abandonment of nature? Corruption of nature, is not nature. Sin is
corruption. Our nature is not corruption. Sin is a violation of our nature. Sin is corruption of
nature. We do not have a sin nature. How is the destruction of nature, nature? It is not. Sin
mutates our nature to the destruction point whereby we are disavowed from practicing our
nature, and thus being in harmony and communion with the natural world, and thus with God.
Our enemies know this. And in no way, would such contrariness to nature, no matter how it is
advertised, be preferred to me such that I would put my faith into the father of another. My
Father has my faith. I trust my Father, and my Father alone, with my faith.
If there was a friend, or one I thought to be my friend, trying to convince me to abandon my
own father and embrace his father, the hackles on the back of my neck should stand on end.
For if he truly were my friend, he would not proselytize me with such communistic and
bolshevik bigotry. Moreover, I imagine to my chagrin, if this friend of mine, so-called, harped
on and on about how great his father was, how loving, how caring, how powerful, how
politically correct and socially hip, droning on and on about his own father, whilst not even
being bothered to mention my Father, or if the topic up for discussion was my Father, how my
so-called friend would have nothing good to say, and be dismissive and condescending and
belittling to both me and my Father, and as quickly as possible move on to talking about
something else, namely his obsession with his father…Well, I should say, I could not abide
such a so-called friend, or “brother” “in christ” for any length of time without genuinely being
driven somewhat mad. Being so alienated in such fellowship, I would have no choice but to
separate and once again, being alone. I pity those people who have never had to learn to
understand the language of being alone and to fluently speak loneliness.
5
“God loves you!”
Jonathan Charles Gillis
Those who are so vile in their presumptuousness, and arrogant in their absurdly inflated
sense of how intelligent they are, or how morally superior they are, notwithstanding the high-
social production value of their assembly and the total conformity to the world of the same, as
to dare to condescendingly slander and bear false witness against my Father, who, like me, is
not a jew, by falsely stating that their father, who is a jew, and my Father are one and, in, the
same, are not worthy of my attention, nor my fellowship, let alone my respect and love.
Forty one years, or 4100 years, in any vocation within any occupation is not at all impressive
in a world where each and every choice and decision is reducible to money (debt owned by
and owed to the jewish race that rules the world) gained, and money (debt owned by and
owed to the jewish race that rules the world) spent. The value of one true man’s faith, albeit
invisible, whatever his race, ethnicity, and tribe, might very well be worth infinitely more than
the value of an entire people’s organized religion, however seen and established. I hate liars.
Like Father, like Son…I uneducatedly guess. Are the Catholics today’s Scribes while the
Protestants are today’s Pharisees?
I do not appreciate the value of a (supposed) good education, when the educated class, by
and large and more often then not, fail, through thoughts, words, and actions, to prove
themselves to be, any less or more than the organized narcissistic, predatory parasitic
abusers of the multi-racial collective, hive-mind alien-hybrid world, totally conformed to, and
accepted by, the same world, and in all ways positively and gleefully benefiting from the same
world system, its dominant reality, and variant realities, and its mainstream culture and
alternative cultures---while paying mocking lip service to this or that problem, woe, or ill, when
in the presence of real men---which to an utmost extent and extreme degree made them as
they are, such as they are, with a pride of life, and a hypocrisy of spirit, that must make, lucifer,
satan, and the devil so proud. No, I cannot abide such a lot.
I will die young for the truth, not of this world, instead of living and growing old for the lie of,
and that is, this world. Spiritual, and otherwise, terrorists, molesters, groomers, tormentors,
torturers, stalkers, abusers, narcissists, parasites, predators, cowards, and insect-like wights,
be damned. In my, agrestic, nescient, and underpinned opinion.
