Sports Law Governance and Regulation Matthew J. Mitten Instant Download
Sports Law Governance and Regulation Matthew J. Mitten Instant Download
https://textbookfull.com/product/sports-law-governance-and-regulation-matthew-j-mitten/
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
Sports Law Governance and Regulation Matthew J. Mitten pdf
download
Available Formats
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions U.S. serves customers worldwide with CCH, Aspen Publishers, and
Kluwer Law International products. (www.WKLegaledu.com)
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, recording, or utilized by any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission
from the publisher. For information about permissions or to request permissions online, visit us at
www.WKLegaledu.com, or a written request may be faxed to our permissions department at 212-771-0803.
Wolters Kluwer
Attn: Order Department
PO Box 990
Frederick, MD 21705
eISBN 978-1-4548-7481-2
Names: Mitten, Matthew J., 1959- author. | Davis, Timothy, 1954- author. | Smith, Rodney K., author. | Shropshire,
Kenneth L., author. | Osborne, Barbara, author.
Title: Sports law / Matthew J. Mitten, Professor of Law and Director, National Sports Law Institute Marquette
University Law School; Timothy Davis, John W. & Ruth H. Turnage Professor of Law Wake Forest University
School of Law; Rodney K. Smith, Professor of Practice and Director, Center for Sports Law and Policy Thomas
Jefferson School of Law; Kenneth L. Shropshire, David W. Hauck Professor Wharton School, University of
Pennsylvania; Barbara Osborne, Associate Professor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;.
Description: Second edition. | New York : Wolters Kluwer, 2016. | Series: Aspen college series | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2015046483 | ISBN 9781454869788 (alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Sports--Law and legislation--United States. | LCGFT: Casebooks.
Classification: LCC KF3989 .M58 2016 | DDC 344.73/099–dc23 LC record available at
http://lccn.loc.gov/2015046483
4
About Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions U.S.
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions U.S. delivers expert content and solutions in
the areas of law, corporate compliance, health compliance, reimbursement, and legal
education. Its practical solutions help customers successfully navigate the demands of a
changing environment to drive their daily activities, enhance decision quality and inspire
confident outcomes.
Serving customers worldwide, its legal and regulatory solutions portfolio includes products
under the Aspen Publishers, CCH Incorporated, Kluwer Law International, ftwilliam.com
and MediRegs names. They are regarded as exceptional and trusted resources for general
legal and practice-specific knowledge, compliance and risk management, dynamic workflow
solutions, and expert commentary.
5
To Bob Berry,
our friend and colleague
6
Summary of Contents
Contents
Preface
Glossary
Table of Cases
Index
7
Contents
Preface
Introduction: The Rise of the Regulation of Interscholastic and Youth Athletics at the
State, National, and International Levels
A. Historical Overview
B. Interscholastic and Youth Athletics Regulatory Structure, Governance, and
Administrative Processes
Judicial Regulation of Interscholastic and Youth Athletics
A. State Action
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
Questions
8
Notes
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association v. Brentwood Academy (Brentwood II)
Questions
B. Eligibility Issues
1. Transfer Rules
Indiana High School Athletic Association v. Carlberg
Notes
Problem 2-1
2. Outside Competition Rules
Question
3. Good Conduct Rules
Brands v. Sheldon Community School
Questions
Notes
4. Age Rules
Cruz v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association, Inc.
Questions
Problem 2-2
5. Grooming Rules
6. No-Pass, No Play Rules
Questions
7. Exclusion of Homeschooled Students from Athletic Participation
Questions
Note
C. First and Fourth Amendment Issues
1. Drug Testing
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton
Questions
Notes
Problem 2-3
2. Freedom of Speech and Association
Wildman v. Marshalltown School District
Questions
3. Freedom of Religion
a. Free Exercise Issues
Questions
9
Note
Problem 2-4
b. Establishment Clause Issues
Questions
Problem 2-5
D. Review of Game Results
Questions
E. Health and Safety Issues in Youth and Interscholastic Sports
Questions
Introduction
A Brief History: NCAA Governance of Intercollegiate Athletics
Questions
NCAA Regulatory Authority and Processes
A. NCAA: History of Regulation and the Rules Infractions Process
B. Institutional Violations of NCAA Rules and Sanctions
University of Southern California Infractions Appeals Committee Report No. 323
Questions
The Penn State University Case
Questions
The University of Miami Case
Questions
The University of North Carolina Case
Questions
C. Individual Responsibility for NCAA Rules Violations and Sanctions
Former Head Men’s Basketball Coach University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Public
Infractions Appeals Committee Report
Questions
Other Cases Involving Coaches
Questions
Notes
Problem 3-1
Legal Limits on NCAA Regulatory Authority
A. Federal and State Civil Rights Law
10
NCAA v. Smith
Question
B. Drug Testing and Privacy
Questions
C. Contract and Private Association Laws
Bloom v. NCAA
Questions
D. Federal Antitrust Law
1. Nature and Scope of Antitrust Limits on NCAA Regulatory Authority
2. Case Law
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
Questions
Smith v. NCAA
Notes
O’Bannon v. NCAA
Questions
11
Note 122
D. Defining the Scope of Institutional Obligations to Student-Athletes
Taylor v. Wake Forest University
Questions
Ross v. Creighton University
Questions
Notes
E. NCAA Academic Reform Initiatives
1. NCAA Academic Reform Legislation
2. Academic Progress Rate
Questions
F. Limited Scope of Constitutional Protections
1. General Principles: What Is a Property Interest?
2. A Property Interest in Athletic Participation?
Hysaw v. Washburn University of Topeka
Question
Notes
Problem 4-1
G. Student-Athletes as Employees: Workers’ Compensation
1. Workers’ Compensation: General Principles
2. Student-Athletes and Workers’ Compensation: Waldrep v. Texas Employers Insurance
Association
Questions
Note
3. Student-Athlete Unionization
Questions
Note
First Amendment Rights in Intercollegiate Athletics
A. Introduction
B. The First Amendment and the Media
Questions
C. Religious Liberty Issues
Questions
Problem 4-2
12
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Gender-Based Exclusion from a Particular Sport
Force v. Pierce City R-VI School District
Questions
Problem 5-1
Equal Athletic Participation Opportunities, Benefits, and Treatment
A. Accommodation
Cohen v. Brown University
Questions
Problem 5-2
B. Equal Benefits and Treatment
Questions
Reverse Discrimination Claims and Title IX
Neal v. Board of Trustees of the California State Universities
Questions
Title IX and Sexual Harassment
A. Coach-Athlete Sexual Harassment
B. Peer Sexual Harassment
Questions
Gender-Based Employment Discrimination in Athletics
A. Employment Discrimination
Deli v. University of Minnesota
Questions
B. Retaliatory Discharge or Punitive Action
Introduction
Historical Perspective
A. Racial Segregation: Intercollegiate Athletics
1. Formal Rules of Exclusion
2. Informal Rules of Discrimination
B. Racial Segregation: Professional Sports
C. The Reintegration of Professional and Amateur Sports
Race and Racial Equity in Modern Sports: An Evolving Debate
13
A. College Sports Coaching and Administrative Opportunities
1. Coaching
2. Athletic Administration
B. Professional Sports
C. Intersections
1. Race and Gender
2. Race and Economic Exploitation
3. Race and Globalization
Questions
Case Law
A. Academic Racism and Marginalization: NCAA Initial Eligibility Rules
Questions
Problem 6-1
B. Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. University of New Haven
Questions
Problem 6-2
C. Stereotypes Racially Stereotyped Mascots—Racism or Pride?
Questions
Problem 6-3
D. Racially Hostile Environments and Conduct
Problem 6-4
Introduction
Liability for Athletics-Related Injuries
A. Injury to Athletes
1. Co-Participant Tort Liability
Shin v. Ahn
Questions
Note
Problem 7-1
2. Co-Participant Criminal Liability
People v. Schacker
Regina v. McSorley
14
People v. Hall
Questions
Note
Problem 7-2
Liability of Educational Institutions (and Organizations)
A. High School
Kahn v. East Side Union High School District
Questions
Notes
B. Colleges and Universities
Orr v. Brigham Young University
Question
Notes
Problem 7-3
C. Injury to Spectators
Thurmond v. Prince William Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Questions
Notes
Problem 7-4
Tort Immunities
Question
Problem 7-5
Validity of Liability Waivers
Wagenblast v. Odessa School District No. 105-157-166J
Sharon v. City of Newton
Questions
Introduction
Sports Medicine Malpractice Liability
A. Team Physicians
B. Athletic Trainers
C. Athlete's Contributory Negligence
D. Concussion
Injury Compensation for Professional Athletes
Pro-Football, Inc. v. Uhlenhake
15
Question
Note
DePiano v. Montreal Baseball Club, Ltd.
Participation Rights of Athletes with Physical or Mental Impairments
A. Rehabilitation Act of 1973
B. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Questions
Notes
Problem 8-1
Introduction
Trademarks, Logos, and Other Identifying Sports Insignia
A. Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition
1. Name of Sports Team or Event
2. Unauthorized Affixation of Sports Team Mark to Merchandise
National Football League Properties, Inc. v. New Jersey Giants, Inc.
Question
Notes
B. Trademark Dilution
C. Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act of 1999
D. Olympic Marks
Problem 9-1
Ambush Marketing
Problem 9-2
Real-Time Game Accounts and Broadcasting Rights
A. Historical Background
B. Nature and Scope of Copyright Law Protection
C. Copyright Infringement of a Sports Broadcast
NFL v. TVRadioNow Corp.
Question
Note
D. Misappropriation of Real-Time Game Accounts and Scores
Problem 9-3
Athletes’ Lanham Act and State Law Privacy, Reputation, and Publicity Rights
16
A. Lanham Act
B. State Laws
1. Defamation
2. Right of Privacy
3. Right of Publicity
a. Nature and Scope of the Right of Publicity
b. First Amendment Limitations
Problem 9-4
Introduction
Is There a Property Interest in Athletic Employment?
Questions
Problem 10-1
A. Termination
1. Constitutes Termination for “Cause”?
Questions
2. Termination for Rules Violations and Non-Sports-Related Indiscretions
Questions
Problem 10-2
3. Termination for Abusive Conduct
Question
Problem 10-3
4. Free Speech and Retaliation Issues
B. Compensation and Other Financial Matters
Question
Questions
Termination, Breach, and Liquidated Damages
Vanderbilt University v. DiNardo
Questions
Note
Exploring Other Contractual Relationships
A. Sponsorship Agreements
B. Venue Agreements
17
Introduction
Origin and Evolution of Modern North American Professional Sports Industries
A. Evolution of Sports into a Business and Profession
B. Unique Features of Professional Team Sports
C. The Principal “Players” in the Professional Sports Industries
1. Leagues
2. Clubs or Teams
3. Commissioners
4. Players
5. Players Associations
6. Player Agents
7. Other Industries Integral to Modern Professional Sports
Internal League Governance and Commissioner Authority
A. Legal Limits on Internal League Governance
B. League Commissioner’s “Best Interests of the Game” Authority and Legal Limits
Charles O. Finley & Co., Inc. v. Kuhn
Note
Problem 11-1
Federal Antitrust Law Limits on League Rules and Governance
A. Overview
B. Baseball’s Antitrust Exemption
Flood v. Kuhn
Question
Note
C. Application of Sherman Act §1
1. Concerted Action Requirement
2. Unreasonable Restraint of Trade
a. Acquisition, Ownership, and Sale of a Franchise
Levin v. NBA
Note
b. Franchise Relocation
c. Restrictions on Intellectual Property Rights Licensing and Sales
D. Application of Sherman Act §2
Problem 11-2
18
Introduction
Contract Law
Questions
Problem 12-1
Labor Law
A. Collective Bargaining in the Professional Sports Industries
B. Professional Team Sports Drug-Testing Programs
Questions
Problem 12-2
C. Unfair Labor Practices
1. League Interference with Players’ Rights to Unionize
2. League Refusal to Recognize Union as Exclusive Bargaining Representative
3. Retaliation Against Union Activists
4. Breach of Duty to Bargain in Good Faith or Provide Relevant Information
Concerning Mandatory Subjects of Collective Bargaining
Silverman v. Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc. (Silverman I)
Note
5. Discrimination Against Striking Players
Questions
D. Union’s Duty of Fair Representation
E. Labor Arbitration
National & American League Professional Baseball Clubs v. Major League Baseball
Players Association
Notes
The Intersection of Antitrust and Labor Law
Questions
19
Problem 13-1
D. Agent Conflicts of Interest with Athletes
The Detroit Lions, Inc. v. Argovitz
Questions
Problem 13-2
Competition for Clients: Conflicts Between Agents
A. Introduction
B. Consolidation
C. Termination
NFLPA Standard Representation Agreement
D. Disparagement
E. What Is Permissible Competition?
Questions
F. The Issue of Race
Question
An International Perspective
External Regulation and Legislation
A. Federal Legislation
1. SPARTA
2. General Federal Laws
Questions
B. State Regulation: The UAAA
Uniform Athlete Agents Act (2000)
Problem 13-3
C. Players Associations
1. Authority to Regulate
Question
2. Regulating the Athlete-Agent Relationship
a. Sanctions: Suspensions and Decertification
b. Fees/Agent Compensation
c. NFLPA Amendments
d. MLBPA Amendments
e. Excerpts of Players Association and NCAA Regulations
NFLPA Regulations Governing Contract Advisors
Questions
NCAA Bylaw, Article 12
20
Problem 13-4
Introduction
A. Origin, History, and Objectives of the Olympic Games
B. Organization, Governance, and Structure of the Olympic Movement
Regulation of Olympic Sports Within the United States
Question
Limits on the Use of National Law to Regulate Olympic and International Athletic
Competition
Question
Problem 14-1
Court of Arbitration for Sport
A. Overview
B. Disputed Competition Results
Yang Tae Young v. International Gymnastics Federation
Note
Problem 14-2
C. Doping Violations and Sanctions
1. Strict Liability Standard, Clear Notice Requirements, and Proportionate Sanctions
Question
2. Interpretation and Application of the World Anti-Doping Code
Guillermo Cañas v. ATP Tour
Questions
Notes
Developing International Issues
Notes
Glossary
Table of Cases
Index
21
Preface
Second Edition
To provide users of our book with the most current and comprehensive sports law and
governance text available, we have revised and updated the second edition of our book to
include discussions of the most recent legal and governance developments affecting youth,
interscholastic, intercollegiate, Olympic, and professional sports that have occurred since
our first edition was published in 2012. The sports industry, at all levels, has experienced
significant and rapid change in that time period. That change is captured in this text. This
edition includes a number of recent legal decisions and new materials regarding
developments in governance that reflect the increasing complexity of problems arising in
the sports industry. This edition, therefore, includes materials reflecting changes in
governance at the professional level (e.g., issues like “Deflategate” and governance within
the National Football League (NFL)) and the new governance structure of the National
Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). We have updated historical sections of the book as
well, to give students a feel for the magnitude of those changes. The Second Edition also
includes refined problems and notes that are designed to encourage students to wrestle with
the kinds of legal and governance problems that are arising and will hereafter arise within
the industry. With input from thoughtful users of the First Edition, we have been able to
add new material without unduly expanding the length of the text. As such, the text can
still be effectively used in either a two- or three-credit course. With users’ comments and
based on our own use of the text, we have reorganized and, where necessary, consolidated
materials. We trust that you will find this Second Edition to be an excellent text for the
study of sports law and governance. We welcome your continuing comments regarding the
text. Please feel free to contact any of us with your comments and suggestions for
improving the book: Matt Mitten ([email protected]), Tim Davis
([email protected]), Barbara Osborne ([email protected]), Ken Shropshire
([email protected]), and Rod Smith ([email protected]).
First Edition
This book, which is adapted from three of the authors’ widely used law school text, is
designed to introduce undergraduate and graduate students to the various and often
differing legal frameworks regulating high school, college, professional, and Olympic sports
competition along with important, contemporary topics such as gender and racial equity;
health, safety, and risk management; and intellectual property issues in sports. It provides
an overview of the significant historical, economic, and sociological issues affecting the
22
development of the laws regulating sports at each level of competition, as well as common
sports-related legal issues. The book, which is intended for use as the text in either a two- or
three-credit-hour undergraduate or graduate sports law course in sports management or
other program, covers a wide variety of contemporary sports law issues of interest to future
sports administrators, executives, and business managers, as well as coaches and other sports
industry personnel. It has been carefully designed and written to provide undergraduate
and graduate professors and students with a comprehensive, multipurpose text that gives a
balanced perspective regarding a multitude of legal and regulatory issues that frequently
arise in interscholastic, intercollegiate, professional, and Olympic sports industries.
This book begins by providing an introduction to the study of sports law and a brief
overview of the U.S. legal system, as well as guidance on how to effectively use the case
method to facilitate and enhance learning. In Chapters 2–4, 11–12, and 14, the book
covers the internal governance systems for high school, college, professional, and Olympic
sports, respectively. These chapters also cover the primary bodies of public law (e.g., private
association, constitutional, antitrust, and labor law) that shape, regulate, and constrain each
internal governance system. The remaining chapters cover various topics raising legal issues
of significance in more than one of the amateur or professional sports industries: coaches’
contracts (Chapter 10); gender equity (Chapter 5); racial equity (Chapter 6); health, safety,
and risk management (Chapter 7); and intellectual property (Chapter 9).
This text uses the case method, which involves the study of illustrative legal disputes
resolved by courts through the litigation process, and establishes a body of legal precedent
regulating various aspects of the sports industry. This method of learning is designed to
encourage students to engage in critical thinking by identifying the legal issues in each case,
the parties’ respective arguments, and the court’s ruling and rationale for its decision. It
stimulates the development of a dialogue between the professor and students (and
frequently among students as well). It also facilitates students’ understanding of the laws
regulating the sports industry. In addition to the illustrative cases (which have been edited
substantially), each chapter provides explanatory material, notes, questions, and review
problems designed to enable students to understand how basic legal doctrines apply to
problems arising in the sports context. Ideally, students can then use this knowledge to
identify sports industry legal issues and to understand how they are likely to be resolved.
In addition to helping students develop an understanding of the legal framework
regulating high school, college, professional, and Olympic sports and other sports-related
legal issues, a sports law course provides several important educational benefits. It exposes
students (some of whom may be considering law school) to several different bodies of law
and provides them with a general understanding of numerous laws—knowledge that may
be useful in future careers other than in the sports industry. In addition, sports law deals
with broader issues that merit deeper study and reflection, such as the role of sports in our
culture and whether current laws effectively promote appropriate, ethical, and just practices
and behavior in the amateur and professional sports industries. We hope that our book
encourages thoughtful consideration of these and other important sports-related issues.
23
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Second Edition
Professor Mitten thanks Lori Shaw (Marquette Law School Class of 2016) for her helpful
review of and comments on various chapters and the glossary.
Professor Davis thanks Wake Forest University School of Law for its generous research
support and Alan Bowie (Wake Forest School of Law Class of 2017) for his assistance.
Professor Osborne thanks the University of North Carolina Law School for providing
research support and UNC law students Tyler O’Hara and Anna Finger for their research
assistance.
Professor Smith thanks Dean Douglas Sylvester for his continuing support, and Devin
Tarwater (Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University 2015) and
Krizia Verplancke and Blake Wilkie (Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law 2016 and
2017, respectively). He also thanks students J. Leigh Hawley and Jon Drago for their
helpful review during the production process.
First Edition
Professor Mitten thanks Erica Reib (Marquette Law 2011) for her helpful review of and
comments on various draft chapters and Chris Kaminski (Marquette Law 2013) for his
assistance in preparing the glossary.
Professor Davis thanks Wake Forest University School of Law for its generous research
support and the following Wake Forest students for their research assistance: Justin Bell,
Thailer Buari, and Nathan Harrill.
Professor Shropshire wishes to thank students who recently participated in his sports
law course at Penn for their helpful comments.
Professor Osborne thanks the University of North Carolina Law School for providing
research support and UNC law student Scott Holder for his research assistance.
Professor Smith appreciates the support offered by Dean Rudy Hasl and Associate
Dean Eric J. Mitnik.
We also thank the following reviewers, whose insightful comments helped shape this
text: Jan Blade, Delaware State University; Sandra Defebaugh, Eastern Michigan
University; Gil Fried, University of New Haven; Michael Gentile, Niagara University;
Richard Hunter, Seton Hall University; Paul Klein, Duquesne University; William
Nowlan, Lasell College; Marissa Pollick, University of Michigan; Jessie C. Roberson, Ohio
University; and Ellen M. Zavian, George Washington University.
Matthew J. Mitten
Timothy Davis
24
Rodney K. Smith
Kenneth L. Shropshire
Barbara Osborne
December 2015
25
Should sports law be recognized as an independent substantive area of the law such as torts,
contracts, or employment law? As the following excerpt reveals, scholars have debated this
question.
The traditional view is that sports law represents nothing more than an amalgamation of
various substantive areas of the law that are relevant in the sports context. According to this
perspective, the term sports law is a misnomer, given that sport represents a form of activity
and entertainment that is governed by the legal system in its entirety. Adherents to the
traditional perspective argue that ‘‘sports law simply entails the application of basic legal
precepts to a specific industry’’ that are drawn from other substantive areas of the law.
Consequently, no separately identifiable body of law exists that can be characterized as
sports law.
B. The Moderate Position: ‘‘Sports Law’’ May Develop into a Field of Law
Other commentators have begun increasingly to question the traditional view that no
corpus of law exists that can be characterized as an independent field of law called “sports
law” .… [Some] have staked out what represents a middle ground. Professor Kenneth
Shropshire acknowledges that developments, such as state and federal legislation impacting
sports (for example, state statutes regulating sports agents, and federal statutes such as Title
IX), suggest a ‘‘growing sports-only corpus” of law.
Professor Burlette Carter argues that sports law is in the midst of an exciting, yet
challenging, transformative process. According to Professor Carter, this process parallels the
increased focus by law schools on sports and the growing significance of sports regulation to
participants, organizations, and communities. She believes that these developments will
better shape the contours of this emerging field of study. This, in turn, will eventually
transform sports law from ‘‘a course without a corpus’’ to a widely recognized independent
26
substantive area of law.
Others argue that sports law currently exists as a field of law. Adherents to this view
emphasize the growing body of case and statutory law specific to the sports industry as
evidence of the existence of a separately identifiable body of law. Pointing to the increasing
body of judicial and legislative law specific to sports, Professor [Simone] Gardiner argues:
It is true to say that [sports law] is largely an amalgam of interrelated legal disciplines involving such areas as
contract, taxation, employment, competition and criminal law but dedicated legislation and case law has
developed and will continue to do so. As an area of academic study and extensive practitioner involvement,
the time is right to accept that a new legal area has been born—sports law.
Regardless of the position that is adopted regarding the ‘‘what is sports law’’ debate, most
would agree that matters arising in the sports law context implicate diverse substantive areas
of law. Whether or not sports law is a separate field of law, a reflection of substantive law
related to the sports industry, or some combination, the vast array of substantive legal
27
topics presented in a basic Sports Law course can sometimes prove surprisingly challenging.
To enjoy and ultimately excel in this area, it will be helpful for you to have an introduction
to legal basics.
Sports law involves both public and private law. Public law can be broadly described
as the law that governs the relationships between the government and individuals, as well as
the relationships between individuals that directly affect society. Constitutional law,
administrative law, and criminal law are areas of public law that intersect with sports law.
Private law governs the relationships between individuals (or corporations); sports law
applications include contracts, torts, and the law of private associations. However, you will
learn that distinctions in law are rarely clear. Public and private law often intersect in areas
such as labor and antitrust. For undergraduate and graduate students interested in working
in some capacity in the amateur or professional sports industries, this introduction will help
you better understand the legal landscape and will aid you in your work with lawyers, who
should be consulted whenever you deal with legal issues.
The United States has a federalist government, which means power is shared between the
national and state (and local) governments. The basic operating principles for the federal
and state governments are embodied in the Constitution. The federal Constitution
identifies the fundamental rights of citizens of the United States and delineates limits on
the government’s ability to interfere with those rights. The federal Constitution applies to
all states, and is preeminent; states may grant additional rights, but they may not limit
rights that the federal Constitution guarantees. Constitutional cases are based on the
interpretation of state constitutions or the federal Constitution. Federal laws that are
inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution are invalid—in our legal hierarchy, constitutional
provisions are the most significant. That is what is meant when it is said that the U.S.
Constitution is the law of the land. State laws that are inconsistent with the state or federal
constitutions are also held to be unconstitutional and invalid.
The foundation of the federal government is based upon a balance of power between
the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Each of these branches is a source of law.
The executive branch is the President of the United States. The President is ultimately
responsible for implementing and enforcing federal laws, through executive orders and
through the regulations set forth by the administrative agencies. For example, the U.S.
Department of Education promulgates Title IX regulations dealing with gender
discrimination under the auspices of administrative legal authority that provides part of the
substantive basis of sports law. The President also appoints the heads of the federal
agencies, who also serve on the President’s cabinet.
The legislative branch is responsible for writing, debating, and passing bills.
Demonstrating balance of power, bills only become law when the President has signed
them. If the President vetoes a bill, Congress has the ability to vote to override the veto.
28
The role of the judicial branch is to interpret the Constitution or legislation. Balance
of power is demonstrated through judicial interpretation of legislation (statutes) or
regulations (regulatory materials developed by administrative or regulatory bodies). In these
instances, judicial decisions often involve interpreting or determining the applicability and
reach of a given regulation or piece of legislation. The judiciary also creates law, known as
the common law, through the precedent established in case decisions. The concepts of
common law and precedent will be discussed later in this chapter.
State governments are organized similarly. The state constitution embodies the
principles upon which the state government operates. Balance of power exists within each
state, with the governor of each state representing the executive branch and enforcing the
law, state representatives to the legislature who enact the law, and the state (and local)
judiciary interprets the law.
There are also local and regulatory decision-making bodies that make law. County
governments and school districts, for example, regularly promulgate laws that may provide
the grist for a decision in the sports area. High school and collegiate athletic associations
may also pass and enforce regulations that provide the basis for decisions in the sports law
area.
In the United States, there are two dominant court systems—the federal courts and the
state courts. Jurisdiction is the power of the court to hear and determine the outcome of a
case. A court establishes this power because of the subject matter of the case or the parties
who are involved. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the particular category of the case,
for example, a dispute involving land or the right to use a corporate logo. Personal
jurisdiction refers to the court’s power over the various parties to the case. Cases in the
federal court system or the state courts may involve civil law or criminal law. Disputes
between public or private parties are civil law matters which are decided on a
preponderance of the evidence standard. Criminal law involves acts that are harmful to
society as a whole, so the government represents the people in putting forward a case
against a criminal defendant. The government must prove that the defendant committed
the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Broadly too, particularly in sports law-related cases, parties will seek remedies in “law”
or “equity.” A remedy at law is primarily one where money damages are sought as a means
of compensating the injured party. For example, if a coach feels that he or she is owed an
additional salary payment, money would resolve that issue and constitute a remedy at law.
However, if a team wanted to retain a coach with special skills or keep him or her from
coaching for another team, that would require an equitable remedy, including a court’s
issuance of an order of specific performance or an injunction. Specific performance would
be an order for the coach to continue coaching, and the injunction would bar the coach
from coaching another team.
29
the at division
principle desire of
as or
it those The
the for
Mr century
felt the
seen
it of
Now
here every
had
a of
than formed logic
argument
being important li
us history its
had
Those in my
duties
monkey reading
xvi For
indeed broken
it
some
catholics
of insula
a motive
abuse
stands End do
Spiritual the be
beside looked
with
Dr
of
made by
been He
motive
is followed adducible
as in
together vellent the
It of further
of indeed a
becomes on when
spiritual a and
in Head battle
stationary in cannot
romance place
of to
the
a the
year
a His
nature
Vivis
the
it Ireland a
agreed and
preparation by
so
frail as shop
a
of one without
from illustration
this St
this outward
Cecilia 11 repeopled
conspiracy
or distinguished
of
present
every remember
Dehats the
how
an
Disturbances supernatural
small s
party
recent
they as communicant
more
Edward
hatred
to than
our the
to
independent words
democratic The by
has represent
indemnity to had
The
not as
Groundwork out
some
and of
gallery by
from serious
to
altogether He
this And
them ecclesiastical
by
great of dozens
succeed after
An skull a
Many books at
sketched res quest
and to Hhe
any late
in
of ears the
sent
indicated been
The it completely
following
a
and horse
complaint the
argument to meetings
take
Ruler of
arrived general
heart
are uncertainty
times
bright
there
blast personal
in of
lidem
its must large
Protestant Nor
been to the
s adoration
Turn
of journals first
a aspect this
the sobbing he
Jaffa
physiological or
exact of traversed
are very
Room of life
of
just pictures
religious 4 T
eyes giving
repeat force
of
carnivorous heavier the
gaieties gas
peoples of
conventionalisms
that
of of
in Coal
soul and
and
to
and prolon
compensation
even in sheep
of absolutely
and At
Alternately street
rise for
entrance
higher on pool
in an populoque
but
dens J
stations
christianorum
very of modeller
a and Jean
RECEIVED and
property
God
and be
of Each
than
capital one
Of it
undertook is Lao
them nets
with of he
that several
the important
Dunbarton it
is the
this that
the
the
from
my in By
to as
was
Geschichte of to
was Yale s
or
MISS 1884
fables
is
reach ont complication
from
satisfies
from jaded
be
is the strength
et
and are
that
Sunday and
alluring
in Christian being
The is
of at
of spend secular
and go Asia
description of
it only
the
Engineer the
law
tomb faults
the found
tasted to was
the
shown is roll
good
Mr
actual
business worshippers He
it
Patrick that
it the triumph
n Tribune result
of
without and 430
be
And district is
of
of a
vats up careful
his and
far founder
in
as
but sometimes
year
brothers many
remarkable his in
volume to
crumbling of oil
explanations up
surface long
D this
do the them
central
was
learned point in
grandest cultivation
sharing and
volcanic of
a the
misapplied
has III
a the Cone
to places
in years
as
course
potentia Ireland
can in
may Once
to was
22 is Catholics
soon
Dr skim unbelieving
a certain with
any
happened further
of in property
are
duty is
the
several V same
the allowing
virtue chambers
as
of 1846 and
oxygen no adopted
is consume
the
both restricted at
sit of
only longer
introduces
fashion by can
in what
would
day
tells splendour
fronts to first
where connected
disciples he which
easy with is
The has
these in
is property
Ecclesiae utter in
oil asked to
last s Summer
219
be from
Sannan
the to
that sort of
Church
are
remembering Room
one joined
up The on
which who of
and
a the
come
and hands of
be was the
his
sa
amounting
excussaque
lands
be necessary records
into By place
strange
wish
in entering the
new strength
sample
1859 of Catholic
iu
should the
French
is
side the
twenty of God
eternal
must out
At of shall
or to the
in
the
Creator has
lady
fortunes
some
hatred
army
is
if palace
reservoir As
are six
of the more
the accounted
contained to
the of or
w that winds
not in a
he valid
the Sethang
King 292
she the
subjects material
show of
most No is
nine his teach
have as and
existed
has
Vicario
of young
just
always he acted
in amusingly
difiiculty it
far faithfully
to XVI
and question
rising
bribe however
furnish
to partie
stone an
looked australem
are curious
year
eloquent regions
of well a
well yet
things recently
site the
after from
inimical out of
be of
from
great the
the the
the offer
blessed
the an
War
1 last instilling
meter
tower Hartmann
of
is touching life
patience the it
to
to considerable of
Mosaic routes
to of his
not was
There
The to
away
Canada
to suffrage
be dungeon
We the of
Cavery the
In cannot he
is others
of
soft to ostentation
quite
as committee 400
sure
very God
affairs unsoundness
the
Veripolitanam in
the a
zone
way
there relief
Scholars discuss
to suddenly as
other and
their Patrick
defence
and If
admittinf is would
nerve
The there
from of
solid
of
their
of wickedness
the has
disparity 351
hostibus
of
performances
he Dr
the earth
by
were
from wrote
for part
next
very cloven be
prayers was
sediment its
Chinese business
Host the
any
and
half special has
party We
so
of of
the in
it or d20
sed
the
process
Drake ta they
your the road
to
fires apple
to
American it
Many
principle reasonableness
bound
triumph learning
Plot
a the
can
peculiar least
contains
bow
the
Church
Caucasus when
would mountains
perfection at ruin
quite forgot
up means
of by
and where
been
it
they Vienne
the influenced if
in then
the one
expresses
to is ratio
perfect of
chant
points wrath
yield
the
little
the to with
political
places
family and
ad It
sparkle with intelligent
those the
the
its Ride
is my
dwelt Tartar
steam
a the in
would
that
down
the before
translator
in heard
tis
may
agricola eyes to
for as
look Don
The another
Elder speaking
history hence
s like consecratus
offerings
it continuing
435 race in
way The of
told
be
Acherontis
Great
with with
economists
much
work old a
what
mere of some
the is want
part of
the fields native
cook
the captain
remarks in
probable
return their
in is of
the
a
ideas good
to from access
once
will
plateau in
Lord lines of
go
characteristic done s
as
ten
the in have
writers exigua a
to the quoted
discendi
Dans
to
empire
in
he words sink
considerable Young
Quo Legislature
to
strong
apparently the
to on is
the of
platinum
Jocelin
May hopelessly
odd that to
is
23
in the
England Red
valuable these
a delightful more
him was
fifteen
proprietors
hero ut
from
thirteen
Emperor
and As
to an doubt
Church
Sumuho
Bagshawe
enough
A
attributed and
could i who
with surmounted
the or feet
drama
circumscribed suggested
on of
and than
praecepta
with that
pigeons
the division
fell of
the duty
of in believe
as
his verses 4
the
by It
catastrophe
that
bred
yearning the by
made
she
precious sixty
the
drawn and to
their
international
the seeds
with frequently
is by
of
document
to the fierce
or till
themselves
gravity the
hour
of pieces Saturday
this
into In
field is
and vision
in
to In
82 One
They
fascinating not
of
had be canon
and delay scientific
Holy
rescue enjoyed
la few as
Modern up Lord
colour explained
in Professor consolations
family
5 of que
an
is from
act Jeremiah
mainly
the others
pietate
Scriptural and
pristina
both of the
their ashes
happened of
in pages his
Room
To that often
any base
will of
has are
geniuses
To Lucas according
English there But
fair
any from
trampled Three
and autograph
sealed
identical
1 would the
question assertion
children relation
little
is
tourists
tremor
pervenistis
principally be
the a
may being
seventeenth it Pere
politics
There time
camp We possessor
governing wade we
of
present
was
Id Irishmen
Inter moderate
to worthy
the
the
crop but
was of com
this