Pom Ob Unit 2 Added Vr. - 1
Pom Ob Unit 2 Added Vr. - 1
1) Being aware of the opportunities: Awareness of opportunities in the environment bothexternal toand
internal in the organization isthe real beginning point for planning.Atthis stage, managers tend to create a
foundation from which they will develop their plans for the next planning period. This awareness stage
precedes actual planning process and is not strictly an actual part of the process.
2) Setting objectives: The first and foremost step is setting objectives. Every organisation must have certain
objectives. Objectives may be set for the entire organisation and each departmentor unit within the
organisation. Objectives or goals specify what the organisation wants to achieve. Objectives should be
stated clearly for all departments, units and employees. Theygive direction to all departments. Departments/
units then need to set their own objectiveswithin the broad framework of the organisation’s philosophy.
Objectives have to percolatedown to each unit and employees at all levels. At the same time, managers
must contributeideas and participate in the objective setting process. They must also understand how their
actions contribute to achieving objectives. If the end result is clear it becomes easier to work towards the
goal.
3) Developing premises: Planning is concerned with the future which is uncertain and every planner is using
conjecture about what might happen in future. Therefore, the manager is required to make certain
assumptions about the future. These assumptions are called premises. Assumptions are the base material
upon which plans are to be drawn.The base material may be in the form of forecasts, existing plans or any
past information about policies. The premises or assumptions must be the same for all and there should be
total agreement on them.
Allmanagersinvolvedinplanningshouldbefamiliarwithandusethesameassumptions.For
example, forecasting is important in developing premises as it is a technique of gathering information.
Forecasts can be made about the demand for a particular product, policy change, interest rates, prices of
capital goods, tax rates etc. Accurate forecasts, therefore become essential for successful plans.
4) Identifying alternative courses of action: Once objectives are set and assumptions are made, then the next
step would be to act upon them. There may be many ways to act and achieve objectives.Allthe alternative
courses of action shouldbe identified.The course of action which may be taken could be either routine or
innovative. An innovative course may be adopted by involving more people and sharing their ideas. If the
project is important, then morealternatives should be generated and thoroughly discussed amongst the
members of the organisation.
5) Evaluating alternative courses: The next step is to weigh the pros and cons of eachalternative. Each
course will havemany variables which haveto be weighed against each other. The positive and negative
aspects of each proposal need to be evaluated in the light of the objective to be achieved. In financial plans,
for example, the risk-return trade-off is very common. The more risky the investment, the higher the returns
it is likely to give. To evaluate such proposals detailed calculations of earnings, earnings per share, interest,
taxes, dividendsare made and decisions taken. Accurate forecasts in conditions of certainty/uncertainty then
become vital assumptions for these proposals. Alternatives are evaluated in the light of their feasibility and
consequences.
6) Selecting a course: This is the real point of decision making. The best plan has to be adopted and
implemented. The ideal plan, of course, would be the most feasible, profitable and with least negative
consequences. Most plans may not always be subjected to a mathematical analysis. In such cases,
subjectivity and the manager’s experience, judgement and at times, intuition play an important part in
selecting the most viable alternative. Sometimes, a combination of plans may be selected instead of one
best course. The manager will have to apply permutations and combinations and select the best possible
course of action.
7) Formulating supporting plans: This is the step where other managerial functions also come into the
picture.For example, if there is a plan to increase production then more labour, more material, more
machinery etc. will be required. Derivative plans are invariably required to support the basic plan
8) Quantifying plans by budgeting: After decisions are made and plans are set, the final step isto quantify
them by converting them into budgets. A properly prepared budget becomes a standard against which
progress can be measured.
Types of Planning
Planning is an essential part of every business, whether that is in the form of laying out a
strategic framework, or making contingency plans for emergencies. Organizations that are
not well-planned may be faced with serious consequences. The four main plans are
strategic, tactical, operational, and contingency.
The four main plans of business are strategic, tactical, operational and contingency.
Strategic planning looks at the long-term issues of the organization, and helps
develop a plan for growth or change of business function. Goals developed at the
strategic planning-level are often increased by dividing them into tactical and
operational levels.
Operations planning focuses on day-to-day issues, such as staffing levels or
inventory quantities. Operational-level planning includes more detailed objectives
with concrete deadlines and task assignments.
Tactical planning is used to reach the goals set out by strategic and operational
planning. Tactical planning includes short-term objectives and tasks designed to
create specific results within a limited time span. Tactical plans often include
operational level plans, and make way for the development of contingency level
plans.
Contingency-level planning includes more detailed action items with specified
responses in case of unexpected events or emergencies, such as natural disasters
or extreme weather events that disrupt business operations.
All four levels of planning are necessary for a business, or individual business projects to
succeed.
Strategic Planning
Strategic planning is a management process for defining a company's long-term vision,
direction, and actions. It is a strategy to figure out what potential business opportunities
exist for the company. It helps to align different initiatives, and get people focused on a
single goal.
Strategic planning is an organizational process that involves defining the current situation, setting goals for the future, and finding
a way to bridge the gap between the two.
Tactical Planning
Tactical planning is the practice of prioritizing tasks and delegating them to team members
in a way that will get the task accomplished. Tactical planning means figuring out what
needs to be done in order to achieve a goal, which team member can do it, and when they
can get it done.
The tactical planning process begins with a strategic plan. The strategic plan establishes
the goals for an organization or business unit. These goals are then translated into tactical
plans by identifying processes, and necessary tasks required to achieve these goals.
Tactical plans are assigned to individual team members who prioritize th
Key Details:
Who Makes It: Top-level leaders and executives in the company are
like the masterminds behind this plan. They gather to brainstorm and
set the course for the future.
Importance: Imagine trying to build a house without a blueprint.
Strategic planning provides focus and direction. It helps a company
grow, adapt to changes, and stay competitive.
Example: Suppose a toy company decides it wants to be the leader in
eco-friendly toys within five years. Their strategic plan might include
goals like designing sustainable toys, expanding into new markets, and
improving their brand’s environmental image.
Operational Planning
Definition: Operational planning is the day-to-day plan
that keeps the company running smoothly. It’s like the to-
do list for each day, making sure everyone knows what
needs to be done.
Purpose: If strategic planning is the big dream,
operational planning is the practical step to make it
happen. It’s about managing resources, tasks, and
deadlines efficiently.
Key Details:
Who Makes It: Operational plans are crafted by managers and
supervisors who oversee specific areas or teams. They take the big
goals from strategic planning and break them into smaller,
manageable tasks.
Importance: Without operational planning, it’s like having a dream
but not knowing how to take the first step. It ensures that everyone in
the company knows their role, resources are used wisely, and things
get done on time.
Example: Consider a restaurant. The strategic plan might include a
goal to become the go-to place for healthy dining. The operational plan
for the kitchen staff would include tasks like sourcing fresh ingredients,
creating daily menus, and maintaining kitchen equipment to serve
healthy meals efficiently.
Tactical Planning
Definition: Tactical planning is like a playbook for a
sports team. It’s about making specific, short-term moves
to score points and win the game. In business, it’s all
about the specific details of a business.
Purpose: Think of this type of planning as breaking down
the big goals from strategic planning into smaller,
achievable actions. Tactical planning tells us exactly what
to do, like a game plan for success.
Key Details:
Who Makes It: Middle-level managers are like the coaches here. They
take the strategic game plan and create tactical plays for their teams.
They decide who does what, when, and how.
Importance: Imagine playing chess without thinking about your next
move. Tactical planning ensures that each part of the organization is
working together efficiently. It’s all about executing the strategy and
getting results.
Example: If a tech company’s strategic plan is to dominate the mobile
app market, tactical planning might involve setting specific targets for
app downloads, designing marketing campaigns, and allocating
resources to app development teams.
Read More: Tactical Goals
Contingency Planning
Definition: Contingency planning is like having a backup
plan for when things go wrong. It’s preparing for
unexpected twists and turns, much like having a spare
tire in your car.
Purpose: This type of planning is all about being ready
for surprises. It’s like having a fire escape plan in case of
emergencies. It helps a company respond to unexpected
challenges effectively.
Key Details:
Who Makes It: Just like having a first-aid kit at home, contingency
plans are developed by experts in risk management or crisis response.
They identify potential risks and create plans to deal with them.
Importance: Life is unpredictable, and so is business. Contingency
planning ensures that when a crisis hits, the company knows exactly
what to do. It minimizes damage and helps the organization bounce
back quickly.
Example: Consider a manufacturing company. While their strategic
plan may focus on increasing production, a contingency plan could
include steps to address disruptions like equipment breakdowns,
supplier issues, or even natural disasters. This way, they’re ready to
keep production going no matter what.
Types of Planning
Organising refers to identifying and growing different activities in the organisation. It brings together
human and non-human resources to achieve organisational goals. Organising helps in the
implementation of the plan by clarifying job and working relationships for the attainment of desired
goals.
Types of Organisation
Organisations are a network of relationships amongst people working together so as to get the best
output in an enterprise. The two types of the organisation formed on the basis of relationships are:
Formal organisation
Informal organisation
Formal Organisation
Formal organisation refers to the official structure of well-defined jobs, each being a measure of
authority and responsibility. This organisational structure is designed by the management to accomplish
a particular task. In formal organisation positions and authority of each level are clearly defined. It is
deliberately designed to enable people to work together for achieving common objectives. It is a
deliberate determination by which people accomplish goals by adhering to the norms laid by the
structure. In this kind of organisation, each person is responsible for their performance. It has a formal
setup of superior-subordinate relationships to achieve a predetermined goal. The structure of a formal
organisation can be functional or divisional.
Features
Formation: Formal organisation is created by top-level management for the smooth functioning of the
organisation.
Purpose: It is created to achieve the organisational objectives, and it gives more emphasis on work
rather than interpersonal relationships.
Reporting Relationship: The position, responsibility, and accountability of each person are clearly
defined. These things clarify who will report to whom and avoids confusion in an organisation.
Stability: Formal organisation is stable due to its well-defined structure.
Chain of Command and Communication: Formal organisation follows the official chain of command and
communication at every step.
Flexibility: Formal organisation is rigid because members are required to behave in a prescribed
manner.
Coordination: Formal organisation coordinates and integrates the effort of various departments.
Informal Organisation
Informal organisation refers to a network of social relations, which emerges on its own due to formal
roles and relationships amongst people. Informal organisations emerge from within the formal
organisation when people interact beyond their official defined roles. When people have frequent
contact, they cannot be forced into a rigid formal structure. It means the informal organisation is not
pre-planned. It arises automatically due to frequent contact of people with each other. It arises to fill the
social and personal needs of an individual, which cannot be satisfied through a formal organisation.
Informal organisations have no prescribed rules and policies, but it comes into existence through social
relations.
Features
Formation: Informal organisation emerges on its own within the formal organisation due to interaction
amongst employees.
Purpose: The main purpose of an informal organisation is to satisfy social and cultural needs and to
fulfill the common interest of the members of the organisation.
Stability: Due to the lack of a definite structure, the informal structure is less stable.
Chain of Command and Communication: There is no definite direction of communication for the flow
of information. Information flows independently.
Flexibility: This organisation is flexible because it has no standard for measures of behaviour.
Decisions are made to sustain the activities of all business activities and organizational
functioning.
As such, decision making process can be further exemplified in the backdrop of the
following definitions.
According to the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary the term decision making means -
the process of deciding about something important, especially in a group of people or in an
organization.
The organizational structure also determines how information flows between levels within the
company. For example, in a centralized structure, decisions flow from the top down, while in a
decentralized structure, decision-making power is distributed among various levels of the
organization. Having an organizational structure in place allows companies to remain efficient
and focused.
What is 'Organizational
structure'
Organizational Structure
Definition of an Organizational Structure
A system that outlines how specific activities are handled to fulfill a
strategic mission is known as an organizational structure. Rules, roles,
and obligations are all part of these activities.
Structure of Flatarchy
It is a management style that flattens the hierarchy and chain of
command while giving employees a great deal of autonomy.
An organizational structure is a system of rules and relationships that govern how an organization is
run.
An organizational structure defines how a company operates.
Since different divisions in a company have specific roles, an organizational structure helps determine
how decision-making is distributed, how work gets done, and how information flows.
What is an organizational structure?
In this system, all the powers of decision-making rest at the topmost level of the management.
They take the shape of a pyramid with the leader or executive team at the top responsible for
making all decisions. Below them are departmental managers overseeing supervisors. These
supervisors lead the workers at the lowest level in the hierarchy.
A centralized OS structure gives uniformity of policy when the operational units face a conflict
of objectives and strategic goals. Also, it speeds up the decision-making process. This type of OS
is prevalent in the retail industry.
Decentralization or Decentralized Organizational Structure
In this system of OS, an organization’s middle- and lower-level managers make decisions as per
the local culture or laws. This leaves the top management to direct its attention to major
decisions. This type of OS flattens the hierarchy and empowers employees. It is widely
prevalent in the hotel sector.
The hotel sector has to comply with local laws to function properly in areas of food and
beverages, human resources (HR), and operations. Therefore, decentralization is required
because handling the guests, food, staff, and processes with a centralized structure is
impossible.
#1 – Hierarchical
This system concentrates decision-making at the top level. As a result, the organization suffers
from a lack of creativity as innovative ideas have to work their way up through various levels of
management. Also, each employee communicates with their immediate superior and
subordinates only. This reduces coordination at various levels of power and departments.
Nevertheless, it is a salient feature of most government organizations.
#2 – Flat
This organizational structure is devoid of any hierarchy. No one commands or controls the
employees. Instead, decisions are made at every level of management. Therefore, it is usually
used in small companies with few employees or new startups. However, with time and business
growth, some form of hierarchy creeps into the organization; otherwise, it may cause chaos and
inefficiency in the organization.
#3 – Flatarchy
It includes features of both hierarchical and flat OS. It is a temporary form of OS that comes into
existence only when a new product is created, a new service is being tested, or when a
company seeks to develop a new customer support system.
By employing flatarchy, an organization can have specialized teams to handle the development
of new products or services more creatively and efficiently. It is the best tool for an organization
to tackle the change in market or industry sentiments without creating capital-intensive
departments or reforming the OS.
#4 – Functional
The functional organizational structure creates a fixed set of departments based on certain
functions like HR, accounts, marketing, etc. It segregates the workforce based on the
requirements of each department. For example, an accounting department will employ
accountants and work to manage the firm’s finances in the best possible manner.
Likewise, the HR department will look after the recruitment, payroll, and administration of the
firm. Moreover, the functional OS allows the employees to work for a particular functional role
without worrying about the other departments. So, for example, a sales executive won’t be
worried about a firm’s accounting work and vice versa.
#5 – Divisional
This type of organizational structure comes into play when a firm has grown exponentially to
become a giant in its sector. For example, a giant clothing company will require separate
divisions based on customer groups, product types, and geographical locations.
Hence, it will create a ladies’ fashion garment division, kids wear division, men’s wear division,
and affordable clothing division. Each division will have its own production, marketing, human
resource, IT, and sales teams. In this manner, the company could manage the product line or
geography with all necessary functional resources.
#6 – Matrix
Under this organizational structure, there is no clear demarcation of roles and responsibilities
of resources. Resources may be shared across different teams to ensure their maximum
utilization. It is the least used OS as it is quite complex and confusing and may prove counter-
productive.
The employees have to play a dual role in this OS. For example, the customer service
representative in many banks also acts as their cashier. It may reduce operating costs but badly
affects the employee’s quality of work and the firm’s efficiency. It is a form of decentralized OS.
Meaning of Centralization
Centralization is a form of organizational structure where the decision making capability rests with the top
management. A couple of hand-picked members are entitled to create strategies, determine the goals
and objectives based on which an organisation will function.
In a centralized organisation, the top management sets rules and procedures which are then
communicated to the lower-level employees, who are expected to carry out the same without questioning
the authority.
The advantage of such a structure is, it allows employees to have a well-defined framework within which
all work needs to carried out.
The disadvantage of such a structure is that it increases the time taken to arrive at a decision. As
decision-making authority lies with selected people from top management, it may result in biased decision
making.
Meaning of Decentralization
Decentralization is another form of organizational structure that functions by delegating decision-making
capabilities to multiple teams across geographies.
In such an organization, most of the planning, strategy and decision to implement them are taken by the
people in the middle and lower level of management.
The advantage of decentralization is that the employees are empowered to make their own decisions that
will benefit the organization, which results in a high level of employee satisfaction and boosts the
productivity of an organization.
Decentralization enables low-level employees to gain leadership skills, which can contribute to the growth
of the organization in the long run.
Let us look at the most crucial points of difference between centralization and decentralization in the
following table.
Decentralization Centralization
Definition
Flow of Information
Ideal for
Decision-making speed
People Involved
Employee Motivation
Conflict in Decision
Burden
The burden gets shared among many levels Only one group is carrying the burden
Stability
Prone to instability due to multiple conflicting Relatively stable as decisions are made
decisions by a central authority sharing a common
ideology
What is Centralization?
Centralization refers to the concentration of authority at the top level of the organisation. It is the
systematic and consistent reservation of authority at the central points within an organisation. In a
centralized organisation, managers at the lower level have a limited role in decision-making. They just
have to execute the orders and decisions of the top level.
What is Decentralization?
Decentralization means the dispersal of authority throughout the organisation. It refers to a systematic
effort to delegate to the lowest levels all authority except which can be exercised at central points. It is
the distribution of authority throughout the organisation. In a decentralized organisation, the authority
of major decisions is vested with the top management and balance authority is delegated to the middle
and lower levels.
What is Organisation
Organisation refers to a collection of people who are working towards a common goal and objective. In
other words, it can be said that organisation is a place where people assemble together and perform
different sets of duties and responsibilities towards fulfilling the organisational goals.
1. Formal Organisation
2. Informal Organisation
Formal Organisation: Formal organisation is that type of organisation structure where the authority and
responsibility are clearly defined. The organisation structure has a defined delegation of authority and
roles and responsibilities for the members.
The formal organisation has predefined policies, rules, schedules, procedures and programs. The
decision making activity in a formal organisation is mostly based on predefined policies.
Formal organisation structure is created by the management with the objective of attaining the
organisational goals.
There are several types of formal organisation based on their structure, which are discussed as follows:
1. Line Organisation
3. Functional Organisation
4. Project Organisation
5. Matrix Organisation
Let us learn about these organisation structures in detail in the following lines.
Line Organisation: Line organisation is the simplest organisation structure and it also happens to be the
oldest organisation structure. It is also known as Scalar or military or departmental type of organisation.
In this type of organisational structure, the authority is well defined and it flows vertically from the top
to the hierarchy level to the managerial level and subordinates at the bottom and continues further to
the workers till the end.
There is a clear division of accountability, authority and responsibility in the line organisation structure.
1. It is rigid in nature
3. Each department will be busy with their work instead of focusing on the overall development of the
organisation.
Line and Staff Organisation: Line and staff organisation is an improved version of the line organisation. In
line and staff organisation, the functional specialists are added in line. The staff is for assisting the line
members in achieving the target effectively.
1. Conflict may arise between line and staff members due to the improper distribution of authority.
2. Staff members provide suggestions to the line members and decision is taken by line members, it
makes the staff members feel ignored.
Functional Organisation: Functional organisation structure is the type of organisation where the task of
managing and directing the employees is arranged as per the function they specialise. In a functional
organisation, there are three types of members, line members, staff members and functional members.
Advantages of Functional organisation
1. Manager has to perform a limited number of tasks which improves the accuracy of the work.
1. It is difficult to achieve coordination among workers as there is no one to manage them directly.
Project Organisation: A project organisation is a temporary form of organisation structure that is formed
to manage projects for a specific period of time. This form of organisation has specialists from different
departments who are brought together for developing a new product.
1. The presence of many specialists from different departments increases the coordination among the
members.
2. Each individual has a different set of responsibilities which improves control of the process.
2. Project managers may find it difficult to judge the performance of different specialists.
Matrix Organisation: Matrix organisation is the latest form of organisation that is a combination of
functional and project organisation. In such organisations there are two lines of authority, the functional
part of the organisation and project management part of the organisation and they have vertical and
horizontal flow of authority, respectively.
1. Since the matrix organisation is a combination of functional and project management teams, there is
an improved coordination between the vertical and horizontal functions.
1. Due to the presence of vertical and horizontal communication, there will be increased cost and
paperwork.
2.Having multiple supervisors for the workers leads to confusion and difficulty in control.
Informal Organisation: Informal organisations are those types of organisations which do not have a
defined hierarchy of authority and responsibility. In such organisations, the relationship between
employees is formed based on common interests, preferences and prejudices.
What is Span of Management?
No single executive should have more people looking to him for controlling & guidance than he can
reasonably manage because :-
Limited time
Limited available energy.
The numbers of persons which can be effectively supervised by single executive is 6 to 8 in an average
firm. However when activities are routine then executive can supervise 20 to 30.
If span is small, an executive may tend to over supervise & may even do span leading to his
subordinates.
If span is large, executive may not be able to supervise his subordinates effectively & they may become
careless or feel neglected.
Suppose, you have 4000 workers in Organization. If you divide those workers in 4 groups then you
need 1000 Managers. If a span is small, you need 1000 managers and will take large amount of money
in terms of Annual Salary of Managers. But Workers will get proper supervision. Now, if we divide
those workers in 8 groups then you need 500 Managers. If a span is big then you need 500 managers
and will save company’s money.
A narrow span of control allows a manager to communicate quickly with the employees under them and
control them more easily Feedback of ideas from the workers will be more effective. It requires a higher
level of management skill to control a greater number of employees, so there is less management skill
required
There are less layers of management to pass a message through, so the message reaches more
employees faster
It costs less money to run a wider span of control because a business does not need to employ as many
managers
For example, a manager can manage 4-6 subordinates when the nature of work is complex,
whereas, the number can go up to 15-20 subordinates for repetitive or fixed work.
Definition and Explanation
The term “Span of Control” is popularly used in business management and human resource
management. Because this term is related to the management and controlling of
employees, the meaning of the word is the total number of subordinates that a manager or
supervisor can manage.
In the past, one manager was capable of managing 1-4 subordinates. Because of that,
there were many levels of management in one organization. In 1980, with the introduction
of information technology in business, many organizations flattened their management by
reducing the number of managers in an organization. After that, the span of one manager
increased from 1-4 to 1-10 subordinates.
Several factors affect the span of control of a manager, such as the nature of work,
capabilities of the manager, capabilities of employees to be managed, and the
responsibilities of a manager. It can be of two types, such as a narrow and a wide span of
control. It is considered to be narrow when a manager manages 2 to 4 subordinates.
Despite many advantages, the narrow span of control is not free from disadvantages.
1. Too much control over employees might hamper their original talent and creativity.
2. Extended hierarchy of control results in a long time in decision-making.
3. Narrow span of controlling prevents cross-functional problem-solving.
On the other hand, a span of control is wide when a manager manages or controls up to 20
subordinates.
The span of management refers to the ideal number of subordinates who report to and are supervised by
one manager.
Also known as the span of control (SOC), it determines how many subordinates are able to provide
maximum output without costing too much under one manager/supervisor.
It also relates to the Unity of Command principle under Fayolism, which discusses that there should be
one manager who should be providing guidance to subordinates.
Without determining an optimal number, a manager may be unable to perform the controlling function.
Likewise, coordinating, directing, etc., will also suffer. With that, the long-term plans suffer.
Centralization is the degree to which decision making takes place at upper levels of the organization. If
top managers make key decisions with little input from below, then the organization is more centralized.
With a centralized structure, line and staff employees have limited authority to carry something out
without prior approval. Centralized organizations are known for decreased span of control – a limited
number of employees report to a manager, who then report to the next management level.
CENTRALIZATION is the degree to which decision making takes place at upper levels of the
organization.
Advantages of Centralization :
Decentralization is the degree to which decision making takes place at lower-level employees
provide input or actually make decisions, the more decentralization is there. Decentralization seeks to
eliminate the unnecessary levels of management and to place authority in the hands of first line
managers and staff – thus increasing the span of control with more employees reporting to one
manager.
Advantages of Decentralization
If the span of control is narrow, then there will be many management levels. That is, there will be many
managers. This organization structure is called "Tall Organization Structure".
If the span of control is wide, then there will be fewer management levels. That is, there will be fewer
managers. This organization structure is called "Flat Organization Structure".
In Tall Organisation Structure, a manager has to manage only a few subordinates. Thus very good in terms
of Control, Close Supervision.
In Flat Organisation Structure, a manager has to manage many subordinates. Thus, there is loose control
and poor supervision.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATION
“Organization is a system of co-operative activities of two or more persons.” Organization is the process of dividing
up of the activities.
1) LINE ORGANIZATION : In this type of organization, authority flows from top to bottom and responsibility flows
from bottom to top.
2) FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION : The main feature of functional organization is the division of work and
specialization. In each department, there is one expert. An expert is not only a counselor but also an administrator.
He advices his subordinates. An Expert does not only bear responsibility of his department but also bear responsibility
of all departments.
3)LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION : Line and staff organization is that in which the line heads are assisted by specialist
staff. In each department, there is one expert and some line personnels / line officials. Line official will do all
managerial work and expert will give advice to line official or line personnel.
Staff groups are in tasks that provide support to the line groups. Their work is like that of
advisory (legal), service (human resource), or control (the accounting) groups. Staff groups
support those who are engaged in the central productive activity of the enterprise. They back up
their work. Staff groups help the organization in analyzing, researching, counseling, monitoring,
and evaluating activities.
1. Production Manager
It has further two subordinates
Plant Supervisor
Foreman
2. Marketing Manager
It has further two subordinates
Market Supervisor
Sales
3. Finance Manager
It has further two subordinates
Accountant
Chief Accountant
Difference 1. Purpose
Line Organization’s purpose is to work directly toward the organisational goals, while staff
advises, assists, and back to the line group to work towards the set goals. This is the main
difference.
Difference 2. Authority
Yet another important difference is authority. Line authority is considered or visualised as the
formal authority which is created by the organisational hierarchy. Staff groups do not get any
such recognition.
What is Organisation
Organisation refers to a collection of people who are working towards a common goal and objective. In
other words, it can be said that organisation is a place where people assemble together and perform
different sets of duties and responsibilities towards fulfilling the organisational goals.
Formal Organisation: Formal organisation is that type of organisation structure where the authority and
responsibility are clearly defined. The organisation structure has a defined delegation of authority and
roles and responsibilities for the members.
The formal organisation has predefined policies, rules, schedules, procedures and programs. The
decision making activity in a formal organisation is mostly based on predefined policies.
Formal organisation structure is created by the management with the objective of attaining the
organisational goals.
There are several types of formal organisation based on their structure, which are discussed as follows:
1. Line Organisation
2. Line and Staff Organisation
3. Functional Organisation
4. Project Organisation
5. Matrix Organisation
Let us learn about these organisation structures in detail in the following lines.
Line Organisation: Line organisation is the simplest organisation structure and it also happens to be the
oldest organisation structure. It is also known as Scalar or military or departmental type of organisation.
In this type of organisational structure, the authority is well defined and it flows vertically from the top
to the hierarchy level to the managerial level and subordinates at the bottom and continues further to
the workers till the end.
There is a clear division of accountability, authority and responsibility in the line organisation structure.
Line and Staff Organisation: Line and staff organisation is an improved version of the line organisation.
In line and staff organisation, the functional specialists are added in line. The staff is for assisting the line
members in achieving the target effectively.
TYPES OF DEPARTMENTALIZATION
(3)PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALIZATION :
Companies may have multiple products. . All common activities required to produce and market a product
are grouped together.
CUSTOMER DEPARTMENTALIZATION :
(5)
Customer divisions are divisions set up to service particular types of clients or customers
Departmentalization is the process of breaking down an enterprise into various departments. How
jobs are grouped together is called departmentalization. A Department is an organization unit that is
headed by a manager who is responsible for its activities. Departmentation and Division of labour are
same things. However technically both are different. Both emphasize on the use of the specialized
knowledge, but depratmentation has higher management level strategic considerations while the
division of labour has a lower level operating considerations.
FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION
It groups jobs according to function.
Functional departmentalization defines departments by the functions each one performs such as
accounting or purchasing. Every Organization must perform certain jobs in order to do its work.
For example, Manufacturing, Production, R & D, Purchasing etc. Same kinds of jobs are grouped
together in departments. This kind of departmentalization includes persons with same knowledge or
skills (like Accounting Department having persons of commerce, Marketing Department having MBA
persons). As in department people with same skill and knowledge are there. Their focus becomes
narrow and they cannot appreciate each other’s work in the same department.
Advantages :-
• Efficiencies from putting together similar specialist and people with common skills, knowledge,
and orientations.
• In-depth specialization.
• Co-ordination within functional area.
Limitations :-
• Poor communication across functional areas.
• Limited view of organizational goals.
GEOGRAPHICAL DEPARTMENTALIZATION
It groups jobs according to geographic region.
Advantages : -
• More effective and efficient handling of specific regional issues that arise.
• Serve needs of unique geographic markets better.
Limitations :-
• Duplication of functions.
• Can feel isolated from other organizational areas.
PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALIZATION
It groups jobs by product line.
Companies may have multiple products. Like Maruti is producing Alto, Zen, Swift. Large companies are
often organized according to the product. All common activities required to produce and market a
product are grouped together. Major disadvantages are duplication of resources. Each product requires
most of the same functional areas such as finance, marketing, production etc.
For example, Samsung manufactures Phones, T.V., Tablet etc. For each product, they have same
functional department like marketing, production etc. Thus, it is duplication of functions.
PROCESS DEPARTMENTALIZATION
Advantages :-
More efficient flow of work activities.
Limitations :-
Can only be used with certain types of products.
CUSTOMER DEPARTMENTALIZATION
Customer divisions are divisions set up to service particular types of clients or customers.Some
companies or organization divides the different units based on customers or markets. For example, any
PC manufacturing company like HP has different divisions like Consumer PC, Commercial PC, and
Workstations etc. Nokia previously had three divisions like Consumer Phone, Business Phone & Smart
Phone. Recently Nokia had changed their departmentalization from customer to process base. Now
there are only two divisions : Hardware and Software base departmentalization. They will also sell their
software to other mobile company. Another example is an educational institution offers regular and
extension courses to cater to the needs of different students groups.
Advantages :-
Customers’ needs and problems can be met by specialists
Limitations :-
Duplication of functions.
Limited view of organizational goals.
What is an Organisation Structure?
An organisational structure is a framework that determines how an organisation is organised, including
the arrangement of roles, responsibilities, and tasks. It outlines the hierarchy, reporting relationships,
and communication channels within the organisation. By clarifying roles and responsibilities, the
structure helps to establish clear lines of authority and decision-making, promoting efficient
coordination and control. It also facilitates effective communication and collaboration by defining
information flow and channels. Additionally, the structure aids in resource allocation and utilisation,
allowing for specialisation and improved productivity. It promotes accountability and performance
evaluation by setting clear expectations and enabling assessment of individual and departmental
performance. Ultimately, an organisational structure plays a crucial role in shaping the organisational
culture, optimising workflows, and driving the achievement of organisational objectives.
Line Organisation
Functional Organisation
Line and Staff Organisation
Project Organisation
Matrix Organisation
Committee Organisation
Here are brief explanations of some common types of organisational structures.
1. Line Organisation
Line Organisation
Line organisation, also known as a scalar or military organisation, is the simplest and oldest form of
organisational structure. It is characterised by a clear and direct chain of command, where authority
flows vertically from top to bottom. Each employee has a single supervisor to whom they report,
creating a clear line of responsibility and accountability. Decision-making is typically centralised at the
top of the hierarchy, with limited delegation. This structure is suitable for small organisations with a
straightforward hierarchy, where decision-making needs to be efficient and communication is direct.
However, it can lead to delays in decision-making as all decisions must pass through the hierarchy, and
communication can be limited to the immediate supervisor. No staff specialists are available in line
organisation and all the persons at the same level are independent of each other.
2. Functional Organisation
Functional Organisation
Functional organisation is a common structure where departments are organised based on specialised
functions or tasks. For example, there might be separate departments for marketing, finance,
operations, human resources, and so on. Each department is headed by a functional manager who has
expertise in that particular area. This structure allows for the efficient utilisation of specialised skills and
knowledge, as employees within each department can focus on their areas of expertise. It also enables
clear career paths within each function. Specialists operate here with considerable independence.
However, functional organisations can create silos, where departments become inwardly focused, and
communication and collaboration between departments may be limited. Coordination across functions
can also be challenging.
In a line and staff organisation structure, line positions focus on core operations, while staff positions
provide specialised support and guidance. Staff roles, like human resources or legal, offer expertise and
advice to line managers. This structure balances operational responsibilities with specialised support,
enabling better decision-making and problem-solving. Specialists in such organisations have advisory
nature as they do not have the power of command over subordinates in other departments. However,
clarifying roles and coordination between line and staff functions is important to avoid conflicts. This can
also lead to confusion and can be quite expensive for small firms.
4. Project Organisation
Project Organisation
A project organisation is a temporary structure formed specifically for a particular project or initiative. It
is characterised by a project team that is assembled to achieve specific goals within a defined
timeframe. The project team is led by a project manager who has authority over team members and
resources. This structure allows for a dedicated and focused approach to project management, with
team members working together to accomplish project objectives. It facilitates effective coordination,
communication, and collaboration within the project team. Once the project is completed, the team is
disbanded. Project organisation is particularly useful when organisations need to manage complex, time-
limited projects that require cross-functional collaboration and a dedicated team focus. In a Project
organisation, unity of command is followed.
5. Matrix Organisation
Matrix Organisation
A hybrid grid structure wherein pure project organisation is superimposed on a functional structure is
known as Matrix Organisation. It combines elements of both functional and project structures. It
involves dual reporting lines, where employees have both a functional manager and a project manager.
The functional manager oversees employees’ functional responsibilities, while the project manager
manages their involvement in specific projects. This structure allows for flexible resource allocation, as
employees can be assigned to different projects based on their skills and availability. There is always a
permanent functional setup and temporary cross-functional teams are created to handle short-term
projects, which are infrequent in nature.
It also promotes effective sharing of expertise and knowledge across projects and functional areas.
Communication is typically multi-directional, as employees interact with both their functional and
project managers. However, a matrix organisation can be complex to manage, as employees have
multiple reporting relationships, and conflicts can arise due to competing priorities and demands from
different managers.
6. Committee Organisation
Committee Organisation
The committee organisation structure distributes decision-making and authority across committees or
groups. These committees are formed to address specific areas or functions within the organisation,
bringing together individuals from different departments and levels. Decisions are made collectively
through discussions and consensus-building, ensuring diverse perspectives and expertise are considered.
The scope of its activities is limited and it cannot handle problems assigned to it. According to Allen,” A
committee is a body of persons appointed or elected to meet on an organised basis for the
consideration of matters brought before it.” Committee organisation promotes collaboration and
participation in decision-making processes. It gives secure viewpoints and consultations of various
persons in the organisation.
LINE-AND-STAFF ORGANIZATIONS
Organizational structure involves, in addition to task organizational boundary
considerations, the designation of jobs within an organization and the relationships
among those jobs. There are numerous ways to structure jobs within an organization,
but two of the most basic forms include simple line structures and line-and-staff
structures.
In a line organization, top management has complete control, and the chain of
command is clear and simple. Examples of line organizations are small businesses in
which the top manager, often the owner, is positioned at the top of the organizational
structure and has clear "lines" of distinction between him and his subordinates.
The line-and-staff organization combines the line organization with staff departments
that support and advise line departments. Most medium and large-sized firms exhibit
line-and-staff organizational structures. The distinguishing characteristic between simple
line organizations and line-and-staff organizations is the multiple layers of management
within line-and-staff organizations. The following sections refer primarily to line-and-staff
structures, although the advantages and disadvantages discussed apply to both types
of organizational structures.
Several advantages and disadvantages are present within a line-and-staff organization.
An advantage of a line-and-staff organization is the availability of technical specialists.
Staff experts in specific areas are incorporated into the formal chain of command. A
disadvantage of a line-and-staff organization is conflict between line and staff
personnel.
LINE-AND-STAFF POSITIONS
A wide variety of positions exist within a line-and-staff organization. Some positions are
primary to the company's mission, whereas others are secondary—in the form of
support and indirect contribution. Although positions within a line-and-staff organization
can be differentiated in several ways, the simplest approach classifies them as being
either line or staff.
A line position is directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the organization, such
as producing or selling a product or service. Line positions are occupied by line
personnel and line managers. Line personnel carry out the primary activities of a
business and are considered essential to the basic functioning of the organization.
Line managers make the majority of the decisions and direct line personnel to achieve
company goals. An example of a line manager is a marketing executive.
Figure 1
Line-and-Staff Organization
Although a marketing executive does not actually produce the product or service, he or she
directly contributes to the firm's overall objectives through market forecasting and generating
product or service demand. Therefore, line positions, whether they are personnel or managers,
engage in activities that are functionally and directly related to the principal workflow of an
organization.
Staff positions serve the organization by indirectly supporting line functions. Staff
positions consist of staff personnel and staff managers. Staff personnel use their
technical expertise to assist line personnel and aid top management in various business
activities. Staff managers provide support, advice, and knowledge to other individuals in
the chain of command.
Although staff managers are not part of the chain of command related to direct
production of products or services, they do have authority over personnel. An example
of a staff manager is a legal adviser. He or she does not actively engage in profit-
making activities, but does provide legal support to those who do. Therefore, staff
positions, whether personnel or managers, engage in activities that are supportive to
line personnel.
LINE-AND-STAFF AUTHORITY
Authority within a line-and-staff organization can be differentiated. Three types of
authority are present: line, staff, and functional. Line authority is the right to carry out
assignments and exact performance from other individuals.
LINE AUTHORITY.
Line authority flows down the chain of command. For example, line authority gives a
production supervisor the right to direct an employee to operate a particular machine,
and it gives the vice president of finance the right to request a certain report from a
department head. Therefore, line authority gives an individual a certain degree of power
relating to the performance of an organizational task.
Two important clarifications should be considered, however, when discussing line
authority: (1) line authority does not ensure effective performance, and (2) line authority
is not restricted to line personnel. The head of a staff department has line authority over
his or her employees by virtue of authority relationships between the department head
and his or her directly-reporting employees.
STAFF AUTHORITY.
Staff authority is the right to advise or counsel those with line authority. For example,
human resource department employees help other departments by selecting and
developing a qualified workforce. A quality control manager aids a production manager
by determining the acceptable quality level of products or services at a manufacturing
company, initiating quality programs, and carrying out statistical analysis to ensure
compliance with quality standards. Therefore, staff authority gives staff personnel the
right to offer advice in an effort to improve line operations.
FUNCTIONAL AUTHORITY.
Functional authority is referred to as limited line authority. It gives a staff person power
over a particular function, such as safety or accounting. Usually, functional authority is
given to specific staff personnel with expertise in a certain area. For example, members
of an accounting department might have authority to request documents they need to
prepare financial reports, or a human resource manager might have authority to ensure
that all departments are complying with equal employment opportunity laws. Functional
authority is a special type of authority for staff personnel, which must be designated by
top management.
LINE-AND-STAFF CONFLICT
Due to different positions and types of authority within a line-and-staff organization,
conflict between line and staff personnel is almost inevitable. Although minimal conflict
due to differences in viewpoints is natural, conflict on the part of line and staff personnel
can disrupt an entire organization. There are many reasons for conflict. Poor human
relations, overlapping authority and responsibility, and misuse of staff personnel by top
management are all primary reasons for feelings of resentment between line and staff
personnel. This resentment can result in various departments viewing the organization
from a narrow stance instead of looking at the organization as a whole.
Fortunately, there are several ways to minimize conflict. One way is to integrate line and
staff personnel into a work team. The success of the work team depends on how well
each group can work together in efforts to increase productivity and performance.
Another solution is to ensure that the areas of responsibility and authority of both line
and staff personnel are clearly defined. With clearly defined lines of authority and
responsibility, each group may better understand their role in the organization. A third
way to minimize conflict is to hold both line and staff personnel accountable for the
results of their own activities. In other words, line personnel should not be entirely
responsible for poor performance resulting from staff personnel advice.
Line-and-staff organizations combine the direct flow of authority present within a line
organization with staff departments that offer support and advice. A clear chain of
command is a consistent characteristic among line-and-staff organizational structures.
Problems of conflict may arise, but organizations that clearly delineate responsibility can
help minimize such conflict.
MANAGING
DIRECTOR
↓ ↓ ↓
Production Manager Marketing Manager Finance Manager
↓ ↓ ↓
Plant Supervisor Market Supervisor Chief Assisstant
↓ ↓ ↓
Foreman Salesman Accountant
1. Relief to line of executives- In a line and staff organization, the advice and
counseling which is provided to the line executives divides the work between the
two.
The line executive can concentrate on the execution of plans and they get relieved of
dividing their attention to many areas.
2. Expert advice- The line and staff organization facilitates expert advice to the line
executive at the time of need.
The planning and investigation which is related to different matters can be done by
the staff specialist and line officers can concentrate on execution of plans.
3. Benefit of Specialization- Line and staff through division of whole concern into two
types of authority divides the enterprise into parts and functional areas. This way
every officer or official can concentrate in its own area.
4. Better co-ordination- Line and staff organization through specialization is able to
provide better decision making and concentration remains in few hands. This feature
helps in bringing co-ordination in work as every official is concentrating in their own
area.
5. Benefits of Research and Development- Through the advice of specialized staff,
the line executives, the line executives get time to execute plans by taking productive
decisions which are helpful for a concern. This gives a wide scope to the line
executive to bring innovations and go for research work in those areas. This is
possible due to the presence of staff specialists.
6. Training- Due to the presence of staff specialists and their expert advice serves as
ground for training to line officials.
Line executives can give due concentration to their decision making. This in itself is a
training ground for them.
1. Lack of understanding- In a line and staff organization, there are two authority
flowing at one time. This results in the confusion between the two. As a result, the
workers are not able to understand as to who is their commanding authority. Hence
the problem of understanding can be a hurdle in effective running.
2. Lack of sound advice- The line official get used to the expertise advice of the staff.
At times the staff specialist also provide wrong decisions which the line executive
have to consider. This can affect the efficient running of the enterprise.
3. Line and staff conflicts- Line and staff are two authorities which are flowing at the
same time. The factors of designations, status influence sentiments which are
related to their relation, can pose a distress on the minds of the employees. This
leads to minimizing of co-ordination which hampers a concern’s working.
4. Costly- In line and staff concern, the concerns have to maintain the high
remuneration of staff specialist. This proves to be costly for a concern with limited
finance.
5. Assumption of authority- The power of concern is with the line official but the staff
dislikes it as they are the one more in mental work.
6. Staff steals the show- In a line and staff concern, the higher returns are considered
to be a product of staff advice and counseling. The line officials feel dissatisfied and
a feeling of distress enters a concern. The satisfaction of line officials is very
important for effective results.
Table of Contents
Line and Staff Aspect of HRM
o Authority
o Line VS. Staff Authority
o Cooperative Line and Staff HR Management
o Line Manager
o Staff Managers
o Human Resource Manager
The main tenet of the early management writers was the authority, the glue
that keeps the organization together. It was to be assigned downward to
manager at lower-level.
They make staff authority functions to assist, support, advice and usually
minimize some of informational burdens they have.
Line managers are authorized to manage the tasks of their assistants. Staff
managers are authorized to advise and help line managers in achieving
their fundamental objectives.
Then the best applicant is referred by them to the supervisor, who interview
and chooses the one he/she desires.
4. Line Manager
They are always someone’s boss because they are authorized the work of
their assistants. In addition, line managers are responsible for achieving the
organization’s fundamental objectives.
Placement
Training
Orientation
Improving job performance
Interpreting policies and procedures
Gaining creative cooperation
Controlling labor costs
Creating and maintaining departmental morale
Developing employee abilities
Protecting employees’ health and physical condition
5. Staff Managers
Staff managers’ advice and aid line managers in execution of their basic
objectives. In order to be successful, they are required to work in
partnership with each other.
It is the organizational process of a manager dividing their own work among all their
people. It involves giving them the responsibility to accomplish the tasks that are
delegated to them in the way they see fit.
Along with responsibility, they also share the corresponding amount of authority.
This ensures that tasks can be completed efficiently and that the individual feels
actually responsible for their completion.
On one level, delegation is just dividing work into tasks that others can do.
At its best, delegation is empowering people to do the work they are best suited to.
It allows them to invest themselves more in the work and develop their own skills
and abilities. It also allows the manager to do other important work that might be
more strategic or higher-level.
In other words, delegated authority is more than just parsing out work. It is truly
sharing responsibility, ownership, and decision-making. Delegated authority is
shared authority.
This includes the ability to make decisions and give orders to achieve
the organizational objectives and goals .
Similarly, there has long been a relationship between power and influence. Learn
what this relationship should look like in our article: Power versus influence: How to
build a legacy of leadership .
2. Responsibility
This refers to the specifics and scope of the individual to complete the task
assigned to them.
Discontent
Dissatisfaction
Conflicts
Frustration for the individual
While authority flows from the top-down, responsibility flows from the bottom-
up. Middle management and lower-level management hold more responsibility.
3. Accountability
Unlike authority and responsibility, accountability cannot be delegated. Rather, it is
inherent in the bestowment of responsibility itself.
Anyone who sets out to accomplish a task and take on a job in a company becomes
accountable for the outcome of their efforts.
Accountability, in short, means being answerable for the end result. Accountability
arises from responsibility.
Authority flows downward, whereas accountability flows upward. The downward flow
of authority and upward flow of accountability must be the same at each position of
the management hierarchy.
The importance of delegation
Delegating has been shown to improve task efficiency and benefit the organization
in ways that aren't obvious at first.
Not only does delegation empower others in the organization , but it also helps
optimize the performance of the group.
Thoughtful delegation, with support, is also a way to stretch and develop people
within the work. This is often more powerful than through periodic professional
development.
And for leaders, it helps you learn how to identify who is best suited to tackle tasks
or projects.
Of course, delegating tasks can also lighten your workload. But according to Dr.
Scott Williams , delegating does much more than just get stuff off your plate.
For one, the people who work for you will be able to develop new skills and gain
knowledge. This prepares them for more responsibility in the future.
Williams writes:
“Delegation can also be a clear sign that you respect your subordinates’ abilities
and that you trust their discretion … Employees who feel that they are trusted and
respected tend to have a higher level of commitment to their work, their
organization, and, especially, their managers.”
Delegation is about entrusting someone else to do parts of your job. Delegation of authority
can be defined as subdivision and sub-allocation of powers to the subordinates in order to
achieve effective results.
Elements of Delegation
Authority must be well-defined. All people who have the authority should know what
is the scope of their authority is and they shouldn’t misutilize it. Authority is the right
to give commands, orders and get the things done. The top level management has
greatest authority.
Authority always flows from top to bottom. It explains how a superior gets work
done from his subordinate by clearly explaining what is expected of him and how he
should go about it.
2. Responsibility - is the duty of the person to complete the task assigned to him.
A person who is given the responsibility should ensure that he accomplishes the
tasks assigned to him. If the tasks for which he was held responsible are not
completed, then he should not give explanations or excuses. Responsibility without
adequate authority leads to discontent and dissatisfaction among the person.
Responsibility flows from bottom to top. The middle level and lower level
management holds more responsibility. The person held responsible for a job is
answerable for it. If he performs the tasks assigned as expected, he is bound for
praises. While if he doesn’t accomplish tasks assigned as expected, then also he is
answerable for that.
Accountability can not be delegated. For example, if ’A’ is given a task with
sufficient authority, and ’A’ delegates this task to B and asks him to ensure that task
is done well, responsibility rest with ’B’, but accountability still rest with ’A’.
The top level management is most accountable. Being accountable means being
innovative as the person will think beyond his scope of job. Accountability, in short,
means being answerable for the end result.
For achieving delegation, a manager has to work in a system and has to perform following
steps : -
Delegation of authority refers to the process by which a superior (usually a manager or leader)
assigns responsibility and authority to a subordinate to perform specific tasks while retaining
overall accountability.
1. Authority: The power to make decisions and use resources to accomplish assigned tasks.
2. Responsibility: The obligation to complete the assigned work.
3. Accountability: The subordinate is answerable to the superior for the task's performance.
Importance of Delegation:
Example of Delegation:
A CEO delegates marketing decisions to the Marketing Manager, who further delegates social
media handling to a Social Media Executive. While authority is shared, the CEO remains
accountable for overall business performance.
Key Points:
1. Authority: The boss gives the employee the power to make decisions about the task.
2. Responsibility: The employee is expected to do the work.
3. Accountability: The employee will report back to the boss on how the task was done, but the
boss remains responsible for the final results.
It helps the boss get more things done because they aren't doing everything themselves.
It gives employees a chance to learn new things and grow in their role.
It helps teams work together and trust each other.
Simple Example:
A manager might ask an assistant to organize an event. The assistant gets the authority to
make decisions about the event, like booking a venue and sending invites. The assistant is
responsible for getting everything ready, but the manager will still be accountable if something
goes wrong.
What is Organization Structure?
Organization structure refers to how the roles, responsibilities, authority, and communication are arranged in
an organization to achieve its goals. It shows who reports to whom and how tasks are divided.
2. Flat Structure: Fewer levels of management. Employees have more responsibility, and communication is
quicker.
3. Matrix Structure: Employees have more than one boss, as they report to both a functional manager and a
project manager.
4. Divisional Structure: The organization is divided into divisions based on product, service, or geography,
and each division has its own team.
Simple Example:
In a restaurant:
Key Points:
Roles: Who does what in the company.
Hierarchy: Who's in charge of whom (like a boss or manager).
Departments: Different parts of the company, like sales, marketing, or finance.
Communication: How information flows between different people in the company.
Why is it important?
Helps everyone know who to talk to about different things.
Clarifies responsibilities so things get done smoothly.
Makes the company more efficient.
Simple Example:
Think of a school: